Rye Road
Highgate
Hawkhurst
01580755782
http://theroyaloakhotelhawkhurst.co.uk/
https://whatpub.com/royal-oak
Above postcard, circa 1909, kindly sent by Rory Kehoe. |
Above postcard, date unknown, kindly sent by Mark Jennings. |
Above postcard, Date 1915, kindly sent by Mark Jennings. |
Above postcard, date unknown, kindly sent by Mark Jennings. |
Above photo, 1926. |
Photos taken on 28 August, 2006 from
http://www.flickr.com
by John Law. |
Above sign left 2009, sign right 2015.
With thanks from Brian Curtis and Roger Pester
www.innsignsociety.com. |
Southeastern Gazette, 10 May 1853.
HAWKHURST.
On Saturday, the 7th inst., an inquest was held at the "Royal Oak
Inn," before W. T. Neve, Esq., coroner, to enquire as to the death
of a labourer named Samuel Reed.
Hannah Fraser, widow, deposed:— I occupy a cottage next to where
deceased lived, and knew him very well. This morning, at a little
before six, I saw him go past my window towards the outhouse. At six
o’clock I went there, and found the door fastened inside. I heard
some one inside bustling about. I went twice within half an hour,
but the door was still fastened. I knocked and asked who was there,
but received no reply. After kicking once or twice, the door flew
open, and I saw the deceased on his feet with his back towards me,
and on looking up I saw that there was a rope round his neck.
Caleb Ballard, labourer, deposed:— At a little after seven I was
called, and found the deceased hanging from a rafter in the roof of
the outhouse; he was quite dead; his feet touched the floor.
Mary Ann Reed deposed:— Deceased was my husband, and was 59 years
old. Last night we went to bed at about nine o’clock; neither of us
slept very well during the night. Deceased seemed very dull, and to
have something on his mind. This morning he tried to got up at four,
but I persuaded him to lie down again until half-past five, when he
got up. He fetched me a pail of water, and then came to the foot of
the stairs, and said to me "Don’t get up; you’re tired, and you had
better lay down again." I afterwards saw him go round towards the
outhouse. I never heard him threaten to make off with himself; he
didn’t tell me that he was suspected at Mr. Dobell’s. I didn’t ask
him what made him so dull and restless.
W. Dobell, of Hawkhurst, grocer, deposed:— I have occasionally
employed the deceased in my shop, picking fruit.
I lately received information that deceased had been selling several
ounces of tobacco at 2d. an ounce, the usual price; being 3d.; in
consequence I suspected him of having stolen some from my shop, and
last night, at about half-past seven, I accused him of it, but he
denied it. I told him what I had heard, and he said he had found two
ounces of tobacco; on the road to Marden. I told him that I strongly
suspected him of having robbed me, and that I didn’t wish him to
come into my shop again. He appeared very downcast. I threatened
proceedings against him.
Verdict, "That deceased hanged himself," but whether or not he was
insane at the time, there was not sufficient evidence to show.
|
Maidstone Telegraph, 9 August 1862.
CRANBROOK.
Richard Darnell, of Hawkhurst, was charged with stealing one bottle of
brandy, the property of Mr. Dives, of the "Royal Oak Inn," in that
parish. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to one month’s hard labour.
|
Maidstone Telegraph - Saturday 11 October 1862.
Frank Dive, landlord of the "Royal Oak," Hawkhurst, was charged with
having unlawfully assaulted Joseph Cogger, on the 23rd September.
Defendant denied the charge, and called a witness who corroborated his
statement, whereupon their worships dismissed the case.
|
Maidstone Journal and Kentish Advertiser, Monday 6 July 1868.
Hawkhurst. Volunteer Inspection.
On Tuesday the 23rd of June, our Rifle Volunteers underwent their annual
inspection at Cranbrook. Drill being finished, they returned home, and
after halting at mine host's of the "Royal Oak," Highgate, for a
preliminary wet, they were invited by the Captain of the corps to
partake of a cold collation, which had been provided by Mr. and Mrs.
Seymour, of the "Eight Bells Inn." After partaking of the same they were
regaled with sundry bowls of punch, at the expense of Lieutenant Piper.
A merry party, under the chairmanship of Ensign Herschel, was the
result, and all appeared to enjoy themselves very much.
|
Maidstone Journal and Kentish Advertiser, Monday 11 January 1869.
Hawkhurst. Increased Value of Property.
The "Royal Oak Commercial Inn" was sold on Monday to the tenants, Mr. F
Dive, for £1,890. The same property was purchased for £1,150 a short
time ago, including part of the meadow, which has been sold for £300.
|
Maidstone Journal and Kentish Advertiser, Monday 9 May 1870.
Bankruptcies in Kent, Surrey and Sussex.
From Finley's Gazette.
Frank Dive, Hawkhurst, inkeeper (Royal Oak), to surrender May 21, at
half past ten.
|
Kent & Sussex Courier, Friday 8 June 1945.
LICENSING.
Full transfers were granted as follows: "Royal Oak Hotel," Hawkhurst,
from Vernon Churchill Simmonds to Charles Douglas Allen.
|
From the
https://www.kentonline.co.uk By Secret Drinker, 27 January 2020.
Secret Drinker reviews the Royal Oak and the Queen’s Inn, Hawkhurst, Cranbrook.
I ended up doing a head-to-head this week after visiting two pubs just a
stone’s throw apart in Hawkhurst, near Cranbrook.
Anyone stepping into the Royal Oak and the Queen’s Inn will be struck by
the similarities between these two sizeable village boozers.
They both offer rooms for those seeking a sleepover, they both have
trendy, bleached beams and are furnished with high-backed wing chairs.
The bar staff in both are dressed head-to-toe in black, they both have
open fireplaces, they offer many of the same drinks, both smell of food
as you walk in and even their addresses only differ by a single postcode
letter.
So, you might think there’s not much to choose between them – you might
think that, but you’d be very, very wrong. One is a delight, the other
as dull as dishwater.
The Royal Oak Country Pub & Carvery, to give it its full title, had
absolutely no life about it and felt like the lobby of a quiet Premier
Inn.
The atmosphere was as flat as the Harvey’s Sussex Best and the false log
walls at both ends just added to the boring sterility.
The switched off staff stood refusing to chat to anyone but themselves –
the only time they looked animated was when they went outside for a fag
in the front car park.
Despite the carvery, to the left of the front door, the overpowering
aroma was burnt fat and the open fire grate, with stacks of logs, showed
no sign of having been lit in recent times and just added to the frosty
atmosphere.
However, take a short stroll along Rye Road and you will come across the
well-lit "Queen’s Inn."
At the Royal Oak there is a small entrance porch leading into the pub
from its car park at the front.
The toilets, for example, were clean and fresh at both pubs, but both
the ladies and the gents at the Oak are long overdue for an upgrade.
With stripped beams, wing-backed chairs and tasteful lighting the Royal
Oak’s bar could be a lovely place to relax.
In the Oak people sat in corners quietly and spoke only in hushed tones,
almost as if they were afraid to be overhead. The only exception was a
woman sitting at the bar drinking pints of Kronenbourg concentrating
constantly on her mobile phone.
I’d been in a full 15 minutes before I realised the child in school
uniform playing quietly at the table behind her was her daughter.
Sadly, from what I witnessed, the only time she acknowledged her
daughter’s presence was to shout at her unnecessarily and tell her she
would be unloading six bags of shopping when they got home.
Many of the interesting features at the Royal Oak have been retained and
well maintained, but this is a pub which, with the right staff and
customer service, could be so much better.
Hardly anyone was eating in the Oak, although looking through the shared
corner window that led to Chinese takeaway next door it was doing a
great trade.
Although the "Queen’s" is undoubtedly more cosy and welcoming, the
"Oak,"
with hops hanging off its beams and comfortable high-backed chairs could
be a decent pub.
The ladies toilet in The Queen's not only boasts trendy basins and a
choice of hand cream, but also the opportunity to sit awhile and chill
out.
Sadly it is the staff who really let it down, they’d much rather be
talking to each other, checking mobiles or smoking than looking after
customers.
Contrast this to the "Queens" where the big, bearded fellow behind the
bar, could not have been more welcoming or attentive.
Geographically speaking these Hawkhurst inns are cheek by jowl, but
they’re miles apart when judged on pub appeal.
|
From the
https://www.kentonline.co.uk By Secret Drinker, 6 April 2020.
Secret Drinker looks back at his 10 worst pubs across Kent.
It’s almost a year since I landed the best job in the world and I’ve
been travelling around Kent ever since discovering the very best, and
worst, pubs right around the county.
Fortunately the majority of boozers I’ve been lucky enough to visit have
been great, but some, sadly, have been found wanting.
I can only ever report exactly what I find at a given moment in time and
I realise a fly-on-the-wall review can’t possibly take into account
everything going on in a pub. - and many of these pubs may well have
improved since my visit.
But, I was tasked with discovering the good, the bad and the ugly – and,
in my humble opinion on the day, these are the 10 worst boozers I’ve
visited...
1. It might seem a strange choice for number one, but the Royal Oak,
Hawkhurst is in top spot because it is the most dull, uninteresting and
soulless place I’ve ever had the misfortune to visit in Kent. Other pubs
on this list may have their problems and failings, but at least they
have some life about them. The Oak also deserves its position because
staff completely switched off and clearly dislike the place too. And,
what makes it even more unforgivable is the fact it clearly has the
resources to be so much better. Describing it as being like the lobby of
a Premier Inn was unfair to Premier Inns – it’s far more boring than
that.
The décor has all the hallmarks of a decent local boozer but the Royal
Oak is a mile wide of the mark.
|
LICENSEE LIST
BATCHELOR Samuel 1828+
LOWDER William 1832+
MARTIN Edward 1843 (owner)
LEONARD John 1858+
DIVE/DIVES Frank 1861-21/May/70 (age 24 in 1861)
EVEREST David 1871+ (age 44 in 1871)
RODMELL Edward Thomas 1881-91+ (age 55 in 1881)
DAVIS John 1903-30+
SIMMONS Vernon Charles 1938-Jun/45 (also farmer age 47 in 1939)
ALLEN Charles Douglas Jun/45+
https://pubwiki.co.uk/RoyalOak.shtml
In the 1871 census Edward Thomas Rodmell is listed as being a hotel
keeper at 61 High Street, Strood.
From the Pigot's Directory 1828-29
From the Pigot's Directory 1832-33-34
Census
|