Herne Street
Herne
Above postcard, circa 1900, kindly sent by Rory Kehoe. |
Above photo, circa 1900, kindly sent by Garth Wyver and Michael
Mirams. |
Above photo, 1930. |
Above postcard, date unknown. |
From the Kentish Chronicle, 9 May, 1863.
BRUTAL MURDER OF THE HERNE CARRIER.
On Saturday evening last. Richard Steed, the carrier between Herne and
Canterbury, was found brutally murdered, a short distance from his
house, and Alfred Aldridge (who was discharged from the 54th Regiment,
with a blank character, and has been in prison for felony), has been
apprehended on suspicion of being concerned in the murder. From
inquiries instituted on the spot it appears that on Saturday afternoon
the murdered man was drinking at a public-house at Herne, in company
with several men. Aldridge being among them, and that he left the house
in the evening for the purpose of proceeding home, accompanied by
Aldridge. Nothing more was heard of him until between seven and eight
o'clock the same evening, when a young man named Turk, with a female
named Connor observed the body lying in a dry ditch by the side of a
foot road leading from Herne to Maypole. It was frightfully knocked
about. The face was completely battered in, and the head forced several
inches into the earth. An alarm was immediately raised, and upon
assistance arriving, the poor fellow was conveyed to his home, but
ceased to breathe just as the house was reached. He was of a jangling
disposition, especially when in liquor, but nothing particular
transpired at that public-house to create any suspicion that foul play
was in store for him. Information was given to the county constabulary,
and Superintendent Walker made an investigation of the circumstances
connected with the murder, which resulted in the apprehension of
Aldridge, whose trousers bear marks of blood, and human hair was
discovered on his boots. The accuse spoke of it as being a very serious
affair, and appeared anxious to know where he would be tried. He admits
having accompanied the deceased from the public-house at Herne, but
states that he left him some distance from where he was afterwards
found, as described above. It would seem that the murdered man was first
knocked down with some blunt instrument, and then his face battered in
with the heel of a heavy boot, such as the prisoner wore at the time of
the murder.
EXAMINATION OF THE PRISONER BEFORE THE MAGISTRATES, AT
CANTERBURY.
On Monday morning the prisoner was placed at the bar of
the St. Augustine's Police Court, to answer the charge of having
wilfully killed and murdered Richard Steed. W. Delmar, Esq., was in the
chair, and the following justices were also present:- W. Plummer and
George Neame Esqrs., and Captain Slarke. The room was crowded, as was
also the street in which the office is situated, and the most intense
excitement prevailed. The prisoner remained cool and collected
throughout the whole of the proceedings, and paid great attention to the
evidence adduced. He is a tall muscular man.
The following evidence was adduced:- George Turk, of Maypole, engine
driver, deposed:- On Saturday night, shortly after eight o’clock, I was
going from Maypole to Herne-street, by the footpath. I had gone nearly
half a mile from Maypole, when I saw the deceased lying in a dyke close
by the footpath. He was then alive. He was frightfully cut about the
face and disfigured. The wounds appeared to have been recently
inflicted, and the blood was flowing from them. Mrs. Connor was with me.
Directly she saw the body she made a dreadful noise and clutched me. I
took her on a few yards, and then returned to the deceased. I only knew
the deceased by his clothes, otherwise I should not have known who it
was. I tried to get him up, but his head rolled back. I then laid him on
the bank. He was perfectly insensible. I went immediately to the house
of a person named Petts, and requested him to go to the deceased, while
I went to inform his friends. Assistance being obtained, the deceased
was removed to his house, but he died soon after; medical aid was sent
for. Did not see any weapon or any person near the place. The deceased
lived at Maypole. There was a good deal of blood and brains on the
ground where Steed was lying, and the brains were pouring out of his
head. Could not see any mark of scuffling about the place. It was
between lights when I first saw the body. Did not notice whether the
deceased's pockets were turned inside out or not. My attention was more
drawn to the state he was in.
Mrs. Connor, who was with the previous witness when the body of the
deceased was discovered, confirmed his evidence. The prisoner declined
to ask these witnesses any questions.
Hannah Steed, the widow of the deceased, deposed:— My husband was
brought home on Saturday night wounded. They did not let me see him
then, but I thought I heard him breathe. Did not examine his clothes,
but the doctor and another witness did. The prisoner owed my husband a
little money, and he said he would pay him when be got his money; but
when the deceased asked him for it, saying if he did not pay it he would
summon him, the prisoner said he would never get it. My husband did
summon him. The day afterwards he came to our door and asked for the
deceased. My little girl went to the door and let him in. the deceased
was at his supper at the time. The prisoner offered him 1s., which
deceased said he could not take, as the summons was out. They jangled
together for some minutes after that, and the deceased ordered him out,
and as he would not go the deceased pushed him out. As the prisoner was
going out he said “Oh you ______, I will do it for you before many
weeks.” That was about two months ago.
By the prisoner:— You gave the child a shilling, and her father made her
take it back to you.
Albert Steed, son of the deceased, 12 years of age, deposed that he was
with his father on Saturday at Bogs-hole, on the new line of railway
between Herne Bay and Reculver. He had been selling coffee and small
beer to the men employed on the line. He saw the deceased go towards the
pay office; he counted his money, and said it was 9s. 9d. He put the
money into his pocket again. The prisoner was at work at Bogs-hole, on
the line. Did not notice the prisoner there on Saturday, or any day
during the past week. He assisted in bringing home the body of the
deceased, and saw some money taken from his pockets; it was 1s. 8d , 6d.
in silver and the rest in coppers.
By the prisoner:— On Friday evening, a little boy was sitting with me on
a style on Mr. Sladden’s land. You came alone. It was between May-street
and Bogs-hole that I parted with my father.
Turk recalled:— About a quarter of au hour elapsed between witness’s
leaving the body of deceased and Petts getting there.
Julia Hammond, daughter of the deceased, deposed that she was present
just after the body of the deceased was brought home. Saw the pockets of
the deceased searched by her brother. There was 6d. in silver and
fourteen pence. Only knew what her father had told her of what had
transpired between them. The face was so disfigured that she hardly knew
it.
Jesse Holness, of Herne-street, deposed that he knew the deceased and
the prisoner. On Saturday night he went at 7 o’clock to the “Prince
Albert,” at Herne-street, about 1 1/4 mile from Maypole. When the
deceased come in, he said “Halloa, Canterbury,” and the prisoner said,
“Halloa, Canterbury.” The deceased asked if Canterbury was going home,
and the prisoner said “Yes.” Deceased then said, “We will go home
together.” Witness went out for about half-an-hour, and on his return
they were both gone. There were others in the taproom at the time
witness left, besides the deceased and prisoner. They did not have any
beer in witness's presence. Could not say whether they left together or
not, or whether they were under the influence of drink. If they went the
right way home, they would go by Maypole.
The prisoner declined asking this witness any question.
George Stannard, a navvy at work on the line, deposed that he saw the
deceased on Saturday on the line. A little after 7 o’clock he saw the
prisoner and deceased going home together. They were then just going up
Herne-street, towards Maypole. Did not speak to either of them. They
appeared to be walking very friendly together.
By Captain Ruxton:- I know Ridgeway farm. The way the prisoner and
deceased went would take them past that farm.
Isaac Pulley, living near Ridgway farm, about five minutes’ walk from
Herne-street, deposed and to seeing the deceased and prisoner pass his
house on Saturday night, going in the direction of Maypole. Witness said
to them, “It’s very cold to-night,” and one or both of them replied,
“Yes, it is.” They seemed to be “talking like” when they passed witness.
The murder took place a quarter of a mile from where they passed
witness’s place. Identified the coat produced as the one worn by the
prisoner on Saturday night, when he passed within two rods of witness's
place.
The prisoner:— That is my coat, and the one I generally wear.
Superintendent Walker deposed:— On Sunday morning I proceeded to Hoath,
to the residence of the deceased. It is called Maypole-street. I saw the
body, and examined the head. Saw that great violence had been used. I
then went with Sergeant Gower to the spot where the murder was
committed, which is about half-way between Ridgway farm and Maypole
street. A footpath leads from Maypole-street to Ridgeway, on to Herne.
On passing down that footpath, I saw where the murder had taken place.
It was a dry ditch, and there was a large quantity of blood and brains
lying there. There was a hollow on the ground about three inches deep;
it had the appearance of the head having been pummelled into the ground.
The blood and brains were scattered about there. There was also the mark
of the heel of a boot, but I did not see any appearance of a struggle
having taken place. I then saw witness Pulley, and from what he said and
other information, I went to the prisoners house, and ordered him to be
stripped, for the purpose of examining the clothing. I then asked for
the boots he had worn on the previous day, and he said they were in the
cupboard. His wife handed the boots to me from the cupboard. I then
asked the prisoner which way he came home on the previous evening, and
if he would show me. He said he would. He then took me and Sergeant
Gower towards Maypole-street, near Mr. Larkin's forge. He said he left
the deceased not far from Herne, who took the road not far from the
wood, and that he (the prisoner) took the road which he was showing me,
coming out at Larkin's forge. He took us across the field where there
was a footway, and sometimes where there was not, in a circuitous
direction, and towards Herne-street. We also went across a ploughed
field, which brought us out nearer to Herne, than to Ridgway farm. He
did not take me past Pulley’s house. When I apprehended him on the
charge he said he was not guilty. The road the prisoner took me would
have been half a mile out of his way going from where he left the
deceased to his (prisoner’s) residence. [The boots of the prisoner were
here produced. There were marks of blood on them, especially at the back
part and the heels, and there were also portions of human hair still
adhering to them. A thrill of horror ran through the Court as this
exhibition took place]. Having carefully examined the boots,
Superintendent Walker said he had no doubt of its being human hair, both
black and grey.
By the prisoner:— You made a stop once as if you did not know where to
go.
After some further evidence, Mr. Jameson, surgeon, stated the nature of
the injuries which the deceased had sustained. The skull was extensively
fractured and the bones of the face completely smashed in. The jaws were
also fractured. These injuries had undoubtedly caused the death of the
deceased.
Some discussion took place respecting the calling of additional
evidence. Captain Ruxton read a letter which had been addressed by Mr.
R. Larkin to Mr. Superintendent Walker. The letter was to the effect
that the prisoner was seen by Mr. Larkin's son on Saturday night, and
that an iron share, with blood upon it, had been found near the spot
where the murder was committed. It was agreed to adjourn the hearing
till four o'clock in order to obtain the attendance of Mr. Larkin and
his son.
ADJOURNED EXAMINATION OF THU PRISONER.
At four o'clock the prisoner was again placed at the bar. The
magistrates on the bench were Mr. Delmar, Mr. Neame, and Mr. Plummer.
The Court was again crowded, and there were some hundreds of people in
the street, unable to obtain admission.
Richard Larkin was then called and examined, he deposed; I am a smith,
and live at Maypole, in the parish of Hoath. Yesterday afternoon my wife
told me there was a plough some distance in the field, and as Mr.
Jameson said the murder had been committed by some powerful instrument,
it struck me that such an instrument as the point of a plough might have
been used. I therefore went to the plough this morning, and took this
point from it, as there appeared to be stains of blood on it. The plough
was about 130 yards from the place where the murder was committed, and
the prisoner must have passed it.
Edgar Albert Larkin deposed to seeing the prisoner pass his house on
Saturday evening, about nine o’clock.
Mr. Jameson, surgeon, then carefully examined the share produced, and
expressed his decided opinion that the marks upon it were blood marks.
He also added that it was his belief, that the deceased’s skull was
broken by the share, and then the boot went to work.
Having been duly cautioned, and asked if he had anything to say in
answer to the charge, the prisoner said:- I can only say what I told the
Superintendent. You say I am charged with having wilfully murdered
Richard Steed. That is a fearful crime and one I am not guilty of. I
started with Richard Steed from Herne Street. We went along the footpath
towards Hoath, about 360 or 400 yards. Then I changed my direction, and
look the left road—Steed going over the style, and along the hedge and
the footpath, to the right of the one I was in. I kept in my direction
till I came out at the forge. I went to the shop for some bread, and
then went straight home, and did not come out after, except into the
yard. When there my neighbour said Steed had met with an accident. I
told him where I left Steed. I did not hear of his death till between
eight and nine on Sunday morning.
The Chairman:— It is our duty to commit you for a jury to decide whether
you are guilty or not.
Prisoner:— I do hope that something will be found out to clear me of the
charge of murder, or at all events, to lighten my crime. I have not seen
the deceased since we parted after leaving Herne-street.
He was then removed and conveyed to St. Augustine's Gaol.
OPENING OF THE INQUEST.
On Monday afternoon Mr. T. T. Delasaux, coroner, opened an inquest to
investigate the circumstances touching the death of Richard Steed, who
was murdered on Saturday evening, as reported above, The jury, which was
a very respectable one, assembled at the “Admiral Rodney” public-house,
but as all the witnesses were in Canterbury attending the examination
before the magistrates, the proceedings were merely of a formal
character. After the jury had been sworn and viewed the body, which
presented a shocking spectacle, evidence was called to prove the
identity of the deceased, in order to enable the coroner to give a
certificate for burial. The inquest was then adjourned till Friday
morning at ten o’clock.
|
From the Kentish Chronicle, 16 May, 1863.
BRUTAL MURDER OF THE HERNE CARRIER. ADJOURNED INQUEST.
The adjourned inquest was held at the “Admiral Rodney,” Hoath, on Friday
morning, before T. T. Delasaux, Esq.
George Turk was examined, and repeated the evidence which he gave before
the magistrates on the previous Monday.
A Juror:- Was the man lying in the ditch?
Witness:- Yes, quite in the ditch.
A Juror:- Was he on his back?
Yes, and it was the back of his head that made the hole.
The Foreman:- Which way was his feet?
Witness:- Towards Maypole, and his head towards Herne-street.
Mrs. Connor’s depositions were rend over to her, and she said they were
quite correct, and had nothing to add to them.
Mrs. Steed added the following to her evidence:— About a week after
Eldridge first brought 1s. he came again to the same door and one of my
daughters went and he gave her 1s., which she took to her father, and he
made her take it back to Eldridge, who wrangled with the child for some
time, but ultimately took the 1s.
By a Juror:— When he first brought 1s. he was perfectly sober.
Albert Steed made the following addition to his evidence:— I have
sometimes spoken to Eldridge; but he has never said anything to me about
my father. I do not know whether my father took any more money after I
left him on Saturday, neither do I know whether he spent any money.
There were 7s. in silver and 2s. 9d. in coppers in his pockets when I
left him.
Julia Hammond also repealed her evidence.
Jesse Holness said, in addition to his depositions, that the deceased
and Eldridge appeared to be on good terms in the public-house. Witness
had never heard Eldridge say anything against Steed.
George Stannard, being examined by the jury, said that the deceased and
Eldridge passed him about a rod distance from the spot where he was
standing. They appeared to be friendly.
Isaac Pooley added that he could identify the coat produced as being the
one worn by the man whom he saw with the deceased. He saw them together
on the Maypole side of Ridgway Farm. That is about twenty rods nearer
the spot where the murder was committed than where Eldridge says he
parted from Steed.
Superintendent Walker said that he walked from the spot where Eldridge
said he left Steed, to the place where Pooley saw him, in four minutes.
P.S. Gower produced some hair which he had cut from the right side of
the head of the deceased on the Sunday after the murder.
The Coroner, in summing up said, Gentlemen,— This is the evidence upon
which you have to consider and return your verdict. A more brutal, or a
more diabolical murder, I think, has never been committed, at all events
within my jurisdiction, during the last fifty years. It is for you to
say to whom she finger of the law should point. I will first read you
the law upon the subject, and then make such observations as I think
necessary. Before doing so, however, I must ask you to dismiss from your
minds anything and everything that you have heard out of this room, and
confine your attention to what has been adduced before you. And I must
ask you to do so with reference to the conduct of the magistrates of the
Home Division. They have thought it right to commit a man that he may be
tried for this offence. I must ask you to dismiss from your minds what
they have done. You must recollect that they do nothing more than commit
a man to gaol; not so with you. You are here, in fact, partially to try
the party whom you think guilty, because you return a verdict after an
inquisition. When the magistrates commit they have to form an
indictment, and send to the Grand Jury, who may throw the bill out; but
you return an indictment, and the prisoner cannot be discharged without
being tried. The Coroner then read the following extract from Jervis on
the case:— “Murder is defined to be when a person of sound memory and
discretion unlawfully kills any reasonable creature, being in and under
the King's peace, by any means with malice aforethought, either
expressed or implied.” There can be no doubt that a murder, and a very
foul murder, has been committed; and the only question is for you to say
to whom the finger of the law should point.
The jury, after having consulted for bout twenty five minutes, returned
a verdict of “Wilful Murder against Alfred Eldridge.”
|
From the Kentish Chronicle, 1 August, 1863.
THE MURDER OF THE HERNE CARRIER.
Alfred Eldridge, 33, labourer, was indicted for the
murder of Richard Steed, at Herne on the 2nd May. Prisoner walked to the
front of the dock apparently but little affected, and pleaded not
guilty. He was then removed.
THURSDAY. THE HERNE MURDER.
Alfred Eldridge, 33, a tall, powerful man, was charged with the wilful
murder of Richard Steed, at Herne, in this county, on the 2nd of May.
The prisoner was also charged with the same offence upon the coroner’s
inquisition.
Mr. Russell and Mr. Biron conducted the prosecution. The prisoner was
unprovided with professional assistance, but, at the request of the
learned judge, Mr. Barrow kindly consented to Watch the case on his
behalf, and he was assisted by Mr. Poland.
It appeared from the opening statement of the learned counsel for the
prosecution that the charge against the prisoner, rested principally
upon circumstantial evidence, although some statements that he himself
made were undoubtedly of a very important character. A great number of
witnesses were examined in support of the charge, but as their evidence
consisted principally of different minute facts, the nature of the case
will be much better understood in the form of a narrative than if the
statements of the different witness were given in detail. It appeared
that the deceased was a man about 55 years of age, and that he resided
at the village of Maypole, about a mile and a half from Herne, near
Canterbury, and that he was originally a carrier, but latterly he had
got his living by supplying the labourers employed upon the Herne Bay
and Margate Railway with beer and other articles, and was constantly
passing backwards and forwards between his own village and the railway
works. The prisoner had formerly been a soldier, but since leaving the
service he had worked us a labourer, and he had been for several months
employed as a navvy upon the railway works at Herne. It seemed that he
had previously lodged at the house of the deceased, but dissensions
arose between them, and some angry feeling existed, and the prisoner,
who is a married man, left the deceased’s lodging and went with his wife
to occupy a cottage by himself in the same village of Maypole. It
appeared that about three months before the death of the deceased he had
made a claim against the prisoner for a debt of a few shillings, which
he alleged he owed him, and which the prisoner refused to pay, and the
result was that the deceased took out a county court summons against him
for the amount. This no doubt exasperated the prisoner, and he went to
the deceased’s house and offered him a shilling in satisfaction of his
claim, but he refused to take it, and a quarrel took place and the
deceased turned the prisoner out of his house, and the latter was heard
to make use of threats, one of which was that he would do for the
deceased in a few weeks. Nothing particular, however, seemed to have
occurred from this time until the day of the fatal occurrence, which was
Saturday, the 2nd of May last. On that day the deceased had gone from
his own house, as usual, to the railway works at Herne; and he was
present when the railway men were paid off, about half past six o'clock
in the evening. The prisoner received his wages with the others, and
nothing took place that was at all calculated to create any suspicion of
violence being intended on his part; and it appeared that the deceased
first left the railway works, and that shortly afterwards he was
followed by the prisoner. The next that was seen of them was about seven
o’clock in the evening, when they were both at a public-house near by,
called the “Prince Albert;” but it appeared that they did not have
anything to drink at this place, and both the deceased and the prisoner
were perfectly sober, and there did not appear to be any ill-feeling
between them, but on the contrary, the former appeared to have addressed
the prisoner as “Canterbury” which was a nickname he went by, and to
have asked him if he was going home, and proposed that they should go
home together. The prisoner consented, and it appeared that they both
went away from the “Prince Albert” apparently on the most friendly
terms, about 7 o’clock in the evening, and the deceased was never again
seen alive, or at all events he was in a dying state when he was found,
and never spoke again. The distance from the village of Herne to that of
Maypole, where the prisoner and the deceased resided, was about a mile
and a half, and persons going to the latter would have to keep along a
footpath, and would pass a place called Pooley’s-gardens, which was
about a quarter of a mile from Herne, and at this place the prisoner and
the deceased were met about half-past seven o'clock, walking together,
and apparently on friendly terms. What happened after this was a blank,
except so far as was suggested by the evidence; but very soon afterwards
some persons passing along the footpath, about half a mile from Pooley’s-gardens,
found the deceased lying in a ditch close by the path in a most
frightful state. His skull was fractured, the bones of one side of his
face were completely smashed, one of his eyes was smashed out and was
lying on his cheek, these injuries having apparently been occasioned by
his head and face being stamped upon by a heavy iron armed boot, and his
brains and blood were scattered about in all directions. There was not
the slightest appearance of any struggle having taken place, and the
suggestion on the part of the prosecution was, that the unhappy man had
been suddenly struck down unawares as he was walking along, and that
while he was lying upon the ground he was stamped or jumped upon, and by
this means the other injuries were inflicted upon him. He was removed to
his own cottage, where he remained insensible for a few hours, and then
died; and it would seem that suspicion at once fell upon the prisoner as
being the author of the deed. On the following morning, therefore,
Superintendent Walker, of the county constabulary, went to the cottage
of the prisoner, accompanied by one of his men, and finding the prisoner
there, they proceeded to question him as to the occurrences of the
previous evening. He was first asked where the boots were that he had
worn, and he said they were in the cupboard, and the policeman took them
out. It was then noticed that he had a pair of clean stockings on and he
was asked where the dirty ones he had taken off were, and he said they
were somewhere about; but, although strict search was made for them,
they have never been discovered, and this induced a belief that they had
stains of blood upon them, and that they had purposely been destroyed.
At the bottom of the trousers worn by the prisoner there were several
red marks, and his boots which were stiff and hard as though they had
been recently soaked in water or washed, presented similar marks. The
boots and the trousers were submitted to the scientific examination of
Dr. Taylor and Dr. Perry; but it appeared that with regard to the former
articles, owing to the time that had elapsed, and the nothing to which
they had been subjected, they were unable to say positively whether the
red marks upon them were made by blood; but with regard to the trousers,
they gave a very confident opinion that the marks which appeared upon
them, and which were at a spot to which they would in all probability
have spurted from the head of the deceased, as he was being trampled
upon, were marks or blood. A most, important discovery was made,
however, upon examining the boots of the prisoner, which was, that
between the clip of iron and the sole, there were found a number of
small hairs of a brown colour tinged with grey, corresponding exactly in
colour with the hair of the deceased. It also appeared that at the time
he met his death the deceased had a red woollen comforter round his
neck, and some small fibres of red wool of the same description as that
of which the comforter was composed, were found among the hairs under
the iron clip of the prisoners boot. When the police had found these
articles they told the prisoner that Steed was dead, and that he was the
last man he had been seen with him on the previous night, and they asked
him whether he wished to say anything as to what had occurred, and he
replied that he was desirous to do so. He then said that it was true
that he and the deceased had left the village of Maypole together,
intending to go home to Maypole, but he said that after they had gone a
short distance he left the deceased , and went home by another route,
and he declared that he did not pass Pooley’s gardens with the deceased.
There did not appear to be any reason why the prisoner should have gone
home by the route he referred to, which was stated to be a much further
distance than the usual route between the two villages, but it appeared
that the prisoner was seen at one portion of the route near a place
called Larkin’s Forge, but this was at nine o’clock at night, and he
gave an explanation where he had been between that hour and half-past
seven o'clock, when he was just seen by the witness in company with the
deceased. The above facts, it will be seen were well calculated to make
out a strong case of suspicion, if not of positive guilt, against the
prisoner, but the statements that were subsequently alleged to have been
made by him appeared to afford almost conclusive evidence of his being
guilty of the crime laid to his charge. It appeared that when the
prisoner was before the magistrates, after being cautioned in the usual
manner, he made a statement, similar in effect to the one he had told
the superintendent, and said that he parted with the deceased after they
had gone a short distance, and that he did not know that he was dead or
that anything had happened to him until the following morning, and he
concluded by making the following extraordinary expression, “I do hope
that something will be found out to clear me of the charge of murder, or
if not to lighten my crime.” It also appeared that when he was in
custody in St. Augustine's Gaol, Canterbury, while, he and another
prisoner, a soldier named Charles Watson, who was charged with stealing
a carpet bag, for which offence he was tried and acquitted on the that
day of the assizes, were in the exercising yard together, the prisoner
asked Watson what he was in for and he told him, and then inquired what
he was charged with, and he replied, “Murder.” Watson asked him who he
was charged with murdering, and he replied, “A man.” He then inquired
whether it was true, and the prisoner was represented to have replied,
“It is too true for me.” The prisoner was then asked how it came to be
found out, and he said that it was known he was the last man who was
seen with him, and the police came to his house and made inquiries and
found blood on his clothes and on his boots, and took them away. The
prisoner was then asked by Watson how he did it, and his reply was, “I
kicked his brains out,” and he went on to say that it was thought at
first that the man had been killed by a ploughshare that was near the
spot, but this was not true, us he had kicked him to death. In addition
to this it appeared that while the prisoner was in the railway carriage
with a number of others, among whom was a boy named Theoff, to be
conveyed to Maidstone to lake their trial at these assizes, this boy,
who lived in the neighbourhood and was well acquainted with the
deceased, said “I should like to see the man who murdered old Steed,”
and the prisoner said “Should you?” The boy then said to him. “Are you
the man?” and the prisoner replied “Somebody has been telling you.” The
boy repeated that he should like to see the ma who was charged with the
murder, and the prisoner then said “I shall have to answer for it.”
Immediately after this he appeared to have a sort of exclamation to the
effect, “I deserve all I shall get for it—it was not more than half a
minute about. I did not know that Steed was dead until the next
morning.”
Nearly twenty witnesses were examined in support of the prosecution, and
although most of them were cross- examined at some length by the counsel
for the prisoner their evidence pretty well established the facts above
stated. Charles Watson the soldier said, however, that the conversations
to which he deposed did not all take place at one time, but on different
occasions during a period of eleven weeks that he was confined with the
prisoner at Canterbury before they were sent to Maidstone to take their
trial. He accounted for this by saying that prisoners, according to the
gaol regulations, were not allowed to converse with each other, and that
they were liable to punishment if they were detected in doing so by the
warders, and consequently they were obliged to converse by stealth, and
he said that the conversations to which he referred were had with the
prisoner without the knowledge of the warders, while they were walking
round the yard at exercise. In re-examination the witness said that he
did not mention a word about what the prisoner had said to him until
last Wednesday, and he said he should not have done so then if
Superintendent Walker had not asked him if the prisoner had said
anything to him while they were in prison together, and he then told him
all that had taken place. Mr. Barrow also elicited from this witness in
cross-examination that in addition to what he had already stated the
prisoner said that it occurred through drink, and that he and the
deceased had quarrelled before the affray took place.
Mr. Barrow, at the close of the case for the prosecution, made a very
able speech to the jury on behalf of the prisoner, and after observing
that, it was solely through the humanity of his learned judge that he
and his learned friend appeared on his behalf, and calling their
attention to the difficult position in which an advocate was placed who
was called upon to defend a prisoner who was charged with an offence for
which his life might be forfeited upon the scaffold without any previous
instruction or information, he said it appeared to him there were two
very important questions for the jury to take into consideration before
they would be justified in returning a verdict that would consign the
prisoner to an ignominious death. The first of these questions was
whether a murder had been committed; and the second was, whether the
prisoner was proved to have been the man who committed the act. The
learned counsel then proceeded with a good deal of ingenuity to contend
that there was no evidence of any malice on the part of the prisoner
towards the deceased, or anything to show that when they set off
together on the fatal evening to return home the prisoner entertained
any idea of committing violence upon the deceased, and that the
probability was that, even supposing they should be of opinion that the
prisoner was the man by whom the act was committed, a quarrel and affray
took place between them, and that the act was done under the excitement
of passion, and was not premeditated, which would reduce the crime from
that of wilful murder to manslaughter. He next proceeded to contend that
the evidence was not conclusive upon the point that the prisoner was the
person who committed the violence upon the deceased and he said that if
there was any doubt in their minds upon this point the prisoner was
entitled to the benefit of it.
The learned Judge then summed up the evidence with the greatest care and
minuteness.
The Jury retired soon after seven o’clock to deliberate upon their
verdict. They returned into court in about half an hour, and found the
prisoner Guilty.
The learned Judge then passed sentence of death in the usual form,
stating to the prisoner at the same time that from the nature of his
crime he must not expect to receive any mercy on this side of the grave.
The prisoner heard the sentence without exhibiting the slightest
emotion, and when the learned judge had concluded he bowed slightly to
him and also to the jury, he was then removed by the warden.
The trial was not concluded until nearly eight o'clock.
|
From the Kentish Chronicle, 15 August, 1863.
THE CONDEMNED MURDERERS AT MAIDSTONE.
During the past week the culprits Holden and Eldridge, under sentence of
death in Maidstone gaol, have been making every preparation to meet
their awful end, under the assiduous attentions of the Rev. C. S Woolmer,
and the assistant chaplain. They are both in a very calm and collected
state of mind, and Eldridge states that he feels happier now than he has
done since the days of his boyhood. With regard to the other culprit
great efforts are being made to obtain a commutation of his sentence.
During the past week a communication has been forwarded to the Secretary
of State, from the Colonel and non commissioned officers of the
Artillery brigade to which he belonged certifying to his general
imbecility, and “positive insanity” when under the influence of a very
slight amount of drink, and testifying to the fact of delirium tremens
being common in his family, and that some of his relations have
committed suicide while in that slate. No intimation, however, has been
received by the gaol authorities as to any reprieve being granted.
|
From the Kentish Chronicle, 22 August, 1863.
THE CONDEMNED MURDERERS.
Maidstone, Monday.
The warrants for the execution of the culprits, Eldridge and Holden,
were received by Major Bannister, the governor of the gaol, on Friday
morning, and on the following day an answer was returned by the Home
Secretary to the memorial praying for a commutation of Holden's
sentence, on the ground of insanity. Sir G. Grey states that he has very
carefully considered the case, and the various representations which
have been made to him, but he has failed to discover any reasons why a
reprieve should be granted. The culprits received the above information
with calmness, as neither, since his condemnation, has seemed to
anticipate any forgiveness. During the past week they have continued to
exhibit the utmost penitence, devoting nearly the whole of their time to
spiritual exercise. In the early part of the week they requested to be
allowed to remain up until twelve o'clock for reading and prayer, and
that desire was of course complied with; but an application for a
superior diet was refused by the visiting justices, who have determined
for the future not to depart in any way from (the ordinary prison fare
in the cases or condemned convicts. Holden, though fully alive to his
position, exhibits a good deal of eccentricity. The respected chaplain
of the gaol, the Rev. C. S. Woolmer, has been most assiduous in his
endeavours to bring the men to a proper frame of mind, and has been so
satisfied of their repentance that he has felt justified in
administering the Holy Communion to them.
THE EXECUTION. MAIDSTONE, THURSDAY.
On Monday their photographs (one copy of each only) were taken to be
presented to their wives. Eldridge's wife, who is not in a condition to
bear an interview, has written some very affectionate letters to that
culprit, in which she says a better father or husband never lived, and
attributes his misfortune “all to drink.” His brother had an interview
with him on Monday and received from him his photograph. Eldridge wrote a letter to his wife, in which he exhorted her to live in
the paths of rectitude, so that she might never be placed in his awful
position. In that letter he stated that drink had been the bane and
curse of his existence, and that if it had not been for that, the crime
of which he was convicted would never have been perpetrated. He
expressed great penitence, and ended by commending his soul to his
Maker. The other prisoner likewise attributed his position to a too free
use of strong drink, and just before coming upon the scaffold he asked
the clergyman to address a few words on this subject to the crowd
beneath. This however, was not done. They each partook of breakfast,
after which the sacrament was administered to them, and they were
removed to the dressing-room to prepare for execution, and from a
quarter past eleven until noon they remained alone in silent prayer. A few minutes before the hour fixed the bell began its solemn dirge, and
shortly afterwards both the culprits walked firmly on to the scaffold,
having previously been pinioned by the executioner. Casting his eyes
round, Eldridge said, “I don't know how it is, but I never felt so happy
in all my life.” For an instant Holden seemed to falter, then said in a
firm voice, “Tell my wife I am very happy, and that I have no fear”
Eldridge was first placed under the drop, and Calcraft proceeded to
adjust the noose, the miserable wretch earnestly opening and clasping
his hands together the while, as if engaged in prayer. The noose was
then adjusted around the neck of Holden, who held an open Testament in
his hands; the caps were placed over both men’s heads; and, after
Calcraft had shaken each by the hand, the bolt was drawn, and the two
wretched men were launched into eternity with scarcely a struggle, death
being to all appearance instantaneous. There were about six or seven thousand people present most of the very
lowest orders, but the usual opportunity of gratifying their morbid
tastes was denied them, as the scaffold was so surrounded with black
cloth that not more than the top of each white cap could be seen after
the drop had fallen. It is a somewhat singular fuel that exactly six years ago, viz. on
Thursday, the 20th August, 1857, two men were executed at Maidstone. |
Ind Coope & Co Ltd purchased the pub from Budden & Biggs Brewery Ltd by
conveyance and assignment dated 23 March 1931. The pub held a full license.
LICENSEE LIST
DOWNS George 1838-62+ (age 65 in 1861)
HOLNESS Richard 1871-74+ (also dealer age 58 in 1871)
BEAN Edwin Isaac 1881-1902 (age 59 in 1901)
PEARSON Arthur 1902-09
PEARSON Ernest Arthur (son) 1909-22+ (age 30 in 1911)
FREEMAN Frederick Alfred 1926-27
KIRBY Bertram 1930+
LODGE Frederick Henry 1934+
FINCHER Ellen E Mrs 1938+
https://pubwiki.co.uk/PrinceAlbert.shtml
Census
From the Kelly's Directory 1903
|