55 (57) High Street
Chatham
The "Crest Arms" had the "Crest Arms Tap" situated at the back.
This was listed under Inns and Hotels in Pigot's Directory of 1828.
The 1858 directory called it the "Chest Hotel and Commercial Inn."
The 1871 census listed a John Hanninger, Plasterer, age 43, as being the
head of the "Crest Arms Tap."
In 1872 the premises was owned by James Hulkes of Frindsbury.
Kentish Weekly Post or Canterbury Journal 3 June 1806.
DIED.
On Saturday morning, aged 15, Mr. S. Chaney son of Mr. Chaney, of the
"Chest Arms Tavern," Chatham; he was lately a midshipman on board the
Agincourt.
|
Kentish Gazette, 3 June, 1806.
DIED.
On Saturday morning, aged 15, Mr. S. Chaney son Mr. Chancy, of the
"Chest Arms Tavern" Chatham;
he was lately a midshipman on board the Agincourt.
|
Kentish Weekly Post or Canterbury Journal 22 January 1808.
CHATHAM, Jan. 19.
Yesterday the New Rooms at the "Chest Arms Tavern," which have been
finished and fitted in a style of considerable elegance and convenience,
were fitted for the reception of the Pokerian Society, for whose use it
is principally intended. About 130 of the principal Members of that
extensive and respectable Club sat down to an elegant dinner, provided
by Brother Chany. After dinner the glass circulated freely with
"Friendship, Love, and Harmony" till a late hour.
|
Kentish Gazette, Friday 22 March 1811.
On the death of Mrs. Chany, of the "Chest Arms," Chatham.
Oh! Death, alas! from this defeat,
Thy vict'ry sure must be complete,
Where will they ravage stop? Oh say!
Or must pure nature fall a prey
Eternally! - unto thy spleen:
Or, Could'st thou not in pity screen
The gen'ral Friend to human kind?
Who scarse, I fear, have left behind
Her equal in such goodly things,
As from the purest virtue springs.
Behold her neighbours, one and all!
Who knew her worth, bewail her fall;
Behold the gloom! behold the tear!
Which ever doth, from sympathy appear;
Which ever doth, with truth impart,
The inmost language of the heart;
Which can but in this case appease,
And give the Soul it's wonted case;
Which mitigates the general grief,
And give to sorrow some relief:
For that the Tyrants, Death! did rend,
The tender Mother, Wife, and Friend!
From every tie, from children dear,
From relatives and friends sincere;
Who yet should be consol'd by this,
To think her Soul is now in bliss.
Chatham, March 16, 1811.
H.S.
|
Kentish Weekly Post or Canterbury Journal, Friday 6 March 1818.
On Sunday night or Monday morning, a room being part of the premises of
the "Chest Arms Tavern," in this town, in which Mr. Chany keeps a
deposit of beer, spirits, tobacco, &c., for the accommodation of his
customers on the wharf at the back of the house, was broke open, and
robbed of all the spirits and tobacco it contained, a quantity of beer,
which was pumped up by the machine, and twenty-two large flint glass
rummers. The thieves got off with their booty undiscovered.
|
Kentish Gazette, 4 August 1820.
DEATH.
Last week, after a long illness, Thomas, son of Mr. Chany, of the
"Chest Arms Tavern," Chatham.
|
From Liverpool Mercury, Friday, June 19, 1829.
BANKRUPTS.
Copied from the London Gazette, June 12,1829. Alexander Bernard, "Chest
Arms Inn", Chatham, Kent. |
Kentish Gazette 14 January 1834.
DEATH.
Jan. 4. at Chatham, aged 70, Mr. Thomas Chanay, formerly of the "Chest
Arms."
|
Maidstone Journal, 10 May, 1842.
On Monday and Wednesday the county Justices proceeded with the
hearing of the information's against the publicans and beersellers
of Chatham, whose cases had not come on at the last previous
sitting. Only two cases were got though on Monday, namely, that of
Mr. Tassell, of the "Red
Lion," who was acquitted; and that of Mr. Champion the "Chest
Arms." Mr. Birch attended for the defendant, and cross-examined the
witness, who proved the offence against the tenor of the license
with regard to the tap of the "Chest Arms Tavern," and detailed the
scenes they had witnessed there. It appeared that the business of
the tap was, as usual, in Inns, superintended by another person
under agreement with Mr. Champion; but the premises being all under
one roof and the same licence, the latter was the only person
responsible for the well conducting the house, and he was
consequently find for a first offence the sum of £5 and the
expenses.
|
From the West Kent Guardian, 15 July, 1843.
Robbery by female servant.
A respectable young woman named Ann Ost, 23 years of age, was placed in
the dock charged with stealing several half crowns, and other moneys,
the property of Mr. Champion of the "Chest Arms Tavern," High Street,
Chatham. The prisoner was also charged with stealing a cambric petticoat
of Mrs. Champion.
Mrs. Harriot Ann Champion the wife of Mr. Benjamin Champion, deposed
that the prisoner had been in her service about 15 months. Witnessed
first engaged her as cook, but afterwards, has chambermaid, which
situation she filled up to the time of the robbery. In consequence of
missing money, witness saw her husband mark some half-crowns and other
money on Wednesday afternoon last, and on the next morning three of the
half-crowns were missing. On Thursday witness saw her husband mark some
more half-crowns, and when she went to bed on Friday night about half
past 11 o'clock, she put into her pocket 4 half crowns, 2 shillings, and
1 six-pence, all marked. The marks on the money she examined before she
put them into her pocket. The prisoner was in the room the whole time
witness was undressing until she was in bed, when the prisoner took away
the candle and bade her good night. Witnesses laid her pocket on the
dressing table. About 2 minutes afterwards the prisoner again entered
the bedroom without a candle, and said she had come in to see if any
water was in the water jug. Having suspicion, witness got out of bed and
examined her pocket, and found that two half crowns and one shilling
were gone. Witnessed rang the bell, and the prisoner answered it;
witness told her to call her master. On his arrival, witness told him
money was missing, and gave him the pocket and her husband left the
room. Witness afterwards got up and came downstairs and found Binds, the
constable, in a room with a prisoner.
Benjamin Champion examined:- On Friday night after 12 o'clock, I was
called to my wife's bedroom, and received from Mrs. Champion a pocket
containing 2 half-crowns, 1 shilling and sixpence, all bearing marks I
have previously put on them by a punch. I went downstairs and found the
prisoner in the passage, and I directed her to go into a room. The
constable came, and I gave him the pocket. I produced the punch with
which I marked the money.
Thomas Bines, constable of Chatham, said, I was called into the "Chest
Arms," after midnight on Friday last, and then found the prisoner with
Mr. Champion in one of the rooms. I told the prisoner she was accused of
taking money from her mistress's pocket. The prisoner denied having done
so, saying that she had no occasion to do that, as she had plenty of
money of her own, and immediately took from her pocket a purse, and
threw it on the table containing 4 shillings and two sixpences. I told
her that was not what I wanted; I wanted the two half-crowns. The
prisoner hesitated and I requested Mr. Champion to procure a female to
search her. The prisoner then gave me from her pocket, 2 half-crowns,
which I produce. The prisoner then gave me a bunch of keys, and from
information I received I went to the house of Mr. Thomas Costa, in Best
Street, Chatham, and applied one of the keys to the trunk, which was
pointed out to me by Mrs. Costa, as belonging to the prisoner. I took
possession of the trunk, and upon it being examined, the petticoat now
produced was sworn to by Mrs. Champion, as her's, and which had been
stolen.
Eliza Ann Coster, sworn:- My husband is a bricklayer. I have known the
prisoner for the last 7 or 8 weeks. On the 28th of June, the prisoner
called on me and said she had had a difference with her mistress, and
was, therefore, going to leave her place; and asked permission to leave
her boxes at my house as she was shortly going to be married to an
acquaintance of my husband's. As I knew that an acquaintance existed I
consented. The "boots" of the "Chest Arms" brought the boxes of the
prisoner the same day. The prisoner afterwards used to come to my house
and go to her trunk.
The money and petticoat was sworn to by the prosecutor, and the prisoner
was fully committed for trial.
A second charge of stealing money was then gone into, and the evidence
being clear, the prisoner was again committed.
|
Kentish Gazette, 19 March 1844.
Intense interest has been manifested during the past week in the
neighbourhood of Chatham, for the fate of a young man named
Louis Isaacs, son of Mr. Isaac Isaacs, army and navy outfitter. It is
feared he is drowned, but so much mystery hangs over his
disappearance, now ten days since, that conjecture is exhausted. He
merely left home, after business was over, for the purpose of
taking a glass of ale with a friend at the "Chest Arms Tap," and was
last seen at that house about five on the following morning, and
said to be perfectly sober. His friend left him between twelve and one
o’clock. A hat has been found in the river, which is supposed
to be his. He was a young man of very excellent character, and of steady
habits. Suspicion exists that he has not been fairly dealt
with.
|
South Eastern Gazette, 8 November 1853.
DREADFUL EXPLOSION OF FIRE WORKS - TWO LIVES LOST.
A most distressing accident occurred in this neighbourhood last
week, by which the lives of two persons, a female, aged 50, and a
lad, aged 14, have been sacrificed, and two other persons
frightfully injured. The sad event has caused the greatest gloom to
be felt among all classes in this neighbourhood, from the position
of the unfortunate sufferers. The scene of the accident was the back
premises of the house and shop occupied by Mr. Henniker, gun-maker,
carrying on his business in Hamond-place, High-street, Chatham. For
several weeks past Mr. Henniker has been busily engaged in preparing
a large quantity of fireworks for the approaching fifth of November,
being assisted by his wife and three sons. On Wednesday afternoon
last they were so engaged, Mrs. Henniker and her second son, Peter,
aged 14, being at work together in the kitchen, in which there was a
fire burning at the time, and William, the eldest son, aged 20, and
the youngest son Albert, aged 10 years, being similarly employed in
the washhouse adjoining, there being a communication between the two
rooms. The servant had been at work in the kitchen, but had that
moment left it when the explosion took place. Mr. Henniker also had
just left the kitchen. About three o’clock the neighbourhood was
alarmed by several loud reports, when it was discovered that from
some unexplained cause the fireworks had exploded, almost completely
destroying the washhouse and kitchen, and frightfully injuring those
who had been engaged therein at work; Mrs. Henniker being found
among the ruins, horribly burnt and scorched, and apparently dying;
her clothes being still on fire. The eldest son William was also
much burnt, and when found was endeavouring to tear off his shirt,
which was burning. The second son, Peter, was greatly injured, and
the youngest son appears to have escaped more fortunately. Mrs.
Henniker was removed from the ruins, taken to the "Chest Arms"
public-house opposite, and attended by Mr. H. Fayle, surgeon, but
she died at twelve o'clock the same night. The second son, Peter,
died on the following night, and William still lies in a precarious
state, the accident having had such an effect upon him that he is at
present in a state of great danger. On our visiting the scene of the
accident a few minutes after the explosion, a dreadful sight
presented itself. The yard was filled up with the debris of the
premises destroyed, the hole of one side of the kitchen and
washhouse having been blown out, and the roof partially torn away,
so great was the force of the explosion. On the floor were scattered
the empty cases of the exploded fireworks, every article in the
rooms not destroyed being scorched and blackened. The effects of the
explosion was apparent, a handsome eight-day clock, which stood in
the kitchen, being battered in. Although the sacrifice of life and
property has been so great, yet the wonder appears to be that it was
not more so in a frightful degree, when it is stated that at the
time of the explosion there were about 75lbs weight of gunpowder in
the washhouse, which by a miracle did not explode, the eldest son
having the presence of mind on the instant of the explosion
occurring to hurl the barrels in which it was contained over the
adjoining wall. Had this exploded we need hardly say that a portion
of the street would have been laid in ruins, besides a corresponding
destruction of life.
The particulars of the accident will be best gathered from the
evidence taken at THE INQUEST, which was held on Thursday evening,
at the "Chest Arms" before T. Hills, Esq., and a highly respectable
jury, of which Mr. T. Beveridge was foreman.
The jury having answered to their names, the Coroner said it was
perhaps hardly necessary for him to state that the occasion which
called them together was to enquire into the circumstances attending
the death of poor Mrs. Henniker, and he was sure it was one to which
they would give their serious attention. He would take that
opportunity of mentioning, that at the time deceased met with her
death, she, and the other persons so employed, were engaged in an
unlawful act, and every person ought to be aware that by an Act
passed in the reign of William the 3rd, it was illegal to
manufacture, sell, or let off fireworks, and any one so engaged was
liable to be indicted. He was aware that if any one had informed
against Mr. Henniker it would have been pronounced an un-neighbourly
act, but they now witnessed the consequences. He had been informed
at the time of the explosion there were upwards of 75lbs. of
gunpowder on the premises, and had that quantity caught fire no one
knew what might have been the consequences, as in all probability
many lives would have been destroyed, and the place blown to pieces.
If any other parties had met their death, the persons employed in
manufacturing the fireworks would have rendered themselves liable to
be indicted for manslaughter, at the assizes. He hoped the present
calamity would operate as a warning and put a stop to the
manufacture of articles of this description.
Before the jury went to view the body, Mr. Fayle, the surgeon, hoped
they would go with as little disturbance as possible, as the eldest
son, who was dangerously ill, was not yet made aware of his mother’s
death.
The jury then went to view the body, which presented a shocking
spectacle, the whole of part, chest, neck, head, and back being
scorched and blackened. On their return, the following evidence was
taken:-
Mary Ann Cray deposed:— I have lived as a servant at the house ot
deceased for the past ten months. On Wednesday afternoon, at about
half-past two or a quarter to three o'clock, I was in the kitchen
washing up the dishes. The kitchen joins the washhouse, and it is
under the same roof. I had occasion to leave the kitchen to throw
water into the yard, when I heard a loud report go off in the
washhouse, and my mistress screaming. On seeing the smoke coming
from the washhouse door, I ran out to the garden steps. The smoke
filled the kitchen. At the time of the explosion I was in the yard
and got under the garden steps, and being nearly suffocated with
smoke I threw a towel over my face to keep the smoke from me. As
soon as I was able to see anything, I saw William, the eldest son,
tearing off his shirt, which was on fire, and I then saw Master
Peter, the second son, all in a blaze. On looking about I saw my
mistress (the deceased) lying at the passage door, and some men were
throwing water over her. After that several persons came to render
assistance. When I left the kitchen to throw away the water, Mrs.
Henniker and Peter were there filling the cases with the
composition, and William and Albert, the eldest and youngest sons,
were together at work in the washhouse also making fireworks. When I
was in the kitchen my mistress was putting on the touch-paper, and
Peter filling the cases; William and Albert were also filling. There
was a fire in the kitchen, and deceased was sitting at work very
near it. A long piece of flat wood lay before the fire, on which
were laid the empty cases drying. There was no fire in the
washhouse. There were three tin cases in the kitchen containing the
composition. I cannot say in what part the explosion took place,
neither do I know the cause of it. There was a large quantity of
gunpowder in the washhouse over the copper, in two small barrels,
and a larger one; neither were quite full; they had some matting
placed over them. I heard Albert tell William to take the powder
down, which he did, and I saw him throw it over the wall.
The Coroner remarked that there was enough, powder there to blow all
that part of the street down, and as much as the Sappers and Miners
used at Tom-all-alone’s in blowing up their large stockades.
Examination continued:— My mistress had about four dozen squibs in
her lap when the explosion took place. At that time she was putting
the touch-paper on them. Peter was standing near the window filling.
The squibs were rammed with a piece of iron wire covered with
leather at the top.
By a Juror:— Peter had only a little "stuff” before him in a dish.
There were some lucifer matches on the kitchen mantel-piece.
By the Foreman:— Mr. Henniker only made fireworks about this time of
the year, and had been engaged about the manufacture three weeks.
By another Juror:— The squibs when made were kept in a glass-case in
the shop. I have not heard either William or Peter say how the
accident happened.
By the Foreman:— I have seen one rocket made, which was sold the
morning the accident occurred; my master mostly made squibs and
white lights.
Frederick Rawlinson deposed:— I was in the "Trumpet" public-house,
opposite, talking to Mr. Burford, at the time of the explosion. I
saw several persons running down Hamond-hill, on which I went across
to Mr. Henniker’s door. The smoke was then pouring out of the shop.
I ran through the premises, and when I got into the back yard I saw
two of the sons standing there, and all one side of the building
blown away. The two sons, whose names I do not know, were standing
one at the back and the other close to the water-butt. The hair on
the head of one of them was quite erect; the other had his clothes
on fire. I looked round and saw Mrs. Henniker lying down, partly in
the kitchen and partly in the yard, under the window of the parlour.
I saw no one else there. Deceased’s clothes were on fire. I
commenced pulling them off, and called for a knife to cut them; it
was two or three minutes before I could get one. The clothes were
very much burnt. Deceased was insensible, and never spoke. She was
so burnt, I asked Mr. Henniker if he knew who the deceased was? He
said “It is my poor wife.” I should think the explosion originated
in the washhouse, as there were so many sky-rockets and squibs lying
about. I saw several persons handling about the powder, and I told
them to throw it over the wall. I saw no flames; my eyes were very
much affected. I obtained some water and poured over deceased, and
then carried her over to the "Chest Arms," with the assistance of
two persons.
By the jury:— Neither of the sons spoke to me as to how the
explosion occurred.
Mr. Higginson Fayle, surgeon, of the firm of Bell and Fayle, deposed
that he was sent for to see deceased immediately after the accident,
and found her much burnt about various parts of the body. She died
on Wednesday night from the results of the burns; her system was not
able to recover the stock. Witness never heard deceased say how the
accident was to be accounted for. She was sensible during her
illness.
Mr. Reader, one of the jurors, said several of the squibs were blown
into his parlour window.
Mr. Fayle said William, the eldest son, undoubtedly saved the
adjoining premises. About 131bs. of power exploded. There were
751bs. in the back room in three canisters of 25lbs. each.
A juror remarked that he saw William Henniker throw the powder over
the wall after he had his shirt torn off.
The Coroner said the jury had now heard the whole of the evidence
they had to lay before them. He begged to call their attention once
more to the 2nd and 3rd William the 4th, which, however, related to
the metropolitan districts. There was also the Act of William the
3rd, to which he had before alluded. In 1847 two persons were
charged before a grand jury in London under the provisions of that
Act; true bills were returned against them, and the parties were
afterwards convicted. He thought if it were generally known that
persons were liable to be indicted it would put a stop to the
careless manufacture of fireworks. He could not help adverting to
the utter carelessness in which these things were generally done. If
it were a lawful act a proper caution ought undoubtedly to be
observed, still more so ought that to be the case when parties were
engaged in an illegal act. If the deceased’s death had been
occasioned by another person, the case would have assumed a very
different aspect. He (the coroner) did not make these observations
to cast any reflections on those that were gone, but he did hope the
magistrates would take the matter up and direct their constables to
prevent fireworks being sold and let off.
A gentleman in the room reminded the coroner that the county
magistrates had given directions to the superintending-constables to
issue notices of that description.
The Coroner said it was useless to issue notices, if they saw a
prohibitory notice in one window, and in the next fireworks exposed
for sale. Notices were of no use unless followed up.
The jury then consulted for a short time, after which they returned
the following verdict “That the deceased met her death from the
accidental explosion of the preparation of gunpowder used in the
making of fireworks; and that the jury consider the practice of
making and selling fireworks in dwelling-houses to be most
reprehensible."
At the conclusion of the inquest the jury requested the coroner to
embody his remarks in a letter and forward it to the county
magistrates, and this the coroner promised to do.
Great commiseration is felt in these towns for the unfortunate
sufferers by this calamity, as they are in greatly straightened
circumstances. A subscription is being raised for their benefit, and
our correspondent at Rochester, Mr. Warne, will be happy to take
charge of any sums for them.
|
From the South Eastern Gazette, 6 December 1853.
DREADFUL EXPLOSION—TWO LIVES LOST.
On Friday night last, at about half-past nine o'clock, a violent
explosion took place at the Gillingham gas works near St. Mary's
barracks, Brompton, by which the lives of two men, named John Rensby
Culyer and William Hall, have been sacrificed.
It appears that the Messrs. Rickon have been engaged for several
months past in erecting extensive gas works near the river Medway, at
Gillingham. The works had been proceeded with all possible despatch, and
at the time of the explosion were in so forward a state that a supply of
gas would have been ready by the next night. During the whole of Friday
evening the workmen were engaged, under the immediate superintendence of
Mr. Rickon, in charging the gasometer, a large quantity of gas having
been admitted. A loud noise attracting the attention of the men, it was
at once suspected that there was something wrong, and Culyer, the
engineer, accompanied by Hall, ascended to the top of the gasometer to
discover what was amiss, foolishly taking a light with them. Mr. Rickson
advised Culyer not to go that evening, but he appeared not to have
attended to the directions given. On the two men reaching the top the
escape of gas must have come in contact with the flame, for immediately
after a loud explosion took place, bursting the top of the gasometer,
which was lifted some height, and tearing of three of the new pillars or
“guide lines."
The body of Culyer was found in the tank of the gasometer,
frightfully disfigured, and quite dead. The body of Hall had not been
discovered on Sunday evening, but it was supposed to be lying beneath
the gasometer. At the time of the explosion there were several persons
in and about the premises, none of whom were hurt. It is a rather
singular circumstance that one of the persons who has met with his death
was the individual who got Mrs. Henniker out of the ruins at the recent
fatal explosion of fireworks, at Chatham, and carried her across the
street to the "Chest Arms."
Owing to this untoward accident it will be some time before the works
are in a fit state to supply the parish of Gillingham with gas.
THE INQUEST
The inquest was held yesterday (Monday) morning, at the "Green
Dragon" on the bodies of the unfortunate men. John Ormsby Culyer and
John Richard Hall, who were killed by the explosion.
Mr. Shindler, solicitor, attended to watch the proceedings for the
Messrs. Rickon.
The Coroner and jury having viewed the bodies which lay at the the
gas-house, the following evidence was taken.
Mr. Weeks, surgeon, at Brompton, deposed that he was called on Friday
night to the gas-works. The body of Culver was then lying near the
retort-house and quite dead. The body had been taken out of the
gasometer tank, having been thrown in by the force of the explosion
Witness made an external examination, and discovered a severe bruise on
the right side of the head. The cause of death was from drowning, the
blow on the head having no doubt stunned him.
John James Rickson, the manager at the works, deposed that they had
been forcing gas into the holder all day on Friday, having commenced at
4 o’clock. About 9 o’clock in the evening, witness was sitting in the
retort-house, telling a workman what to do, when the deceased (Culyer)
came in; witness had not seen him since Monday afternoon. The deceased
was in very high spirits. Witness at this time was congratulating the
workman that the third charge just driven in would forca the crown of
the holder out. Two charges, each of 49lbs. of coal, had been driven in,
the mixture causing what was known as "choke damp." Deceased called for
a candle, went out with Hall, and ascending to the top of the holder, on
his return said that everything was going on right. As far as witness
could judge Culyer was perfectly sober. When deceased arrived at the top
of the holder, Hall turned the tap of the standpipe, to which he applied
a light, when there appeared a beautiful blue flame about the size of a
pea. When Colyer went to the top witness felt a peculiar sense of dread
come over him. Deceased put out the flame and returned to the
retort-house. On finding that the burner in the retort-house would not
burn, they proceeded to the top of the holder a second, and subsequently
a third time, on each occasion taking the lighted candle with them,
trying the same experiment. On the third occasion witness saw Culver
apply the light as before, and for a few seconds no flame appeared from
the pipe, but witness saw the light of the candle as if drawn into the
pipe. The gas holder then rose bodily, and when it was not able to
resist the force, the explosion took place. The holder was rent asunder,
and the men went down into it. Culyer’s body was taken out, quite dead,
a few minutes afterwards, but Hall's was not discovered till Sunday
night.
Henry Beaumont, one of the workmen in the retort-house, hearing the
explosion, ran out. Heard Culyer struggle in the water and groan two or
three times, when taken out he was quite dead.
Mr. Pope was also examined, who proved assisting to get Culyer’s body
out of the water.
The jury, after a few remarks from the coroner, returned a verdict,
“That the deceased John Ormsby Culyer was killed by an explosion at the
gas works, but whether drowned or suffocated by gas there was not
sufficient evidence to show.
|
Southeastern Gazette, 27 September 1853.
Death.
Sept. 18, at Ordnance-place, Chatham, Mrs. Mary Chany, aged 61
years, much regretted, relict of the late Mr. Thomas Chany, formerly
of the "Chest Arms Tavern," Chatham, and the "Lord
Nelson," Ordnance-place.
|
Maidstone Journal and Kentish Advertiser 2 January 1865.
STEALING WEARING APPAREL.
William Wilson and Jane Wilson, man and wife, the latter remanded from
Wednesday, charged with stealing a flannel petticoat, stockings and
other articles, the property of Mr. Wilson landlord of the "Chest Arms,"
Chatham, were again placed at the bar. Several witnesses were examined,
amongst them being the prosecutor, prosecutor's wife, Sarah Lorden
(female searcher at the county magistrates), and Police-constable Kilby,
from whose evidence there appeared little doubt that the male prisoner,
with the assistance of his wife, stole the articles. Both were fully
committed for trial.
|
Maidstone Telegraph. 5 June 1869.
Chatham local board of health rights.
Mr. T. Hills, Clerk to the local
board of health, appeared to support two applications to recover payment
of arrears of rates. The summonses were adjourned from last week to
enable the defendant's to have professional assistance.
On the
cases being called the defendant answered but no solicitor appeared for
them.
The first case was against James Wilson late landlord of the
"Chester Arms Tap," who disputed payment on the grounds that he had left
the house before the rates became payable, but after a brief
investigation it was clearly established that the defendant was legally
liable to pay the rates and the magistrates made the usual order for
payment.
The defendant said he would not pay unless a distress
warrant was issued. He did not mean to pay for other people.
|
From the Rochester and Chatham Journal and Mid-Kent Advertiser,
Saturday, September 2, 1876.
Miscellaneous.
The magistrates hear adjourned for some time to take of luncheon. On
business being resumed the following persons, who had been convicted of
various offences during the year, and his cases had been deferred in
consequence, apply for the renewal of their licences. vis. Mrs. Harcus,
"Chest Arms," Chatham......
The other licences were renewed after the holders had been cautioned. |
LICENSEE LIST
CHANEY Thomas 1806-20+
WARMAN Thomas 1828+
BERNARD Alexander to June/1828
CHAMPION Benjamin 1826-43+
CHANEY Thomas to Jan/1834 dec'd
FRANCIS William 1858-62+
WILSON James 1865+
TOMLIN Joseph Thomas 1867+
HARCUS Selina Mrs 1871-76+
(age 47 in 1871)
CHARD Henry 1881+ (age 55 in 1881)
https://pubwiki.co.uk/ChestArms.shtml
From the Pigot's Directory 1828-29
From the Pigot's Directory 1832-33-34
From the Post Office Directory 1866-67
Licensing
Records 1872
Census
|