2 (33) St. Martin's Hill
Canterbury
Above photo, circa 1890, kindly sent by Rory Kehoe. |
Above photograph taken by Edward Wilmot in 1965. |
Listed in 1692 as the "Syne
of Sandwich" and in 1693 offering Billeting for 4 soldiers. By the early
1800s the name was shortened to the "Sandwich" and in 1804 the rent was a
mere £12 rent per annum, paid to the brewers Rigdens.
A Rigdens receipt for 31st January 1825 shows a Mr. Baldock paying £51
16s. 9p plus an extra £15 1s. 6d, totalling £66 18s. 3d., plus of Messrs
Rigden, Delmar and Co. £18 14s 0d., totalling £85 12s. 3d. Received Mrs.
Willard Half Stamp 2/6.
The pub was renamed the "Princess Charlotte" some time in the 1800s,
probably just after the Prince Regent's daughter died in 1817.
The Inns of Canterbury by Edward Wilmot's,1988, mentions a document, date
circa 1945 that gives the description of clientele at the pub as being "Labouring."
The premises was compulsory purchased in 1972 and the licence has been in
suspension ever since, the pub being closed then.
From the Kentish Gazette, 28 April 1846.
CORONER’S INQUEST.
Wednesday morning an inquest was held by the above coroner (T. T.
Delasaux) at the "Princess Charlotte," Saint Martin's Hill, in this
city, on the body of John Hinds, aged two years and six months, son of
Mr. Hinds, miller, who had died the previous day from the effects of a
blow on the head, received by the sweeps of the wind mill at Saint
Martin’s-hill. It was stated by Mr. Richardson, miller, that the child
was in the habit of getting near the mill to pick up the wheat that
might have been shattered in conveying the sacks into the mill, and he
was so engaged on Tuesday last as a witness had seen him in the yard a
short time previous to finding him extended on the ground near the
sweeps, which were working at the time. Deceased was quite senseless,
and exhibited a severe contusion on the forehead. Medical aid was
immediately procured, but death shortly put a period to the poor child’s
sufferings.
Verdict "Accidental Death."
|
Kentish Gazette, 20 June 1854.
Inquest.
On Saturday, Mr. Delasaux held an inquest at the "Princess Charlotte,"
St. Martin's Hill, on the body of John Stanner, an infant, whose death
had been caused by tincture of opium, sold by mistake by a Mr. Walters,
at Fordwich, for a cordial.
Mr. T. S. Cooper surgeon, made a post mortem examination, and gave it as
his opinion, that the child died from the effects of tincture of opium.
The jury accordingly returned a verdict "that the deceased was
accidently poisoned."
|
Whitstable Times and Herne Bay Herald, 9 April 1870.
An inquest was held on Monday, at the "Princess Charlotte" public-house,
St. Martin's, before Mr. T. T. Delasaux, coroner, on the body of John
Saunders, who, while undergoing a term of imprisonment for theft in the
St. Augustine's gaol, died on Saturday last.
A verdict of "Died from natural causes" was returned.
|
Leighton Buzzard Observer and Linslade Gazette 15 August 1876.
FATAL BOATING ACCIDENT AT DOVER REGATTA.
Three boating accidents occurred lest week at Dover, and one was
attended with loss of life. It was the annual regatta, and a large
number of people were on the water. In the morning a sailing boat
capsized, and three Dover boatmen were nearly drowned. In the afternoon
a second boat was upset, and at about six o'clock a third. This
contained six persons and a boatman, a mere lad. The parties were
changing oars, which caused the boat to turn over. The women were
frightened, and they immediately jumped on one side. The boat went over
and some clung to her bottom, while others struck out for the shore.
Fortunately a boat belonging to one of the channel steamers was near,
and the whole were picked up, but one man named White, the occupier of
the "Princess Charlotte," St. Martin's Hill, Canterbury, who was
drowned.
|
From the Canterbury Journal, Kentish Times and Farmers' Gazette, Saturday 25 April, 1903.
CANTERBURY POLICE COURT. FRIDAY.
Before Mr. W. W. Mason (in the chair), Mr. J. Hunt, Mr. W. H.
Nethercleft, and Captain Stead.
SERIOUS ASSAULT ON A POLICE SERGEANT.
Michael Lynch, a private in the 11th Hussars, was charged on remand with
assaulting Police Sergeant Ewell in the execution of his duty on April
8th.
Complainant, who appeared to be in a very weak state and who was
allowed to be seated while giving his evidence, stated that at about
five minutes past eleven o'clock on the night of April 8th he was on
duty in Palace Street where he saw five soldiers and two women standing
outside the East Kent Fire Station. They were shouting and as witness
approached them the two woman walked away. When he requested the
soldiers to go away one of them went to the women. Prisoner came close
up to him and said "We haven't got to get in till six. We shall go when
we like." One of the other soldiers said to prisoner "Come on, Paddy."
Prisoner said, "He's only one man by himself and I'm going for him."
Prisoner then struck him in the mouth knocking him down. He did not
remember any more until he saw Sergeant Jackson and P.C. Smith in
Military Road. At that time the two soldiers went by and prisoner
behind. Witness said "There's the man." Prisoner was taken into custody
by P.C. Smith and the Provost Sergeant.
In reply to Mr. Mercer witness said it appeared that he must have
followed the soldiers.
Mr. Mason:- It must have been a very severe blow to have knocked you
down.
Witness said it was and he was taken unawares. He did not remember any
more. He could not remember how he got from one place to another.
P.C. Adley stated that at about 11.20 p.m. on the 8th April he was on
duty beside the "Jolly Sailor" public house. He met six or seven
soldiers of the 11th Hussars. he saw Sergeant Ewell coming up behind
them and as he had his handkerchief to his mouth witness asked him what
was the matter. The Sergeant took the handkerchief away and said he had
been assaulted by those soldiers, meaning those in front, and asked
witness to go with him to the Barracks to get their names and regiment.
They went up Broad Street and the soldiers turned round. Sergeant Ewell
walked up to them and asked one for his name and regiment. They kept
calling one man "Paddy." He gave a false name of his regiment and the
Sergeant said "Very well, we will see about you later." Ewell came to
witness and on turning round all the soldiers set on them with their
whips. They got Sergeant Ewell between them and two came up to witness
and he dropped back a little way to get his staff out. He did not run
away. They went into Northgate Street where they met the piquet and
asked the corporal in charge to go to Military Road where some soldiers
had assaulted the Sergeant. The corporal said he could not go unless he
had orders to go from the Provost Sergeant. They then met Sergeant
Jackson and P.C. Smith, who saw the Provost Sergeant and said they
wanted the man they called "Paddy." The Provost Sergeant asked if they
wanted the name of any other man and he said they only wanted this one
called "Paddy."
Superintendent Farmery said there was a suggestion that the witness ran
away.
Witness said it was not true. He dropped back about nine or ten yards to
draw his staff. When he turned round he saw Sergeant Ewell between two
soldiers.
William Brown, a private in the 11th Hussars, stated that he was
stationed at the Cavalry Barracks, Canterbury. He recollected being with
prisoner in Palace Street on the 8th inst. at about 11 o'clock. He and
others broke out of Barracks. They got over the wall and went across the
farm and then went from the "Princess Charlotte" public house. From
there they went to the "Bell and Crown." They arrived there at about
twenty minutes to eleven and had five glasses of beer. At eleven o'clock
they went outside and got in a "muddle" in the road. When the Sergeant
came across to them witness went across to the two women at the corner
of the street and on looking round saw Lynch strike the Sergeant with
his fist. Lynch was drunk. Witness had been in prisoner's company about
an hour and a half. They had been drinking all day. The Sergeant then
fell on his back and as he was lifting his head Lynch kicked him in the
head. Witness and the other soldiers went to pull Lynch away but could
not. The Sergeant crawled away to the gutter and Lynch kicked him in the
back of the ear and in the ribs. He and others picked the Sergeant up
and took him to the fire office. The Sergeant took out his whistle and
tried to blow it, but the force of the blood rushing from his mouth and
nose he could not do so. The Sergeant said he should follow them.
Witness got hold of Lynch and tried to conduct him to the Barracks. They
got round Broad Street into Military Road, the Sergeant following.
Witness again looked round and saw the Sergeant on the opposite side
still approaching them. Lynch went up to the Sergeant just beside the
church wall and they both fell to the ground. The Constable lent over
Lynch and tried to get him away. Lynch got up and stepped towards the
Constable who ran across the road. With that witness got hold of Lunch
and took him towards the barracks as far as the "Little Wander." The
provost Sergeant and a private then came up and the Provost Sergeant
said "Is this the man you want?" The Police Sergeant said "That's him,
Paddy." The Provost Sergeant looked round and said "Is that all?" and
the Sergeant said "Yes." The Provost Sergeant said "We had better get
them in Barracks." They said "All right, Sergeant" and went into the
Barracks. Lynch was taken into custody.
In reply to Superintendent Farmery witness said Lynch had a whip but did
not use it. He used his fists and feet.
In reply to Mr. Netherclift, witness said he tried to separate the men.
There were five soldiers standing there. He had never been out with
Lynch before.
In answer to questions by Mr. R. M. Mercer, witness said he had been in
Lynch's company in the afternoon. He was the worse for drink at about
half-past one and had been in public houses and had been supplied.
The Chairman:- Lynch was not sober when he came out of Barracks?
Witness:- No, sir.
The Chairman:- And he got drink at the "Princess Charlotte" when he was
drunk?
Witness said that was so.
Mr. Netherclift:- What was the last public house you came out of?
Witness:- The "Bell and Crown."
Mr. Z. Prentice, police surgeon, stated that he had been attending
Sergeant Ewell since Thursday, the 9th inst. Ewell, who was in bed on
the 9th, when witness saw him, complained of pains in his head and there
was a certain amount of loss of memory. There was an abrasion on the
right side of the head and forehead. The top of the right ear had been
cut and bruised, and two stitches had to be put in. There was a
tenderness on the right side of the chest, but there was no mark there.
The sergeant had remained in bed until two days previously by witness's
instructions.
In reply to Mr. Netherclift, witness said generally speaking of the
injuries and judging from the loss of memory the condition was
harmonious with the evidence of the last witness.
Prisoner said he was drunk at the time and only remembered he was
fighting, but he could not say who with.
The Chairman:- Do you wish to call any evidence as to your character?
Prisoner said he had been in the 11th Hussars twelve months, and had
been in the Army three months before that.
The Provost Sergeant, who was in Court, said the Corporal in charge of
the piquet should have gone to assist the police. The piqued had
instructions to patrol from palace Street to the "Jolly Sailor," but the
Corporal being young did not like to exceed his orders without
permission. All the soldiers were on pass until the reveille, at 5.30.
Soldiers were now allowed out all night. They got out at about twelve
o'clock in the afternoon.
The Chairman said that if that sort of thing went on some recommendation
would be made to the Commandant. Continuing, he said prisoner was guilty
of a most cowardly and brutal assault, which might have been attended
with much more serious consequences. There was no possible excuse and
prisoner saying he was drunk was simply a disgrace. he had brought
disgrace upon the regiment to which he belonged. The Magistrates were
determined to protect the police, and they would deal with the case
seriously. prisoner would have to go to prison for three months with
hard labour.
Addressing the other soldiers in Court, the Chairman said he did not
think their conduct was very exemplary to see a single policeman knocked
about by one of their comrades. They should have stood up by the
policemen if they were true soldiers of the King, and not have seen him
so maltreated. It seemed, however, that brown endeavoured to interfere
to stop the prisoner. |
LICENSEE LIST
ROBINS William 1820
PIERCE Isaac 1821-24+
BALDOCK John 1828-47+ (age 65 in 1841)
COCK G 1858-62+
WHITE Thomas 1871-Aug/76 dec'd (age 43 in 1871)
WHITE Elizabeth 1881+
SLADDEN E 1882-91+
STIGGER F 1903+
PEARCE F 1913-22+
NICHOLLS Robert E 1930+
SMITH Sidney 1938+
https://pubwiki.co.uk/PrincessCharlotte.shtml
http://www.closedpubs.co.uk/princesscharlotte.html
From the Pigot's Directory 1824
From the Pigot's Directory 1828-29
From the Pigot's Directory 1832-33-34
Stapleton's
Guide 1838
From the Pigot's Directory 1840
From Bagshaw Directory 1847
From Melville's Directory 1858
From the Post Office Directory 1862
From the Post Office Directory 1874
Census
From the Post Office Directory 1882
From the Post Office Directory 1891
From the Post Office Directory 1903
From the Kelly's Directory 1903
From the Post Office Directory 1913
From the Post Office Directory 1922
From the Post Office Directory 1930
From the Post Office Directory 1938
Inns of Canterbury
by Edward Wilmot, 1988
|