|
High Street
Ashford
Above photo, date unknown, kindly sent by Christopher Green. |
|
|
It has been suggested by Jim Ashby that this was also known as the "White
Hart" previously to this name. The building was unfortunately
demolished, date unknown.
|
From an article in unknown paper 1732.
Monday the 14th of January a Match of Cocking will be fought it the
"Saracen's Head" in Ashford, between the Gentlemen of Ashford and the
Gentlemen of Wye, for Two Guineas a Battle, and Ten the Odd; And the Pit
will be feather'd with a Pair of Shakebags for Ten Pounds.
The next Day another Match will be fought at the "Fountain" in Ashford,
between the Gentlemen of Ashford and those of Basmore; and as many Cocks
will be shewn the second Day as the first: And a Battle Royal of as many
Cocks as may be brought by any that place, for as many Crowns as there
are Cocks to fight; that is, each Person shall put in his Cock and a
Crown, and the surviving Cock shall take of all the Money.
|
|
Kentish Gazette, 15 April 1851.
EAST KENT SESSION.
George White, 30, convicted of having, on the 5th of April stolen a
cloth, two pieces of meat, and a piece of liver the property
of Robert Bean, at Ashford.
G. Barns deposed of having seen the prisoner go out of the "Fountain"
public-house, Ashford, with the articles stolen.
A Constable of Ashford said, he went to the "Saracens Head Tap," and was
told by the landlady that prisoner was a "good-for-nothing fellow," and had brought the articles there, but did not say
whether for sale or not.
Prisoner, in defence, said he was requested by a man unknown to him, to
take the goods to the "Saracens Head Tap," which
he did, but found no owner.
Two weeks' hard labour, and once whipped.
|
|
Kentish Gazette, 10 February 1857.
ASHFORD.
At the Petty Sessions on the 7th inst., before J. B. Wildman, Esq.,
chairman, H. W. Carter, Esq., M.D., H. K. Hugesson, Esq., Jas. L.
Wildman, Esq., and the Rev. N. Toke, the following cases were heard:
The landlord of the "Fountain," public house, Ashford, was again
fined 40s. and costs for permitting drunkenness and disorderly
conduct in his house on the 26th of December last.
|
|
Kent Times, 10 May 1862.
Petty Sessions, Saturday. (Before Sir E. C. Dering, Bart., chairman,
Sir N. J. Knatchbull, Bart., G. E. Sayer, W. Burra, and W. P. Burra,
Esqrs).
Thomas Jones, a man who goes about selling shell ware, was charged
with drunkenness and assault.
Joseph Pomfrett, landlord of the "Fountain Inn," Ashford, deposed
that, between 11 and 12 on the previous night his waiter carried a
pint of ale to the prisoner who was in the tap-room. He was
assaulted by the prisoner because he would not let him have it
without payment. The prisoner also assaulted witness upon his going
to assist in putting him out of the house, and they were obliged to
hold him down to prevent his violence when outside, as he kicked at
the doors, and endeavoured to get in again.
The prisoner said the waiter assaulted him because he would not pay
for a pint of ale which he (the waiter) alleged that he had ordered
for a common woman who was in the room, with several others of the
same class. Both the waiter said the complainant treated him
shamefully, holding him down and kicking him till his body was
covered with bruises. (His face certainly bore testimony to the
truth of his statement, being shockingly cut and bruised.)
P.C. Fowle deposed that he found the complainant and another man
holding the prisoner down. He was, tipsy, but went without trouble
to the lock-up.
Sergt. Dunk said the prisoner made a great deal of noise; he
complained of being ill-treated.
Thomas Jones, a man in search of employment, an entire stranger to
the prisoner, deposed that the tap room was full of common women,
and the waiter appeared to be on sociable terms with them and
assaulted the prisoner, who had been standing treat, because he
would not pay for a pint of ale which one wanted. He spoke to very
brutal usage of the prisoner by the complainant and his waiter.
Sir. E. Dering said the waiter ought to have been in attendance. The
Bench had decided to dismiss the case.
|
|
South Eastern Gazette, 9 September, 1862.
Licences.
This was the annual licensing day. The landlords of the
"Marlborough," "New Inn," and "Fountain," all in Ashford, were
cautioned by the bench respecting their allowing prostitutes to
assemble in their houses.
|
|
Kentish Gazette, 05 April 1864.
The remanded case of pot stealing.
Thomas Finn and George Webb, the two young men remanded from Thursday on
a charge of steering a pewter pot, value 2s., the property of Mr. Joseph
Pomfret, landlord of the "Fountain Inn," Ashford, on the night of the
24th of March last, were again brought up.
The parties pleading drunkenness, and was sentenced to be imprisoned for
21 days with hard labour.
|
|
Kentish Gazette 05 December 1865.
ASHFORD PETTY SESSIONS. THE FELONY AT THE FOUNTAIN.
Frederick Sinclair, a travelling hat-cleaner, belonging to Kennington,
Surrey, who had been staying at Ashford for some time past, was brought
up in custody, charged with stealing a flat iron and a quantity of
knives and forks, the property of Mr. Samuel Brown, the new landlord of
the "Fountain Inn," Ashford.
It appeared that on November 23rd the "Fountain Inn" changed hands, and
that an appraisement took place between the incoming and outgoing
tenants. The articles were placed out on the tables, and the house was
in considerable confusion. The defendant had been lodging at the rear of
the inn for some days, and took advantage of the confusion to
place the articles he was charged with stealing in his bundle, and leave
the town. They were, however, missed, and information having been given
to Superintendent Dewar, he went in pursuit, and apprehended the
prisoner at Hamstreet, with the articles in his possession.
The prisoner was further charged with stealing a hat, value 4s. 6d., the
property of Mr. Joseph Pomfret, the late landlord of the "Fountain." It
appeared that Mr. Joseph Pomfret had hung his hat up in the bar, and the
prisoner took it down, telling the waiting woman who saw him with it,
that he was going to clean it. The hat was also recovered by
Superintendent Dewar, and identified by Mr. Pomfret.
The Bench convicted the prisoner, and sentenced him to six weeks'
imprisonment with hard labour for each offence - three months in all.
|
|
From the Southeastern Gazette, 23 January 1866 Ashford CC 2.bmp"
County Court.
This court was held on Monday, before C. Harwood, Esq. Moat of the cases
were undefended.
Emma Brightwell v. Samuel Brown.
In this case a servant girl sued the landlord of the “Fountain Inn,”
Ashford, for a week’s wages, and also to recover possession of a box of
clothes, valued at £4. The girl, it appeared, was only engaged by the
week, and wishing to leave her place, gave Mrs. Brown notice on a Friday
to leave on the following Wednesday. Mrs. Brown said she should not
leave before the Friday, and she now said that the girl ought to have
stopped till the following Wednesday. The girl had left them on the
Friday night, whereupon Mrs. Brown refused to pay her her wages for the
last week and two days, and also refused to give up her box.
The Judge ordered the box to be given up, but the poor girl lost her
week's wages and the costs, being unable to remember what day of the
month the Friday fell upon.
|
|
From the Southeastern Gazette, 16 January 1866
Accident by Burning.
On Tuesday last, a little girl, three years and a half old, was
seriously burnt. She is the daughter of a widow woman named Pluck, who
resides with her father, the landlord of the “George and Dragon”
public-house. At about five o’clock in the evening, the child was left
upstairs alone, for a few moments, and got hold of a candle which had
been left burning there, and the poor little thing must have let it fall
upon her pinafore. Her clothes were found in flames, and before these
could be extinguished she had been seriously burned about the arms and
throat. Mr. Bishop was soon in attendance, and hopes were entertained
that the child’s life would be spared.
|
|
From the Southeastern Gazette, 6 February 1866.
Magisterial Business, Monday. (Before W. P. Burra,
Esq.)
A respectably-dressed young man, named Jacobs, by
trade a blacksmith, was brought up on a charge of robbing a gentleman
staying at Ashford of a gold chain and locket, a purse containing about
15s., and other articles. The complainant, Theophilus John Holes, by his
own evidence, was very drunk on the evening of Friday, and met the
prisoner in the street while in that state. He knew he had chain,
locket, and purse safe about five o’clock, but he did not appear to know
much further what took place until the next morning, when he found
himself in bed at the “Queen’s Head Inn,” and all his property gone. It
appeared from other evidence that the prisoner brought Mr. Holes to the
“Queen's Head,” about eleven o'clock, and engaged a bed for them both,
and that he took the complainant upstairs, and came down in twenty
minutes and went out, saying he would return in a short time. He did not
come back, but it was shown that he went to the “Fountain,” and treated
a prostitute, named Harriet Watson, with brandy, flourishing a purse of,
money, and displaying a gold chain. He was drinking afterwards with the
same woman at the “British Flag,” and appeared to be intoxicated. He
wanted the landlord to buy the chain and locket, but this was declined.
Afterwards he went to the house of Watson, and she, with another
notorious character called “Blackey Top,” it seemed, plundered him of
all he had about him, and then threw him out of doors. The locket and
chain had not been found.
The prisoner, in defense, said Mr. Holes gave him
the articles to take care of.
The magistrate dismissed the ease, observing that
no jury would convict upon the evidence, and that the affair was most
discreditable to Mr. Holes.
|
|
From the Southeastern Gazette, 5 June 1866.
Petty Sessions, Saturday. (Before Sir N. J. Knatchbull:. Bart., G.. E.
Sayer, Esq., and Major Groves).
Richard Walter Brown made application to have the license of the
“Fountain Inn” transferred to him from Joseph Pomfret. Brown has been in
the house six months, selling under Pomfret’s license, and during that
time complaints have been made of the way in which the house has been
conducted. A complaint was now preferred against Brown of having
obstructed P.C. Walter in the execution of his duty. It appeared that on
Whit-Monday night Walter was ordered to visit the house by Supt. Dewar,
and that as he was going to an upstairs room Brown asked him what he
wanted, and told him he should not go in, but that he must stop outside,
and ask him if he wanted anything. He further threatened to kick the
constable out.
The Bench, after a long investigation, refused the license.
|
|
|
LICENSEE LIST
HALL George 1858-Feb/60

COOMBER Mary Mrs Feb/1860+

COOMBER Elizabeth 1861+ (widow age 67 in 1861 )
POMFRET Joseph 1862-23/Nov/65

BROWN Samuel 23/Nov1865-June/66

https://pubwiki.co.uk/Fountain.shtml
Kentish Gazette
Census
|