95-97 Canterbury Road
South Willesborough
https://whatpub.com/crown-anchor
Above photo, date unknown, from "Weebly Remembering Ashford
as it was". |
Above photo kindly sent by Chris Excell, circa 2003. |
Above photo 2009 by David Anstiss
Creative Commons Licence. |
Above photo, circa 1960.
The lady centre left is Jane Stanley, daughter of William Frederick
Yates who had been landlord. According to my records, her husband Arthur
Ernest Hubert Stanley (my grandfather) was landlord after 1937. In his
probate from June 1963 his address is recorded as the Crown & Anchor, so
presumably he was landlord until then.
A bit of trivia, William Frederick Yates registered a black Ford 20hp
car at the Crown & Anchor on May 13th 1920 which was believed to be the
first car in Willesborough.
Regards,
David Stanley. |
Above photo, circa 1920, showing William Yates in his Ford. |
Above sign left, July 1991, sign right, August 1993.
With thanks from Brian Curtis
www.innsignsociety.com. |
From the Whitstable Times, 18 January, 1902.
PETTY SESSIONS —TUESDAY.
Two young men belonging to Willesborough, and named Samuel Newnham and
Stephen Mepstead, were summoned for assaulting Elizabeth Stanley
(mother of Arthur E H Stanley) and
Kate Elizabeth Moseley, of the same place, on the night of December
27th. Mr. Poncia (Messrs. Mowll and Mowll) appeared for the
complainants, and Mr. B. C. Drake defended. The case occupied a very
long time, and the evidence was very contradictory. The women stated
that they were going home from a party at the “Crown and Anchor Inn,”
South Willesborough, when the two young fellows set on to them, and
knocked them down, inflicting several rather severe injuries. They
alleged no reason for the act, but it was assumed the men made a
mistake, and took them for some one else. The complainants also stated
that the defendants had called the next day and apologised, as well as
offering to pay all the expenses that had been incurred, if they agreed
not to take the matter into Court. A witness was called on the side of
the complainants, who said he saw Newnham knock one of the women down.
Both men gave evidence on their own behalf, and they both characterised
one of the women and their witness as lies, alleging that one of the
women simply fell down through the road being in a frosty state, and
then, as they happened to he near at hand, accused them of knocking her
down. They also strenuously denied the suggestion that they had ever
admitted to the women that they had done anything, saying that when they
called the next day they merely expressed their regret if any one had
been hurt by the fall. It was not true to say they had ever agreed to
pay any expenses if the case were not proceeded with. In the end the
bench decided to give the defendants the benefit of the doubt, and
dismissed the summonses, each side having to pay their own costs. The
ladies had each to find 8s.,and the gentlemen 4s. |
I have been informed that this pub has been demolished around 2009.
LICENSEE LIST
MARSHALL Charles 1861+ (age 27 in 1861)
WOODLAND John 1882+
YATES William Frederick 1903-22+
MASTERS Bartholomew 1930-38+
STANLEY Arthur Ernest Hubert 1938-June/63 dec'd
https://pubwiki.co.uk/CrownAnchor.shtml
http://www.closedpubs.co.uk/crownanchor.html
From the Kelly's Directory 1903
Census
|