63 Fenchurch Street
3 Francis Street
4 Little Fancy Street 1860
Folkestone
Originally titled the "Hope and
Anchor" the name changed in 1810.
As shown below the house was put up for auction half way through 1860
while under the rule of Sarah Ellis, but she obviously remained at the house
after this date as she remained there till 1865.
The house was eventually closed on Christmas Eve 1906 and continued as a
private house till the majority of Fenchurch Street accept the "George
III Inn" was demolished as a slum clearance of 1937.
Dover Telegraph 4 July 1840.
Inquest: An inquest was held on Tuesday at the "Hope," Folkestone, on
the body of Joseph Reynolds, labourer. From the evidence adduced, it
appeared that the deceased was one of the labourers employed on the
works of the South Eastern Railway, and that he was much injured by
a fall of chalk on the Warren excavations, which caused his death in
about three hours. Verdict: Accidental Death.
|
Dover Chronicle 4 July 1840.
On Tuesday and inquest was held at the "Hope" on the body of a man
named Joseph Reynolds, a labourer on the South Eastern Railway, who
was much injured by a fall of chalk, and died about three hours
afterwards.
Verdict: Accidental Death.
|
Dover Chronicle 1 April 1843.
A meeting was held at the Hope, in Fancy Street, on Tuesday evening
last, for the purpose of forming a Literary Society, but few
persons, we are sorry to state, attended. As we much wish success to
anything of this kind, we hope the few spirited gentlemen who have
started it may persevere in their laudable endeavours in
establishing this Society.
|
From the Folkestone Chronicle 21 July, 1860.
ADVERT
Extract from an advertisement for an auction to be held at The "Rose
Inn" on 31st July, 1860:-
Lot 4. A Freehold and Free Public House, situate in Little Fancy
Street, in the tenure of Mrs. Sarah Ellis.
|
South Eastern Gazette, 24 July, 1860.
FOLKESTONE. Valuable FREEHOLD HOUSES,
Free Public House and Eligible Freehold Building Land.
Mr. T. ROBINSON IS favoured with instructions from the Proprietors
to submit for SALE by PUBLIC AUCTION, on Tuesday, July 31, 1860, at
Two for Three o’clock in the afternoon punctually, at the "Rose
Inn," in Folkestone, the following desirable FREEHOLD
DWELLING-HOUSES, FREE PUBLIC-HOUSE, and a very advantageous plot of
valuable BUILDING LAND.
Lot 4. A Freehold and Free Public-house, situate in little Fancy
street, in the tenure of Mrs. Sarah Ellis.
For particulars and conditions of sale apply to the Auctioneer, 18,
Beach-street, or to Edward Knocker Esq., Solicitor, Dover.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 9 November 1861.
Town Council Meeting Extract:
Business: To make an order as to removal of urinal and nuisance in front
of Hope Tavern, Fancy Street.
The question of the removal of a urinal in Fancy Street was settled by
the surveyor reporting that it had been removed.
But Mr. Boorn moved, seconded by Mr. John Banks, that the corner be
bricked up, at the expense of the town. Carried by 11 votes.
|
Folkestone Observer 9 January 1869.
Wednesday, January 4th: Before The Mayor and R.W. Boarer Esq.
John French applied for a transfer of the license granted to Arthur
Ayliff to sell excisable liquors at the Hope Inn, Fancy Street.
Application granted.
|
Folkestone Express 9 January 1869.
Transfer of License.
Wednesday, January 6th: Before The Mayor and R.W. Boarer Esq.
The Hope, Fancy Street transferred from Mr. Ayliffe to John French.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 25 October, 1871. Price 1d.
IMPUDENT ROBBERY
Patrick Brady, a gunner in the Royal Artillery, aged 35 years, was
charged with stealing a ring, valued at 35s., the property of George
Baker, at the South-Easter Railway Terminus, on Monday evening last.
George Baker deposed: I am the landlord of the “Hope Inn” at Folkestone.
Last Monday evening I was going to Folkestone by the 7 o'clock train. I
was in a third-class carriage, and just as the train was about to start
the prisoner came up and shook hands with me, and took the ring off my
finger. The prisoner does not know me, nor I him. I have not met him
before. This is the ring produced. It is worth 30s., but I would not
take £10 for it. I followed him along the platform.
Major Crookes: Was he running?
Witness: Yes, sir. The train was on the start, and I was told to get in,
which I did. I saw the ring yesterday morning in the possession of the
detective.
Major Crookes: Where did the prisoner shake hands with you?
Witness: I was leaning out of the carriage.
Mr. Mowll: Then I suppose that, instead of shaking hands, he took hold
of your hand and wrung the ring off?
Witness: Yes, sir.
Major Crookes: Your hand was hanging out of the window, and was visible
to everybody on the platform?
Witness: Yes, sir.
Major Crookes: Did he say anything?
Witness: yes, sir. He said, “Helloa, old chum,” or something to that
effect.
Major Crookes: As soon as you lost it you jumped out of the carriage?
Witness: Yes, sir.
Charles Hemmings deposed: I am a detective police-constable. About 7
p.m. on the 16th inst., I was on duty at the South-Eastern Railway
Station, and just a minute or two before the train started, I saw the
prisoner running down the platform, and the prosecutor followed him. I
heard the prosecutor say, “He has got my ring.” I stopped the prisoner
and asked him what he was running for, and he said he did not know.
Prosecutor ran back and got in the carriage just as the train was
starting. A few minutes after, I saw the ring in the possession of
police-constable Davis, one of the company's men. From information I
received from the prosecutor yesterday morning, I apprehended the
prisoner at the Hospital at the Dover Castle, and charged him with
stealing the ring. In answer to the charge, he said he knew nothing
about it, and had not taken the ring. I then took him to the police
station, and on the charge being read over to him there, he made the
same reply.
Morris Davis, one of the constable's constables, corroborated the
evidence of the previous witnesses and added – About 10 minutes after
the train had started, I found the ring produced, about 20 yards from
the place where Hemmings had stopped the prisoner.
Major Crookes: Was he running towards the “Lord Warden Hotel.”
Witness: No, sir; towards the bookstall. I took the ring to the lost
property office, where it was claimed by Hemmings. I delivered it
myself.
Prisoner, in answer to the clerk, said he was guilty of the charge.
An officer in attendance gave the prisoner a very good character, and
stated that he had been in the service two years and six months.
The Bench told the prisoner, that in consequence of the good character
given him by the officer, the sentence would be but six weeks'
imprisonment with hard labour in the Dover Gaol.
The ring was then returned.
|
Folkestone Express 10 January 1874.
Monday, January 5th: Before W. Wightwick, J. Kelcey, R.W. Boarer, J.
Clark, and J. Hoad Esqs.
William Boorn applied for temporary authority to sell excisable liquors
at the Hope, Fancy Street, under the license granted to George Baker.
Application granted.
Note: Date is at variance with information in More Bastions.
|
Southeastern Gazette 12 January 1874.
Local News.
At the Borough Bench on Monday, William Boorn applied for and obtained a
temporary authority to sell excisable liquors at the Hope, Fancy Street,
under the license originally granted to George Baker.
|
Folkestone Express 31 January 1874.
Transfer:
Wednesday, January 28th: Before Col. De Crespigny, J. Tolputt and R.W.
Boarer Esqs.
The following transfer of public house was granted:
Hope Inn – to William Boorn.
|
Folkestone Express 14 February 1874.
Monday, February 9th: Before The Mayor, J. Kelcey, J. Hoad and R.W.
Boarer Esqs.
Catherine Wood, alias Kate Murray (23), whose career appears to be one
of delinquency, having been three years in a reformatory, and against
whom was registered some half-score convictions, was brought up on
remand from Saturday, charged with stealing sundry books of the value of
1s. 6d., from the shop of Mr. Edward Dale, bookseller, Dover Street.
Annie Dale, prosecutor's daughter, deposed: I was in my father's shop on
Wednesday afternoon, when prisoner came in and asked for a ticket for
the Servants' Home. I told her to go to Mr. Birch's. She then left the
shop and came back in a quarter of an hour and said she had been to Mr.
Birch's and found she was too old to go into a Servants' Home. I then
told her to go to Mr. Pope's and she went away. She had a bonnet or
shawl on.
Prisoner to witness: I told you I could not find Mr. Birch's.
Elizabeth Dale, prosecutor's wife, deposed: Prisoner came to our shop on
Wednesday evening between seven and eight o'clock, and said she wanted
to get into the Servants' Home. I told her my husband had no means of
getting her into such an institution and that it was of no use her
calling again. She left the shop, and after she was gone I looked round
and missed about a dozen “Churchman's Almanack” and “Dover and Deal
Guide”s. The books now produced correspond with those I missed.
Hannah Carter, wife of John Carter, Oddfellows Arms, Radnor Street,
said: Prisoner has lodged at my house. She came on Wednesday and called
for a glass of beer and porter and paid a penny for it. She had a yellow
covered book in her hand and asked if I liked reading, and I replied
that I could not read and she then gave the book to my little girl.
Prisoner went out after she had drank her beer. I gave the book to P.C.
Keeler.
Harriett Hall, wife of William Hall, fishmonger, said: I saw prisoner
come out of the fishmarket about half past three on Wednesday afternoon.
She went through the arch in front of the Royal George, and was tossing
up a number of books. She said “I am going to put these up for a pint of
beer”. I said “You may as well give me one for my little girl”, and she
gave me one and then went away.
Charlotte, wife of William Bourne, Hope, Fancy Street said prisoner came
into her house in company with a tall man on Wednesday, and he paid for
a pint of beer. Prisoner had several books in her hand and offered to
give witness them, and as she said she did not want them, she gave her a
“Churchman's Almanack”, and said if she kept the books she would only
make away with them. Witness threw the book prisoner gave her on the tap
room fire.
P.C. Keeler said: On Thursday morning, from information received, I went
to the Oddfellows Arms and received the book I now produce from Mrs.
Carter. I then went in search of prisoner and apprehended her in Tontine
Street about noon. After being cautioned she said she was drunk and went
into a shop, but she would not have done it if it had not been for a
young man who was standing outside, and she gave him a portion of the
books. She said she did not know his name, but they called him
“Charlie”. Prisoner was searched by the female searcher, but nothing was
found upon her. I have been to Dover and Hythe in search of the man, but
could not find him.
Prisoner, after being duly cautioned, said: I came to Folkestone on
Monday with a young man named Mackson, whose father keeps a farm. We
went to the Dew Drop and got a bed there; we went into the tap room and
had a pot of beer. I had just come out of prison and got a little beer,
which upset me. If you will be so kind as to forgive me I will go into a
Home: I could go in one today. I have lost my mother. I will go down on
my hands and knees if you will forgive me. I don't want to go to prison
again.
The Mayor said the Bench had no alternative but to commit prisoner for
trial, and she was accordingly committed to the Quarter Sessions.
|
Folkestone Express 2 May 1874.
Quarter Sessions.
Tuesday, April 28th: Before J.J. Lonsdale Esq.
Catherine Wood (22) was charged with stealing fourteen books, value of
1s. 4d., the property of Mr. Edward Dale, stationer, 1, Dover Street, on
the 4th February. Mr. Minter for the prosecution.
Prisoner, on being called upon to plead, said she could not remember
taking the books.
Mrs. Elizabeth Dale deposed: I am the wife of Edward Dale, carrying on
business of stationer, 1, Dover Street. Prisoner came into the shop
between seven and eight o'clock on the evening of Wednesday, 4th
February last. She said she wanted to get into a servants' home. I told
her Mr. Dale had no means of getting her into one, and it was no use her
calling again. I missed some books after she was gone. I had a bundle of
the “Dover and Deal Guide” on the counter between two and three o'clock.
After she had gone I missed them. One contained “The Dover and Deal
Guide”, and the other the “Churchman's Almanack”. The books now produced
by P.C. Keeler correspond with those I lost.
By Prisoner: I did not see you take the books.
Annie Dale, ten years of age, deposed: On the 4th February I was in my
father's shop in the afternoon between three and four o'clock . Prisoner
came in and said she wanted to get into a home, and inquired if my
father could get her in. I told her to go to Mr. Birch, the Relieving
Officer. She then left and came back in about quarter of an hour, and
said Mr. Birch could not get her into a home. I then told her to go to
Mr. Pope's, Registry Office. She went away again. I was in the shop at
half past seven, and heard mother tell her father had no means of
getting her into a home.
By the Recorder: The books were on the counter, and prisoner stood near
to them. I found her in the shop when I came downstairs. She was
standing near the books.
Hannah Carter, Oddfellows Inn, Radnor Street, deposed: I have known
prisoner some time. She came to my house on the 4th February between six
and seven in the evening and asked for a glass of half-and-half. She had
a book in her hand and asked if I would have the book. I said I could
not read, and she gave me the book for my little girl. It had a yellow
cover, and I believe it was a “Dover and Deal Guide”. I gave the book to
P.C. Keeler on the following morning.
Harriett Hall deposed: I saw the prisoner on the 4th February between
three and four o'clock. She came from the fish market, and had some
books in her hand, which she was throwing up, and said “I am going to
put them up for a pot of beer”. I said “You might as well give me one
for my little boy”, and she did so. The book was put on the table by the
side of my bed. P.C. Keeler came the next day and I gave the book to
him, and at his request I put a mark upon it. The book now produced is
the samen
Charlotte Bourne deposed: I live at the Hope, Fancy Street. I remember
prisoner coming to my house on the 4th February about five o'clock, with
a man. She had several books in her hand, and offered to give them to
me, and she gave me a “Churchman's Almanack”, which I afterwards put in
the fire.
P.C. Keeler deposed: On the 5th February I went to Mrs. Carter's house
and received a “Dover and Deal Guide”. I also went to Mrs. Hall's and
received a “Churchman's Almanack”, and requested Mrs. Hall to make a
mark upon it, which she did. I then went in search of prisoner and found
her in Tontine Street, and took her into custody on the charge of
stealing a number of books from Mr. Dale's shop. She said she would not
have “tooken” them if it had not been for a man who was standing
outside. I asked her who he was, and she said “Charlie”, which was all
the name she knew, and she had given a portion of the books to him. She
said she had been in Mr. Dale's shop.
This was the case for the prosecution.
The statement made by prisoner when before the Magistrates was read, to
which she now added: I had done a long sentence in prison, and I took a
glass of beer or two, which one and another gave me, and it upset me. I
came to Folkestone with the intention of seeing a Sister of Mercy, and
have not the slightest memory of taking the books. A Sister of Mercy was
going to put me in a home. My mother was killed, and my father ran away,
and I have not a friend in the world. I had not broken my fast after
coming out of gaol till I got to Folkestone.
In answer to the Recorder, Mrs. Dale said she did not think prisoner was
tipsy when she was in the shop, but she smelt strongly of what she
thought was rum; she seemed to know what she was about.
Prisoner: If you will be merciful to me I will never take another drop
of beer as long as I live. It has been the ruin of me.
The learned Recorder summed up the case as favourably as he could for
the prisoner and remarked that if she did not know what she was about
when she took the books there was no offence, but there was great
inconsistency in her statements. A second count charged her with having
been convicted at the Dover Quarter Sessions of felony on the 27th
December.
Prisoner pleaded Guilty to the former conviction.
Mr. Minter remarked that His Honour ought to know that there were no
less than thirteen previous convictions against prisoner.
The Recorder said that from a document before him he saw that prisoner
began her evil course when she was only fourteen years of age by
stealing a silver spoon; after that there were convictions for being in
workhouses for an unlawful purpose, assaulting a child, absconding from
a reformatory, four times drunk and disorderly, stealing boots,, and
breaking fourteen panes of glass in Dover gaol. She was really a
habitual criminal.
Mr. Minter remarked that the Visiting Justices offered to get her into a
Home, but she refused to go, and the chaplain of the prison offered to
get her into a workhouse in order to see if that would do her any good.
Prisoner: Since the death of my mother my father ran away, and I have
seven little brothers in the workhouse, and I did not want to go to see
them there. Mrs. Smith wanted to get me in a Home, but Mrs. Quilter, the
Matron of the gaol, told her an untruth that I used bad language when I
was coming out of chapel. Mr. Simmons put me in a dark cell three days
on bread and water. If you will be merciful I will leave England.
The Recorder: I really don't know what to do with such a habitual
criminal. I have power to send you to penal servitude, but I will not go
to that length. I cannot pass a less sentence than twelve months' hard
labour.
Prisoner destroyed all faith of her professions of contrition and
amendment by threatening Mr. Simmons as she was removed from the dock.
|
Folkestone News 1 May 1886.
Wednesday, April 28th:
Transfer was granted as follows: Drayner, Hope.
|
Folkestone Express 31 May 1890.
Wednesday, May 28th: Before The Mayor, H.W. Poole Esq., Surgeon General
Gilbourne, W.G. Herbert and W. Wightwick Esqs.
The licence of the Hope Inn was transferred to Mrs. Donaldson, widow of
the landlord, who is supposed to have been lost at sea recently.
|
Folkestone Express 14 June 1890.
Wednesday, June 11th: before J. Clark, J. Hoad, J. Dunk, F. Boykett and
E.T. Ward Esqs.
The licence of the Hope Inn was transferred to Mrs. Donaldson.
|
Folkestone Express 13 December 1890.
Transfer.
Wednesday, December 10th: Before The Mayor, Col. De Crespigny, Surgeon
General Gilbourne, Alderman Banks and W.G. Herbert Esq.
Temporary authority was granted to John Coghlan for the Hope Inn.
Note: Hope transfer is at variance with More Bastions.
|
Folkestone Herald 14 December 1895.
Felix.
Then we chatted about the Folkestone of Mr. Francis' young days. A mere
hamlet was it then. Fishing and smuggling were the principal industries.
“Things”, said my vivacious informant, “have altered, both in trade and
custom. I can remember the time when there was not so much stand-offishness
amongst the tradespeople as now. There was no cliqueism then. Why, we
used to meet together in the evening and smoke our pipes – the lawyers,
the doctors, and the banker, and the rest of the tradesmen. One of our
principal hotels was in Fenchurch Street. It is now called the Hope. But
we divided our custom. But we divided our custom. Sunday was left out.
For six nights in the week one of six hotels was regularly visited. An
innocent rubber of whist was always indulged in, but on no account was
the game commenced until Doctor Bateman (an ancestor of the present
doctor bearing that honoured name) had lighted the tallow candles. These
good old people lived by the rule. A pint of good English ale and a
“night cap” was the regulation refreshment. At ten p.m. the “Hotels”
closed, and a quarter before that hour the company punctually separated
to meet again on the morrow evening”. Who can cast a stone at those old
times, when men looked upon each other as men? As Mr. Francis said “One
by one my companions have died off, I am alone, and the old days to me
are but a memory”.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 20 January 1900.
Wednesday, January 17th: Before Mr. Fitness.
A licence to sell until the annual transfer day was granted to Fredk.
Hart in respect of the Hope, Fenchurch Street.
|
Folkestone Herald 20 January 1900.
Folkestone Police Court.
On Wednesday a temporary authority to sell was granted to Mr. Frederick
Hart for the Hope, in Fenchurch Street, Mr. G.W. Haines representing the
applicant.
|
Folkestone Herald 10 March 1900.
Folkestone Police Court.
On Wednesday, on the application of Mr. G.W. Haines, a transfer was
granted to Mr. Hart for the Hope, Great Fenchurch Street.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 3 August 1901.
Saturday, July 27th: Before Alderman Banks, Messrs. Herbert, Wightwick,
and Pursey, and Lieut. Colonel Hamilton.
Richard William Heritage was granted temporary authority to sell at the
Hope Inn, Fenchurch Street.
|
Folkestone Express 10 August 1901.
Wednesday, August 7th: Before W. Wightwick, C.J. Pursey, W.G. Herbert,
and G.I. Swoffer Esqs., and Colonel Keily Westropp.
The following licence was transferred: Mr. William Richard Heritage was
granted a temporary renewal in respect of the Hope.
|
Folkestone Herald 10 August 1901.
Wednesday, August 7th: Before Messrs. W. Wightwick, W.G. Herbert, C.J.
Pursey, G.I. Swoffer, and Lieut. Colonel Westropp.
Mr. Heritage was granted a temporary licence for the Hope Inn.
|
Folkestone Express 14 September 1901.
Wednesday, September 11th: Before T.J. Vaughan, G. Peden, and J. Stainer
Esqs., Lieut. Col. Westropp, and Lieut. Col. Hamilton.
Fredk. Hart was granted a transfer of the licence of the Hope Inn,
Fenchurch Street.
|
Folkestone Herald 14 September 1901.
Wednesday, September 11th: Before Councillors T.J. Vaughan and G. Peden,
Mr. J. Stainer, Mr. W. Wightwick, and Lieut. Colonels Westropp and
Hamilton.
The licence of the Hope Inn, Providence Street (sic), was transferred to
Fredk. Hart.
Note: Transfer at the Hope is FROM Hart to Heritage.
|
Folkestone Express 26 April 1902.
Local News.
On Thursday the licence of the Hope Inn was temporarily transferred to
Mr. William Finn.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 13 February 1904.
Licensing Sessions.
Wednesday, February 10th: Before Mr. W. Wightwick, Alderman Herbert,
Lieut. Cols. Fynmore, Westropp, and Hamilton, Messrs. C.J. Pursey and
E.T. Ward.
The Chief Constable (Mr. H. Reeve) read his annual report, which
contained interesting figures with regard to drunkenness, etc. No person
in Folkestone had yet been convicted a sufficient number of times to be
placed on the “black list”. The Chief Constable objected to the renewal
of the licence of the Swan Inn, Dover Road, and asked that the
consideration of this licence might be deferred until the adjourned
sessions.
The Chairman then read the Justices' Report, which stated that the
number of licensed houses in Folkestone, and especially around the
harbour, was out of all proportion to the population. The number of
licences had not been reduced, owing to the fact that a Bill amending
the Licensing Laws was shortly to be introduced in Parliament. Certain
public houses – the Imperial Brewery Tap, the Hope, the East Cliff
Tavern, the Victoria, the Lifeboat Inn, the Duke Of Edinburgh, and the
Channel Inn had been inspected by the Justices, and recommendations with
regard to their sanitary improvement and closing of back entries were
made.
Mr. John Minter said that water had been laid on at the Channel Inn
since the report on the bad state of the sanitary arrangements. Mr.
Minter also suggested with regard to the Imperial Brewery Tap that a
public bar should be made with an entrance from Mill Bay.
The Bench decided, however, that the orders made in the report should be
adhered to.
Licences were then granted to the lessees of public houses and licensed
premises.
|
Folkestone Express 13 February 1904.
Annual Licensing Meeting.
Wednesday, February 10th: Before W. Wightwick Esq., Lieut. Col.
Hamilton, Lieut. Col. Fynmore, Lieut. Colonel Westropp, and W.G.
Herbert, E.T. Ward, and C.J. Pursey Esqs.
The following was the report of Supt. Reeve: Chief Constable's Office,
Folkestone, 10th February, 1904. To the Chairman and Members of the
Licensing Committee of the Borough of Folkestone. Gentlemen, I have the
honour to report for your information that there are at present within
your jurisdiction 139 premises licensed for the sale of intoxicating
liquors, namely: Full licences 87; Beer on 11; Beer off 6; Beer and
Spirits (dealers) 16; Grocers 12; Confectioners 3; Chemists 4; Total 139
– an average of one licence to every 220 persons, or one “on” licence to
every 313. This is a decrease of one full licence as compared with last
year's return, the licence of the Marquis Of Lorne having been refused
at the adjourned meeting in March. Twenty of the licences have been
transferred during the year, namely, 14 full licences, two beer on, two
beer off, and two grocers. One beer off licence was transferred twice
during the year. One licence holder has been convicted since the last
annual meeting of committing drunkenness on his licensed premises. He
has since transferred his licence and left the house. The alterations
which the Justices at the adjourned meeting last year directed to be
made to the Packet Boat, Castle, Tramway, Bricklayers' Arms, Granville,
and Star Inns have all been carried out in a satisfactory manner, and
none of the licensed houses are now used as common lodging houses. Ten
occasional licences, and extensions of hours on 21 occasions, have been
granted to licence holders during the year. There are 14 places licensed
for music and dancing, and two for public billiard playing. Eleven clubs
where intoxicating liquors are sold are registered in accordance with
the Licensing Act of 1902. For the year ending 31st December last year,
154 persons (131 males and 23 females) were proceeded against for
drunkenness. 131 were convicted and 23 discharged. This is an increase
of 65 persons proceeded against, and 51 convicted, as compared with
1902. The increase is chiefly due to the additional powers given to the
police under the Licensing Act, 1902. Up to the present time no person
within the Borough has been convicted the necessary number of times
within the 12 months to be placed on the “black list” as provided by
Section 6 of the Act of 1902. With very few exceptions the whole of the
licensed houses have been conducted in a satisfactory manner. The only
objection I have to make to the renewal of any of the present licences
is that of the Swan Inn, Dover Road, and I would ask that the renewal of
this licence be deferred until the adjourned meeting. I have the honour
to be, gentlemen, your obedient servant, H. Reeve (Chief Constable).
The Chairman: I think, gentlemen, you will agree that the report of the
Superintendent is a satisfactory one – in fact, I may say very
satisfactory – for the whole year. With your permission I well read the
report we now make to you. At the adjournment of the last general
licensing meeting we stated that in our opinion the number of licences
for the sale of intoxicating liquor then existing in the borough of
Folkestone, especially in the part of the immediate neighbourhood of the
Harbour, was out of all proportion to the population, and that we
proposed between then and the general annual licensing meeting of this
year to obtain information on various matters, to enable us to determine
what reduction would be made in the number of licences. We invited the
owners of licensed houses in the meantime to meet and agree among
themselves for the voluntary surrender at this general meeting of a
substantial number of licences in the borough, and to submit the result
of their united action to the Licensing Justices for acceptance. Failing
any satisfactory proposal for reduction by the owners, the Licensing
Justices last year intimated that in the exercise of their discretionary
powers they would at this year's meeting decide in a fair and equitable
spirit what reduction should be made. But at the opening of Parliament
last week it was announced in the King's speech that the Government
intended to introduce in the House of Commons during the present session
a Bill to amend the Licensing Laws. In view of this legislation we are
of opinion we ought not, pending the passage of this Bill through
Parliament, exercise the discretionary powers vested in us, and take
measures for effecting a further reduction in the number of licences
within the borough on the ground that certain licensed premises are not
required for the public accommodation. We have recently inspected
certain houses known as the Imperial Brewery Tap, the Hope, East Cliff
Tavern, Victoria, Lifeboat, Duke Of Edinburgh, Railway Tavern, and
Channel Inn.
As to the Hope, we direct that the holder of the licence of this house
shall, within fourteen days from this date, close up the gateway forming
the back entrance to the licensed premises from a yard leading out of
Bennett's Yard into Dover Street, inasmuch as the existence of this
gateway renders it more difficult for the police to exercise proper
supervision over the licensed premises.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 16 April 1904.
Wednesday, April 13th: Before Mr. W.G. Herbert, Lieut. Cols. Westropp
and Fynmore, Mr. G.I. Swoffer, and Mr. J. Stainer.
A temporary transfer of the licence of the Hope Inn from Stephen J.
Smith to Alfred Burbell (sic) was allowed.
|
Folkestone Express 16 April 1904.
Wednesday, April 13th: Before W.G. Herbert Esq., Lieut. Col. Fynmore,
Lieut. Col. Westropp, G.I. Swoffer and J. Stainer Esqs.
Alfred Geo. Burwell (sic) applied for the licence of the Hope Inn to be
transferred to him from Stephen James Smith. Granted.
|
Folkestone Herald 16 April 1904.
Wednesday, April 13th: Before Ald. W.G. Herbert, Lieut. Colonel Fynmore,
Mr. J. Stainer, Mr. G.I. Swoffer, and Lieut. Colonel Westropp.
Licence was transferred as follows:- The Hope Inn, from Stephen James
Smith to Alfred George Burvill.
|
Folkestone Express 4 June 1904.
Wednesday, June 1st: Before W. Wightwick Esq., Lieut Colonel Westropp,
Lieut. Colonel Fynmore, C.J. Pursey and W.G. Herbert Esqs.
Special transfer sessions were held, when the licence of the Hope Inn
was transferred from Stephen James Smith to Alfred G. Burvill.
|
Folkestone Herald 4 June 1904.
Wednesday, June 1st: Before Mr. W. Wightwick, Alderman W.G. Herbert, Mr.
C.J. Pursey, Lieut. Colonel Fynmore, and Lieut. Colonel Westropp.
The licence of the Hope Inn was transferred from Stephen James Smith to
Alfred George Burvill.
|
Folkestone Express 25 February 1905.
Monday, February 20th: Before The Mayor and Alderman Spurgen.
Fanny Moore was charged with being drunk and disorderly on Saturday
night.
P.C. Fagg said at 8.20 on Saturday evening he was called to the Hope
public house by the landlord, who said he had refused to serve the
defendant. She was drunk, so witness asked her to leave, but as she
refused he was obliged to eject her. When outside she commenced to swear
and shout, causing a large crowd to assemble, so he took her into
custody.
The Chief Constable said he heard a sample of the woman's language, and
he had never heard anything like it from a woman.
Defendant was fined 2s. 6d. and 4s. 6d. costs.
|
Folkestone Daily News 12 April 1905.
Wednesday, April 12th: Before Messrs. Spurgen, Carpenter and Fynmore.
Temporary authority was granted to Mr. Boorman from Mr. Burvill of the
Hope.
|
Folkestone Express 15 April 1905.
Wednesday, April 12th: Before Lieut. Col. Fynmore, and W.C. Carpenter
Esq.
Temporary authority was granted to Mr. Boorman to sell at the Hope Inn.
|
Folkestone Herald 15 April 1905.
Wednesday, April 11th: Before Mr. W.C. Carpenter and Councillor R.J.
Fynmore.
The licence of the Hope was temporarily transferred from Mr. Burvill to
Mr. H. Boorman.
|
Folkestone Daily News 31 May 1905.
Wednesday, May 31st: Before Alderman Herbert, J. Stainer and C.J. Pursey.
The licence of the Hope was transferred to Mr. Boorman.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 3 June 1905.
Wednesday, May 31st: Before Alderman W.G. Herbert, Mr. J. Stainer, and
Mr. C.J. Pursey.
The licence of the Hope Inn, Fenchurch Street, was transferred from Mr.
Alfred Burvill to Mr. Harry Geo. Boorman.
|
Folkestone Express 3 June 1905.
Wednesday, May 31st: Before W.G. Herbert, C.J. Pursey and J. Stainer
Esqs.
This was the day fixed as the special sessions for transferring
licences, and the following temporary transfer of licences was
confirmed: The Hope Inn, from Mr. A.G. Burvill to Mr. G. Boorman.
|
Folkestone Herald 3 June 1905.
Wednesday, May 31st: Before Aldermen W.G. Herbert, Mr. J. Stainer, and
Mr. C.J. Pursey.
The licence of the Hope Inn was transferred from Mr. A.G. Burvill to Mr.
H. Boorman.
|
Folkestone Express 4 November 1905.
Wednesday, November 1st: Before Aldermen Spurgen and Vaughan, Lieut.
Col. Fynmore, and W.C. Carpenter Esq.
Robert James Smart, Patrick Maloney, and Robert Richard Fitzgerald were
charged with stealing a mackintosh, an overcoat, a woollen scarf, and a
pair of woollen gloves, the property of General Jackson, from the hall
of No. 6, Castle Hill Avenue, the previous Wednesday.
Kate Hunter, parlourmaid in the employ of General Jackson, of 6, Castle
Hill Avenue, said she recognised Maloney as a man who went to the house
on the previous Wednesday evening and asked for assistance. On Sunday
she missed from the hall a mackintosh coat, and also a dark cloth
overcoat. The cloth coat had silk facings, and had covered buttons. She
also missed a white woollen knitted scarf, and also a pair of woollen
gloves. The articles were missed from the lobby of the hall, the door of
which was only closed at night. On Monday evening Det. Sergt. Burniston
showed her the mackintosh, which she identified as the property of
General Jackson.
In answer to Maloney, she said he went to the house about seven o'clock,
and he was in the lobby.
Charles Dobbs, residing at 24, Athelstan Road, said he recognised the
three men. At half past eight on Saturday night he saw Smart and
Fitzgerald in Harbour Street. The former was wearing a dark overcoat and
a white knitted scarf. The latter had the mackintosh produced on his
arm, and was trying to sell it. Smart asked him if he could sell the
mackintosh, but previous to that he asked witness to have a drink. He
accepted the invitation, and they went into the Wellington public house,
where he asked him to sell the overcoat. He said if witness sold it he
would give him a shilling. Witness told him he would not, as he did not
know where to sell it. They came out of the house together, and witness
left him after directing him to the Pavilion Shades stables, where he
said he might sell it. He remembered one day last week he saw Maloney
and Smart going up Canterbury Road.
Frederick Charles Rigden, a licensed cab driver, residing at 5, East
Cliff, said he recognised Smart and Fitzgerald. On Saturday night he was
in the harness room at the Pavilion Shades when they came to him. Smart
had the mackintosh, which he asked him to buy. He replied he did not
want it, and the prisoner then said he could have it for 4s. Witness
told him he did not want it, and he had better take it away. Prisoner
then said he had been out of work several weeks and had got the coat
from General Jackson, who had given it to him because he was going away.
Witness eventually gave him 3s. for it. On Monday he handed the
mackintosh to Sergt. Burniston.
In answer to Smart, witness said he told him that General Jackson had
given him the overcoat.
Smart: It is a lie.
Fitzgerald then said that Smart did tell the witness General Jackson
gave him the mackintosh, but as he was drunk at the time he could not
remember what he said.
Det. Sergt. Burniston said on Monday, from information he received
respecting an overcoat and mackintosh missing from 6, Castle Hill
Avenue, he made enquiries, and at 7 p.m. he called on Rigden, who handed
him the mackintosh produced. Witness continued the enquiry, and the
previous evening he went to Canterbury. At 10.20 p.m. he saw Maloney and
Fitzgerald together. He said to them “I shall charge you with being
concerned with a man named Smart, who is detained at Canterbury police
station, in stealing from the hall of No. 6, Castle Hill Avenue,
Folkestone, a mackintosh, an overcoat, a woollen scarf, and a pair of
woollen gloves, the property of General Jackson”. Neither made any
reply. Witness took them to the Canterbury police station, where Smart
was brought forward, and he then charged the prisoners with being
concerned in the theft. Later on he brought them to the Folkestone
police station, where they were formally charged. Maloney replied “About
10 a.m. last Sunday I went in the Tramway public house to look for
Smart. I waited half an hour, when I saw Smart and Fitzgerald. Smart
said “Can you sell an overcoat for me?” I told him I would try, and
Smart then handed me a dark mixture overcoat, which was silk lined. I
took the coat and tried to sell it. I could not sell it, and later on I
took the coat back to Smart”. Smart said “Maloney and myself kept a look
out while Fitzgerald went to the house and stole the coats. When he sold
the coat on Sunday, Maloney had a share in the money”. Fitzgerald said
“I am not going to get the old sergeant into trouble”, no doubt
referring to Maloney as the “old sergeant”.
The Chief Constable said that was as far as he could take the case that
morning, and he should like the Magistrates to grant a remand, so that
he could endeavour to trace the other coat.
Prisoners were the remanded until Saturday.
|
Folkestone Express 11 November 1905.
Saturday, November 4th: Before Aldermen Spurgen and Vaughan, Lieut. Col.
Fynmore, and W.C. Carpenter Esq.
Robert James Smart, Patrick Maloney, and Robert Richard Fitzgerald, who
were before the Magistrates on Wednesday, were brought up on remand and
charged with stealing an overcoat, a mackintosh, a woollen scarf, and a
pair of woollen gloves from the hall of No. 6, Castle Hill Avenue, the
property of General Jackson.
The evidence given at the first appearance of the prisoners before the
Magistrates was read over.
Miss Hunter, a parlourmaid in the employ of General Jackson, said she
identified the overcoat produced as that of her employer.
Detective Sergeant Burniston further stated that at midday on Wednesday
he called on Alfred Howard, who handed him the coat now produced, which
was afterwards identified by Miss Hunter. The value of the coat and
mackintosh was 30s.
Henry Boorman, the landlord of the Hope Inn, said he recognised Smart
and Maloney. On Sunday, just before two o'clock, Maloney went to his
private bar and asked him if he wanted to buy the coat produced. He said
the man was “on the road” and stopping at the Radnor, and wanted 4s. for
it. Witness told him he had no use for the coat, and prisoner replied if
he had the money he would buy it. When Maloney got outside, he was
joined by Smart and another man and went off towards Dover Street.
Alfred Howard, living at the Tramway Tavern, said on Sunday, about a
quarter to two, he saw Smart in the Clarendon Hotel with a man with whom
witness worked. Smart was wearing the coat, and he asked witness if he
would buy the coat for 4s. Witness asked him if the coat belonged to
him, and he said it did, but he had not had it long. He further said he
was hard up and wanted to get to Canterbury and also wanted food.
Witness told him he could only afford to give him 3s. for the coat, and
also said that when the prisoner pulled himself round at Canterbury he
could have the coat if he returned with the 3s. he gave for it. On
Wednesday Detective Sergeant Burniston came to him and he handed the
coat to him.
Smart pleaded Not Guilty to stealing the coat, but Guilty to selling it
knowing it to have been stolen. Maloney did not steal the coat.
Maloney said he was Not Guilty. He met Smart on Sunday morning about ten
o'clock, and he asked him if he could dispose of the coat. He (the
speaker) took the coat, silly enough, because he thought the coat
actually belonged to Smart.
Fitzgerald pleaded Guilty to stealing the coat.
Inspector Swift said he had not been able to find any convictions
against Maloney and Smart. However, he identified Fitzgerald as William
Murray, against whom there were nine convictions for larceny dating from
1887. One of the sentences was three years penal servitude for theft
from a hall.
The prisoners were sentenced to six weeks' hard labour, and the Chairman
said it would have been a serious thing for Fitzgerald if he had been
sent to the Quarter Sessions with a record like he had.
Smart said that if the two others had spoken the truth they would have
said that he did not steal the coat but that Maloney took it.
The Chairman further said that people ought to be more careful in buying
anything from unknown men.
|
Folkestone Herald 11 November 1905.
Saturday, November 4th: Before Alderman G. Spurgen, Alderman T.J.
Vaughan, Lieut. Colonel R.J. Fynmore, and Mr. W.C. Carpenter.
Robert Jas. Smart, Patrick Maloney, and Robt. Richd. Fitzgerald were
charged, on remand, with stealing a mackintosh, a coat, a scarf, and a
pair of gloves from the residence of Major General W. Jackson, at 6,
Castle Hill Avenue. The evidence previously given was read over and
confirmed.
Detective Sergeant Burniston stated that at midnight on Wednesday, the
1st inst., he called on Alfred Howard, who handed him the coat produced,
which was afterwards identified by Miss Hutter. The value of the
mackintosh and overcoat was 30s.
Henry Boorman, the licensee of the Hope Inn, Great Fenchurch Street,
said he recognised all the men except Fitzgerald. Smart and Maloney came
to his house on Sunday and asked him to buy the coat produced. Maloney
said a “man on the road” stopped him at the Radnor and asked him 4s. for
it; he (Maloney) refused, but said if he had had the money he would have
bought it. He went down Fenchurch Street, and about a minute afterwards
Smart and a short man joined him.
Alfred Howard stated that he lived at the Tramway Tavern. On the
previous Sunday he saw the prisoner Smart in Tontine Street with a party
with whom witness worked, opposite the Clarendon Hotel. He asked him to
buy a coat which he was wearing, saying he could have it for 4s. On
being asked if the coat belonged to him, he replied that it did, and
that he had not had it long. He also said he was hard up, wanted to go
to Canterbury, and wanted food. He (witness) said he would give him 3s.
for it, but if, when the prisoner got to Canterbury, he could pull
himself round, he could have the coat back for the same money. He
(witness) felt pity for the man, seeing his two badges (meaning his
medal ribbons), and the position he was in. On the 1st inst., he handed
the coat to D.S. Burniston.
Prisoners elected to be dealt with summarily. Smart pleaded Guilty to
helping to steal the articles. Maloney pleaded Not Guilty, stating that
he met Smart, who asked him to sell a coat, and he requested witness
Boorman to buy it. Fitzgerald pleaded Guilty.
Inspector Swift stated that nothing was known against Maloney and Smart,
but Fitzgerald was believed to be a Wm. Murray, who had many previous
convictions for larceny against him.
Prisoners were sentenced to six weeks' imprisonment with hard labour,
Alderman Spurgen remarking that people should be more careful in buying
articles offered them by strangers, as they might find themselves in a
serious position. He cautioned the witness Howard.
|
Folkestone Daily News 7 February 1906.
Annual Licensing Sessions.
Wednesday, February 7th: Before Messrs. Ward, Hamilton, Pursey, Ames,
Herbert, Fynmore, and Leggett.
The Chief Constable presented his report (for details see Folkestone
Chronicle).
Mr. Ward called attention to the increase of 12 cases of drunkenness,
and asked the licensed victuallers to assist the police in carrying out
their duties.
The Welcome public house was objected to on the ground of misconduct.
The Hope, the Channel, the Providence, the Tramway and the Blue Anchor
were objected to on the ground that they were not required. All the
other licences were granted.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 10 February 1906.
Annual Licensing Sessions.
Wednesday, February 7th: Before Mr. E.T. Ward, Alderman W.G. Herbert,
Col. Fynmore, Lt. Col. Hamilton, Mr. C.J. Pursey, Mr. C. Carpenter, Mr.
C. Ames, and Mr. Linton.
On the Court being opened the Chief Constable read his annual report,
which was as follows:-
“Gentlemen, I have the honour to report that there are at present within
your jurisdiction 136 premises licensed for the sale of intoxicating
liquors, viz.:- Full licences 85, Beer “on” 9, Beer “off” 6, Beer and
Spirit Dealers 16, Grocers 12, Chemists 5, Confectioners 3.
This gives an average, according to the Census of 1901, of one licence
to every 225 persons, or one “on” licence to every 326 persons.
Three of the “off” licences (two held by spirit dealers and one by a
chemist) will not be renewed, as the premises are no longer used for the
sale of drink, thus reducing the number of licensed premises to 133, or
one to every 230 persons.
At the Adjourned Licensing Meeting, held in March last, the renewal
of six licences was referred to the Compensation Committee for East Kent
on the ground of redundancy, with the result that four of the licences
were refused and two renewed.
The licences which were refused were:- the Victoria Inn, South Street;
Star Inn, Radnor Street; Duke of Edinburgh, Tontine Street; and Cinque
Port Arms, Seagate Street. Compensation was paid in each case and the
houses closed.
Since the last Annual Licensing Meeting 24 of the licences have been
transferred, viz:- Full Licences 17, Beer “on” 2, Off licences 5.
During the year 13 occasional licences have been granted by the justices
for the sale of intoxicating liquor on premises not ordinarily licensed
for such sale, and 25 extensions of the ordinary time of closing have
been granted to licence holders when balls, dinners, etc., were being
held on their premises.
During the year ended 31st December last 183 persons (135 males and 48
females) were proceeded against for drunkenness; 164 were convicted and
19 discharged. This is an increase of 12 persons proceeded against, and
eight convicted, as compared with the previous year.
Only one licence holder has been convicted during the year, viz., the
licensee of the Welcome Inn, Dover Street, who was fined £5 and costs
for permitting drunkenness on his licensed premises. He has since
transferred the licence and left the house.
Eleven clubs where intoxicating liquors are sold are registered in
accordance with the Act of 1902.
There are 16 places licensed for music and dancing, and three for public
billiard playing.
With very few exceptions, the licensed houses have been conducted in a
satisfactory manner during the year. The only licence to which I offer
objection on the ground of misconduct is that of the Welcome Inn, Dover
Street, and I would ask that the consideration of the renewal of this
licence be deferred until the Adjourned Licensing Meeting.
I would respectfully suggest that the Committee again avail themselves
of the powers given by the Licensing Act, 1904, and refer the renewal of
some of the licences in the congested area to the Compensation Committee
for consideration, on the ground that there are within the area more
licensed houses than are necessary for the requirements of the
neighbourhood.
I beg to submit a plan on which I have marked out the congested area,
also the public houses within the area.
Within this area there is a population approximately of 4,600, with 42
“on” licensed houses, giving a proportion of one licensed house to every
109 persons.
There are also situate within the area six premises licensed for sale
off the premises, one confectioner with a licence to sell wine on the
premises, and four registered clubs, with a total membership of 898”.
The Chairman said with regard to the report just read by Chief Constable
Reeve the Bench were pleased to hear that the houses had been so well
conducted, but he must point out that over the preceding year there had
been 12 more cases of drunkenness. The Bench earnestly asked the licence
holders to do their utmost to stop excessive drinking on their licensed
premises. It was a curious circumstance that although there were many
convictions there was no information where the drink was obtained.
The whole of the licences, with the exception of six, were then renewed.
The six licences objected to were the Welcome, Dover Street, in which
case the Chief Constable was instructed to serve notice of opposition on
the ground of misconduct. In the five other instances the Chief
Constable was instructed to serve notices of objection on the grounds
that the licences were not required, the houses opposed being the
Channel, High Street; Hope, Fenchurch Street; Blue Anchor, Beach Street;
and Tramway, Radnor Street.
|
Folkestone, Hythe, Sandgate & Cheriton Herald, Saturday 10 March 1906.
The Hope Inn.
The Chief Constable said the Hope Inn was situated in Fenchurch Street,
and the present licensee was Harry Boorman, who obtained a transfer of
the licence on 21st May last year. The registered owners were Messrs.
Ash and Co., Canterbury. The rateable value was £17 10s. The house had
two entrances. The accommodation for the public consisted of a bar in
the front and a tap room behind, with a serving window in the passage.
The landlord's living room was in the basement, and approached by a dark
flight of stair behind the bar. The licence had been transferred six
times in six years. Within a radius of 100 yards there were 16 other on
licensed houses; within a radius of 150 yards 27; and within a radius of
200 yards there were 35. He particularly drew the attention of the Bench
to the rateable value and the number of transfers. The trade was small,
and, in his opinion, the licence was unnecessary.
Cross-examined by Mr. Mercer (representing the owners): He had had no
complaint against the tenant.
Mr. Mercer: The landlord says he does not reside in the basement?
The Chief Constable: The last tenant did when I was there. I withdraw
that part so far as the landlord is concerned.
Mr. Mercer: Do you object to a house being licensed because it is not
highly assessed?
The Chief Constable: No.
Mr. Mercer: You are jealous, Superintendent. (Laughter)
The Chief Constable: No. I am not.
Mr. Mercer said in this case they did a good trade. The sale was 155
barrels of beer and 54 gallons of spirits. That was the average for
seven years. They had a good tenant and the house was well conducted.
There were no other houses particularly close. With reference to the
matter referred to by the Chief Constable, the owners would be willing
to undertake any structural repairs that the Bench suggested.
The case was referred to Quarter Sessions.
|
Folkestone Express 10 February 1906.
Annual Licensing Sessions.
Wednesday, February 7th: Before E.T. Ward Esq., Major Leggett, Lieut.
Col. Fynmore, Lieut. Col. Hamilton, W.G. Herbert, C.J. Pursey, W.C.
Carpenter, and R.J. Linton Esqs.
The Chief Constable presented his annual report. (See Folkestone
Chronicle for details).
The Chairman said they were pleased to see that the whole of the
licensed houses had been well conducted. There had only been one
conviction during the year. He wanted to point out that that year there
was an increase of twelve cases of drunkenness in the borough. They
earnestly asked the licence holders to help the police as much as
possible to prevent drunkenness. It was always a curious thing where
those people got their drink, and they must ask the licence holders to
try and do their utmost to stop drunkenness on their premises.
All the licences were granted with the exception of six. The Chief
Constable was instructed to serve notices upon the tenants and owners of
the following public houses on the ground that they were not necessary;
The Channel Inn, High Street; the Hope, Fenchurch Street; the
Providence, Beach Street; Blue Anchor, Beach Street; and the Tramway,
Radnor Street. He was also instructed to serve notices with regard to
the Welcome Inn on the ground of misconduct.
|
Folkestone Herald 10 February 1906.
Annual Licensing Sessions.
The annual licensing sessions were held on Wednesday morning. The Police
Court was crowded with those interested in the trade and the general
public. The Magistrates present were Mr. E.T. Ward, Lieut. Colonel
Hamilton, Mr. C.J. Pursey, Alderman W.G. Herbert, and Mr. R.J. Linton.
The Chief Constable presented his report. (For details see Folkestone
Chronicle).
It was intimated that at the adjourned licensing sessions the licences
of the Blue Anchor, the Providence, the Welcome, the Tramway, the
Channel, and the Hope would be opposed, on the ground that they were in
excess of the requirements of the neighbourhood. The licence holders of
those houses received this information as they stepped forward to ask
for their renewals.
|
Southeastern Gazette 13 February 1906.
Local News.
The annual Licensing Sessions for the Borough of Folkestone were held on
Wednesday, before E.T. Ward Esq., in the chair.
The Chief Constable reported that there were 136 premises licensed for
the sale of intoxicating liquors, viz., full licenses 85, beer “on” 9,
beer “off” 6, beer and spirit dealers 16, grocers 12, chemists 5, and
confectioners' 3. This gave an average, according to the census of 1901,
of one license to every 225 persons, or one “on” license to every 326
persons. Three of the “off” licenses (two held by spirit dealers and one
by a chemist), would not be renewed, as the premises were no longer used
for the sale of drink, thus reducing the number of licensed premises to
133, or one to every 230 persons. During the year ended 31st December,
183 persons (135 males and 48 females) were proceeded against for
drunkenness; 164 were, convicted and 19 discharged. This was an increase
of 12 persons proceeded against, and 8, convicted as compared with the
preceding year. Only one license holder had been convicted during the
year. All the licenses were granted with the exception of six. The Chief
Constable was instructed to serve notices upon the tenants and owners of
the following houses on the ground that they were not necessary: The
Channel Inn, High Street; the Hope, Fenchurch Street; the Providence,
Beach Street; Blue Anchor Beach Street; and the Tramway, Radnor Street.
He was also instructed to serve notice with regard to the Welcome Inn,
on the ground of misconduct.
|
Folkestone Daily News 5 March 1906.
Adjourned Licensing Sessions.
The Hope Inn.
Monday, March 5th: Before Messrs. E.T. Ward, W.G. Herbert, C.J. Pursey,
R.J. Linton, T. Ames, Lieut. Col. Fynmore, and Lieut. Col. Hamilton.
This licence was opposed on the grounds of its not being required, and
the Bench decided to refer it to Quarter Sessions.
Mr. Mercer appeared in the above case for the owners.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 10 March 1906.
Adjourned Licensing Meeting.
The Adjourned Annual General Licensing Sessions were held at the Town
Hall on Monday, when the Chief Constable opposed the renewal of five
licences on the ground of redundancy, and one on the ground of
misconduct. The evidence was of the usual technical order, where a whole
host of police witnesses testified to an extraordinary state of things
which had apparently gone on for years. The sitting lasted from 11 a.m.
until 4.30 p.m., and was only relieved by one little light episode when
Mr. Mercer on two occasions quoted the Folkestone Herald as bearing upon
a case heard at the Court, and on each occasion the Chairman saying that
the report was wrong, whereupon Mr. Mercer intimated that he should give
up taking the Herald.
The Bench sitting on Monday morning were Mr. E.T. Ward, Alderman W.G.
Herbert, Lt. Col. Fynmore, Lt. Col. Hamilton, Mr. C.J. Pursey, Mr. W.
Linton, and Major Leggatt.
The Hope.
The Hope Inn, Fenchurch Street; tenant Mr. Harry Boorman; brewers
Messrs. Ash and Co. Mr. Mercer for tenant and brewers.
The Chief Constable said the present tenant had obtained the transfer on
the 31st of May last year. The registered owners of the house were
Messrs. Ash and Co., of Canterbury. The rateable value was £17 10s. The
house had two entrances, a bar in front and a tap room behind, with a
serving bar in a passage leading to the tap room. The landlord's living
room was in the basement, and approached by a very dark passage behind
the bar, and all the rooms were very low-pitched. The licence had been
transferred six times in six years. In a radius of 100 yards there were
16 licensed houses, 150 yards 27 licensed houses, and 200 yards 35
licensed houses. The trade was very small, and in his opinion the
licence was not necessary for the requirements of the neighbourhood.
By Mr. Mercer: The house is in a quiet situation. There has been no
complaint against the present tenant.
Mr. Mercer: Is the George III wanted?
The Chief Constable: If you ask my private opinion, I should say the
George III might go as well as this.
Mr. Mercer said the trade done at the house over a seven years' average
was 156 barrels of beer and 56 gallons of spirits.
The Chairman announced that the licence would be referred to the
Compensation Court.
|
Folkestone Express 10 March 1906.
Adjourned Licensing Sessions.
The adjourned licensing sessions were held on Monday, when the six
licences which were adjourned from the Brewster Sessions were
considered. On the Bench were E.T. Ward Esq., Lieut. Col. Fynmore,
Lieut. Col. Hamilton, W.G. Herbert, C.J. Pursey, and R.J. Linton Esqs.
The Hope Inn.
The licence of the Hope Inn was then taken. Mr. Mercer appeared on
behalf of the owners and occupier.
The Chief Constable said the ground of objection was the same as in the
previous case. The house was situate in Fenchurch Street, and the
licensee was Harry Boorman, who obtained a transfer of the licence on
May 31st last. The brewers were Messrs. Ash and Co. The rateable value
was £17 10s. The accommodation for the public consisted of a bar in
front and tap room behind, with a serving window in the passage leading
to the tap room. The landlord lived in the basement, approached by a
very dark flight of stairs behind the bar. The rooms were very
low-pitched. The licence had been transferred six times in the past six
years. Within a radius of 100 yards there were 16 other on licensed
houses, within 150 yards there were 27, and within 200 yards there were
35. He wished particularly to call attention to the low rateable value
and the number of transfers. The trade was very small, and the licence
was unnecessary.
Mr. Mercer said there was a good tenant, and it was a quiet and
well-conducted house. The landlord told him he did not live in the
basement, but he did his cooking there and lived upstairs.
The Chief Constable: I will withdraw what I have said with regard to
that.
Mr. Mercer: Is the George the Third required?
The Chief Constable: That is a very funny question. If you were to ask
me my private opinion, I should say we could spare it very well.
Mr. Mercer said he would undertake to do any alterations the Magistrates
might call upon him to do. He asked the Magistrates not to allow him to
go away depressed. He appealed to them to allow it.
The Chairman: I am afraid you must go away depressed. The licence will
be referred.
Mr. Mercer: Very well, I must take it as best I can.
|
Folkestone Herald 10 March 1906.
Adjourned Licensing Sessions.
Monday, March 5th: Before Mr. E.T. Ward, Alderman W.G. Herbert, Mr. R.J.
Linton, Mr. C.J. Pursey, and Mr. T. Ames.
The Hope Inn.
The Chief Constable said the Hope Inn was situated in Fenchurch Street,
and the present licensee was Harry Boorman, who obtained a transfer of
the licence on 21st May last year. The registered owners were Messrs.
Ash and Co., Canterbury. The rateable value was £17 10s. The house had
two entrances. The accommodation for the public consisted of a bar in
the front and a tap room behind, with a serving window in the passage.
The landlord's living room was in the basement, and approached by a dark
flight of stair behind the bar. The licence had been transferred six
times in six years. Within a radius of 100 yards there were 16 other on
licensed houses; within a radius of 150 yards 27; and within a radius of
200 yards there were 35. He particularly drew the attention of the Bench
to the rateable value and the number of transfers. The trade was small,
and, in his opinion, the licence was unnecessary.
Cross-examined by Mr. Mercer (representing the owners): He had had no
complaint against the tenant.
Mr. Mercer: The landlord says he does not reside in the basement?
The Chief Constable: The last tenant did when I was there. I withdraw
that part so far as the landlord is concerned.
Mr. Mercer: Do you object to a house being licensed because it is not
highly assessed?
The Chief Constable: No.
Mr. Mercer: You are jealous, Superintendent. (Laughter).
The Chief Constable: No. I am not.
Mr. Mercer said in this case they did a good trade. The sale was 155
barrels of beer and 54 gallons of spirits. That was the average for
seven years. They had a good tenant and the house was well conducted.
There were no other houses particularly close. With reference to the
matter referred to by the Chief Constable, the owners would be willing
to undertake any structural repairs that the Bench suggested.
The case was referred to Quarter Sessions.
|
Folkestone Daily News 23 July 1906.
Monday, July 23rd: Before The Mayor, Alderman Banks, Messrs. Linton,
Herbert, Ames, and Stainer.
Harry Munns, a soldier, pleaded Guilty to being drunk and assaulting the
police.
P.C. Minter stated that prisoner was fighting outside the Hope Inn, in
Fenchurch Street, and he went to the landlord's assistance.
Prisoner was fined 11s. for being drunk, and was sentenced to 14 days'
hard labour, without the option of a fine, for the assault.
|
Folkestone Daily News 25 July 1906.
Wednesday, July 25th: Before Messrs. Herbert, Swoffer, and Ames.
Herbert Ireland and John Dimsdale, two soldiers, were charged with
assaulting Edward Boorman on the 21st July.
Dimsdale pleaded Guilty and Ireland Not Guilty. Mr. Haines prosecuted.
Edward Boorman, landlord of the Hope Inn, Fenchurch Street, said at
10.45 on Saturday last Ireland came into his house and called for two
pints of beer. He then went out. After a little time several soldiers
came in, including Ireland, who said he would fight the best man in the
house. Witness ordered him out, when Ireland struck him and knocked him
down. Ireland afterwards struck him with a stick, and knocked his head
through a window.
Ireland: When did I strike you? – Inside.
P.C. Minter deposed that on Saturday last he saw Ireland. Both prisoners
were outside the Hope Inn, and were knocking the landlord about. He
pulled Ireland away several times, but he still attacked him.
An officer said both prisoners had good characters.
They were each fined 20s. and 10s. costs, or 14 days' hard labour.
|
Folkestone Express 28 July 1906.
Wednesday, July 25th: Before W.G. Herbert, R.J. Linton, and G.I. Swoffer
Esqs.
Herbert Ireland and John Dimsdale, two soldiers belonging to the East
Yorks Regt., were summoned by Harry Boorman, the landlord of the Hope
Inn, Fenchurch Street, for assaulting him on Saturday night. Dimsdale
pleaded Guilty, but Ireland denied the assault. Mr. Haines appeared on
behalf of the prosecutor.
Prosecutor said on Saturday at 10.45 p.m., Ireland came into his house
and called for two pints of beer. He supplied him, as he was quite
sober. A gang of soldiers came in, and, after having a drink, they went
out, going to the bottom of the street. They returned, and a soldier and
a sailor came into the house first, being followed by other soldiers.
Ireland jumped on a form and said he would fight the best man in the
house. He then struck a man belonging to his own regiment, and they
commenced fighting. He (prosecutor) went and held him back, when
Dimsdale came up and knocked him down. Ireland then struck him. The
soldiers were got out of the house, and when he was standing on the
step, close to the door, Ireland struck him on the forehead with his
stick and pushed him through the window, which was broken.
P.C. Minter said he saw the two defendants belabouring the landlord
outside his house. There were about nine soldiers there altogether. He
pulled Ireland away from the landlord several times.
An officer from the regiment said both men had good characters. Dimsdale
had six years' service and Ireland two years', and there were no civil
convictions against either of them.
Neither of the defendants had anything to say.
The Chairman said licensed victuallers must be protected, and soldiers
ought to be very careful and try to help them. As both men had good
characters, they had decided to deal leniently with them. They would be
fined 20s. and 10s. costs each, or 14 days' hard labour.
The defendants said they wished to pay, and the officer said he would
send the money from the Camp.
|
Folkestone Herald 28 July 1906.
Monday, July 23rd: Before The Mayor, Aldermen J. Banks and W.G. Herbert,
Messrs. J. Stainer, R.J. Linton, and T. Ames.
Harry Munds, a private in the East Yorks., was charged with being drunk
and disorderly, and also wit assaulting a constable in the execution of
his duty. Prisoner pleaded Guilty to both charges.
P.C. Minter said that at 10.45 on Saturday night he saw prisoner
fighting with several other soldiers outside the Oak (sic), in Fenchurch
Street. The landlord came out to get them to go away, and prisoner stuck
him (the landlord). Witness then went up to arrest prisoner, who struck
him a blow in the mouth and ran away. Witness chased him, and with the
assistance of P.C. Styles, caught him.
There was one previous conviction against the prisoner in Folkestone.
For being drunk and disorderly he was fined 7s. 6d. and 4s. 6d. costs,
or seven days', whilst for assaulting the constable he was sentenced to
fourteen days' hard labour.
Wednesday, July 25th: Before Alderman W.G. Herbert, Mr. G.I. Swoffer,
and Mr. R.J. Linton.
Herbert Ireland and John Dimsdale, privates of the East Yorks Regiment,
were summoned for assaulting Harry Boorman, of the Hope Inn, 6, Great
Fenchurch Street.
Harry Boorman gave evidence to the effect that on Saturday defendant
came into the bar at 10.45 p.m. and asked for two pints of beer. He was,
at that time, quite sober. A number of friends came in after – quite a
gang of them. Two pots of beer were handed round, and they afterwards
went out. Soon after a soldier and a sailor came, and then some more
soldiers. Ireland came in again, and jumped on a form and struck him. He
(complainant) landed out too. When he went out Ireland struck him with a
whip. Dimsdale also struck him repeatedly.
P.C. Minter deposed that he was in Fenchurch Street on Saturday evening,
where he saw Ireland belabouring the landlord. He tried to take him and
Dimsdale outside.
An officer of the regiment said that both defendants had good
characters. Dimsdale had six years' service, and Ireland two years'
service.
The Bench said that as the defendants had good characters they would be
dealt with leniently. Each would be fined 20s. and 10s. costs, or
fourteen days'.
It was understood that the money would be paid.
|
Folkestone Daily News 1 October 1906.
Canterbury Licensing Sessions.
At the Canterbury Licensing Sessions today the question of the renewal
of the licences of The Hope, The Tramway, The Providence, and The Blue
Anchor came up for hearing. Lord Harris presided. The Folkestone
Licensing Justices were represented by Mr. T. Matthew, instructed by Mr.
H.B. Bradley.
The case occupied some time, and eventually the justices unanimously
decided not to grant the renewal of either of the licences, but to
uphold and confirm the decision of the Folkestone Licensing Bench.
The question of compensation will come up for consideration at a later
date.
|
From the Canterbury Journal and Farmers' Gazette, Saturday 6 October, 1906.
THE HOPE INN, FENCHURCH STREET, FOLKESTONE.
Mr. Mercer applied for this licence, and Mr. Matthew represented the
Justices.
Superintendent Reeve said the "Hope Inn" was a very old house and the
customers were of a low class. Within a hundred yards there were 14
licensed houses, in 150 yards there were 24 licensed houses, and within
200 yards 32 houses.
Detective Sergeant Burniston stated that trade at the house was of a
very low description.
Harry Boorman, the tenant, stated that the trade at the house was an
increasing one, and in the past 12 months the barrelage was 167. The
police had never made any complaint about the conduct of the house.
Witness got a good living at the house and was very well satisfied with
it.
Mr. Mercer ask the Committee to renew the licence, saying there was a
good trade at the house.
The Committee refused to renew licence.
|
Folkestone Express 6 October 1906.
Local News.
On Monday last the East Kent Licensing Bench at Canterbury considered
the question of renewing the licences of the Providence, the Hope, the
Tramway Tavern, and the Blue Anchor, public houses referred to them by
the Folkestone licensing justices. In each case they decided to refuse
the granting of the licence, and the next matter for them to consider
will be how much compensation is to be paid to the brewers and holders
of the licences for the closing of the houses.
|
Folkestone Herald 6 October 1906.
Local News.
The Compensation Authority for East Kent sat at Canterbury on Monday and
Tuesday last, Lord Harris presiding.
Amongst the 31 houses scheduled, there were four from Folkestone. These
were; The Providence, Blue Anchor, the Hope, and the Tramway.
The owners of the Providence and the Hope sought for renewals.
In these cases Mr. H.B. Matthew appeared for the Licensing Justices of
Folkestone in opposition to the renewals, and Mr. R.M. Mercer, of
Canterbury, appeared for the owners and tenants.
In the case of the Hope, Mr. Reeve said the licence of this house had
been transferred six times in six years, and the trade done was of a
very low character. The customers were mostly hawkers and costers, and
did not live in the neighbourhood. The rateable value was lower than any
other house in the district. Within 100 yards there were 14 licensed
houses, within 150 yards 24, and within 200 yards 32.
In reply to Mr. Mercer, witness said this house was in another street to
the Welcome. He did not know about the latter having been given 22
years' bad character.
Mr. Mercer: Here it is, stated by your men in a police case. Yet this
house was not objected to for years. My firm have had to give up two
houses without compensation, and now this seems to be a case of Hope
deferred. (Laughter).
Detective Sergeant Burniston said a low class frequented the house.
Mr. Mercer: Do you suggest that a low class of people are not to be
allowed to have any refreshment. Whether they are criminals or not they
are entitled to a drink. – There are a good many criminals at this
house.
The tenant, Harry Boorman, said he took over the house in April, 1905,
and the trade was an increasing one. When the Welcome was shut up he
declined to serve its customers, and he did not want that class in his
house.
Mr. Mercer complained that Messrs. Ash and Co. had lost three houses in
three years, two without compensation, and h did seriously ask the
Committee to renew the licence in this case.
The Committee declined to grant the application.
In the cases of the Providence, Blue Anchor and the Hope, the fixing of
the compensation was adjourned to a subsequent meeting.
|
From an email received 27 April 2018.
I thought you might like a bit more background on George Barker, the landlord of the
"Hope" (1871-73)
whose ring was stolen, and a connexion with John Carter, landlord of the
"Oddfellows Arms" 1870-81.
George Barker was my great-great-great-grandfather. He was baptised in
Buxton (a small village NE of Norwich) in Norfolk in 1822, married Mary
Fabb in Norfolk in 1841, and they had a number of children in Norfolk
including a daughter Hannah in 1844.
The family moved to Kent around 1864. George's wife Mary died either
very late 1870 or early 1871 (death registered in Elham registration
district in the first quarter of 1871), so George appeared on the 1871
census as George Barker, 49, widowed, publican, resident in the "Hope
Inn," South Fancy Street, Folkestone.
George had been an agricultural labourer in Norfolk - not someone you'd
expect to own many rings - so I'd guess the ring he had stolen on the
station in 1871 (per the newspaper report on your website) was probably
his wedding ring - and it was stolen only a matter of months after his
wife had died. You can see why he "would not take £10 for it."
It looks like the licensed trade didn't suit him though: by 1881 he was
a general labourer lodging in Hastings. He lived to 1904.
His daughter Hannah Barker, born in Norfolk in 1844, married John Major
Carter in 1865 (registered in Elham in the second quarter of 1865), and
they appeared together on the 1871 census as John Carter, 32, married,
publican, and Hannah Carter, 27, married, his wife, living at "Oddfellows,"
Radnor Street, Folkestone.
So in 1871, the wife of the licensee of the "Oddfellows Arms" was the
daughter of the licensee of the "Hope".
But the James Barker who was licensee of the "Oddfellows" before John
Carter (in 1870) was not related to George or Hannah Barker. George did
not have a brother James, and his son James was only 9 in 1870, so that
surname seems to be just a coincidence.
I'm happy for you to use any of the above information on your website,
if you wish (and please let me know if you ever find a picture of the
"Hope!")
Regards,
George Barker's great-great-great-grandson!
|
LICENSEE LIST
SMITH Mary circa 1822-46
ELLIS Sarah 1846-65 (widow age 56 in 1851)
(4 Fancy Street)
DIXIE James 1865-68
AYLIFFE Mr 1868-69
FRENCH John 1869-71
BARKER George 1871-73
BOORN William 1873-80
KNIGHT Edward 1880-86
DRAYNOR Joseph 1886-87
HUNT Frederick 1886-87
WRATTEN William 1887
DONALDSON Robert 1887-90
DONALDSON Elizabeth 1890
FRYER Absalom 1890-91
COUGHLAN John 1891-1900
HART Frederick 1900-01
HERITAGE William 1901-02
FINN Frederick 1902
SMITH Stephen 1902-04
BURVILL Alfred 1904-05
BOORMAN Harry 1905-06
From
the Pigot's Directory 1828-29
From
the Pigot's Directory 1832-33-34
From
the Pigot's Directory 1839
From
the Pigot's Directory 1840
From
Bagshaw Directory 1847
From
the Post Office Directory 1874
From
the Kelly's Directory 1903
From
More Bastions of the Bar by Easdown and Rooney
More
Tales from the Tap Room by Easdown and Rooney
|