166 Snargate Street
167 Snargate Street
Dover
A licensed house prior to 1832 and Dover Harbour Board
were the proprietors when it was auctioned in May 1859. The lease of 61
years had commenced in April 1834. The (unknown) buyer paid £550. George
Eastman was still dispensing drinks there in 1870 but then the picture
fades. My notes suggest the premises later becoming the "Lord Roberts" but I
cannot reconcile any facts with the number.
From the Dover Telegraph 13 Feb 1836
Henry BREWER in his 20th year,
(son of Mr Samuel BREWER, Bee Hive Tavern) died Sept 1835 on board the
George IV, near Bengal.
|
From the Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General
Advertiser, Saturday 7 January, 1837.
ACCIDENTS FROM THE SNOW
On Monday evening Mrs. Brewer, of the "Bee Hive Tavern," Snargate
Street, while in the act of crossing from a neighbour's to her own
house, had the misfortune to slip down and break one of her legs. The
requisite assistance was promptly given, and she is doing well.
|
Canterbury Weekly, 19 August, 1837.
On Saturday an inquest was held at the "Bee Hive," Dover, on the
body of Mrs. Lucy Johnson, who had died suddenly of an apoplectic
attack at Squires's Bizarre, on the preceding evening.
The evidence was in substance as follows:- Susanna, the wife of
Thomas Squire, deposed that the deceased came to the Bazaar alone
last evening; she personally attended her; after selecting a taper
stand and toy, she sat down in a chair and took out her purse to pay
for them, when she appeared suddenly ill, she assisted her to a seat
at the garden door for fresh air, and ordered some cold water; the
lady drank from it and said she would soon be better; and wished her
bonnet to be tied and her dress adjusted, she however, seemed worse,
and the deponent immediately sent for a medical gentleman, who
promptly attended, and finding it a serious case, he sent for Dr.
Ashley, who soon after came; she was removed to the grass plat in a
chair, and from thence to the house, and placed on a bed laid on the
sofa and chairs, where in less than 2-hours she expired.
Mr. Thompson surgeon, stated he was sent for to Mr. Squires's the
preceding evening to attend Mrs. Johnson, he bled her in the temple,
and from one arm, tried other means and thought it necessary to send
the Dr. Ashley, who was shortly in attendance; the patient's case
soon became hopeless, and about 9:30 she died of a rupture of a
blood vessel in the head. The servants of the deceased stated that
her mistress, who lodged in Castle Street, left home about 7:30 in
health being previously taken tea and eat eaten heartedly. She did
not see her alive afterwards, but getting late, and her mistress not
returning, she became alarmed, and on making an enquiry at different
places she heard of what had occurred at the Bazaar; went to the
house and identified the corps as that of her late mistress, and
that she have been dead some time.
Verdict:- Died by apoplexy.
The Jury, through their foreman Mr. William Pascal, expressed their
satisfaction that every attention possible had been given very
promptly to the deceased lady by Mrs. Squires and assistants, as
well as by the medical gentleman called in on the melancholy
occasion. The deceased was a visitor to the town, having a daughter
married to first Lieutenant Mortimer of the Rifle Corps, stationed
at Dover Castle.
Notwithstanding every means were tried to ascertain the residents,
name or connexion of the unfortunate lady, it was without success
till after her death, although she survived nearly two hours.
Mrs. Johnson was a widow lady aged 49 years, and was left with a
family 27 years ago, and has since resided occasionally on the
Continent, and with her brother Thomas Spencer Esq., Chewton House,
near Christchurch, Hampshire; and of Margaret Street, Cavendish
Square, London.
|
From the Dover Telegraph 2 Sept 1837
Charlotte Maria BREWER (eldest
daughter of Mr BREWER, of the Bee Hive, Dover) married 27 August at St
Mary's Dover to Mr EWELL, draper, Deal.
|
From the Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General
Advertiser, Saturday 9 November, 1839.
CORONER'S INQUEST
An inquest was held on Wednesday last, at the "Bee Hive," before G.
T. Thompson, Esq., Coroner for the borough of Dover, on the body of Mary
Goodwin, aged 18, who had destroyed herself by taking poison.
Thomas Coleman, surgeon, deposed, that he had opened the body, and
analyzed the contents of the stomach, which were highly impregnated with
arsenic, and which had, no doubt, caused the death of the deceased.
Eliza Leigh, milliner, Snargate Street examined. "The deceased was
servant in the house, and had lived with them about three weeks. On
Sunday, the deceased had permission to dine with her sister, and
returned home about nine o'clock in the evening. I saw her on Monday
morning, when she came into the work-room to receive instructions for
some errands, which she went out to execute, and returned home about
noon. She then appeared pale, and I asked her if she was ill; but she
said no. She then had a luncheon of bread, cheese, and beer, which she
partook of at the table where the rest of us had been eating. At five
o'clock we dined with the apprentices, and the deceased had some mutton
broth; but refused to take any meat. About half an hour afterwards I
heard someone cough as if they were sick, and I asked the deceased if
she had been sick; and she replied, yes; but that she was better. She
then went to Charlton on an errand, and returned in about half an
hour, and lit the fire which had gone out during her absence. I did not
see her again till about half-past nine o'clock, when I again heard some
one sick in the yard. I again asked her what was the matter, and she
said she had a head-ache, and pains in her limbs, when I desired her to
go to bed, and gave her some brandy which she drank. I did not see the
deceased again until ten o'clock the next morning when I heard her
calling; I went and asked what she required, and she said some gin and
ginger, as she had a pain in her stomach. I did not see the deceased
again alive. The deceased appeared to me obliging and cheerful; but I
had heard there was something mysterious in her manner, and I intended
to make some enquiry into it."
Deborah Hill examined. "I am apprentice to Miss Leigh. The deceased
slept in the same room as myself, on Monday night. She did not make any
noise to disturb me till about four o'clock, when she said she hoped it
was not time to get up. I rose about seven, and left her in bed. I have
never seen any powders or poison in her room. She never said anything to
me about taking poison or dying, but had said she was very uncomfortable
because her mother was so cross."
Sarah Leigh re-examined: "During the time deceased has been in our
service I have observed nothing particular in her manner, except
sometimes coming home crying, after she had been out, when she said her
mother did not use her well. I have searched the boxed of the deceased
and all places she usually had access to, but have discovered nothing
that would bear on this enquiry. She appeared to me, on Monday night and
Tuesday morning, composed, although distressed by sickness; and made no
complaint except of pain in her stomach. I said to her on Tuesday
morning, that if she did not bear up I must send for her mother, and she
replied "No, do not; if you send for anyone, send for my sister."
Esther Prescott, wife of Richard Prescott, mariner, examined: "I saw
the deceased, who is my sister, on Sunday last about noon. She remained
about an hour and a half. When she left she said she should call in the
evening if I would let her walk out with her sister, which I said I
would do, but she never came. Her manner was then cheerful as usual. I
had not seen her to speak to her till last Sunday for near two years,
there having been a coldness between us. My husband told me on Sunday
that she was coming. The deceased did not like her step-father; and in
consequence seldom went to see her mother."
Sarah Baker examined: "I live with Mrs. Marsh, in Last Lane, and knew
the deceased well, having been acquainted with her from childhood. On
Monday she came to me about eleven o'clock, with a piece of paper, on
which she wished me to write 'Two-pennyworth of Arsenic' in Mrs. Hiller's
name, for her mistress did not like to have it in her own name. She
further said her mistress had given her a note for the poison; but she
had been up the shaft, and lost it. I would not write it, as I told her
I believed she wanted it to poison a young Artilleryman. I said this in
a laugh, when she went away, saying she could not stop long before she
would serve him out. I saw her on Sunday between twelve and one o'clock,
when she said she had been looking for an Artilleryman, named Peter
Preel; and that she would try and find him before she went home.
Deceased told me on Monday, she would get the poison where she used to
get it when she lived with Mrs. Hillier.
Peter Preel, gunner, Royal Artillery, examined: "I have known the
deceased about six weeks. I saw her on Monday evening in the street
about seven o'clock, but we did not speak. I saw her also on Sunday
morning while I was sentry on the bridge, at the Heights. She came up
the steps; and then waiting a short time at the foot of the bridge,
returned without speaking. She appeared as if she wished to speak to me.
The last time I spoke to her, was Wednesday; when I told her I did not
want to speak to her any more. She said 'If you won't speak to me, I'll
haunt you always.' She used to follow me constantly, which I did not
like. She never threatened before me, to destroy herself."
It now being near eleven o'clock, the Coroner observed that the
evidence adduced did not appear sufficient for the Jury to come to any
other than a general verdict; and the case being of some importance,
under his direction the inquest was adjourned till Thursday; when the
enquiry was again resumed, at eight o'clock.
John Thomas Harvey, Chemist, examined: "I recollect selling poison to
a young woman on Monday, but do not know her name. She asked for
twopenny-worth of arsenic for Mrs. Hiller. She had purchased arsenic of
me about four months ago, which, she said was for Mrs. Hiller, whose son
accompanied her. I served the poison in a white paper, with a printed
label, "Arsenic - Poison." She has at other times bought salts of
sorrel, which is a poison, and used in cleaning bonnets. There was
nothing particular in her manner when she purchased the arsenic on
Monday, which she said was to destroy rats."
The Coroner then summed up the evidence, and addressed the Jury, who
retired to consider their verdict. After a short time the foreman, Mr.
Hopley, returned, saying if it could be allowed, the Jury were anxious
to have the evidence of Mr. T. Houghton's servant, as they had
understood she could throw much light on this enquiry. The Coroner
replied that if wished, the Jury had the power of calling further
evidence, and issued a warrant for the attendance of-
Hannah Hoile, who being sworn said, "I knew the deceased, and saw her
on Monday last between three and four o'clock, and she then told me she
came to wish me good bye; on which I asked where she was going. She
replied, not out of town; and I said, then why do you wish me good bye?
She replied, you will soon find out, for news soon flies. I have found
out the young man I walk with, nicely; and I don't like the news I hear
about him. He walks with other young women; and I have never dreaded
life as I have done for the last two or three days. I asked the deceased
what she intended to do; and she replied, to poison myself. I thought
nothing of this, as she had several times in the summer told me she
should make off with herself. She appeared on Monday very low spirited,
but was not wild or excited. The artilleryman's name is Preel; and
deceased told me she was in the family way by him.
The Jury having again retired for a quarter of an hour, returned with
a Verdict, "That deceased destroyed herself by taking poison during a
temporary fit of insanity."
|
From the Kentish Gazette, 24 March 1840.
DEATHS.
Last week, at Dover, the wife of Mr. John Tilden, formerly of the "Bee
Hive" public house.
|
From the Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General
Advertiser, Saturday 17 October, 1840. Price 5d.
DOVER POLICE COURT
Michael Moir, 34, a private in the 77th regiment of foot, was charged
with stealing, on the 28th of August last, a basket, containing sundry
articles of grocery, from Daniel Pound, a coast guardsman. From the
evidence produced it appeared, that prosecutor, who is fond of "lifting
his elbow very oft," came down to Dover on the evening in question, for
some articles of grocery, and getting a leetle drop too much, in
his ramblings up and down Snargate-street, encountered the prisoner, who
being a brother lately from the Emerald Isle, shared in the
bounty of the mountain dew. Having "stuffed both their skins," till Mr.
Brewer, of the "Beehive" public house, perceived they were a little
touched. They were reminded by the worthy host of the lateness of
the hour, when they went away, and proceeded towards their destinations.
They had not gone far, however, before the prisoner snatched the basket
containing the grocery from Pound's hand, and made off with it. What
became of Pound during the remainder of the night was not ascertained;
certain it was he did not like the encounter the frowns of his amiable
partner, and did not go home, but early in the morning found his way to
the station-house, to give information of the robbery. On his way to the
station-house, he met an artillery man, whom he recollected to have
quarrelled with on the previous evening. The artillery-man, however,
denied the charge, and assisted in finding the prisoner. The
artillery-man said, that in the evening in question he believed that
prosecutor and he had one blow between them; but he could not say who
gave it. After committing the robbery, at appeared that the prisoner had
amused himself with drinking potations, "pottle deep," at the "Rising
Sun," public house, in company of a fair damsel of the name Dunn, to
whom he communicated the intelligence of his late good fortune. She,
however, gave information of the same to the police, and prisoner was
taken into custody. Prisoner said the young woman he passed the night
with gave him the articles that were found upon him, because she did not
know what to do with them. She said she found them.
Sentenced to three months hard labour.
|
Dover Chronicles, 12 April, 1842.
Police Court. Monday. Rape.
Thomas Scott, a private in the 7th royal Fusiliers, was brought up,
charged by Ann Hooly, the wife of James Hooley, a private in the
same regiment, with committing a rape on her last Saturday evening.
The prosecutrix stated, that as she was on her way home from the
"Bee-hive," in this town, to the Castle, the prisoner, whom she had
seen at the "Bee-hive," followed her, and overtook her, and they
walked together as far as the "Victoria" public house, where she
gave him a pint of beer to carry the sergeant major's child (which
she had the care of up to the Castle.) They remained there about
10-minutes, and then walked together as far as the "White Horse,"
near the foot of the Castle Hill, prisoner carrying the child.
Prisonon then gave her the child, and she proceeded as far as the
steps leading to the Castle. Prisoner then put his hand on her, and
said, "Give me the child, I will carry it for you." She would not
give him the child; bit immediately stooped under the railing, and
said she would go round the road. She proceeded in that direction,
and prisoner followed and overtook her just at the turning leading
from the turnpike road to the Castle. Prisoner did not speak to her
until he pulled her back, and made the child fall out of her arms.
He then got hold of her, and said he would not let her go until he
had satisfied himself with her. She made great noise and resistance
(which was evident from the scratches on the prisoners face and
hands, where prosecutrix had bitten and scratched him,) while the
prisoner was abusing her. Prisoner, after accomplishing his ends,
ran away, and prosecutrix, when she got home, repeated to the
sergeant-major and his wife what had happened.
Elizabeth Forster, the sergeant-major's wife, said:- Last Saturday
night's, a little after 8 0'clock, prosecutrix brought my child
home. I asked her what made her so late, and then took my child from
her. On seeing he (the child) was all over dirt, I ask what was the
matter with him, when prosecutrix said that prisoner have pulled her
down in the road on the way home, and abused her, and made the child
fall out of her arms. She was crying very much at the time, and
could hardly speak to me. Presently afterwards she made the same
statement to my husband.
K. C. Correl, superintendent of police, said he apprehended
prisoner; and on his way from the Castle to the Justice's office he
stopped one of his comrades, shook hands with him, and said "Goodbye
Jack, I shall not not see you again for some time unless you come
down to the Court;" and he also bade several others good-bye.
Prisoner denied the assault all together, and said he was not with
the woman any further than the "White Horse;" and that he did not go
up the hill with her.
The Prisoner was committed to Maidstone gaol for trial at the next
assizes.
|
From the Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General Advertiser, Saturday, 18 October, 1845. Price 5d.
DEATH
October 22, at Dover, Mr. Samuel Brewer, plasterer, of the “Bee Hive
Inn,” aged 54.
|
Dover Chronicles 31 January 1846.
Alarming Accident.
The late heavy rains have caused some falls of cliff in the
neighbourhood, but we are happy to state that no injury to persons
has been the result, though considerable damage has been done at the
back of Snargate Street, by the slipping of a portion of a wall, 50
feet in height, that faced the cliff behind Mr. Bottles, grocer, and
the "Beehive" public house.
This wall, to the extent of about 30 feet in height, and the same in
length, gave way early on Tuesday morning last, bringing with it a
quantity of the loose earth that was behind it. In its descent, it
totally demolished a range of warehouses belong to Mr. Bottle, and
destroyed 70 firkins of butter, a large quantity of cheese, and
other articles. Some of the inmates at the "Beehive" had a narrow
escape with their lives bricks and stones having fallen into their
bed-rooms.
Several pig-sties which were at the top of the bank fell with the
wall, and, singularly enough, their inhabitants, 4 pigs sustained
scarcely any injury by their involuntary descent. Two of the porkers
made their way into Mrs. Brewer's bed-room, through an aperture and
made by some of the stones.
Before the wall fell, it gave an audible warning by emitting a
sound, which being heard by Mr. Bottle, he got up, under the idea
that they were thieves in the house. As he was going down stairs,
the wall fell, and one of the bricks falling with a quantity of
others through his house, struck his hand knocking out the light,
and smashed the candlestick he was carrying. Mr. Bottle is the
principal sufferer. His lost, by damage done to the house and
destruction of stock is said to be about £700. The whole
neighbourhood were thrown into much alarm, and much credit is due to
Mr. J. D. Squire, of the Bazaar, who opened his house to the
reception of those who were obliged to leave their homes, and
assisted the policeman in rescuing by means of ladders, there
inmates, who from the destruction of the staircase were left without
any other mode of egress.
|
From the Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General
Advertiser, Saturday 31 January, 1846.
NARROW ESCAPE OF LIFE FROM THE FALL OF A WALL AT
DOVER
One of the most miraculous preservations from impending danger and
death that it has ever fallen our lot to record occurred in Snargate
Street during the present week. We have been favoured from an authentic
source with the principal facts, and, without entering upon a lengthened
detail of all the particulars, are enabled to furnish the following:-
About midnight on Monday Mr. E. Bottle, grocer, of Snargate-street
was disturbed by a noise, apparently like he falling of bricks, in the
rear of his premises. Supposing that depredators were endeavouring to
effect an entrance, he aroused the male inmates of his establishment,
with whom he searched the yard &c., and for a while watched the back of
his premises; but observing no indications rendering further precaution
necessary, the whole then returned to rest, totally unconscious of their
critical and perilous position. About three o'clock (Tuesday morning) Mr.
Bottle was awakened by a loud crash, and on proceeding towards the
supposed spot a brick struck his hand, and knocked out the light which
he held. The fearful truth no flashed upon his mind - that the wall at
the back had fallen against the house - and alarming the inmates, whose
exit by the staircase was stopped by bricks, &c., he then called the
assistance of the police, who promptly repaired to the spot, and
procured ladders, by which all in the house, viz., Mr. and Mrs. Bottle,
two Miss Frys, (who were staying on a visit,) two young men, and a
maid-servant effected an escape in their night clothes from the front
window, and were received by Mr. Squire, whom the alarm had aroused, and
who in the kindest manner instantly supplied what the exigences of the
case rendered necessary. After some time had elapsed it was found, on an
examination of the premises, that the wall erected against a bank at the
base of the cliff, about 30 feet in height, and the same in length, as
well as some of the bank, had fallen, and partially destroyed a range of
storehouses, and the parlour, some of the furniture of which was driven
into the cellar, while portions of the fallen mass had forced their way
into the very apartment where the Miss Frys slept, and who, but for the
fortunate position of their bed, must have been crushed to death. At the
dawn of the day the removal of the rubbish was commenced, and upwards of
200 loads have been already removed. We hear that Mrs. Bottle, who has
recently purchased the premises, is a sufferer to the extent of about
£400, and that the re-building of the destroyed building &c., will
require an expenditure of 3 or £400 more.
The premises adjoining Mr. Bottle's also experienced the destructive
effects of the calamitous occurrence. At Mrs. Brewer's (the "Bee Hive")
large masses fell on a workshop and the kitchen, driving the materials
into the tap-room, over which Mrs. Brewer was sleeping; but the head of
the bed being placed against the wall, the progress of the large stones
was checked, and a most providential escape thus afforded was speedily
effected by the front door. Some loose rubbish fell, however, on the
head of Mr's Brewers bed, and slightly grazed her face, while two pigs
were actually forced into her bed-room. Mrs. Brewer, it will be
remembered, was left a widow a short time since; and as the workshop
contained several new models, &c., belonging to her son, to enable whom
to carry on business a as plasterer she has expended all her means, this
loss will indeed be most severely felt.
At Mr. Elgar's, fruiterer, a quantity of rubbish also fell through
the roof into an attic where two of his sons were sleeping. The whole
family were immediately aroused, and in a state of alarm rished into the
street with only their bed clothes on, and were taken in by Mr. Squire,
from whom they received the same humane treatment as was experienced by
Mr. and Mrs. Bottle &c.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer,
19 July, 1867.
DESERTION
Charles Outley, a private of the 102nd Regiment was charged with
desertion.
The prisoner had been apprehended by police sergeant Stevens at
twenty minutes past six the same evening, in the Market Place. He had no
pass, and in answer to the police officer he said he had none with him,
but that he had been provided with one, and had left it with a girl
named Jenny, ay the "Bee Hive" public-house. The sergeant went to the
"Bee Hive," and found "Jenny," but she declared she had seen no pass. As
the regiment was quartered at Shorncliffe the officer took prisoner into
custody on a charge if desertion.
The prisoner denied that he was a deserter, but admitted that he was
absent without leave. He said he had left his quarters on the previous
evening.
The Magistrates ordered his conveyance back to Shorncliffe.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday,
15 May, 1868.
AN IMPUDENT SWINDLER.
George Smith, who described himself as servant to the Colonel of the
33rd Regiment, quartered at Shorncliff, was charged with stealing two
silk pocket-handkerchiefs, the property of Mr. George Bennett, general
outfitter, of Snargate Street, and also with obtaining by false
pretences from Mr. Bennett, two pounds' worth of silver and from Mr.
George Ambrose Eastman, landlord of the "Beehive Inn," Snargate Street,
one pound's worth.
The offences were taken in three separate charges, the first deposed
of being the false pretence practised upon Mr. Eastman.
George Ambrose Eastman said the prisoner came into his house on
Saturday afternoon. He had been there on the previous night, and
remained some time. He was served with refreshments on Saturday and
before leaving he asked witness if he could oblige him with change for a
couple of sovereigns. Witness found he had only one pound's worth of
silver in the till and he laid that on the top of the bar. The prisoner
took it up, and on witness asking for the sovereign, he said, "All
right, I have left a note with Mr. Bennett, who was unable to change
it." Witness then allowed him to take the silver, and walked to the shop
of Mr. Bennett with him. He remained in the shop some time, apparently
selecting goods, and as witness had run to and fro to his own place, he
ultimately lost sight of the prisoner and did not see him again till he
was in custody.
By the prisoner: I did not on the Friday evening get on very friendly
terms with you or offer to lend you any money you might require.
Mr. Bennett was then called to prove that the representation made by
the prisoner to Mr. Eastman as to leaving a bank note with him was
untrue.
On the charge of stealing a handkerchief being proceeded with, Mr.
Bennett said the prisoner came to his shop on Saturday evening about the
time he was said to have left Mr. Eastman, and selected a great quantity
of goods, amounting altogether in value to about £6. He represented that
he was captain of the ?????? a vessel lying in the harbour and that he
was on a voyage to India. He did not take the goods away; but he (Mr.
Bennett) was subsequently taken to the police-station, where he found
the prisoner, who had in his possession the silk handkerchief produced,
and one orange. They did not form part of the goods which the prisoner
had selected.
Police-constable Baker said that on Saturday evening in consequence
of information received, he went in search of the prisoner, and found
him at the "Military Arms"
public-house, Snargate Street. He told him that he wanted to see him on
a charge of felony, and took him to the police-station. On searching him
the purple handkerchief was found upon him, and the other was afterwards
taken from him.
In reference to obtaining the two pounds' worth of silver from Mr.
Bennett, it appeared that after he had selected the things above
referred to, he requested Mr. Bennett to make out the bill, and have it
ready by a certain time, when he would call and pay it and fetch the
things away. He then asked Mr. Bennett if he could oblige him with a
couple of pounds' worth of silver, as he was wanting some money to pay
the boat's crew. In consequence of the prisoner's representations Mr.
Bennett allowed him to have the money, and he then went away. Almost
immediately he had quitted the shop, however, Mr. Bennett's suspicions
were excited, and he made inquiries with the view of testing the
accuracy of the statements made by the prisoner, the result inducing him
to believe that they were fictitious.
Mrs. Caroline Foord, wife of John Foord, landlord of the "Gothic
Inn," Snargate Street, said that on Saturday evening the prisoner
entered the bar of the house and called for something to drink. While he
was standing there she had occasion to send her niece for an article of
grocery and laid down a sovereign, so that the niece might get change.
The prisoner thereupon said he had plenty of silver change if she wanted
any. She said that she would take what he had if he liked, and he then
counted down £3 worth of silver, and she gave him three sovereigns.
Baker was again called to prove that on the prisoner being searched a
purse was found upon him containing three sovereigns and some loose
silver.
The prisoner, who had nothing to say in reply to any of the charges,
was committed for trial at the next Quarter Sessions.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 10 June, 1870.
ROBBERY FROM THE PERSON
Mary Ann Freeman, an unfortunate, was charged with stealing from the
waistcoat pocket of Samuel Palmer, at the “Bee Hive,” public-house,
Snargate Street, on Saturday afternoon, 16s. in silver and 4d. in
coppers.
The prosecutor was not in attendance, and the police, therefore, asked
for a remand, which was granted. From the statement of Police-sergeant
Stevens, it appeared that the prosecutor and the prisoner were in a
bedroom at the “Bee Hive” on Saturday, and the prosecutor leaving the
room he found that his money was gone. At the station-house the landlady
of the “Bee Hive,” who had followed the prosecutor and the prisoner, to
hear the charge taken, endeavoured to thrust some money into
prosecutor's hand. Some if it dropped, and witness picked up
half-a-sovereign and a shilling form the mat.
A remand until to-day was granted.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer, 16 September, 1870. Price 1d.
THE ANNUAL LICENSING DAY
The Borough Magistrates held their annual licensing meeting on Monday
last at the Sessions House. The Magistrates on the bench were E. F.
Astley (in the Chair), J. F. Crookes, T. E. Back, C. Stein, J. G.
Churchward, J. G. Smith, and W. R. Mowll Esqs. Most of the licenses were
renewed pro forma. The exceptional cases were the following.
THE BEE HIVE INN
In this case there were some question as to the renewal of the license
in consequence of certain allegations made against the character of the
house in the course of a charge which had been recently brought before
the Bench in which a man named Samuel Palmer appeared as prosecutor.
Palmer, it appeared, had given a woman into custody on a charge of
robbing him. According to his statement he fell in with her in the
middle of the day in the Market Place, and took her to the “Bee Hive,”
where he saw the landlord, who permitted him to retire to a bed room
with the woman. They remained there some time, and Palmer ultimately
fell asleep. When he awoke it was evening, and the woman had
disappeared; and, according to his statement, a sum of 16s. had been
taken from his pocket. He admitted, however, that he was very drunk when
he went into the house; and as only fourteen pence was found in the
woman's possession when she was arrested at her lodgings immediately
afterwards, the Magistrates dismissed the case. It transpired, however,
in the course of it, that Mrs. Eastman followed the prosecutor to the
Station-house and endeavoured to force some money into his hand in order
that he might not go on with the charge.
Mr. Fox, who appeared for the applicant, said he should be able to show
that in all material respects the statement of Palmer was untrue. Mr.
Eastman had had no opportunity of going into witness box when the case
was heard before the Magistrates, or he would have shown them that there
was not a particle of foundation for the allegations. As to the affair
of money on the part of Mrs. Eastman though it was a matter calculated
to excite some prejudice, it was easily susceptible of explanation, and,
as he hoped he should show, amounted to nothing more than an act of
indiscretion on her part. He should call Mr. and Mrs. Eastman, and
examine them upon their oath, to show that, although Palmer did go into
the house accompanied by a woman in the middle of the day, he was
supplied with refreshment, as an ordinary customer, in a parlour, and
that no facilities for any immoral purpose were afforded. The parties
were not seen by the landlord at all; but Mrs. Eastman did supply them
with some refreshment, and the woman shortly afterwards went away. As
Palmer appeared the worse for liquor, Mrs. Eastman kindly gave him
permission to lie down on a sofa; but he found his way into the
servant's bedroom, where he was subsequently found by Mr. Eastman. He
pointed out to the Magistrates that the defendant in the case, when it
was brought before the Bench, was dismissed by the Magistrates, and this
decision could have been brought about only by a want of reliance on the
prosecutor's testimony. He asked the Magistrates, on the present
occasion, then, to extend this doubt to that part of his statement which
affected Mr. Eastman, and not allow the inaccuracies of a drunken man's
statement to prejudice their decision. He pointed out that Mr. Eastman
had held the licence of the “Bee Hive” for twelve years and that during
the whole of that time he had never been summoned before the Magistrates
for any offence whatever.
George Andrew Eastman, on being sworn said he had kept the “Bee Hive”
twelve years, and had never given occasion for a single complaint. He
denied entirely the truth of the statement made by Palmer as to his
having permitted him to make use of a bedroom. He did not see either him
or the woman. He did not know Palmer was in the house till someone told
him there was a man lying asleep in a servant's bedroom. He then went up
and endeavoured to rouse him; and shortly afterwards Palmer came down
and said he had been robbed. The woman in whose company he had been was
found, but she had no money; and as the man returned to the house and
insisted on having the money he said he had lost restored to him, he
(Mr. Eastman) told his wife to give him 12s., not because he believed he
had lost any money in the house, but to avoid the disgrace which would
be likely to be brought upon the house by the prisoner persisting in his
declaration.
Mrs. Eastman was also called. She said she did not give Palmer
permission to go into a bedroom. He went upstairs into a sitting room,
and was supplied with a quartern of gin. She afterwards gave him
permission to lie down in the sitting room, but not in a bedroom.
By the Bench: A woman accompanied him when he came in; but she went away
again very shortly. The man was intoxicated. As he persisted in pressing
the charge, I offered him 12s. not to go on with it, thinking that the
allegation would injure the house, and that it was better to avoid it in
this way.
Superintendent Coram said there had never been any complaint against the
“Bee Hive.”
Sergeant Stevens also spoke as to the character of the house. He had
seen prostitutes go in and out of it, and he had seen them go in and out
of other houses; but the “Bee Hive” had always been very quietly
conducted, and had never been the subject of a report.
By Mr. Fox: It is the duty of publicans to serve prostitutes, if they
present themselves in an orderly way. I do not mean to insinuate that
prostitutes have been harbouring at the “Bee Hive,” nor have I seen any
disorderly conduct in the house.
The Magistrates then retired to consult; and upon their return into
Court, they announced that their decision would be given at the
adjourned meeting at Broadstairs.
|
LICENSEE LIST
TYLDEN John previous to 1840
BREWER Samuel 1826-22/Oct/45 Dec'd
(also plasterer
)
BREWER Ann 1846-47
ALLEN William T 1851-53 (age 38 in 1851)
ALLEN Mrs Jane 1853-58
EASTMAN George Ambrose 1858-70 also wheelwright age 26 in 1861)
From the Pigot's Directory 1832-33-34
From the Pigot's Directory 1839
From the Pigot's Directory 1840
From Bagshaw Directory 1847
From Melville's Directory 1858
From the Post Office Directory 1862
From the Dover Telegraph
Census
|