|
Maidstone Gazette 18 February 1851.
Petty Sessions; Before R. Hart Esq., Mayor, S. Mackie, W. Bateman,
W. Major, T. Golder and J. Bateman Esqs.
There were six publicans charged by the police with serving beer,
&c., contrary to the law. Mr. R.T. Brockman appeared for the Watch
Committee; Mr. Delasaux (Canterbury) for several of the defendants.
James Hall, Old Marquis of Granby, was charged on the information of
police constable Collins with serving beer before the hour of half
past twelve o'clock p.m., on Sunday, the 2nd instant. Police
constable Collins having proved the case, the Mayor addressed the
defendant, telling him that the only object of the magistrates was
to keep the town in an orderly and proper manner. The magistrates or
the police were not actuated by any ill-feeling towards him or
anyone else in his business, but they felt that the law had been
disregarded, and that it was necessary now for all parties that the
public houses should not now do as they had done; the Bench taking
all circumstances into consideration, would mitigate the penalty to
1s. and costs.
Note: The name “Old” Marquis of Granby suggests that this was the
house in the High Street. However, at the time of the 1851 Census,
he was in Radnor Street at what was the "Ship," the name of which was
crossed out and Marquis of Granby overwritten. Also, the Post Office
Directory for 1851, information for which would most likely have
been compiled in 1850, has him at the Marquis of Granby in Radnor
Street. I feel, therefore, that this report refers to the Marquis of
Granby, Radnor Street.
|
|
Kent Herald 20 February 1851
Petty Sessions: There were six publicans charged by the police with serving
beer, &c., contrary to the law. Mr. R.T. Brockman appeared for the Watch
Committee, Mr. Delasaux (of Canterbury) for several of the defendants.
James Hall, Old Marquis of Granby, was charged on the information of police
constable Collins with serving beer before the hour of half past twelve o’clock
p.m., on Sunday, the 2nd instant.
Police constable Collins having proved the case, the Mayor addressed the
defendant, telling him the only object of the magistrates was to keep the town
in an orderly and proper manner. The magistrates or the police were not actuated
by any ill-feeling towards him or anyone else in his business, but they felt
that the law had been disregarded, and that it was necessary now for all parties
that the public houses should not now do as they had done; the bench, taking all
circumstances into consideration, would mitigate the penalty to 1s. and costs.
|