25 Commercial Quay
Dover
This daughter of King Christian of Denmark married the Prince of Wales,
later King Edward VII, in 1863. That would seem sufficient reason for George
Crimp to be granted a new licence here in 1864. Although his downfall could
well have been for selling spirits as a beerhouse.
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer, 5
December, 1863.
PUBLICAN'S OFFENCE
George Crimp, landlord of the "Princess Alexandra" public house,
Commercial Quay, was summoned for unlawfully refusing to admit to his
house Sergeant Barton on Sunday last.
Barton said that at a quarter-past one o'clock on Sunday morning, in
consequence of information he received, he went to the house of the
defendant. He saw Mrs. Crimp let a man out of the side door into Hall's
Passage. He heard several voices in the front room of the house, and
finding the door fastened he knocked. Mrs. Crimp came to the door and
asked who was there, and he told her, "The police - Sergeant Barton."
She asked him what he wanted, and he said he wanted to come in, and
that he wished her to open the door. Instead of doing so, she went away,
and witness heard her walk through the passage. He stood knocking for
the space of thirty minutes, and the door was then opened. On getting
into the house he asked Mrs. Crimp why she did not open the door when he
first knocked, and she said her husband would not let her. That was said
in the presence of the defendant, who made no remark. He then went into
the bar, where he saw two young men drinking - one a railway guard and
the other a tailor. Mrs. Crimp said they were lodgers. There was a pot
on the bar-room table, and two glasses, both with beer in them. In the
tap-room there ere a number of pots and glasses, some of them containing
beer, with froth on top, as if it had just been poured out. He desired
to go upstairs, but the landlord and landlady both refused to allow him.
Witness had reason to believe there were other persons in the house. He
subsequently went upstairs, but found no one in the public room; but
there was a room in which defendant refused to admit him, -
Defendant: Yes, my wife's bedroom.
Sergeant Barton: And at a quarter-past three three persons left the
house.
Police-constable Johnson corroborated Barton's evidence. Witness
watched the house till a quarter past three when he saw two men and a
woman leave by the front door. One of the men had been described by Mrs.
Crimp as a lodger. He knew the other man by sight, and the woman was a
tradesmen's wife belonging to the town.
Defendant: I left my house, but nobody else.
Johnson: You left at a quarter past two, aft the woman's husband had
been to the door, to enquire if his wife was there, and returned at five
minutes to three. Twenty minutes afterwards the parties left the house.
The defendant denied having any person in his house and called:
George Hughes, tailor, who said he had temporary lodgings at the
"Princess Alexandria" from Friday till Tuesday, the guard also lodged
there.
Barton and Johnson both said the witness was one of the men who left
the house at a quarter past three. The witness had the married woman on
his arm. (A laugh.)
The Bench though the offence clearly proved, and fined the defendant
5s. and costs, 13s. which he paid.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 28 May, 1864.
EXCISE PROSECUTION.
George Partridge Crimp, landlord of the "Princess Alexandria"
beer-house, Commercial Quay, was charged with selling spirits without a
license and also with having spirits on his premises. Mr. Gilbert,
collector of Inland Revenue, appeared in support of the information, and
Mr. Minter for the defendant.
Oliver Underwood stated that on the 5th of April he went to the house
of the defendant. He first asked for a pint of ale, and afterwards for
six-pennyworth of gin. The gin was brought to him, and he paid for it.
He was told to let no one else see the pot. Three-pennyworth of gin was
afterwards supplied to him, and he paid for that also.
By Mr. Minter: I told the defendant I was very ill and wanted some
gin. Defendant did not say he did not keep gin, but would go to the "Ale
Shades" for some. He said nothing but brought it to me in two minutes or
two minutes and a half. He did not have time to go to the "Ale Shades"
for it. I did not afterwards hear him tell the excise officer that he
had got it from the "Ale Shades." [On being pressed by Mr. Minter,
witness afterwards admitted that he did hear this said by the defendant,
and did not contradict it.] I do not expect to get anything for coming
here, and should not have appeared if I had not been subpoenaed.
Mr. George Brown, supervisor of Inland Revenue at Dover: I know that
defendant is not a licensed retailer of spirits. The "Ale Shades" kept
by Mr. Kempt, are a quarter of a mile from defendant's house. He could
not have gone there and back in two minutes and a half. I saw Underwood
in the parlour at the "Princess Alexandria" on the day in question, with
a glass of gin before him. In one of the cupboards in the back parlour I
found a small bottle containing a little gin, and an empty bottle which
had contained brandy. Crimp observed to me that he had fetched the gin
from Kemp's.
Mr. George Boddy, assistant supervisor, confirmed this testimony. He
asked Crimp if he sold spirits and he said "No, this is some I have
fetched for this man (Underwood), who is ill."
Mr. Minter, for the defendant, contended that the prosecution had
failed on both points. The evidence of Underwood was not worthy of
belief. He referred to his revivification in answering the question in
respect to what had passed between defendant and the excise officer as
to the fetching of the spirits, and as this portion of the case rested
entirely on Underwood's statement, he thought the Bench would consider
it had failed. As to the spirits being found in the house, it was but a
small quantity, and this he was informed was kept by the wife of the
defendant for medicinal use.
He called Joseph Kemp, landlord of the "Ale Shades," Snargate Street,
who said he remembered Crimp coming to his house a few Sunday's
previously and purchasing half-a-pint of gin. A few days afterwards he
again came for a quarter of gin.
Ellen Finnery, servant of all work to defendant, said she had taken
the small bottle containing the gin which had been produced out of Mr.
Crimp's bedroom, and removed it to a cupboard in the lower room, where
it was found in the morning when discovered by the excise officer.
George Brown proved that he was in the defendant's company on the
Sunday, when the first purchase of gin was made; and the evidence
completed the defence.
The Excise Officer having replied, the Bench consulted for a short
time with closed doors, and on the re-admission of the public, the
Magistrates dismissed the case.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer, 22
October, 1864.
FELONY
James Gallaghan, a private in the 13th Brigade Royal Artillery,
stationed at the Castle, was charged with stealing a gold ring from the
"Princess Alexandra" public-house, Commercial Quay.
George Crimp, landlord of the "Princess Alexandra," said that on the
previous Friday night prisoner slept at his house. On the following
morning, after prisoner had left, he went upstairs and he then missed a
gold ring. He left it lying on the drawers in his (witness's) bedroom
room, together with a chain and watch. He immediately went to the
pawnbrokers, and informed them of his loss.
John Williams Bacon, pawnbroker, Snargate Street, said: Prisoner came
to my shop on Saturday afternoon, about half-past four, and offered the
ring produced to pledge. He wanted me to advance him 5s. on it. I asked
him if the ring belonged to him, and he replied, "Of course it does."
Crimp had informed me of having lost a ring, and i therefore engaged
defendant in conversation, while my assistant fetched a policeman.
Sergeant Bayly came and took prisoner into custody.
Sergeant Bayly deposed to taking the prisoner into custody. On
telling him what he was charged with he said, "It's all right." At the
station-house, in reply to the charge, he said he had received the ring
from a girl with whom he had slept at the prosecutor's house. He also
said he hoped he should not get into trouble.
Prisoner, after he had been cautioned, repeated this statement, and
pleaded not guilty.
The Magistrates committed him for trial at the next Quarter Sessions.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer, 12
November, 1864.
CHARGE OF STEALING A PIECE OF CALICO
Emma Foord, a young woman who acknowledged herself as an unfortunate
woman, was charged with stealing a piece of unbleached calico, value 1s.
6d., the property of George Stapley, the landlord of the "Princess
Alexandra," Commercial Quay.
Sarah Stapley, wife of prosecutor, said the prisoner had been lodging
at her house. On Wednesday night prisoner left her lodgings and did not
return until the previous (Friday) evening, when she came into the
house with a policeman. She (witness) was called upstairs to the
prisoner's room, and she there was the piece of calico produced, which
had been taken out of prisoner's box. The calico was her property, and
had been left in prisoner's room by mistake.
George Stapley said: He kept the "Princess Alexandra," Commercial
Quay. He lately kept the "Odd
Fellows Arms," beach Street. The prisoner lodged with him there, and
she removed with him to the "Princess Alexandra." The piece of calico
produced, and a number of other things, were put into the prisoner's
room after they had been removed to the "Princess Alexandra." She had no
right whatever to make any use of anything that was not her own. On the
previous evening she came into his house with a policeman, and said she
wanted her clothes. He (witness) went up into the prisoner's room, in
company with the constable and the prisoner, and on her box being opened
he found a piece of calico produced. He called his wife, and she
identified it as his property. He (witness) then gave her into custody
for destroying the calico, as it had been cut up to make a crinoline.
Magistrates' Clerk: Then you don't charge her with stealing the
calico?
Witness: No, Sir.
Police-constable Sabin: Between six and seven o'clock last evening I
was on duty in Snargate Street. I met the prisoner, who was in company
with a soldier. The soldier requested me to go with the prisoner to the
"Princess Alexandra," as the landlord would not give up possession of
her box. I proceeded with the prisoner to the house, and went upstairs
with the landlord and the prisoner. Prisoner handed the key of her room
to the landlord, but he could not unlock the door. Prisoner then took
the key and unlocked the door immediately. On getting inside the room
the landlord went to the prisoner's box and opened it. The box was not
locked. He took out the piece of calico produced, and called his wife,
who identified it as her property. Prisoner denied this, and said that
the calico belonged to her. The landlord then gave the calico to me, and
after getting outside the house he gave prisoner into my custody for
stealing the calico.
By the prisoner: The calico was not concealed in any way.
Ellen Elliot, a married woman, said she lodged at the "Princess
Alexandra." One day during the previous week she went into the
prisoner's room and saw her sitting on the bed doing something to a
piece of calico like that produced. She could not say whether the piece
produced was that she had seen in prisoner's possession. Prisoner
endeavoured to conceal it when she went into her room.
prisoner denied that the calico belonged to the prosecutor. It was
her property. She had it sent to her from Aldershot, and she could bring
a witness to prove the truth of her assertion, if the Magistrates would
grant a remand.
After a short consultation the Magistrates directed the prisoner to
be remanded, in order that she might bring forward her witness on the
following Monday. I the meantime she was allowed to go at large.
MONDAY REMANDED CHARGE
Emma Foord, the young woman remanded from the previous Saturday,
again put in her appearance.
Mr. Fox appeared for the prosecutor. He stated that a great deal had
been said at the previous examination by the prisoner as to the
respectability of this house, and as the prosecutor would that morning
apply for a transfer of the "Princess Alexandra's" license, he attended
the question the prosecutor on the representations prisoner had made
when he took lodgings at his house.
The Magistrates thought this was unnecessary, as prosecutor had
stated in evidence that prisoner was represented to be a married woman
when she engaged a room at the house.
The charge upon which the prisoner was arrested, and the evidence
taken at the previous examination having been read over.
Prisoner again denied that the sheet belonged to prosecutor and
called:
Corporal Michael Salew, of the 37th Regiment, who stated that he had
known the defendant nearly three years. He remembered opening a parcel
at prosecutor's house. This parcel contained a number of articles, which
were wrapped in the piece of calico produced.
Mr. Fox: How do you know that calico from any other piece?
Witness: Well, I have visited this young woman nearly every day since
she took lodgings at prosecutor's house, and I have seen this piece of
calico in her room nearly every time I have been there.
Mr. Fox: Did you represent the prisoner as your wife when you went
with her to engage apartments for her?
Witness: I did not go with her, I sent another man belonging to my
regiment, and he engaged the room.
Mr. Fox: Did he make any such representations?
Witness: I should think not.
Prisoner: Why are there three or four other girls living in the same
house?
The Magistrates consulted for a few moments, and dismissed the case,
ordering that the calico should be given to the prisoner.
TRANSFER OF LICENSE
This being transfer day, the prosecutor in the last case applied for
the license of the "Princess Alexandra" public-house to be transferred
to him, and the Magistrates, after hearing a good account from the
Superintendent of the police as to the general character of
Stapley's house, granted the application.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer, 13
May, 1865.
CHARGE OF HARBOURING PROSTITUTES
George Stapley, landlord of the "Princess Alexandra," public house,
Commercial Quay was charged with harbouring prostitutes, contrary to the
terms of his license.
Fined £1 including costs.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer, 11
April, 1873.
PERMISSION TO DRAW
On the application of Mr. Coleman, the bench gave Mr. Tomlin
permission to draw at the "Princess Alexandria," Commercial Quay.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday 9 May, 1873.
ALTERATION OF A PUBLIC-HOUSE SIGN
On the application of Mr. Coleman, the Magistrates gave permission to
the landlord of the “Princess Alexandra,” Commercial Quay, to alter the
present name of his house to that of “The Rodney.”
|
It was no longer in evidence
after 1873.
LICENSEE LIST
CRIMP George Partridge to Nov/1864
STAPLEY George Nov/1864-69 end
KEMP Joseph 1869-71+ (age 56 in 1871)
TOMLIN Mr J Apr/1873+
From the Dover Express
Census
|