Kentish Gazette, 14 April 1857.
ALLEGED CASE OF POISONING BY AN ARTILLERYMAN.
Much excitement prevailed in Woolwich on Thursday, and the
police-court was crowded in consequence of a report that one of the
artillerymen was to be brought up on a charge of having administered
poison to a girl named Ellen Smith. A little after four o’clock
George Heatherley, aged 32, a gunner and driver in the Royal
Artillery Barracks, was placed at the bar before Mr. Trail, charged
on suspicion of administering poison in some beer to a girl of the
town named Ellen Smith.
Ellen Mallocs deposed that she was an unfortunate girl, and that
last Sunday fortnight she was in company with Smith and the prisoner
at the "Alma" beer-house. The two appeared as if they were
quarrelling. They talked about poisoning: prisoner said he had put
many a brighter girl than her under the turf; and said he could put
it in an orange or a cake. He did not appear much in liquor, but he
had been drinking. She did not see him give her any thing; since
then (on last Tuesday week) she became ill. On the day before Smith
was taken ill prisoner and the girl were both in the same room
together.
R. D. Walker, M.D., said he was called in last Monday to attend
Ellen Smith. He found her in a very low state. It was named to him
yesterday that poison had been administered to her, and he was
labouring under symptoms of having taken poison. She had a tingling
of the skin, or itching, and vomited, and now remained in the same
state. He thought it would be important to take the girl’s evidence,
as he considered her life in danger; she was fast sinking.
His Worship, having disposed of the other remaining cases, adjourned
to the residence of the girl, accompanied by the medical gentlemen,
the clerk of the court, our reporter, two or three officials, and
the prisoner, who was placed at the bottom of the bed.
The woman appeared in an emaciated and exhausted state, and
immediately upon catching sight of the prisoner she called out
loudly, pointing, "That’s the young man." As soon as her excitement
was over she said her name was Mura Bassnm, and that she was
married. Upon being asked her husband's name, she became so visibly
affected that no answer could be got from her. After a time she
resumed — that she knew the prisoner well; she had seen him in the
London Hospital, in the Mile-end-road, four years and a half ago.
She had met him at the "Alma" beer-house several times. They were
there one night when Eliza Mellows was there, and had some words
last Sunday fortnight. He was in liquor. I said to him, "Be quiet,
or I shall say things you don’t like to hear." He said, "I’ll cook
your goose before another week;" he said he would knock my ------
brains out. He asked me to drink out of his pot, which I did; and
the next night after that I saw him put something into a pot of ale
down stairs. That was the Monday night. I drank some of it, and so
did he. Here the witness became confused and exhausted. She
afterwards said she did not know there was anything in the ale; she
said she afterwards found bad effects from taking it on Thursday
week, hut did not know the cause. At this point she evidently became
unconscious, and apparently swooned away.
The magistrate found that there was no coherence in her answer, and
that she now became perfectly sensible. Some stimulant was
administered, but she did not revive. The doctor gave his opinion
that she was getting from bad to worse. As the examination could not
be continued, the prisoner was taken back to the court and remanded
till Saturday, to wait the issue of the woman’s illness.
On leaving the house it was asserted by some person present that the
prisoner and the victim were man and wife.
|
Kentish Independent, 09 September 1865.
BURGLARY AT PLUMSTEAD.
John Williams, 28, landlord of the "Alma," beer shop, Mulgrave Place,
Woolwich, was charged with being concerned with two others, named
Sergeant and Perks, in burglariously entering the dwelling house of
William Samuel Jocelyn, at Plumstead and stealing property to the value
of £5.
Prosecutor said he was a grocer living at 1 Plumstead Terrace. On the
Wednesday previous he discovered that his cellar bad been entered, and a
box containing 40lbs of butter, a firkin of butter and 1/4 cwt of soap
stolen. The outside flap had been broken open, and on the top someone
had written in chalk "To let."
John Brompton, a milkman in the employ of Mr Standing, said that on
Wednesday the prisoner employed him to bring a box, and a basket, to his
house, from the residence of a young man named Sergeant, at Plumstead
Village, and he did so, receiving them from Sergeant, and taking them to
his master‘s yard, from whence they were afterwards taken during his
absence.
Detective officer Margetson said that he had ascertained that there were
three persons concerned in the robbery, of whom no doubt Sargeant and
Perks were two. Another man named Ammond, had also no doubt something to
do with it, but he had absconded. The prisoner now before the court was
charged as the supposed receiver, and when apprehended he at first
denied knowing the other men, afterwards saying that they were at his
beerhouse on the night before and after the robbery.
The prisoner said he had been in the carriers business, and was still
occasionally engaged in the same line. Sergeant asked him to move some
boxes, and he entrusted the job to Mr. Standing, never having seen the
property himself.
Margetson said the prisoner had admitted knowing the men to be thieves.
The prisoner said this was true, and he always treated them as such.
Mr. Woolrych remanded the prisoner, taking two sureties in £25 for his
appearance next Tuesday.
|