Folkestone, Hythe, Sandgate & Cheriton Herald, Saturday 03 June 1933.
Youth association with widow. Leads to fight with brother.
Bilsington man in assault case.
Details of a 20 year old youth association with a 30 year old widow, the
mother of three children, contrary to his parents wishes, and a fight
with his 24 year old brother, were told during the hearing of an assault
case at Elham Petty Sessions on Thursday.
Don Newman, of the "White Horse," Bilsington, Miller, was charged with
assaulting Lily Agnes Talana Ridgwell, of St Martin's Cottage, Aldington,
on May 18th, at Aldington.
He was found guilty and fined £2 7s. including costs, and was bound over
for 12 months.
The Magistrates were Colonel E. R. Wayland (in the chair), Mr. Charles
Sheath, Mr. J. J. Clayson, Major J. G. Welch and Councillor J. S.
Clarke.
Mr. J. Mowll appeared for Newman, who pleaded not guilty.
Mrs. Redgwell, in evidence, said she was returning home from Dymchurch
on May 18th with defendants brother, Sydney Newman, both of them riding
bicycles, when the defendant came along on a motorcycle from behind
them. He jumped off his machine whilst it was still going, and it ran
into the hedge. He came up to his brother and struck him, and when his
brother turned around to speak to her, defendant struck her on the face.
He punched her on the right side of jaw, and knocked her down. Next she
remembered seeing the two brothers fighting, and she got up and went
between them to stop them. Defendant afterwards picked up his machine
and rode off calling out names to her. Witness wrote the names on a
piece of paper, which was handed to the Magistrates. Knew of parents
objection.
She had no previous quarrel with John Newman. He had not raised any
objections to her going out with his brother, but his people had. She
sought a doctor on the following day.
Cross examined by Mr. Mowll, Mrs. Ridgewell said she knew Sydney Newman
was 20 years of age. It was a fact that his parents objected to his
going out with her. She was 30 years of age, and had three children.
On the morning after the alleged assault she was able to cycle to work.
Mr. Mowll:- Was not this trouble due to the fact that you interviewed
between the two brothers?
I did not interfere.
Did you hear the defendant sat to his brother "Isn't it nearly time this
game finished?
No, all he said was that he was to go home as his mother was lying very
ill.
Did Sydney Newman say: "So this is what you are doing, chasing about
after me?"
No.
Dr. A. E. MacMillan, New Romney, said he saw Mrs. Redgwell on May 19th,
and she was suffering from a contusion on the right side of the lower
jaw, bruising on the surface of the lip, and two lose teeth on the right
side of the jaw. The injuries were consistent with the possibility of
her having been struck, it would have been a fairly heavy blow.
The Chairman:- Could it have been caused by her falling off a bicycle?
Yes, it could, but I think it is more likely that it was caused by a
blow.
Cross examined by Mr. Mowll, witness said the injuries could not be
serious, but it was possible for injuries caused by a blow to turn
serious.
Turned out of home.
Sydney Newman was then called, and gave corroborative evidence regarding
the alleged incident.
Mr. Miller:- Do you know your parents have a strong objection to your
association with Mrs. Redgwell, and have done their best to keep you
from meeting her?
Yes.
Do you live at home with your parents?
I have been.
You have been out of work?
Yes.
And they have been keeping you?
Yes.
As far as Mrs. Redgwell is concerned you have had no regard for your
parents?
I was turned out of home.
When?
The day before this happened.
Because you have been associated with Mrs. Redgwell?
Yes.
This concluded the evidence for the prosecution.
Mr. Mowll, addressing the Bench, said he could call his client to make a
complete denial of assault. He would say that is struck Mrs. Redgwell,
purely by accident, when she attempted to separate him from his brother
when they were fighting. He was very sorry for having struck a woman,
but it was an accident, and he thought, when the Bench had before them
the reason for that, their sympathies would be very much with the
Newmans' parents. There was a young man, not yet of age, going out with
a woman considerably older than himself; his parents doing all they
could to stop what they considered an association which should not be.
It had all come about through Mrs. Redgwell. The brother was only acting
for his parents in trying to get the youth away. It was not surprising
that they came to blows.
Without discipline.
He hoped, for the future piece of the family, if such a thing could be,
that the Bench would caution all parties in the case, and leave it at
that, because it was a disgraceful thing that a boy out of work, his
parents looking after him, a boy without any sort of discipline in his
life except the discipline his brother was trying to exercise, could be
taken away by Mrs. Redgwell.
The Clerk:- You are not suggesting that there is anything criminal in a
boy going out with a woman on bicycles?
Well, the boy is under age, and it is not right.
The Magistrates retired, and upon their return, the Chairman said Newman
was found guilty of assaulting Mrs. Redgwell, and would be fined 20s.,
with one £1 and 7s. costs, and would be bound over for 12 months in the
sum of £5.
Newman asked for time to pay, and was allowed one month.
|