Commercial Quay
Dover
A beerhouse of, 1850-51 but I never saw it mentioned again.
I can certainly visualize the maiden's welcome lantern in the window. Barry
Smith.
Just found:- mention of this pub in the Dover Telegraph of 1839. As
below.
From the Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General
Advertiser, Saturday 22 June, 1839. Price 5d
CORONERS INQUEST
An inquest was held, on Monday, at the "Sailor's Return," before
Matthew Kennett, Esq. in the absence of the Coroner, on the body of
Thomas Swinnock, aged 26, who was unfortunately drowned while bathing
neat Shakespeare's Cliff the previous morning. Mr. M. Husband being
appointed foreman of the jury, they proceeded to view the body.
From the evidence of Emilien Fehrenback, it appeared that between 7
and 8 o'clock he had accompanied the deceased to bathe, who, shortly
after entering the water, appeared to be seized with cramp, and called
for help. Witness then ran for assistance, ad procured a plank; but
could not reach the deceased, whose head was then above the water.
William Symonds was on the railway at the time stated; and hearing
his cries, went down and launched a punt, when he found there were no
thowles on board. He saw the pilot cutter's boat approaching, which
reached the deceased before him, and brought the body on shore.
Richard Beal, surgeon, was called out about half-past 7 o'clock on
Sunday morning. He had the body brought to the house, where he used
every exertion to restore animation without effect.
Verdict - "Accidentally drowned while bathing."
|
From the Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General
Advertiser, Saturday 13 April, 1850. Price 5d
DOVER POLICE COURT
Isaac Clements, landlord of the "Sailor's Return," was summoned on a
charge of keeping disorderly persons in his house. Mr. Tapley, who
appeared for the defendant, applied that the summons might be set aside,
on the ground that it had not been personally served; but as defendant
was himself present, the objection was over-ruled by the Bench. A second
objection, that the summons itself was informal, was raised by Mr.
Tapley, who contended that the charge ought to have been laid out in the
specific terms of the Act. This also being over-ruled by the Bench, the
case was proceeded with by the examination of John Brindlow, who had
lived as servant with defendant, and who detailed the particulars
constituting the charge. At the close, the Court was cleared and on our
readmission the charge was declared not sustained, the Bench, by giving
defendant the benefit of a doubt (there being two for, and two against,
a conviction,) considering that the evidence of Brindlow, who was
released at the Sessions the other day on a charge of felony, was not
sufficiently satisfactory without confirmation by other witnesses.
|
LICENSEE LIST
CLEMENTS Isaac 1850
CLEMENTS Mrs Sarah 1850-51 end
From the Dover Telegraph
|