46 Upper Stone Street
Maidstone
The census of 1891 described this as a Lodging House.
Local knowledge, further pictures, and licensee information would be
appreciated.
I will be adding the historical information when I find or are sent it,
but this project is a very big one, and I do not know when or where the
information will come from.
All emails are answered.
From the Maidstone Telegraph and West Kent Messenger, 27
November, 1869.
CHILD MURDER IN MAIDSTONE.
Yesterday (Thursday) morning, as Charles Hickmott, landlord of the
"Hammer and Hand" beerhouse, Upper Stone street, and John Ring, of
Bonny’s yard, were about 3 o’clock engaged in cleaning out a closet,
used by the residents of Nos. 31 and 32, Tufton-street, they
discovered the body of a female child in the hole. They at once gave
information to the police, and a constable went with them, and in
his presence Ring took the body out. The constable took possession
of it, and brought it to the police station. Dr. Leney, surgeon to
the police force, has examined the body, and is quite satisfied that
the child was born alive, full grown, and healthy, and that death
has been caused by bleeding, the umbilical cord having been roughly
snapped asunder, and not tied. Supt. Gifford made active inquiries
during the day, and has communicated the particulars of the case to
the coroner, who will hold an inquest this day (Friday). The child
is supposed to have been dead about three weeks. A full report of
the inquest will appear in the Second Edition.
|
From the Maidstone Telegraph and West Kent Messenger, 4 December, 1869.
SUPPOSED CHILD MURDER AT MAIDSTONE. INQUEST.
An inquest on the body took place at the Town-hall, on Friday
afternoon, before J. B. Stephens, Esq., coroner, and a respective
jury, of which Mr. Marshall was chosen foreman. The first witness
called was Charles Hickmott, who stated:- I live in Upper
Stone-street, and keep the "Hammer and Hand" beerhouse. On Thursday
morning last, about 3 o’clock, I was engaged in company with another man named Ring,
emptying a closet in Tufton-street. While at work, my mate said,
"There is a dog or cat down the hole." I told him he had better get
the light, and look and see if it was a child. He afterwards told me
it was a child. The child I have just seen is the same. I told him
to let it remain till I fetched a policeman, as I saw it was quite
dead. I went to the police-station and gave information, and the
child was handed over to the police. The child was lying back
upwards in the soil, and the face buried. The body looked very white
and clean considering the place it was in. I thought it had not been
there but a few days. There was nothing round the body when I
discovered it; but quite naked I don't know the names of the
occupiers of the house, as I was employed by Mr. Baldwin, rent
collector, to do the work. I do not know the number of the houses.
The closet is a public one, used by six or eight houses. Any person
passing along the street, could have easy access to the closet, as
the gates of the passage are never shut. The closet where the body
was found is the nearest to the street, and on the south side of it. Sergt. Wm. Rhodes said:— I was at the police station on duty
yesterday morning, when the last witness told me they had got a
child in a closet in Tufton-street, and wished me to go there. I
went to the place, and found the child in the hole
as already described. I got Mr. Ring to take it out, and it was
conveyed to the police-station. Careful inquiries have been made by
the police authorities, but at present no clue has been found as to
who the mother of the child is. The child according to my opinion,
could not have been there long. Mr. Leney, surgeon to the police force, stated:- Yesterday morning.
about 12 o'clock, I was requested to attend at the station, and was
showed the body of a female infant, which the jury have just seen.
It is a full size. No marks of violence upon it, and it is too much
decomposed to form an opinion whether it was thrown in the hole
alive. A post mortem examination would have been useless, as far as
regards opening the child. It is, judging from its size, a nine
months' child. If not still-born, it could not have lived any length
of time. The umbilical cord is torn off, and not secured, thereby
causing bleeding. With regard to what the witnesses said regarding
the fresh appearance of the body, the reason of it is in consequence
of it having been immersed in water. In my opinion the body had been
there two or three weeks, and I come to this conclusion in
consequence of its distended appearance. It is impossible to say
whether the child was born alive or not. The Coroner said they had done the best, with the aid of the Supt.,
and could only return a verdict of "Found Dead." The matter is in
the hands of the police, and if the person is found she can be
proceeded against by the magistrates. A verdict of "Found Dead," with no marks of violence was returned. |
LICENSEE LIST
LINGHAM Henry 1851+ (also lock-maker
)
HICKMOTT Charles 1867-81+ (age 57 in 1881)
PEARCE Richard J 1891-1903+ (age 71 in 1891)
https://pubwiki.co.uk/HammerinHand.shtml
Census
From the Post Office Directory 1867
|