Risborough Lane
Cheriton
Above photo, 1890s. |
Any further information or indeed photographs would be appreciated.
Please email me at the address at bottom of page.
Folkestone Chronicle 25 April 1868.
Local News.
Patrick Maguire, a private in the C battery, 11th Brigade, stationed at
Shorncliffe, was at a public house called the Unity in Risborough Lane
on Good Friday. It appears he was rather the worse for liquor, and began
quarrelling between nine and ten o’clock, and was turned out of the
house by the military police. Within half an hour after, some of his
comrades found him a little distance from the house, with his jacket and
shirt off, covered with his greatcoat. He was carried up to the camp and
put in the guardroom, being supposed to be drunk, and it was not until
Sunday that medical aid was obtained, when it was found he was suffering
from concussion of the brain, of which he died on Friday last. At the
inquest, which was held at the Kent Hotel, evidence was given to show
that he could not have received the blows from the effects of which he
died in the house, but nothing further was elicited. The jury returned a
verdict censuring the military authorities for allowing him to remain so
long without being seen by the doctor.
|
Folkestone Observer 25 April 1868.
Inquest.
Great excitement has been exhibited in Sandgate since yesterday week in
consequence of the death of an artilleryman named Maguire from violence
received from some person or persons unknown. It appears that the poor
fellow was spending Good Friday in a public house in Risborough Lane,
and near to the camp at Shorncliffe, when a general disturbance took
place, but how he met with his death is enveloped in mystery.
On Monday an inquest was opened by T.T. Delasaux Esq., and a respectable
jury. The body having been viewed, the following evidence was taken:-
John Back deposed: On Good Friday I was attending to the business of
Robert Bailey, who keeps the Unity Inn, Cheriton. The deceased came into
the house between eight and nine o’clock that evening in a state of
intoxication. He was accompanied by another soldier belonging to the
Artillery. There was a quarrel between two men, and I obtained
assistance and they were removed from the house. The deceased remained,
but shortly afterwards left. I believe the man who came into the house
with deceased was William Elvison. The deceased was not hopelessly
drunk. I believe he was capable of walking home.
William Elvison, driver, Royal Artillery: I saw the deceased in the
barrack canteen about seven o’clock on the evening of Good Friday. I
accompanied him to the Unity beerhouse, and we arrived there a little
after eight. The deceased was a little the worse for liquor, but I was
sober. I ordered and paid for a pot of ale, which was drunk by deceased,
another soldier named Robert Murray, and myself. John Johnson, a gunner
in the Artillery, got off his seat, came towards the deceased, and
struck him in the face. In consequence of Johnson having struck the
deceased I struck Johnson, and we had a round or two. I looked round for
the deceased afterwards and he was gone. I was turned out of the house
with others by the provost, and on my going out into the road I saw
Maguire lying in the middle of the lane, about five or six yards from
the Unity, and covered with blood. He was then alone. Robert Murray was
with me, and we endeavoured to lift up the deceased. Being unable to do
so, I left the deceased in the charge of Murray and went and fetched
another comrade named Philip Blyth. We three then carried the deceased
home to the barracks and placed him in bed, he being insensible. The
blow given to the deceased by Johnson was a severe one. It was on his
nose, and blood came therefrom.
Robert Murray, lance corporal, 7th Dragoon Guards: On Good Friday I was
doing duty as garrison military policeman from about a quarter to seven
until half past eleven. About half past nine I went into the Unity for
the purpose of quelling a row. Upon going into the parlour I observed
Johnson and Elvison fighting. I immediately removed them from the house
with the assistance of Sergt. Marshall, of the Royal Artillery. The
deceased was sitting in the corner of the room at that time. I did not
observe any mark upon him, or that he was bleeding. Afterwards I turned
deceased and several other soldiers belonging to the artillery out of
the house. Deceased went in the direction of the barracks. Johnson
returned in about five minutes. I refused to admit him into the house.
He was then more calm than when he went from the house.
Daniel Murray: I went into the Unity about half past seven on Good
Friday evening, and remained there about an hour. About twenty minutes
to nine o’clock I was called out by Elvison, and went with him. We found
the deceased lying in the road about forty yards from the Unity Inn. It
was dark. Deceased did not speak. I assisted Elvison and Blyth in
carrying the deceased into his hut. I believed he was very drunk, as he
was in the habit of getting intoxicated.
Henry Shelley, bombardier, Royal Artillery: I saw the deceased in the
Royal Artillery Guardroom about half past seven o’clock on the morning
of Saturday, the 11th instant. He was there for being drunk. I saw blood
on his face. I saw him three times that morning, and about two o’clock
in the afternoon I handed him over to bombardier James Meedes. Deceased
appeared then in the same state.
Bombardier James Meedes: I saw the deceased in the Guardroom, and
examined him. I found he had two black eyes, and was insensible. He was
imprisoned in the cell all that night, and on Sunday morning I made a
report to the Sergeant Major concerning him. The medical officer then
came and attended the deceased in the Guardroom.
Alfred Frederick Stafford Clarke: I am a doctor of medicine and
assistant surgeon in the Royal Artillery. I was called upon to attend
the deceased at 12 o’clock on the 12th inst. I found him speechless, but
partly conscious. I prescribed him for necessary treatment, believing
him to be suffering from the combined effects of drink and a slight
concussion of the brain. I made an external examination of his body, and
discovered that he had two black eyes, a slight bruise on the nose, and
marks as of dry blood on his face. I continued to attend him till his
death, which took place on Friday morning last, about eight o’clock. I
was then unable to account for his death, but I have this day made a
post mortem examination of the deceased, and on opening his head I
discovered a quantity of extravasated blood between the membrane and the
surface of the brain, which produced death. The skull was not fractured,
nor was there any external mark of violence besides those before stated.
The blow alleged to have been received in the Unity could not have
produced the extravasation of blood which caused death, as, if it had,
the deceased could not have walked from the house to the road where he
was subsequently found.
Some discrepancies will be noticed in the foregoing evidence, and the
police had been quite unable to obtain any evidence as to what
transpired after the deceased left the Unity, although i was believed
that many persons could do so if they would come forward, as great
numbers of soldiers were passing along Risborough Lane about the time
the deceased must have received his injuries. The jury examined the
witnesses at great length without being able to ascertain anything
further, and it was ultimately resolved to adjourn until Thursday in
order that Supt. English might make further inquiries.
The inquest was resumed on Thursday afternoon at the Royal Kent Hotel.
Mr. English, Superintendent of the K.C.C., said, in answer to the
Coroner, that he had a woman present who could perhaps throw some light
on the matter.
Hannah Jay deposed that she did not know the deceased. Her husband asked
her to go for a pint of beer for supper on good Friday evening between
nine and ten o’clock. She went to the Unity Inn and there was a great
disturbance there; men were fighting. Saw Mr. Back knock an Artilleryman
down and kick him: that occurred in the passage. Sergeant Marshall said
that he would see the man home and went out with him. Whether that man
was the deceased or not she could not tell. Was positive as to the time;
it was between twenty minutes and half past nine.
Gunner Elvison, re-examined, said he did not see Mr. Back strike
Maguire. There were about eight men in the room when witness was
fighting with Johnson.
By the Foreman: Witness had to get to his hut at roll call – ten
o’clock. He was at home at that time.
Gunner Harvey, examined (but not sworn), said he was at the Unity Inn on
Good Friday evening about eight o’clock. There was a scuffle in the
front room. Saw Back strike Maguire, and witness struck Back. Back then
knocked witness down. Witness was then pushed out of the house. Thought
there were about 20 or 30 men in the room – it was full. Maguire was a
comrade of witness’s. Knew of his death on the following Saturday, but
had never repeated to anyone what he had now stated.
A juror explained that Harvey was in front of the bar of the Hotel, when
he was heard to say that Back kicked Maguire and broke his ribs, and
that deceased was murdered.
Witness said that he had never told anyone of the above circumstances
until now. The Sergeant Major had told him to come down to the jury.
An officer present said it was the duty of the witness to have reported
to his commanding officer what he had just now said immediately after
the death of Maguire.
The Coroner said it was most extraordinary that the witness – an old
comrade of the deceased – should have gone so long with closed lips on
the affair – from Good Friday evening until now.
John Back said he was conducting the business of the Unity Inn for Mr.
Bailey. To his knowledge he saw no-one strike or kick Maguire, either in
the room or passage. He certainly did not himself strike Maguire, but he
did strike a Royal Artillery gunner in the passage about a quarter or
half past nine. The gunner’s name was Harvey. There was a row in the
room, and witness was trying to part Johnson and Elvison, when Harvey
struck him on the cheek bone. Witness then followed him and returned the
blow by knocking him down in the passage. He was quite certain as to the
time, and could produce witnesses as to it’s correctness. At that time
deceased was sitting in the room.
The jury then wished the room cleared, and after being closeted together
for three quarters of an hour the public were admitted and the Foreman
of the jury read the following verdict:
“That the deceased Patrick Maguire came by his death through injuries
inflicted upon him on the night of the 15th April in an encounter with
some person or persons unknown, and that his death was accelerated from
being unattended from the time of being carried to his room between nine
and ten o’clock p.m. on the said evening in a totally helpless state and
insensible, and subsequently on the following morning between seven and
eight o’clock being transferred as a prisoner to the Guardroom, and
there detained till Sunday morning about ten o’clock in the same state
of unconsciousness and insensibility, with unmistakable proof of the
injuries from which he was suffering (at which time a report was made to
a medical officer), and from thence transferred to the military
hospital, where he died on the 17th instant.
The jury desire that a copy of this, their verdict, should be forwarded
to the Commander-in-Chief, and the jury would express their unqualified
disapprobriation of the treatment of soldiers supposed to be
intoxicated, and would urge upon the Commander-in-Chief a regulation
whereby no soldier should be allowed to remain beyond 12 hours in a
state of helplessness or insensibility without a medical examination”.
The Coroner said he was very much obliged to the jury for the kind
attention they had paid to the inquest, trespassing as it did so much on
their valuable time, and he quite agreed with their verdict. By the
evidence before them they could not have returned any other. He hoped
that on some future occasion the case would be quite cleared up.
|
Folkestone Observer 6 February 1869.
Inquest.
An inquest was held at the Unity Inn, Cheriton, on Saturday afternoon
last, before T.T. Delasaux Esq., Coroner for East Kent, and a
respectable jury, on the body of a girl 12 years of age, named Anne
Stokes, who was severely burnt at the National Schools on Monday last,
and who died on Tuesday night. After the swearing of the jury and
viewing of the body, the following evidence was taken:
John Philpott, aged 11 years, was at the National schoolroom of the
Parish of Cheriton and Newington on Monday last about 12 o’clock, when
the scholars were all sitting down. Desired them to rise, and they did
so, deceased at this time being near the fire. Her clothes were shortly
afterwards seen to be in flames and she ran up the schoolroom, witness
running after her, but not being able to catch her. The schoolmistress
extinguished the flames. Believed it was purely accidental, and no blame
could be attached to any person. Deceased ran to the house of the
schoolmistress, and it was there that the flames were extinguished.
Amy Greenstreet, wife of Stephen Henry Greenstreet, schoolmaster of the
Cheriton National Schools deposed that on Monday last, about 12 o’clock,
she was nursing her bay at her home when she heard someone scream and
call “Fire”. She placed her child in the arms of the last witness,
Philpott, and ran into the washhouse. Saw deceased there, whose clothes
were in flames. Took a mat and a hearth rug and wrapped them round the
body of deceased, thereby extinguishing the flames. Witness then cut the
clothes from deceased and applied oil and wadding to the injuries.
Witness then sent for a surgeon, and Dr. Bateman came.
William Bateman, surgeon, Folkestone, said he was sent for about two
o’clock on Monday to attend the deceased. On his arrival he found
deceased suffering from severe burns on every part of her body, with the
exception of that part of the body protected by her stays. He continued
to attend until her death, which took place the following night.
Deceased never rallied from the time of the accident until the time of
her death.
The jury returned a verdict of death from accidental burning.
|
Whitstable Times and Herne Bay Herald, Saturday 5 August 1882.
Sad Case of Suicide.
T. T. Delasaux, Esq., coroner for East Kent, held an inquest on
Wednesday at the "Unity Inn," Cheriton, touching the circumstances
attending the death of Mary Philpott, aged 36 years. The deceased, who
was the widow of a labourer, had for some time past been suffering from
fluctuation of spirits, at one time being very melancholy and at others
in the highest of spirits. On Tuesday, soon after noon, John Philpott,
deceased’s father-in-law, on returning home to dinner discovered her
suspended to a rafter by a piece of rope and quite dead. In her pocket
was found an unfinished letter in the woman’s handwriting, complaining
that she had not a friend in the world except her children, but would
soon be out of the way. She stated that she had tried to do her best,
but could never do right, and hoped God would forgive her for what she
had done, adding that now people would not have to be paid to look after
her.
A verdict of "Suicide whilst in a state of temporary insanity" was
returned.
|
Folkestone Express 9 September 1882.
Inquest.
On Saturday an inquest was held at the Unity Inn, Risborough Lane, by T.
Delasaux Esq., County Coroner, on the body of a boy aged 10 years, named
Tom Culver Foulks, who committed suicide by hanging himself on the
previous day. This is the third inquest on the bodies of persons who
have committed suicide by hanging within a period of three months,
although the village itself does not number more than thirty houses, and
about 150 inhabitants. About six weeks since a woman committed suicide
by hanging in the next house to that in which the present case occurred,
and the deceased child was said to be the primary cause of the quarrel
which led to the woman hanging herself.
The only witness called was Ellen Foulks, wife of John Foulks, a
labourer, (who) said the body viewed by the jury was that of her child,
Tom Culver Foulks, aged 10 years. On Thursday she sent him to Sandgate
at half past seven in the morning. He did not return until about two
o’clock. She scolded him and told him to go to bed. He went up to his
room, and she last saw him alive about half past three. When she went up
soon after four o’clock she found him hanging from a nail in the wall by
a piece of cord. He was quite dead.
By the jury: When I saw him at half past three he laughed at me. He was
a very affectionate child. He had typhoid fever last summer, and was a
little light headed, but he had not been so since.
The jury returned a verdict of “Suicide while in a state of temporary
insanity”.
|
Folkestone Up To Date 16 July 1898.
Hythe County Bench.
Thursday, July 14th: Before J. Du Boulay, W. Wightwick, E.S. Thompson,
and A.S. Jones Esqs., and Captain Mansell.
The temporary licence of the Unity Inn, Cheriton, was granted to Mr.
Thomas Lane.
Note: Date is at variance with More Bastions.
|
From the Folkestone, Hythe, Sandgate & Cheriton Herald, 16 July, 1898.
LICENSING.
On Thursday last before Messrs. Du Boulay, Jones, Wightwick, Thompson,
and Capt. Mansell — the transfer of the "Unity Inn" was granted to Mr.
Thomas Laine.
|
Hythe Reporter 16 July 1898.
Hythe County Sessions.
Before Messrs. Du Boulay, A.S. Jones, E.S. Thompson, W. Wightwick, and
Capt. Mansell.
Mr. Lane applied for the transfer of the Unity Inn at Cheriton.
The transfer was granted.
Note: Date is at variance with More Bastions.
|
Folkestone Herald 15 July 1899.
Felix.
Exit the Unity Inn, Risborough Lane.
This well known inn, and a small cottage adjoining, having been disposed
of by the Trustees of the Bayly Estate to the Government, the buildings
will be shortly demolished, and the land utilised for military purposes.
I understand the owner of the Unity intends to apply for a licence for a
building to be erected further down the lane, in the vicinity of
Keeler’s Stores. I take it that the Government will set back their new
buildings, and thus effect the widening to the Camp end of the
thoroughfare.
|
Folkestone Express 12 August 1899.
Hythe Police Court.
Thursday, August 11th: Before Captain Mansell and A.S. Jones Esq.
Thomas Lane, Unity Inn, Cheriton, was charged with unlawfully permitting
drunkenness on his licensed premises on July 31st. Mr. Ford appeared for
defendant, who pleaded Not Guilty.
P.C. Gannaway, stationed at Cheriton, said at 7.30 p.m. on the date in
question, while passing the Unity Inn he noticed several persons in and
out of the house very much the worse for liquor. He noticed that two men
named Thomas Down and James Shorter were drunk, and a man named Conley
was very much the worse for liquor. He afterwards reported the case to
the sergeant.
By the Inspector: The men he had named were drinking beer from pint
glasses.
Cross-examined by Mr. Ford: Witness didn’t see the men Downs or Shorter
served. Witness was watching for about three minutes, but did not go in
and tell the landlord of the inn.
P.C. Stone deposed: At 10.15 p.m. on the 31st July last, from what I was
told, I visited the Unity public house. Outside the house on a seat
between the tap-room window and the wall I saw a man named James
Shorter, who was drunk, in company with a man named Conley, who was very
much the worse for drink. They were both drinking beer. Shorter was very
quiet, he being almost unable to speak. I then went inside the house. In
the passage I saw another man, unknown to me, very much the worse for
drink, drinking with a sober man. I then went into the tap-room, where I
saw Thomas Downs sitting at a table with two other men. Downs was drunk
– the other two men perfectly sober. I then left the house, and at about
10.45 p.m. I saw Downs leave by the front door and with difficulty he
got down the steps into the road, in company with another man, and went
in the direction of his home. He was very quiet, but staggered from one
side of the road to the other. I then noticed that Shorter and Conley
were about leaving from the wall at the side of the house. I went inside
and called the landlord to see Shorter. I pointed him out as he was
going down the road. Defendant said “You know, Sergeant, I can’t see
much – I don’t think he is so very drunk”. I then followed Shorter and
Conley down the lane towards their homes. I saw Shorter home to his
door. For some distance I kept speaking to Shorter, but he was unable to
answer me. I then went back to the landlord and told him what I had
seen, namely, these two men – whom I had previously cautioned him about
serving, and about having men in his house drunk. I mentioned their
names to him and told him it was little or no good cautioning him, and
it was my duty to report him for permitting drunkenness. Defendant said
“Do you know I have been looking for you all the day, Sergeant? That man
Shorter is a great nuisance to me. I pay rates and taxes, and don’t see
why I should not have more police protection”. I told him it might be a
serious matter to him being reported, and if he had any doubt about
whether the men were drunk, as they were both gone to their homes, he
might have them medically examined.
Cross-examined by Mr. Ford: When witness visited the house at 10.15 he
did not see the landlord, and made no remark to the barmaids. The
defendant did not express surprise when he was told the men were drunk.
Defendant stated that he had turned Shorter out of the house on Saturday
night.
A Lance Corpl. Of the Military Police gave corroborative evidence.
Defendant said that he had cautioned Shorter that he would never be
served in the house again whether he was drunk or sober. As far as he
knew, Shorter was not in the house on the date in question. Witness had
held the licence about 15 months, but had been connected with it for 40
years. On the night in question defendant never saw or served Shorter or
Downs.
A barmaid in the employ of defendant said she served Downs once on the
night in question, but did not see Shorter. Witness had received
instructions from her employer never to serve anyone the worse for drink
or to permit drunkenness on the premises. She did not notice whether
Downs was drunk.
Stephen Tutt said he was at the Unity Inn on the date in question and
saw Downs enter in company with two friends. He was perfectly sober.
Witness was outside, sitting on a bench in company with Shorter, who did
not go into the house. Witness went into the house and left Shorter
sitting on the wall. When witness left the house about ten o’clock
Shorter was sober, and he had not seen him served with drink.
Mr. Ford, for the defence, pointed out that the man Shorter remained in
the front of the premises and did not enter the house, or he would have
been refused drink and ordered to leave the premises. Shorter, if he had
any drink, had obtained it by subterfuge or trick.
The Magistrates retired to consider, and upon returning to the Court,
the Chairman, addressing the defendant, said: We find you did permit
drunkenness and therefore we fine you £5, and the costs, £1 3s. 6d. As
it is the first occasion we shall not endorse the licence.
James Shorter and Thomas Downs were then charged with being drunk on
licensed premises on the same date.
Mr. H.S. Wilks, solicitor, addressed the Bench at some length on behalf
of the defendants.
Downs was fined 5s. and 12s. costs, and Shorter 2s. 6d. and 12s. costs.
|
Folkestone Herald 12 August 1899.
Hythe Divisional Sessions.
On Thursday last, before Captain Mansell and Mr. A.S. Jones, Mr. Thomas
Lane, landlord of the Unity Inn, Cheriton, was summoned for permitting
drunkenness. He pleaded Not Guilty. Mr. F. Hall, of Folkestone, appeared
for the defendant.
P.C. Frederick Kenward, stationed at Cheriton, deposed: About 7.30 p.m.
on the 31st July, while passing the Unity Inn, I noticed several persons
in and out of the house very much the worse for liquor, amongst whom
were Thomas Downs and James Shorter, and a man named Conley. I
afterwards saw P.S. Stone and reported the case to him. I am quite sure
Shorter and Downs were drunk. Downs was in the tap-room and Shorter was
outside. They were drinking beer in pint glasses.
By Mr. Hall: On the 31st July it was a hot day. It was nothing unusual
for people to be outside of a summer’s evening. I was out in the road. I
could see Downs. His head was out of the window. I was about seven yards
off. Shorter was outside. I did not see either Shorter or Downs served
with drink; I simply saw them drinking. I made no communication to the
landlord at the time. I did not go inside the house. I had called in
several times before; not on this occasion.
Mr. Hall: You simply passed by like the Good Samaritan and said nothing.
(Laughter)
Cross-examination continued: I reported to P.S. Stone a quarter of an
hour afterwards. Shorter was on his legs, talking very loudly, and
unable to speak plainly. Downs was standing up talking loudly. He did
not make any disturbance. Shorter kept rolling about. I made a note
about ten minutes after, adding to it when I had seen P.S. Stone. I took
the time from my watch.
P.S. Stone, stationed at Cheriton, deposed: At 10.15 p.m. on the date in
question I visited the Unity Inn. Outside the house, between the
tap-room window and the wall, I saw James Shorter, who was drunk, in
company with Conley, who was very much the worse for drink. They were
both drinking beer. Shorter was very quiet, being almost unable to
speak. I then went inside the house in the passage. I saw another man,
unknown to me, very much the worse for drink, drinking with a sober man.
I then went into the tap-room, where I saw Thomas Downs, sitting at a
table with two other men, the other two men being perfectly sober. I
then left the house. At about 10.45 I saw Downs leave by the front door,
and with difficulty he got down the steps, with another man, going in
the direction of his home. He was very quiet, but staggering from one
side of the road to the other. I noticed that Shorter and Conley were
about to leave from the wall outside the house. I went inside, and
called the landlord’s attention to Shorter. I pointed him out as he was
going down the road. The landlord said “Do you know, Sergeant, I can’t
see very much. I don’t think that he is so very drunk”. I then followed
Shorter and Conley down the lane towards their homes. I saw Shorter home
to his door. I kept speaking to him, but he was unable to answer. He was
full right up with drink. I went back to the Unity Inn, where I saw Mr.
Lane, the landlord. I told him what I had seen, naming the two men whom
I had previously cautioned him about serving. I told him that it was
little or no good cautioning him, and felt it my duty to report him for
permitting drunkenness. He said “Do you know that I have been looking
for you all day, Sergeant? That man Shorter is a great nuisance to me. I
pay rates and taxes, and I don’t see why I should not have more police
protection”. I told him that as it might be a serious matter for him
being reported, if he had any doubt whether the men were drunk, as they
had both gone to their homes, he might have them medically examined.
Cross-examined by Mr. Hall: I went to the house. I saw the two barmaids,
I believe, but made no remark to them. Shorter was outside, leaning
against the wall. I saw him drinking beer with a man named Conley.
Conley was more active on his legs, but he was really the worse man of
the two. He was swearing, but I won’t say he was drunk. I did not see
Downs served with drink. I have been sent for on more than one occasion
by Mr. Lane to remove Shorter. I believe he said that on Saturday, 29th,
he had to turn Shorter out. I told him that it was a pity he did not
turn him out then. I saw Shorter outside the premises; not inside the
house itself. It is a private garden. The only other licensed place in
Cheriton was the White Lion. My object in calling at Downs’ house was to
let his wife know his condition if he had not reached home.
By the Bench: There might be difficulty in finding the police.
By Mr. Hall: When I saw Mr. Lane I told him I had not seen him for more
than a week. Both the men are habitual drunkards.
Lance Crpl. Fredk. Srodiznski, of the Military Police, Shorncliffe,
deposed: On the night of the 31st, at about 10.15 p.m., I was on
Military Police duty in Risborough Lane. I saw P.S. Stone leave the
Unity Inn. I stood there till 10.45. I saw him again enter. I saw Downs
leave. As he came down the steps he nearly fell. I saw the Sergeant
follow him towards Cheriton. I also saw him speak to Shorter, who was
sitting on the wall at the top of the steps. He also went towards
Cheriton. They were both drunk. Some few minutes after, P.S. Stone came
back to me. I have no doubt whatever about their being drunk.
By Mr. Hall: There is a lamp directly opposite. A man might make a
mistake in his footing. Sharter was not able to get home without
assistance. It would take Downs some time.
On the other side, the defendant, Mr. Thomas Lane, deposed: I am the
licence holder of the Unity, the licence of which I have held about 15
months. The house belongs to the family. I had the object in view of
protecting the licence in the interests of the family. I had told
Shorter never to come again. I said “I will never allow you to be served
whether you are drunk or sober”. Every day I gave instructions that
Shorter was not to be served, or anyone else that had anything
approaching too much drink. I am always on the premises myself. On July
31st I was at the Unity during the whole evening. I did not serve
Shorter with any drink. I was in the bar parlour. I did not know that
Shorter was there before the police sergeant came up. I never saw Bowns
at all; I don’t know him. I belive there were only three people in the
tap-room the whole evening. They were making no noise. I have sent for
the police on two or three occasions, not for Shorter. On one occasion
that resulted in the prosecution of a man. I told the Sergeant that I
had not seen him or any of his men for a week. When the Sergeant came in
and saw me, he told me there was a man or two on the premises drunk. I
was very much surprised to hear it. I thought that it was their duty to
look after the outside people. I was surprised to know that Shorter was
outside. That was the first intimation I had that Shorter was anywhere
about. If I had known I should have ordered him off at once. I swear
that I never saw Shorter that night. I never served him with any drink.
I did not serve Downs; I never saw him. There was no disturbance.
By Superintendent Hollands: Shorter is a troublesome customer. They were
very quiet outside. I provide a seat close to the front of the house.
Between the house and the road belonged to the house. I do very little
serving myself.
Miss Lucy Mount, barmaid to Mr. Lane, deposed: Instructions were given
never to serve Shorter. On Monday evening I was serving at the bar. I
was there all the evening. I did not serve Shorter with any drink. I did
not see him at all. Downs and someone else came in about half past nine.
I served him with a pint of beer. I did not serve him during the rest of
the evening. Downs was not noisy. There were three people in the smoking
room. I did not take much notice of Downs. I did not see that there was
anything at all the matter with him. There was nothing to lead me to
suppose that he was drunk. When I went in the Inn I had instructions not
to serve anyone the worse for drink.
Miss Laura Mount, barmaid, deposed: On Monday night I did not see
Shorter. I would have seen him if he was inside the house. I saw Downs.
He went straight through. There were three men, I think. I served them
with a pot of beer. Downs was quiet. I did not notice that there was
anything the matter with him. I had instructions not to serve anyone the
worse for drink.
By Superintendent Hollands: I did not notice there was anything the
matter with Downs.
Stephen Tutt, house painter, Cheriton, deposed: On the evening in
question I was at the Unity in company with Shorter. I saw Downs enter
with two friends. He was perfectly sober. I saw him go in the tap-room.
Shorter did not go inside whilst I was there, from eight to ten. I got
beer from the Unity. I allowed Shorter to have some of it. Shorter was
sitting on the wall by the road. He was not sitting on the seat. I
should say Shorter was sober when I left.
By Superintendent Hollands: I did not see P.S. Stone.
Mr. F. Hall having addressed the Bench at some length, the Magistrates
fined the defendant £5 and £1 3s. costs, and as it was the first
occasion they did not endorse the licence.
James Shorter and Thos. Downs were subsequently fined 2s. 6d. and 12s.
costs respectively for being drunk on licensed premises on the 31st
July. This was the latter’s second offence. Mr. G.W. Haines represented
them.
|
Folkestone Up To Date 12 August 1899.
Local News.
At the Hythe County Police Court on Monday, Thomas Lane, of the Unity
Inn, Cheriton, was summoned for permitting drunkenness at his licensed
house on the night of July 31st. He was represented for the defence by
Mr. Ford.
P.C. Gannaway deposed to seeing several persons, including two men who
were specially named, Downs and Shorter, drunk in the house, and were
seen drinking beer from pint glasses.
P.S. Stone gave corroborative evidence. One man was so drunk that he
could with difficulty get down the steps on to the road, and two men
were followed by the police to their homes. Defendant said, added Stone
“Do you know I have been looking for you all the day, Sergeant? That man
Shorter is a great nuisance to me. I pay rates and taxes, and don’t see
why I should not have more police protection”. Stone replied that the
defendant should have the men medically examined.
The defendant deposed that he had cautioned Shorter. He had held his
licence for 15 months, but had been connected with the house many years.
A barmaid at the Unity Inn gave evidence to the effect that she had
strict instructions not to serve those who came into the house drunk.
A person named Stephen Tutt said that Downs, who was mentioned by the
police as having been drunk, entered the house in a sober state on the
night in question, and Shorter was sober at 10 o’clock, and remained
outside.
The defendant was fined £5 and £1 3s. 6d. costs, but the licence was not
endorsed.
Thomas Downs and James Shorter, for being drunk at the Unity Inn, were
fined, the first 5s. and 12s. costs, and the latter, 2s. 6d. and 12s.
costs.
|
Folkestone Express 26 August 1899.
Elham Licensing Sessions.
The annual licensing sessions were held at Elham on Monday before F.D.
Brockman Esq., and Captain Smythies.
The police opposed the licence of the Unity Inn, Cheriton, and an
application of Mr. Lonergan for a new licence, all the other licences in
the district being renewed. The sessions were adjourned until September
29th.
|
Folkestone Express 11 August 1900.
Hythe Petty Sessions.
Thursday, August 9th: Before Capt. Mansell and W. Wightwick and A.S.
Jones Esqs.
William Hobday, a carter in the employ of Messrs. Mackeson and Co.,
brewers, Hythe, was summoned for unlawfully obstructing Risborough Lane.
He pleaded Not Guilty. Mr. Haines appeared for defendant.
Sergt. Amos Stone deposed that about 10.10 a.m. he was in Risborough
Lane, and saw defendant’s cart with many barrels opposite the Unity
public house. He kept observations for thirty minutes, and during that
time defendant was down in the cellar and did not go to his cart once.
All carts and traffic had to go on the wrong side of the road. The cart
caused an obstruction. The road was only about 14 feet wide where the
obstruction was caused.
A fine of 5s. and 9s. costs was inflicted.
|
Folkestone Programme 12 November 1900.
Notes.
The Unity Inn in Risborough Lane some time ago became War Department
property, and the authorities at Shorncliffe Camp have now allowed the
licence to lapse. General Hallam Parr has conceived the idea that it
would be a splendid thing to convert the old inn into a coffee palace.
The structural alterations will cost several hundreds of pounds, and the
Commandant has appealed for monetary assistance in this work, which is
really a work of Temperance.
The coffee palace would be used by soldiers, and mechanics who are
employed on the Camp, and it is proposed that dinners would be provided,
while there would also be reading rooms and rooms for recreation. The
idea is a capital one, and should receive the heartiest support from all
who desire to promote the cause of Temperance.
|
Folkestone Herald 8 February 1902.
Felix (extract).
After partaking of lunch with the Colonel and officers of the Royal
Artillery mess, the Commander-in-Chief looked over at the Unity
Temperance Inn, lately acquired by the Army Temperance Society.
|
LICENSEE LIST
BAILEY Robert 1856-72 (age 64 in 1861)
BAILEY Charles 1872-80
PHILPOTT Isaiah E 1881+ (age 41 in 1881)
HARRIS
Mary 1880-85
HARRIS
Francis 1885-91
PHILPOTT
Isiah 1891-95
PHILPOTT
George 1895-98
HARRIS Francis Eliz Mrs 1891+
LAINE/LANE Thomas July/1898-1901+
https://pubwiki.co.uk/UnityInn.shtml
From the Post Office Directory 1874
Census
|