OUR VILLAGES AT THE BEGINNING OF THE NINETEENTH
CENTURY AND NOW. (1901)
STOURMOUTH THE DOVER EXPRESS AND EAST KENT NEWS—FRIDAY,
25 JULY, 1902.
OUR VILLAGES
LXII.—STOURMOUTH.
Stourmouth is a parish which lies off the 'beaten track, bounded on three
sides by marshes, which margin the Greater and Lesser Stour. Its area is 878
acres, and according to the census of 1901 it contains 77 houses and 288
inhabitants.
HISTORY OF STOURMOUH.
Concerning Stourmouth there seems to be nothing particularly recorded until
some time after the Conquest, but long before that time this corner of East
Kent was a place of habitation. The Romans probably did not have a station
here because they preferred to settle on the higher ground southward, but
their habitable centres at Reculver over in Thanet, at Richborough on the
east, and at Preston and Wingham on the south,, dominated the whole of the
region, and they had a road through it, and a crossing place to Reculver.
The place takes its name from a condition of things which has long ceased to
exist. The Stour has no mouth here now, only a junction of the Lesser Stour,
and several contributory streams, with the Greater Stour, which sleepily
meanders amongst the marshes and , meadows down to Sandwich, beyond which
its mouth now is, but in the time of the Remans the Stour just below this
village emptied into the Wantsume, which, was really a narrow arm of the sea
which made Thanet a real island. At the time of the Conquest, and probably
earlier, the Manor of Stourmouth was a part of the possessions of some Thane
or Knight who held it for service, and, as was the custom with such tenure,
it in course of years became a private possession. In the time of William
II. the Manor was held by Hamo son of Vitalis. At that time the Archbishop
of ¦ Canterbury seems to have been the superior lord, but during Archbishop
Anselm’s exile ; Hamo seems not only to have acted as a , superior lord of
the Manor, but he made a : gift of the Church and the tithe, all the ¦
customs, four acres of land, as well as pasture for a hundred sheep, to the
Bishop of Rochester, and it is asserted that he did « this with the consent
of Archbishop An- , selm. However that may be, the Manor minuB the Church
property, continued -part of the possessions of the Archbishop of ;
Canterbury until the beginning of the 12th Century, and in the time of
Archbishop ; Stephen Langton the Manor was held under i the Archbishop by
Walter do Valoigus. Soon after Henry III. came to the throne the family of ^ussee
were in possession of the Manor, and at that time the mansion house standing
near the church was called North Court. The Hussees were a great , family in
this part of Kent, and they appear to have also held the Manor of Dene in
Wingham. Henry de Hussee n the year 1221 obtained a charter of free warren
for for Stourmouth Manor, and his grandchild of the same name died possessed
of the Manor in the year 1290, and ht- also possessed the Manors of Dene
Childerstone, and Chekeshill. His son, Henry de Hussee, was summoned to
Parliament amongst the Barons of the realm in the year 1322, and was
probably one of the first mebben of Parliament for East Kent. About the year
1413 the family of Hussee became extinct in Stourmouth, and the de Apulder-fields,
a family of much note, came to Stourmouth. The la4t of that name was Sir
¦William de Apulderfield. who died m the reign of Henry VI.; and his
daughter Elizabeth, carried the Manor in marriage to Sir John Fineux, Chief
Justice of the King’s Bench. After the Chief Justices death the
SaEtWRet"j£>t to j'Tjp? Esq., of -WellhaH, Eltham, who was Attorney-General
to Henry VIII., and died in possession of Stourmouth Manor in 1524, le wing
it by his will to his youngest son, Christopher. His great grandson,
Christopher, Lord Teynham, died possessed of it in 1622. That lorf
Teynham“left two sons, John, who inherited his title, and William R£Per
inherited the Manor of Stourmouth, and resided here in the year 1640 JSX‘
ceeded by his son John, and he dying without issue in 1718, the name °?
¦Rnooer as it was sometimes spelt), became Srt&et at Stourmouth, the Manor
being sold by the co-heirs to Jenkin Gillow. It next passed to his nephew of
the same name, and he dying without issue, the Manor passed, by the marriage
of his sister Anne, to the Tappendens, John Tappenden, a London merchant,
being in possession of it at the close of the 18th century. After the
Tappendens day, down to whose time a Court Baron was held for this Manor,
the estate ecame divided, and in the first half of the 19th century the
landowners were the Rev John Hilton, William Da man Esq., Mrs. Culmer, the
Key. Richard Drabe ahe
Sr)wS!8a^WcfMme, The
Si"Manor House^called' North' Court. To those who find pleasure in folklore,
it will be interesting to read a list of the residents in 1840. There ''ere
at West Stourmouth, near the church: Eliza Add-lev (Rose Cottage}, Thomas
Castle (beerhouse). Edward Cook (farmer) George Culmer (New House, farmer).
Stephen and Vin-(£nt Cook (farmers), William Culmer (North Court farmer” the
Rev. Richard Drake (rectorv), Henry Gibhs (inaltster and brew-«>¦ Clement
LasW. <^rhouse), and^. C.
Tower Stourmouth: James Add ley (farmer).
!herkiunCUWTsS. 8£
Sei/.^d^Ch-a^HS; <«
dSert/'nnT’GeorS?'White
This recital brings the history of Stour mouth sufficiently up to date.
MODERN STOURMOUTH.
Leaving the domain of history and look-
S^Tloot”^ place that haf been
;t ™he Tappendens, the Gillows, and the Ropers were the lords of the soil,
and not verv different from the fur her-off time when Apulderfields and the
Hussees were
that time, but in the low land which margins the Stour and its
contributories there were a few centuries ago important changes made bv the
drainage of the marsh lands by the* Commissioners appointed for that
purpose, and at the present tune the lower part of the parish is intersected
with many dvkes which keep the w»teroffthe surface and make a great pnr^t^erl
^iseless and a menace V the health of the sun-ounding districts, very
valuable for meadows and > arable land, much of it yielding market
tikimr a drive down to East Stourmouth, wherewill be seen the low land
luxuriant
in the growth of fruit and vegetables; if, in the right season—the beginning
of July —wide strawberry fields with the luscious red fruit giving a rich
under curtain to the green leaves, with women and children engaged picking
and carrying the fruit to tents, where it is basketted for market. Equally
inviting to the eye are the laden cherry trees, of which there are whole
orchards cultivated. Writing of this side of Stourmouth, Hasted says: “Here
is a house which by the flat walls and arched doorway i seems of some
antiquity. It is called Stone ; Hall, and belongs to Lee Warley, gentleman,
i of Canterbury. The fields here are very i large, being common and
unenclosed, and ! throughout the whole are flat and level. 1 In the north
east of the parish there is a 1 ferry from it for foot passengers only into
the Isle of Thanet.’’ To Hasted's description there is not very much to add.
Stone hall is there still, alhough much modernized. The fields are flat but
not unenclosed. There are more houses in the East than in Hasted’s day,
notably the large ' house with a wide frontage facing the Stour J! just
below the Rising Sun Inn, where re- > sided the late Mr. George Dowker. of
anti- ( quarian renown. The ferry to Thanet has j! hitherto been for foot
passengers only, but 1 there is now in the course of construction a a bridge
which will afford a direct carriage " route from Wingham to Ramsgate and
Mar- 5 gate, a change which will greatly open up S this parish to the
outside world. Leaving the bridge in the course of construction at c Plux
Gutter, on the right the carriage road ” rounds the point, and leaving the
Greater v Stour on the right goes up a narrow way ^ where a good steady
driver and a docile v horse are desirable, for the road lies be- Z tween the
lesser Stour on the one side and a deep dyke on the other, something, like ?
the path which Bunyan’s pilgrims had to J take at one part of their journey.
After J leaving the road of roughness and some ? peril, the course of the
Lesser Stour wan- * ders away along the flat meadows towards " Wickhambreaux.
and a tributary of it, ” known as the Wingham stream, taking a course nearer
the upland of Preston. Leaving these we pass towards West Stourmouth village
through luxuriant arable fields clad in all the glory of a fast-approaching
harvest. Hussee’s farm, named after the an- i cient family that held that
land, is a productive farm lot, and so is Denne farm, on < the same side of
the parish. Hasted seems to have travelled this ground a century r ago, and
he taking up the story at this j point wrote: “Further on is the parsonage,
, and the Court lodge opposite the church. , Of itself, it is not
unpleasant, and the houses are mostly of the better sort and s well
conditioned, which perhaps induced J Leland to call it a fair village.” The
fair ! village of Leland’s time has not developed \ very much since, but
there has been some , extension and increase. The population in f 1801
numbered 202 persons: in 1811—230: in 1821—257; in 1831 the same; in
1841—253; -
in 1851—274; in 1861—294; in 1871—301; in i 1881—321: in 1891—330; and in
1901—288. -In 1841 there were 51 houses in the parish, : and there are now
77; but six of them ; when the census was taken were unoccupied. It will be
observed that in the last : ten years the population has ebbed, but it is
probable that the bridge over the Stour will improve Stourmouh and add to
the . number of its residents.
STOURMOUTH CHURCH.
The church at Stourmouth, which is dedicated to All Saints, stands on the
east of the main road to Grove Ferry. The church and the rectory which is
just across the 1 road, aje embowered in trees. The edifice consists of a
chancei, a nave, and two small ' side aisles, north porch, and wooden belfry
at the west end containing three bells. The walls of the church are chiefly
of flints, < and the style is mainly Early English; but i at the west end
there are two massive but- < resses of brick. The body of the church and the
chancel no doubt date from the 12th century, but the aisles are of a later
date. The list of rectors dates from the year 1281, and from then till now
there have been ; fifty who have held the office. No men of 1 very great
note have been numbered amongst them; but there is a very able rector there
now—the Rev. Nathaniel J. Wilkins, M.A., LL.D., who has held the living
since 1895. The interior of the church has a rather old-fashioned look, the
last restoration and re-seating having taken place in the year 1845. On a
desk in the north aisle is a black letter copy of Foxe’s Book of Martvrs,
dated from the year 1564, in its original binding. This book was bought by
the churchwardens out of the parish funds about two centuries ago, and it
has long been an object of curiosity in the church; but it is now no use
there, and if left much longer will fall to pieces. With the binding
properly repaired and a plate placed in it to relate where it came from, it
would be a very proper relic to preserve in the Beaney Institute at
Canterbury. The pillars which support the four arches on the south side of
the nave are alternate circular and octagonal. On the north side there are
two large arches. On the eastern side of the top pillar of the south arcade
there is a block of stone about I nine inches high, three inches long, and
eighteen inches broad. It is not known why it is fixed there. Some have
supposed that it was the base of a shrine or altar, while others have
suggested that it had been a sort of stool of repentance. In the chancel
part of the rood screen remains, and there are some encaustic tiles which
are ancient. The font consists of a square bowl resting on four shafts, over
which is suspended a rather unique carved canopy. In the vestry is a parish
chest bearing date 1695. The church and churchyard are rich in memorials of
those who have been leading people in the parish, and amongst them on the
north wall of the nave is a marble tablet to the memory of a Stourmouth
centenarian Carr Culmer, who lived from the 1st Janu-arv 1735, to the 10th
of January, 1835. The inscription runs as follows: In the vault beneath are
deposited the remains of Carr Culmer, gentleman, born 1 January 1735, and
died 10 January, 1835. Also Sarah his wife, obit 1812, aged 70 years; also
Sarah, his daughter, obit 1852, aged 80 years.” There is in the chancel a
brass for Master Thomas Mareys, rector, obit 1475. There is also on the
pavement a memorial for John Powell- rector, obit 1680. In the middle aisle
is a memorial for Henry Jenkin, of this parish, obit 1679. On the south side
of the chancel is a small memorial window to Richard Drake. M.A.. 43 years
rector here, obit 1883. Over this is a small tablet to Jane Frances, wife of
the above-named rector, second daughter of Lieut.-Colonel Groves, of
Boughton-under-Blean, obit 1853, aged 41 years; also to the Rev. Percy James
Drake, M.A., son of the above obit 1879, aged 30 years. In the chancel floor
is a stone to the memory of Thomas Beake, of Stourmoutli, obit 1734, aged
65; “iso to his wife Elizabeth Beake obit 1771. In the churchyard are
several tombstones t-» the Culmers. Also a tombstone to Theo-philus
Harrison, obit 1779, aged 67, on Shich is the line’, “To-day for me;
to-morrow for you.” There are all in one line seven headstones to members of
the Harrison family, whose descendants still reside
in the parish. Several of the older headstones in this graveyard are
elaborately sculptured at the top with more or less hideous emblems of
mortality. The history of this church is given by Hasted thus: The church of
Stourmouth was given by Hamo, son of Vitalis, to Gundulph, bishop of
Rochester, and the monks of that Priory, together with the tithes, customs,
four acres of land, and pasture for 100 sheep, and this he did in the
presence and with the consent of Archbishop Anselm; after which the bishop
assigned the church and the free disposition of it to the monks of his
Priory. But bishop Gilbert de Glanvill, who came to the see in the year
1185, disputed their right to it, and he decreed that when the living was
vacant the bishop and the monks should jointly present to it. The church
remained in this ssate of alternate presentation until the 14th year of
Richard II., after which the presentation to the living of Stcurmouth was
left entirely with the Bishop of Rochester, as it is to the present time.
|