From the Dover Express 28 April 1994, by John Mitchell.
DO YOU WANT JOBS OR NOT?
Furious attack on council as members say 'no' to major hotel plan. Decision flies in face of tourism strategy, says harbour board.
FURIOUS harbour board chiefs have lashed out at the council accusing it
of losing jobs for local people by turning down a chance to bring in
tourists.
The amazing attack came after plans to build a 60 bedroom,
budget-style hotel near the seafront were turned down.
It was decided
the council-owned site earmarked for the two star hotel was being sold
off too cheaply.
And there were worries about the design which one
councillor labelled 'a disaster'.
A harbour board spokesman hit back:
"This decision undermines the tourism and economic development strategy
and studies which are being paid for
by the council and other groups."
The board had negotiated for more than a year with the council which
owns the site of the former Dover State Hotel off Townwall Street - now
a car park.
A planning application had been put in by hotel operators
Henley Lodges and the development, which could have created 35 jobs, got
approval from the council's policy committee.
But by a 26-24 vote, the
full council reversed the decision after some councillors said the land
was being offered for three times less than the council paid in 1989,
though no figure was revealed.
'A disaster'
Other councillors were unhappy about the proposed design.
Conservative Councillor John Bragg called it
'hideous and appalling. a disaster'.
But this week harbour board spokesman John Turgoose told the Dover
Express the proposal was the type of investment organisations like the
East Kent Initiative. Discover East Kent and South East England Tourist
Board want to see boosting the district.
"The hotel would have
encouraged travellers to stay in the town and visit pubs, shops,
restaurants and
tourist attractions.
"I regret the council does not wish to support a project which
would appear to satisfy its stated objectives, particularly regarding
tourism."
The saga of the hotel plan started when the council's tourism
committee approved the sale of the site. The land committee was against
selling but the policy committee came down in favour.
At the full
council, land committee chairman, Independent Councillor Brian Walker,
attacked the project. He said the council bought the land in 1989 for
more than three times the selling price proposed.
"I will not go along
with those in favour of selling this land or this district short," he
said.
Liberal Democrat councillor Phil King was also against the
sale. The kind of short stay, budget style hotel envisaged wouldn't
bring the boost to tourism and the economy the council wants, he said.
But Tory councillors Kit Smith and Paul Watkins were in favour.
Councillor Watkins argued: "We've been saying for years we want hotels
to come to our area. Now we have a chance to deliver. Coaches have been
by-passing Dover and going on to Ashford
because we don't have the hotels to cope with the tourists."
But
Councillor Paul SheIdrake, Labour,· said he didn't feeI a hotel was
right for such an important site. He preferred to see something like a
theatre or art gallery, an attraction which would keep people in the
town.
But fellow Labour councillor Gwyn Prosser said there is a
clear need in Dover for the kind of hotel proposed and a dire need for
more jobs in the area.
The council's decision was also attacked by Keith
Berry and Les Pennington, directors of Henley Lodges, who put in a
planning application for the hotel on behalf of the harbour board.
"Does
Dover want jobs?" they asked, after the full council decision to reject
the scheme.
They said in a statement:
"Contradictory decisions by a variety of council committees give the
impression of indecision and confusion.
"Surely the council should
stick with its stated objectives by looking for longer term security for
the people of Dover."
|