Beach Street & Seven Stars Street
Dover
Above map 1907. |
Another with the same name at 8 Adrian Street caused a little confusion
here, but I believe I have sorted out the differences in licensees.
For photo of Beach Street click here.
Dover Express, Saturday 28 May 1864.
To Publicans.
To Be Let, the "Oddfellows Arms," Commercial Quay. Apply to Mr.
Harding, Wellington Brewery, Buckland.
(I am not sure whether this indeed is a
different pub having the address of Commercial Quay, or whether the
address was incorrect. As you can see from the map below, Commercial
Quay and Beach Street are quite a distance apart. Paul Skelton.)
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer, 26
November, 1864.
INFRINGEMENT OF LICENSE
William Back, landlord of the "Odd Fellows Arms," Beach Street, was
charged with infringement of his license, and was fined 10s. and costs,
which he paid.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer,
29 April, 1865. Price 1d.
DOG STEALING
Richard Amos, a bricklayer, living in Mill Lane, was charged with
stealing a small terrier, belonging to Thomas Sinclair, of beach Street.
Prosecutor deposed to the loss of the dog on the preceding day, and
identified the one produced as belonging to him. A little boy named
William Hill stated that on the previous day, he saw the dog playing
inside the "Oddfellows' Arms," and the prisoner took it up, put it in his
pocket, and went off with it. Police-sergeant Bailey and Stevens deposed
to the apprehension of the prisoner, and finding the dog at his sister's
house in Mill Lane.
Prisoner pleaded as an excuse that he was drunk at the time, and that
he only took the dog in a "lark."
Superintendent Coram observed there had been a great number of dogs
stolen this way lately, and Sergeant Bailey, said he knew of a former
case in which the prisoner had taken a dog belonging to someone else.
The Magistrates committed the prisoner to gaol for a month with hard
labour.
|
Dover Express 14 October 1865.
LONDON COURT OF BANKRUPTCY. October 5.
RE: THOMAS CRADDUCK.
This was an examination and order of discharge sitting, under the
bankruptcy of Thomas Cradduck (sued and committed as Thomas Craddock),
described as late of the "Odd Fellows Arms" beer shop, Beach Street,
Dover, and on the 19th June a prisoner for debt in Maidstone Gaol, from
which prison he was subsequently released by order of Mr. Registrar Scudamore. The Bankrupt attributes his failure to the following causes,
viz: "The illness of myself and family, the death of two wives and
four children, and bad debts."
Mr. Sykes represented the official assignee, and stated that the
bankrupt had not filed any "statement of accounts," according to the
provisions of the Bankruptcy Act, 1861, whereupon the Court adjourned
his examination sine dic, with liberty to apply for another sitting at
his own expense, when he shall have filed such account. - Enlarged
protection from arrest was granted the bankrupt for a month, and the
sitting ended.
RE SARAH CRADDUCK.
This was also an examination and discharge sitting, under the bankruptcy
of Sarah Craddock, wife of the above bankrupt Thomas Craddock.
It
appears from the examination of the bankrupt, that she was in Maidstone
Gaol, from the 16th May to the 19th of June last, and at the time of her
arrest she was living with her husband at the "Odd Fellows Arms" beer
shop; and that she had previously lived with him at Boughton Monchelsea,
at the "Rose" beer shop, which she kept for three years before her
marriage in February, 1865. The amount of her debts before her marriage,
which still remain unpaid, is about £60. The husband's debts are stated
to be between £300 and £400.
She has no property whatever, and she
attributes her difficulties to "losses by lodgers, and the heavy rent
she had to pay." Mr. Aldridge stated that in this case there were no
accounts, and the Court made the same order as in the foregoing case.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer,
4 May, 1866.
ROBBERY FROM A PUBLIC HOUSE
John Potts, a private from the 74th Regiment, was charged with
stealing from a bedroom at the "Odd Fellows' Arms," Beach Street, half a
sovereign, a brooch, some copper money, and a number of foreign coins,
the property of the landlord, George Craddock.
The prosecutor said that prisoner came into his house on the previous
morning, about eleven o'clock, and remained there some two or three
hours. His wife was engaged in the lower part of the house, and witness
was employed about the premises. The prisoner remained chiefly in the
tap-room, but must have taken advantage of an opportunity to get
upstairs, as witness saw him coming down about three o'clock. He
(witness) told him he had no business upstairs, and he said he went up
"in a mistake." Immediately after the prisoner left the house, a half
sovereign was missed from a little box, standing in a bedroom window.
Witness pursued the prisoner, and ultimately found him at the "White
Hart" public house. He sent for a policeman and gave the prisoner into
custody. He was conveyed to the station-house, where witness saw him
searched. Among the money found on him was a number of foreign coins,
and a brooch, which had been in the place from which the half sovereign
was stolen. There were also found upon him some English copper coins,
dated 1797, which witness also identified.
The prisoner did not desire to put any questions to prosecutor.
Elizabeth Craddock, the daughter of the prosecutor, gave
corroborative evidence as to the identity of the coins, but there was
some technical difficulty in respect to the half sovereign, and the
charge was therefore confined to the stealing of such articles as could
be clearly identified.
The prisoner pleaded guilty, and was sentenced to six weeks'
imprisonment, with hard labour, a sergeant of his regiment, who was
present, giving him but an indifferent character.
|
Kentish Gazette 15 May 1866.
LONDON COURT OF BANKRUPTCY. DOVER, ETC.
RE: CRADDUCK - A FIFTH ADJOURNMENT.
This was an adjourned examination sitting and application for order of
discharge under the bankruptcy of Thomas Cradduck (sued and committed as
Thomas Craddock) described as late of the "Odd Fellows Arms" beershop,
Beach Street, Dover, in the County of Kent and now of the same place,
out of business, but occasionally employed as a painter, previously of Boughton Monchelsea, in the said County of Kent, painter and beerseller. The bankrupt stated his expenditure to have been £80 and £68 for the
previous year. His creditors reside at Wateringbury, Maidstone, Boughton
Monchelsea, and Loose in this county. Mr. Graham, the official assignee, reported as follows:- "This was a
prison adjudication, no creditor attended the first meeting. The
bankrupt's indebtedness amounts to £335 10s., of which £295 is due to
unsecured creditors contracted from 1861 to 1865. There are no assets,
he has no books." The bankrupt's examination was adjourned "sine
die" on the 5th of
October, and he again came up at his own expense on the 7th of December,
when it appeared upon the opposition of Mr. Chidley, that the bankrupt's
accounts required amendment as to the property mortgaged to the
bankrupt's interest in the same. His examination was then adjourned
until 29th of January, when, as he had not complied with the order of
the Court, he was again adjourned until 15th of March, and leave was
given to the opposing creditors to apply in the meantime for a sitting
for the purpose of appointing a trade assignee, there being questions as
to the bankrupt's estate in which the official assignee declined to
embark. It now appeared from the statement of Mr. Chidley, that a creditor's
assignee was willing to accept the trust and had been appointed by the
body of creditors to investigate the bankrupt's affairs, but as the
choice paper could not be found on the file of the official records of
the Court, a fifth adjournment was ordered until the 25th May, at 1
o'clock, with enlarged protection from arrest to the bankrupt. The
sitting then terminated. |
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday,
21 June, 1867.
CUSTOMS INFORMATION
Thomas Craddock, the landlord of the "Odd Fellows' Arms Inn," Beach
Street, was summonsed for having, on the 30th May, been concerned with
shipping or unshipping one pound of tobacco of foreign manufacture,
contrary to the Customs Act. The defendant was also charged upon another
count with infringing the clause of the act which provided that dealers
in tobacco should keep all foreign tobacco in their possession in a
printed wrapper provided for the purpose.
The defendant pleaded not guilty.
It appeared from the statement of Mr. Beverly, the solicitor to the
Board of Customs, who appeared in support of the prosecution, that the
defendant keeps the "Odd Fellows' Arms," a public-house in Beach
Street, Dover, and that the prosecution had been instituted in
consequence of the tobacco mentioned in the information having been
found concealed on his premises, on the 30th May. It appeared that on
that day the officers of customs, in consequence of certain information
they had received, visited the premises. They requested Craddock to
produce his stock of tobacco, and he showed them a very small quantity,
saying that was all he had. The officers then commenced a search of the
premises; and underneath the flooring of a cupboard, in a kind of
store-room adjoining the passage, they discovered the tobacco referred
to. It was loose and was of foreign manufacture, and such tobacco being
found on the defendant's premises, the onus was cast upon him of showing
whether the duty had paid upon it. The Customs authorities had taken the
lenient course in this case, it being open to them to prosecute the
defendant either for the £100 penalty, or for treble the value and duty
of the tobacco found, and they having decided to adopt the latter
alternative. The tobacco being negro-head, the defendant had moreover
laid himself open to prosecution for having such a description of
tobacco in his possession without being enclosed in the distinctive
label provided by the excise authorities, it being the practice, on the
information of such tobacco to place it in bond, which it did not leave
under any circumstances without being enclosed in the distinctive
wrapper he had referred to. For this offence, therefore, the defendant
had laid himself open to a second penalty.
William Clark: I am an examining officer of customs. On the 30th May
last I went to the house of the defendant, who keeps the "Odd Fellows'
Arms," in Beach Street and Seven Stars Street, Dover. Mr. Boddy (an
officer of Excise), two police constables and four other officers of
customs were with me. The time was about half-past eleven in the
morning. I entering the house I told the defendant I had received
information that he had foreign tobacco and spirits on his premises. He
said he had not. I then showed him my authority for searching the house.
Before doing so I requested him to produce what tobacco he had, and he
showed me a small quantity in a box, about half an once, saying that was
all he had got. A search of the premises was afterwards made, and in a
cupboard of a lumber-room was found one package of foreign manufactured
tobacco. I called the defendant, and produced the tobacco to him. He
asked me where I had found it, and n my pointing out the place to him he
said he knew nothing about it. He asked whether it was likely if he knew
it was there, he should let it remain so, as to become unfit for use.
The tobacco was found underneath the flooring. The flooring was loose,
and in the cupboard, upon the floor, were some pots and kettles. I then
told the defendant I should report the case to the collector, and I
subsequently did so.
By the defendant: You did say the tobacco was rotten. It is produced.
By the Magistrates: The tobacco is deteriorated, but it is not
rotten. It is a little mouldy.
William Francis Driver, an out-door officer of Customs in Dover: I
accompanied the last witness and other officers to the "Odd Fellows
Arms" on the 30th May. The tobacco produced was found concealed under
the flooring of a cupboard in a storeroom. I removed the flooring. Upon
the flooring were several pots and kettles; and under the flooring there
were several loose bricks. On removing the bricks the tobacco was found
in a hole.
By the Bench: The flooring did not seem as if it had been recently
disturbed. The bricks were not loose, but wedged in. the tobacco was
damp, and the paper in which it was wrapped was rotten. On handling it
the paper dropped to pieces, but part of it still remains around the
tobacco. The defendant said the hole had been made to get at the
gas-pipe.
George Boddy: I am an excise officer stationed at Dover. I know the
defendant, who has a license to deal in tobacco. He has held such a
license for the "Odd Fellows' Arms" since the 14th March, 1865.I was
present with the other officers when the tobacco in question was found.
Foreign negro-head, if in the possession of a dealer, should be wrapped
in a printed wrapper. This was not so enclosed.
Mr. C. S. Saunders, the collector of customs at Dover, proved the
single value and duty of the tobacco to be 5s. 6d.; and this evidence
completed the case.
The defendant, on being called upon for his reply to the charge, said
he was entirely ignorant of how the tobacco came upon his premises. He
accounted for the floorboards being loose by saying that they remained
in that manner in order that the gas-pipe which ran through the cupboard
might the more easily be got at.
The Magistrates did not consider the defence sufficiently
satisfactory, and convicted the defendant fining him treble the value
and duty and costs.
Mr. Beverly asked whether the Magistrates convicted on both counts.
The Chairman: No, upon the second count alone.
The defendant paid the fine and costs, which amounted to £2 3s.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer,
1 November, 1867.
CONVEYING CONTRABAND GOODS
John Ticknor, a baker carrying on business in Dover, charged with
conveying in his cart 1⅓ lbs of foreign manufactured
cigars which had not paid duty. A customs officer named Pattison saw the
defendant come from the "Odd Fellows' Arms" in Bench Street on Friday
afternoon, with a box under his arm. On going up to him and asking what
the box contained, he said he was in a hurry and could not stop, but on
the officer pressing his question he replied, "Eggs." The officer
insisted on looking, and he then said there were in it a few cigars he
was going to take home to dry for the landlord. Mr. Minter, for the
defendant, said the landlord of the "Oddfellows' Arms" put the box into
the cart, and on his interfering he said the box contained a few cigars
which he wanted Ticknor to dry for him. Mr. Minter addressed the Bench
for the defendant, contending that if any one ought to have been
proceeded against in this case it was not his client, and also that
there was no evidence as to manufacture. The Magistrates dismissed the
summons on the ground of insufficient evidence as to the manufactures of
the cigars.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer,
8 November, 1867.
SINGULAR CHARGE OF SMUGGLING
Thomas Cradock, landlord of the "Odd Fellows' Arms," Beach Street,
was brought up in custody, charged with having on the 31st of October in
his possession, 4½ lbs of cigars of foreign
manufacture, and liable to forfeiture.
These were the same cigars that a baker named
Ticknor was seen to receive into his cart, and against whom a similar
charge to the above was brought last week and dismissed by the
Magistrates. It will be remembered that his defence was that they were
entrusted to him by the present defendant to be dried in his over; and
another reason for the dismissal was that the only witness for the
prosecution would not swear that the cigars were foreign ones.
Mr. Saunders, collector of customs, was again
present to watch the case on behalf of the revenue.
John L. Patterson, a Customs' officer, now proved
the case to the satisfaction of the Magistrates.
Defendant was convicted, and ordered to pay single
value and duty, and costs, amounting to £2 17s. 6d.
|
LICENSEE LIST
STAPLEY George 1863
BACK William 1864
CRADDOCK Stephen or Thomas 1865-67
|