Christ Church Road
Folkestone
Above photograph kindly supplied by Jan Pedersen, 1978. |
From the Folkestone Chronicle 18 June, 1864. Transcribed by Jan Pedersen.
ADVERT
"West Cliff Hotel Tap" And Livery Stables.
Upper Sandgate Road, Folkestone
T.W. Cobb begs to inform the Visitors, Gentry, and Inhabitants of
Folkestone that he has opened the above house and trusts, by strict
attention to business to merit a share of Public patronage.
Lock-up Coach Houses, Loose Boxes, Horses taken in at livery.
Licensed to let Carriages of every description on hire.
"West Cliff Hotel Tap" And Livery Stables.
Note: This refers to the "West Cliff Shades." Jan Pedersen.
|
Also known as the "West Cliff Tap" and was the tap room for the hotel
with the same name.
Changed name to the "Happy
Frenchman" and today it's the "Frenchman."
Any further information or indeed photographs would be appreciated.
Please email me at the address below.
Folkestone Chronicle 18 June 1864.
Advert.
West Cliff Hotel Tap And Livery Stables.
Upper Sandgate Road, Folkestone.
T.W. Cobb begs to inform the Visitors, Gentry, and Inhabitants of
Folkestone that he has opened the above house and trusts, by strict
attention to business to merit a share of Public patronage.
Lock-up Coach Houses, Loose Boxes, Horses taken in at livery/
Licensed to let Carriages of every description on hire.
West Cliff Hotel Tap And Livery Stables.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 27 August 1864.
Wednesday 24th August:- Before Captain Kennicott R.N., James Tolputt,
and A.M. Leith Esqs.
General Annual Licencing Meeting – Special Sessions.
Application for new licence was made by Mr. Minter, and granted, for the
following person: Thomas William Cobb, West Cliff Hotel Tap.
|
Folkestone Observer 4 April 1868.
Wednesday, April 1st: Before The Mayor, Captain Leith, and R.W. Boarer
Esq.
Transfer of license was granted to Mr. Cobb, West Cliff Tap, Sandgate
Road.
|
Folkestone Express 4 April 1868.
Transfer of License.
Wednesday, April 1st: Before The Mayor, Capt. Leith, and Alderman Boarer.
The West Cliff Hotel Tap, from Mr. Pointer to Mr. Thomas Cobb.
Note: No record of Pointer is given in More Bastions.
|
Folkestone Express 23 May 1868.
Local Intelligence.
The West Cliff Tap was transferred from Mr. Pointer to T. Cobb on
Wednesday last.
|
Folkestone Express 28 May 1870.
Transfer of License.
Wednesday, May 25th: Before The Mayor, R.W. Boarer, and C. Dashwood Esqs.
The license of Thomas Cobb to George Wright at the West Cliff Hotel Tap.
|
Folkestone Observer 7 July 1870.
Wednesday, July 6th: Before The Mayor, Capt. Kennicott, W. Bateman and
J. Tolputt Esqs.
This was a special sessions for the transfer of licenses.
The West Cliff Tap was transferred from Thomas W. Cobb to George Wright.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 9 July 1870.
Wednesday July 6th: Before the Mayor, Capt. Kennicott R.N., W. Bateman
and J. Tolputt Esqs.
This was a special sessions for the transfer of licenses. The West Cliff
Tap was transferred from Thomas W. Cobb to George Wright.
|
Folkestone Express 9 July 1870.
Transfer of License.
Wednesday, July 6th: Before The Mayor, Captain Kennicott R.N., W.
Bateman, and J. Tolputt Esqs.
West Cliff Hotel Tap: The license was transferred from Thomas Cobb to
George Wright.
|
Folkestone Express 23 July 1870.
Advertisement.
George Wright, Wine and Spirit Merchant.
West Cliff Hotel Tap, Sandgate Road.
Families Supplied. Good Beds.
N.B. Large and commodious Billiard and Bagatelle Rooms.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 30 September 1871.
Thursday, September 28th: Before W. Bateman and J. Tolputt Esqs.
George Wright, landlord of the West Cliff Tap, was summoned by the
Superintendent, charged with keeping his house open during prohibited
hours last Sunday. A police constable went to the house and discovered
that defendant had served some beer to customers, the remains of which
were in pint pots on the counter.
Defendant said he had some lodgers in the house and they caused the door
to be opened, and then people came in.
Mr. Bateman said that many complaints had been made about public houses
opening on a Sunday, and the nuisance must be stopped. The Bench would
therefore fine defendant £2 and costs, and hoped he would be more
cautious in the future.
|
Folkestone Express 30 September 1871.
Thursday, September 28th: Before Dr. Bateman and Ald. Tolputt.
George Wright, of the West Cliff Tavern, was summoned on the information
of P.C. Smith, for that on Sunday last he did unlawfully supply to
certain men in his house, beer, within the prohibited hours of Sunday.
The defendant admitted the charge, saying that the man went into his
house, and he yielded to the importunity.
The chairman said the offence was one of too common occurrence, and it
must be severely punished. The Bench fined the defendant £2, with 9s.
costs, in default one month imprisonment.
The money was paid.
|
Folkestone Express 1 June 1872.
Wednesday, May 29th: Before The Mayor, R.W. Boarer, J. Clarke and S.
Eastes Esqs.
Mr. George Howse, West Cliff Hotel, applied for and obtained a temporary
authority to sell at the Hotel Tap by George Wright, which was granted.
Note: More Bastions lists Wright as being there from 1870.
|
Southeastern Gazette 8 March 1875.
Local News.
On Monday last a valuable mare, the property of Messrs. Leney and Co.,
brewers, left in charge of a boy, at the West Cliff Tap, became restive,
broke away and started down the Sandgate Road, when, coming in contact
with a coal cart, a general smash of the vehicles occurred, fortunately
without resulting in injury to either of the horses.
|
Folkestone Express 4 December 1875.
Saturday, November 27th: Before The Mayor, Col. De Crespigny, T. Caister
and W.J. Jeffreason Esqs.
William Croucher, a cabman in the employ of Mr. Thomas Inman, innkeeper
and fly proprietor, West Cliff, was charged with embezzling 2s., the
monies of his master, on the 15th November.
Mr. Minter prosecuted.
Mr. Minter, having briefly opened the case, called Thomas Inman,
innkeeper and fly proprietor, West Cliff, who said: Defendant was in my
employ as fly driver for 10s. per week. On the previous Tuesday I gave
him notice to leave in a week; that would be on Saturday, November 20th.
Defendant's duty, when he received money, was to enter it in a book on
the following day and pay it over to me. On Monday morning, the 15th, he
went with his fly to Mrs. Williams, No. 10, Manor Road. I told him to go
there. I never saw him again, as he did not come back. He had not booked
any money taken on the Monday.
By defendant: I never saw you come to my yard. I distinctly deny it.
By the Bench: This is the first time I have seen him since.
Mrs. Emily Williams said: On the 15th November I had a fly from Mr.
Inman's to go to Shorncliffe Station. I cannot swear that the defendant
was the driver on that morning. I paid the driver, whoever he was, 2s.
6d., which would be 2s. for the fare and 6d. for himself.
Mr. Inman, re-called, said he saw the defendant leave the yard with the
horse and fly.
Defendant: Didn't I come to your yard on the 17th to settle with you?
Prosecutor: No, I never saw you.
Mr. Minter applied for an adjournment in order to produce more evidence,
and the case was therefore adjourned until Wednesday.
Wednesday, December 1st: Before The Mayor, Col. De Crespigny, T. Caister
and J. Clark esqs.
William Croucher, a fly driver in the employ of Mr. Inman, cab
proprietor, was charged on remand of embezzling 2s., the monies of his
master.
The particulars of the case will be found in our police report of
Saturday.
The evidence taken on Saturday having been read over by the Clerk to the
Magistrates, Thomas Inman, re-called by Mr. Minter said the fare from
Mrs. Williams' house to Shorncliffe was 2s.
Elizabeth Simmons said: I am in the service of Mrs. Williams. On the
15th ult. my mistress went to Shorncliffe in a cab. I saw her go away.
The defendant is the man who took the box downstairs. I saw the fly, and
the defendant was acting as the driver.
By the Bench: I saw defendant drive the fly away.
Thomas Taylor said: I am in the service of Mr. Inman and know the
defendant.
Mr. Minter: Will you tell the Bench what you said to Mr. Inman relative
to a conversation which took place between you and the defendant?
Witness: I know nothing. I have made no statement to Mr. Inman.
Mr. Minter: Did you not see defendant drive away on the day in question?
Witness: No I did not. I never said anything to Mr. Inman.
Mr. Minter: Did not defendant say anything to you?
Witness: No, sir. He only said he should keep what he had got.
(Laughter)
George Winson said: I am in the employ of Mr. Inman and know defendant.
When he went away on the Monday he said he should not come again.
Defendant said nothing about any money.
Mr Minter: Did you hear Taylor make any statement to Mr. Inman?
Witness: No. I heard defendant say he should spend what he had got, and
then he should be “straight” with Mr. Inman.
Mr. Minter applied for a remand until Saturday, which was granted by the
Bench.
|
Folkestone Express 11 December 1875.
Saturday, December 4th: Before The Mayor, Col. De Crespigny, and T.
Caister Esq.
William Croucher, a flyman, was again charged on remand with embezzling
2s., the monies of his master, Mr. Inman, cab proprietor.
Mr. Till, in the absence of Mr. Minter, appeared for the prosecution,
and Mr. Fox, of Dover, for the defendant.
Mr. Inman was re-called, and in answer to Mr. Fox, said: Defendant has
been in my employ for three months. It is a general rule for my men to
come and settle with me every morning. Sometimes three or even four days
elapse before they settle. I always settle with them for the week on
Sunday morning. I do not supply any men with books to keep their
accounts in. I gave defendant notice to leave on the 9th November and
the time expired on the following Saturday. I told him on that day he
could come again next week as he had nothing to do. He came on the
following Monday. Sometimes the men buy candles for their lamps and
charge me with the amount. He was my servant for another week. Mrs.
Williams gave an order for a cab on the Monday, the 15th November, to go
to Shorncliffe Station. I knew the fare would be 2s. and 6d. for the
man. I saw defendant go out of the yard on that day. I cannot say that I
did not see him again on that day. I did not see him on the Tuesday
(next day) nor on the Wednesday. I am sworn. I did not see defendant in
my yard on Wednesday evening between eight and nine o'clock. I did not
say to defendant on the Wednesday evening “Is that you, Bill?” I will
swear that. Defendant did not say he had come up to settle. I never saw
him. I did not see a man named Boxer in my yard that evening. I never
spoke to him about my son. I saw Thomas Taylor in my bar on Wednesday
evening. Defendant has never made a claim against me for 3s. for money
paid for repairs to a lamp of mine. It was my duty to find lamps for my
carriages. The men generally buy candles and charge me with them. If
defendant said he had received less than was due to him, I should pay
him the difference. The man would stop the money if I owed him anything.
I went to defendant's home on Tuesday evening, the 16th November, and
saw his wife. She was crying.
Re-examined by Mr. Till: Defendant never made any claims against me for
lamps and candles. He never came near after the Monday. Defendant did
not come to me on the Tuesday or on the Wednesday. I know Boxer; he used
to work for me. He was not in my yard to my knowledge. I saw Boxer and
Thomas Taylor in my bar. There is a partition in the bar which would
prevent me from seeing anyone behind it. I will swear that he never
spoke to me. The notice expired on the Saturday, but as he came on the
Monday I considered him my servant.
Mr. Fox then addressed the Bench for the defence. He said they were
aware it was a serious charge – one of embezzlement – and he was sure
the Bench would give their utmost attention to the facts of the case.
They had heard from the prosecutor that the men were supposed to account
every morning for what they had received on the previous day, but in
cross-examination Mr. Inman said that sometimes went three or even four
days without accounting, and at times bought candles for their lamps and
stopped the money out of what they had received. If masters allowed
their servants to make such matters a question of accounts, then the law
provided that the remedy for the recovery of any balances lay by civil
action in the County Court, and not by criminal action. In the present
case there was no opportunity afforded the defendant of settling on the
following Sunday because they were told that he had left on the previous
Monday. He did so because he had been told by Mr. Inman that if he could
not get anything else to do he was at liberty to leave. Now, he was not
going to deny that the cab was sent to Mrs. Williams' house on the day
in question, or that the money was paid for the fare. On the contrary,
he was prepared on the part of defendant to say that Mrs. Williams did
pay him 2s., and also gave him 6d. for himself, but he wished to state
that if the defendant had had an opportunity of settling, the case would
never have been brought before the Court. Mr. Inman had said that he
never saw the defendant from the Monday in question until he saw him in
Court, but he (the speaker) was prepared to bring forward witnesses who
would swear that defendant went into Mr. Inman's yard on the Tuesday
night, that Mr. Inman said “Is that you, Bill?”, and that defendant said
it was and he had come to settle. Another witness would also say that he
saw the defendant in Mr.Inman's bar on Wednesday night. He (the speaker)
thought the statement of the prosecutor was calculated to mislead the
Court. He understood that the defendant had paid 1s. for candles and 3s.
for repairs done to the lamps. If that was true, then Mr. Inman was
really indebted to the defendant. Defendant had lived in Folkestone many
years; he bore an excellent character, and it really appeared to him
(the speaker) that the prosecutor had come into Court to commit perjury.
Mr. Till said that Mr. Fox had stated it was a question of accounts, and
as such could only be settled in the County Court. He was prepared to
state that such was not the case, neither had it been proved to be so.
Henry Boxer: I am a fly driver, living in Folkestone. I know the
defendant, and have known him for many years. He is a Folkestone man. I
know Mr. Inman. On the 17th November I went with defendant to Mr.
Inman's. It was between eight and nine o'clock in the evening. Mr. Inman
came into the yard and said to defendant “Hello, Bill, is that you?”
Defendant said it was and he had come up to settle, or something to that
effect. I did not hear Mr. Inman make any reply. He went in the house.
Defendant and I followed him in. Mr. Inman came in the bar soon after we
got in. He could see us, and we could see him. I should think Mr. Inman
was in the bar for an hour. Mr. Inman was betting that his son could
clean tripe with any man in Folkestone. Defendant and he talked together
about it. There were two men there, each of whose names was Thomas
Taylor. I identify this one as one I saw there.
By Mr. Till: There were five or six other people in the bar. The other
Thomas Taylor was in and out during the evening. I worked for Mr. Inman
once, and I left because we had a quarrel. I charged a gentleman too
much money. I charged the gentleman 7s. and gave Mr. Inman 5s. That is
the only way of living. (Laughter)
Re-examined by Mr. Fox: The proper fare would be 5s. and that I gave to
Mr. Inman.
Thomas Taylor: I am a dairyman and grocer, living in High Street. I know
prosecutor and defendant. I have known the latter for a number of years.
I know nothing against him. On Wednesday evening, November 17th, I saw
defendant in Mr. Inman's bar between eight and nine o'clock. Mr. Inman
came into the bar. I saw a man named Boxer there. Prosecutor and
defendant spoke to each other. There was a conversation about Inman's
son being a professional hand at cleaning tripe. (Laughter) Inman
offered to bet anybody that his son could clean a certain quantity of
tripe in a given time. (Renewed laughter)
By Mr. Till: I have not been in the bar since. I had a glass of ale.
Mr. Till: Only one?
Witness: Well, I might have had two or three. Perhaps half a dozen.
(Laughter)
Mr. Till: How long does it take you to drink half a dozen glasses of
ale?
Witness: Well, that all depends. I did not time myself.
Mr. Till: What time did you leave?
Witness: About ten o'clock.
Re-examined by Mr. Fox: Mr. Inman could see the defendant. I am sure he
must have done so.
Joseph Whittingham, dealer, Folkestone, said he had known defendant
about twelve years, during which time he had borne an excellent
character.
After a short deliberation, the Mayor said that the evidence was not
satisfactory, and the charge would therefore be dismissed.
This announcement was received with applause, which was at once
suppressed.
The witness Boxer applied for costs, saying he had been subpoenaed to
give evidence.
The Mayor, addressing the applicant, said he was glad he had returned
into Court, as he wished to speak to him. The applicant in his evidence
had acknowledged charging 7s. for a cab fare, the authorised amount for
which was 5s. Such conduct could not be too highly deprecated, as it did
a great amount of injury to business by preventing people from taking a
carriage as often as they otherwise would do. He hoped that the
applicant would discontinue the practice, as if another case came under
the notice of the Bench he would lose his license.
The applicant, who appeared somewhat crestfallen at the result, then
left the Court.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 16 September 1876.
The Bankruptcy Act 1869.
In the County of Kent, holden at Canterbury.
In the matter of a Special Resolution for Liquidation, by arrangement,
of the affairs of Thomas Inman, the elder, of the West Cliff Hotel Tap,
Folkestone, Kent, Inn and Livery Stable Keeper.
The Creditors of the above named Thomas Inman, the elder, who have not
already proved their debts, are required on or before the 25th day of
September instant to send their names and addresses, and the particulars
of their debts to me, the undersigned James Pledge, of Folkestone, Kent,
Auctioneer, and Trustee under the Liquidation, or in default thereof
they will be excluded from the benefit of the Divident proposed to be
declared.
Dated this 11th Day of September, 1876.
JAMES PLEDGE, Trustee.
|
Folkestone Express 28 October 1876.
Wednesday, October 25th: Before J. Tolputt Esq., Dr. Bateman, and
Alderman Caister.
Application for the transfer of the license of the West Cliff Hotel Tap
was made and granted.
|
Folkestone Express 12 January 1878.
Monday, 7th January: Before R.W. Boarer and F.C. Fletcher Esqs., and
General Armstrong.
John Brian, no home, was charged with begging. A constable saw him go to
the Club House and ask for assistance, and he was relieved. He then went
round to the West Cliff Tap, where he bought some beer, and again
begged. He was drunk, and very violent when taken into custody.
He was sentenced to 21 days' with hard labour.
|
Folkestone Express 3 July 1880.
Wednesday, June 30th: Before The Mayor, Aldermen Caister and Sherwood,
W.J. Jeffreason and J. Clark Esqs.
Robert Downs was charged with using obscene language in Sandgate Road on
the 29th April last.
Edmund Poynter, coachman to Sir Henry Hunt, said on the 29th April he
saw the prisoner at the West Cliff Tap about half past one. There had
been an argument between defendant and another man and they asked
witness's opinion, which he gave. Defendant then commenced to abuse him
in the most violent manner, and followed him into the street and wanted
to fight.
He was fined 10s. and 11s. 6d. costs, or 14 days' imprisonment in
default, with hard labour.
The Mayor thanked the prosecutor for proceeding with the case, the
defendant having absconded and been apprehended on a warrant.
|
Folkestone Express 6 August 1887.
Wednesday, August 3rd: Before General Armstrong, Alderman Banks and
Surgeon General Gilbourne.
The licence of the West Cliff Hotel Tap was transferred from Mr. C.W.
Wedderburn to Mr. C. Lord.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 15 October 1887.
Thursday, October 13th: Before J. Fitness, J. Clark and J. Ward Esqs.
Mary Mitchell, and old woman, was charged with being drunk and
disorderly at the West Cliff Shades on Wednesday.
The case was proved by Sergeant Harman, and prisoner was fined 5s. and
4s. 6d. costs, or seven days'.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 13 October 1888.
Monday, October 8th: Before The Mayor, Alderman Sherwood, J. Holden
Esq., and Captain Carter.
John Roach, a sailor, belonging to H.M. Depot Ship Pembroke, of Chatham,
was summoned for being drunk and disorderly and resisting the police in
Christ Church Road on the previous Saturday.
P.C. W. Knott stated that he saw the defendant trying to get in to the
West Cliff Shades, and as he was refused, he became very noisy. He was
alone. The constable advised him to go away, but he refused to do so.
His language was most obscene, and when taken into custody he became
very violent. In the struggle they both fell to the ground, and the
defendant for the collar of the constable's greatcoat (produced), and
also struck him a severe blow in the face. It was only with the
assistance of the military police that he was taken to the police
station.
The defendant pleaded Guilty and expressed his sorrow at the occurrence.
He did not know anything about it until he found himself in the police
station on the following morning. He had never been in trouble before
and had good conduct badges.
The Bench inflicted a fine of 5s. for being drunk, and 3s. 6d. costs;
also 5s. for being disorderly and resisting the police, and 3s. 6d.
costs.
The defendant paid the money, and also for the damage to the coat, 1s.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 16 March 1889.
Local News.
At the Folkestone police court on Monday, before Dr. Bateman and Messrs.
Hoad and Fitness, Ann Norley was charged with being drunk and disorderly
in Sandgate Road on Sunday night.
Sergeant Harman preferred the charge, to which the prisoner pleaded
Guilty and made a rambling statement, describing herself as a cook, and
living with a lady in the Sandgate Road.
She was very comfortable in her situation, and went out on Sunday to see
her sister. She went into the West Cliff Tap – wasn't in there more than
an hour - (Laughter) – and had a few glasses of stout – not many.
Dr. Bateman said the prisoner would be fined 5s. and 3s. 6d. costs, or
seven days' imprisonment.
Prisoner: I've spent nearly all my money, sir. I've got fourpence.
(Laughter)
A distraint warrant was ordered to be issued on her goods, if she had
any.
|
Folkestone Express 16 March 1889.
Monday, March 12th: Before Dr. Bateman, J. Hoad and J. Fitness Esqs.
Ann Norley was charged with being drunk and disorderly in Sandgate Road
on Sunday night.
Sergt. Harman said the prisoner was very drunk and in company with about
six soldiers. He requested her to go home, but she refused. He followed
her as far as Mr. Fitness's.
Prisoner said she was a cook and had a place in Clifton Gardens. She
went out on Sunday to have tea with a friend.
The Magistrates' Clerk: You had something stronger than tea.
Prisoner admitted that she went to the West Cliff Shades and “had a lot
of stout”.
She was fined 5s. and 3s. 6d. costs, and responded: “Oh, I haven't got
any money. I have been a widow six years. I haven't got any money except
3d. I spent all the other. My clothes are at Clifton Gardens”.
She was ordered to be detained while a distress warrant was issued, and
in default of goods being found, ordered seven days' hard labour.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 27 February 1897.
Saturday, February 20th: Before The Mayor, Messrs. J. Pledge, G. Spurgen,
T.J. Vaughan, and J. Holden.
Mr. John Burgess was granted permission to sell at the West Cliff Hotel
Tap.
Note: This does not appear in More Bastions. Maybe should have read
Bergerson!
|
Folkestone Express 27 February 1897.
Saturday, February 20th: Before The Mayor, Aldermen Pledge and Spurgen,
and J. Holden and T.J. Vaughan Esqs.
The licence of the West Cliff Tap was transferred to Mr. Bercheson
(sic).
|
Folkestone Chronicle 13 March 1897.
Wednesday, March 10th: Before Messrs. W.G. Herbert, C.J. Pursey, and J.
Pledge.
Mr. Burgess (sic) was granted the transfer of the licence of the West
Cliff Hotel Tap.
|
Folkestone Express 25 September 1897.
Adjourned Brewster Sessions.
Wednesday, September 22nd: Before J. Fitness, W.G. Herbert, C.J. Pursey,
J. Pledge, and H.D. Stock Esqs.
The West Cliff Shades.
The licence of these premises was transferred to Mr. William Patrick
Barrett.
Note: No record of this in More Bastions.
|
Folkestone Herald 25 September 1897.
Police Court Report.
On Wednesday – Mr. Fitness presiding – a temporary authority was granted
to Mr. Patrick Parrett, of the West Cliff Shades.
Note: This does not appear in More Bastions.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 9 October 1897.
Saturday, October 2nd: Before The Mayor and Messrs. J. Fitness, J.
Pledge, J. Holden, T.J. Vaughan, and J. Hoad.
The licence of the West Cliff Shades was transferred to Mr. Schultz of
the Paris Hotel.
|
Folkestone Express 9 October 1897.
Saturday, October 2nd: Before The Mayor, Alderman Pledge, T.J. Vaughan
and J. Holden Esqs.
The licence of the West Cliff Shades was transferred to Mr. Schultz.
|
Folkestone Herald 9 October 1897.
Police Court Report.
On Saturday an application was made by Mr. Schultz for a temporary
authority for the West Cliff Tavern for the brewers, while he was yet
managing the Paris Hotel, which he was going to leave.
Superintendent Taylor stated that the applicant was a highly respectable
man, but he considered both houses required a responsible manager. The
Bench, the Mayor not taking part in this, thought the application was
premature, but the applicant could renew it when the coast was clear.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 11 December 1897.
Wednesday, December 8th: Before The Mayor, Messrs. J. Fitness, and W.G.
Herbert.
Mr. Schultz was granted the transfer of the licence of the West Cliff
Shades.
|
Folkestone Express 11 December 1897.
Wednesday, December 8th: Before The Mayor, J. Fitness, and W.G. Herbert
Esqs.
The licence of the West Cliff Shades was transferred to Mr. Schultz.
|
Folkestone Herald 11 December 1897.
Local News.
The following licence was transferred on Wednesday at the sitting of the
Folkestone Justices: West Cliff Shades to Mr. Schultz.
|
Folkestone Express 11 January 1902.
Wednesday, January 8th: Before W.G. Herbert, C.J. Pursey, and G.I.
Swoffer Esqs.
Frank Epps, a cabman, denied that he left his horse and cart unattended
at 10.30 p.m. on the 1st inst. in Christ Church Road.
P.C. Thomas Wm. Allen said on the 1st inst., about 10.35 p.m., he saw a
horse and carriage unattended opposite the West Cliff Shades in Christ
Church Road. He kept observation, and it was unattended for 20 minutes,
at the end of which time the defendant came out of the private bar of
the public house. When informed, the defendant said “If you give me
another chance I won't do it again”.
Corporal Arthur Epps and Corporal Wm. Wilson, both of the 1st Dragoons,
who were in the public house, testified that as it was a very wet night
the cabman stood in the doorway. They did not leave the theatre till
twenty five minutes to eleven and did not arrive at the public house
till quarter to eleven, which made it impossible for them to be there
twenty minutes, as the house closed at eleven.
The Constable here said he timed the defendant by the Christ Church
clock.
After a short consultation, the Bench said they would give the defendant
the benefit of the doubt, and they discharged him.
|
Folkestone Express 3 January 1903.
Friday, January 2nd: Before Aldermen Penfold, Spurgen, and Vaughan.
Andrew Wilson was charged with begging.
Detective Burniston said from information received he went to West Cliff
Shades on Christmas Eve, where he saw prisoner, and followed him to
Ingles Road, where he called at a house and handed in a letter for the
mistress of the house, who sent out 6d. to him. Witness then arrested
prisoner, who became very violent.
The letter was read by the Bench, and it concluded by wishing the person
to whom it was addressed the compliments of the season, which was
characterised by one of the Magistrates as the height of impudence. Two
other similar documents were found in the prisoner's possession, and
Superintendent Reeve said the man had done no work for months.
Prisoner was sentenced to seven days' hard labour.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 16 May 1903.
Wednesday, May 13th: Before Lieut. Colonel Fynmore and Lieut. Col.
Westropp.
The licence of the West Cliff Shades was temporarily transferred from
Frederick Schutz to Walter Barker.
|
Folkestone Express 16 May 1903.
Wednesday, May 13th: Before Lieut. Col. Fynmore and Lieut. Col. Westropp.
A temporary transfer of the licence was granted to Walter Barker, of the
West Cliff Shades, the outgoing tenant being Frederick Schulz.
|
Folkestone Herald 16 May 1903.
Wednesday, May 13th: Before Lieut Colonels Fynmore and Westropp.
The following temporary transfer of licence was granted: The West Cliff
Shades from Frederick Schutz to Walter Barker.
|
Folkestone Chronicle 30 May 1903.
Wednesday, May 27th: Before Mr. W. Wightwick, Lieut. Col. Westropp,
Lieut. Col. Hamilton, Colonel Fynmore, and Messrs. W.G. Herbert, G.I.
Swoffer, E.T. Ward, and T.J. Vaughan.
The licence of the West Cliff Shades was transferred from Walter Schutz
to Fredk. Henry Parker.
|
Folkestone Express 30 May 1903.
Wednesday, May 27th: Before Alderman Vaughan, Lieut. Colonels Westropp,
Fynmore and Hamilton, G.I. Swoffer, W. Wightwick, E.T. Ward, and W.G.
Herbert Esqs.
The following transfer was granted: The West Cliff Shades from Frederick
Schulz to Walter Herbert Barker.
|
Folkestone Herald 30 May 1903.
Wednesday, May 27th: Before Mr. W. Wightwick, Alderman T.J. Vaughan,
Lieut. Colonels Westropp, Hamilton, and Fynmore, Messrs. W.G. Herbert,
J. Pledge, and G.I. Swoffer.
The following temporary transfer was confirmed by the Bench: West Cliff
Shades, from Mr. F. Schultz to Mr. W.H. Park (sic).
|
Folkestone Herald 3 October 1903.
Inquest.
Yesterday afternoon the Borough Coroner, Mr. G.W. Haines, conducted an
inquiry at the Town Hall respecting the circumstances attending the
death of John Doherty, an out-porter.
Francis Baker, barman at the West Cliff Shades, identified the body as
that of John Doherty. The deceased had said lately that he was 65 years
of age. He had no home, and slept where he could. Doherty was an old
soldier, having served in several campaigns. He was the possessor of
several medals. Witness had never known him draw a pension, although he
had been in the Queen's Bays, 4th Hussars, and the “Buffs” Militia. Very
often witness had supplied Doherty with a meal. On Thursday, about a
quarter past one, he came to the Shades, and said that he was hungry.
Witness replied that if he kept himself quiet he should have a dinner.
He was quite sober, but was inclined to be noisy. He had two-pennyworth
of rum, but he did not drink it. Half an hour later witness gave him a
dinner, consisting of some cabbage, potatoes, liver and bacon, and the
deceased went into another room to eat it. Ten minutes afterwards
witness was called to the yard by a man named Johnson, who said “There
is something the matter with Jimmy. I do not like the look of him”.
Witness went into the yard and saw the old porter lying there quite
still. A doctor was sent for. Subsequently witness ascertained that
Doherty had not eaten much of the repast.
Thomas Johnson, a bathchair man, of 14, Church Street, said he knew the
deceased well. On Thursday, witness was having his food in the “Shades”,
when deceased came into the room and sat at the same table. He had a hot
dinner. Before he had finished the meal he left the room, and witness
next saw him lying in the yard.
Thomas Heath, a stableman, living at Clifton Mews, said that he knew
Doherty by sight. Witness was in the West Cliff Shades the previous day,
and going out into the yard, he saw the deceased lying on the ground. He
was on his side, and witness, thinking that he was in a fit, turned him
on his back. There was no gurgling or choking sound. His lips were blue,
and his mouth was wide open.
Mr. Yunge Bateman said he examined the man and saw a large piece of
partially masticated meat in the thorax. Two policemen, under witness's
instruction, tried artificial respiration, but the heart did not beat.
Death was due to suffocation caused by choking.
A verdict was returned in accordance with the medical testimony.
|
Folkestone Express 10 October 1903.
Inquest.
On Friday morning the Borough Coroner (Mr. G.W. Haines) held an inquest
at the Town Hall touching the death of James Dogherty, who expired
suddenly the previous day.
Francis Baker said that he resided at the West Cliff Shades, where he
was employed as barman. He knew deceased, who informed him that he was
65 years of age. He had no fixed abode. Dogherty was an old soldier,
having served in the Queen's Bays and 4th Hussars, and had several
medals, but witness did not know whether he was a pensioner. Deceased
was often pinched for a meal, and witness on more than one occasion had
supplied him with food. The previous day, about 1.15, deceased came to
the West Cliff Shades and said that he was hungry. Witness told him to
keep quiet and he should have a dinner. He was quite sober, but was
naturally inclined to be noisy. About 1.40 witness handed deceased some
cabbage, potatoes, liver and bacon, which was part of witness's dinner.
Deceased then took the food in another room. Ten minutes later witness
was called to the urinal, where he saw deceased lying on his side quite
still. Witness thought he was dead, and sent for a doctor. He had eaten
but very little of his dinner.
Thomas Johnson, a bathchair-man, of No. 28. Church Street, said that he
had seen deceased at the West Cliff Shades on several occasions. The
previous day deceased came into the same room as witness with his
dinner. After a few seconds he went out, and after about eight minutes a
man called out “Come and look at Jimmy”. Witness went, and not liking
the look of deceased's face, he called the manager.
Thomes Heath, a stableman, residing at Clifton Mews, said he was in the
bar of the West Cliff Shades on Thursday, and happening to go to the
lavatory he found deceased lying there. He was insensible, and thinking
deceased was in a fit he called the last witness. Deceased was very blue
about the lips, and his tongue was swollen.
Dr. Bateman deposed that the previous day, shortly before two o'clock,
he was called to the West Cliff Shades, where he found Dogherty lying on
his back. Witness examined his throat, and found a large piece of
partially masticated meat in his larynx. Deceased was carried into the
house, and with the assistance of two police constables witness tried
artificial respiration for half an hour, but without success. Death was
due to suffocation.
A verdict of “Accidental Death” was returned.
|
Folkestone Express 15 February 1913.
Annual Licensing Sessions.
The Brewster Sessions were held on Wednesday morning. The Justices
present were E.T. Ward Esq., Major Leggett, Lieut. Col. Fynmore, Lieut.
Col. Hamilton, G. Boyd, G.I. Swoffer, R.J. Linton, and J. Stainer Esqs.
Mr. Boyd and Mr. Stainer did not take part in the licensing business,
not being on the committee.
Plans were submitted for interior alterations at the West Cliff Shades,
and the Chairman said they had examined them, but they would like to see
the premises before deciding. The application was therefore adjourned
until the 10th March.
|
Folkestone Herald 15 February 1913.
Annual Licensing Sessions.
Wednesday, February 12th: Before Mr. E.T. Ward, Lieut. Col. Fynmore,
Lieut. Col. Hamilton, Major Leggett, Mr. W.G. Herbert, Mr. J. Stainer,
and Mr. G. Boyd.
Application was made on behalf of the Ashford Breweries for sanction to
certain interior alterations at the West Cliff Shades for the provision
of two bedrooms. It was stated that the plans had been filed with the
Clerk, and were in order.
The Chairman remarked that the Bench had seen the plans, but they would
like to see the premises before they consented to the alterations.
Therefore they would visit the premises, and the matter would come up
again at the transfer sessions.
|
Folkestone Express 19 July 1913.
Monday, July 14th: Before Alderman Penfold and G. Boyd Esq.
Edward Moran was charged with begging on Saturday night. He pleaded
Guilty.
P.C. Cox said at 10.40 on Saturday night he saw the prisoner come out of
the West Cliff Shades, and he went into Sandgate Road, where he stopped
a gentleman. He went a little further down and stopped two other
gentlemen. He then turned round to him (witness), he being in plain
clothes, and said “Will you give me something to make up the money for
my bed?” He told him he was a police officer, and the prisoner said “I
have just had two pints, and I wanted to make the money up”. When
searched, tenpence in coppers, a soldier's discharge papers, and a pawn
ticket were found on the prisoner.
The prisoner said the pawn tickets were for two medals. He only came in
the town on Saturday. He had had a sprained ankle. He had two pints of
beer, but they were given to him. He had not done any begging before
then.
The Chief Constable (Mr. Reeve) said the prisoner was a stranger. There
was, he was sorry to say, a large number of such men in the town at the
present time.
Sent to prison for twenty one days' hard labour.
|
Folkestone Express 3 January 1914.
Saturday, December 27th: Before The Mayor, Councillors C.E. Mumford and
W.G. Harrison, and Messrs. Stainer, Swoffer, and Boyd.
John Harrison was charged with begging. He pleaded Not Guilty.
P.C. Bourne said about six o'clock the previous evening he was on duty
in Sandgate Road near Christ Church when he saw the prisoner accosting
foot passengers, and he received something from three different persons.
He then went into the West Cliff Shades, and later returned, and he
received something from a young man. He told him he should take him to
the police station, and he replied “Don't charge me with begging. Charge
me with selling lavender”. On searching him, he found one penny in his
possession.
The Chief Constable said prisoner was a perfect bully, and he had been
convicted for bad as well as minor offences.
One month's hard labour.
|
Folkestone Herald 3 January 1914.
Saturday, December 27th: Before The Mayor, Mr. J. Stainer, Mr. G.I.
Swoffer, Mr. G. Boyd, Councillor Mr. W.J. Harrison, and Councillor C.E.
Mumford.
John Harrison was charged with begging. He pleaded Not Guilty.
P.C. Bourne said that at about 6.30 the previous evening he saw prisoner
in the Sandgate Road, near Christ Church. He was accosting foor
passengers, and witness saw him receive money from three. He then went
into the West Cliff public house. Half an hour later, witness again saw
him in Sandgate Road, near the same place, accosting foot passengers.
Harrison received money from a young man, and asked two ladies for
something towards a night's lodging. When searched at the police
station, prisoner was found to have a few packets of lavender and one or
two post cards on him.
The Chief Constable said he knew prisoner to be a perfect bully. In
December, 1911, he committed a most violent and unprovoked assault upon
a gentleman who refused to assist him, for which he was committed for
fourteen days. There was also a conviction against him at Dover for
being drunk and assaulting the police.
The Chairman said that men such as prisoner were a curse to the
neighbourhood. The Lower and Upper Sandgate Road were infested by them.
The Bench wanted to get rid of them. Prisoner would be sentenced to one
month's hard labour.
|
Folkestone Express 25 October 1919.
Friday, October 17th: Before Col. Owen and other Magistrates.
Robert Wilson was charged with obtaining £5 by false pretences from
William Muddle on the 4th October.
Det. Con. Butcher said that at 3 p.m. on Thursday he saw prisoner
detained at Lime Street police station, London. He told him he was a
police officer from Folkestone, and that a warrant had been issued for
his arrest for obtaining five £1 Treasury Notes by false pretences from
Mr. William Muddle on the 4th October, with intent to defraud. He
cautioned him, and prisoner replied “It is all a fake. I wrote the
cheques and letters myself. I didn't know any person of the name of
Lewis at St. Margaret's Chambers, Victoria Street”. He brought Wilson
back to Folkestone, read the warrant to him, and showed him the letter
and cheque (produced). He replied “Quite right”.
Prisoner was remanded in custody until yesterday (Thursday).
The accused was again brought before the Magistrates yesterday
(Thursday) morning.
Two further charges were preferred against the prisoner, one of
obtaining £2 from Mr. Barker, the landlord of the West Cliff Shades, and
also of obtaining £5 10s. from Miss Stay, greengrocer, Guildhall Street,
both sums being obtained under false pretences.
Mr. Walter William Muddle, managing director to Mr. William Muddle,
grocer, 26, Bouverie Road West, said he identified prisoner. On the 4th
October, from something he was told by a clerk in his employment, he
proceeded to the Metropole Hotel about 3.30 p.m. He saw the prisoner
there at the receiving office. He knew prisoner was in the employ of the
hotel company, and he had done business with him on previous occasions.
He had a conversation with the prisoner with regard to the price of
goods to be supplied to the hotel. After that prisoner took a letter and
a cheque from his pocket, and said he was entitled to some money from a
private estate, and that the cheque had come through from a trustee.
Prisoner asked him to pay the cheque in through his (witness's) bank,
and asked him to let him have some money on it. He believed, in
consequence of what the accused said, that the letter and cheque were
genuine, and that the cheque would be honoured on presentation. He told
Wilson he would let him have £5 on account of the cheque, and prisoner
said he would call at the shop when he left work at six o'clock. Witness
then left, taking the letter and the cheque with him. Prisoner called at
the shop shortly after six o'clock, and five £1 Treasury Notes were paid
to him by the cashier in his presence. The accused then left the shop.
The cheque was endorsed “R. Wilson” when it was handed to him. Witness
paid the cheque into the bank on the 6th, and received it back on the
9th marked “No Account”. He saw the accused in the shop about 3.30 on
the afternoon of the 9th, and told him the cheque had been returned
marked “No Account”. Prisoner said he had been having a few days'
holiday, and had been to London, that the man Lewis had no money in the
bank, and that he (prisoner) would have to pay the money himself. He
asked the prisoner if he could find the money himself, and he replied
that he would let him have £5 at the Hotel Metropole at 12 o'clock on
Saturday. He had not received the money, or any part of it. On the 16th
he took out a warrant for the prisoner's arrest.
Mr. Walter Herbert Barker, the proprietor of the West Cliff Shades, said
he had known the prisoner as a customer for the last seven or eight
weeks. Prisoner went to his house about 6.30 p.m. on the 6th October,
and produced from his pocket book a cheque and letter, the latter being
signed by Lewis, and the money order being for £10 10s. Wilson asked him
if he would cash the cheque, and he replied he was not in the habit of
cashing cheques. Prisoner then asked him to pay it through his account
and asked him to advance £2 on it. He gave him two £1 Treasury Notes,
and told prisoner to call on the Thursday or Friday for the balance, and
he said “All right”. Before he advanced the money he read the letter and
cheque, and he believed the letter was a genuine communication. On the
7th he paid the cheque into his bank, and it was returned on the 9th
marked “No Account”. He had not seen the prisoner since he called on the
6th, and he had not received his £2, or any portion of it.
Miss Nancy Stay, greengrocer, 50, Guildhall Street, said the prisoner
went to her shop about 2 o'clock on the 9th October. On several
occasions she had done business with the prisoner on behalf of the Hotel
Metropole, where he was employed. On this occasion prisoner handed her a
cheque for £5 10s., signed by Mr. Lewis, and asked her if she would
change it, and she did so. Prisoner said it was a cheque from his
sister. It was endorsed “R. Wilson”. She gave prisoner notes to the
value of £5 10s. He left the shop, and she had not seen him since. She
had not received her £5 10s. She changed the cheque because she knew him
through business transactions, and she believed the cheque would be
honoured on presentation. The cheque was paid into the bank the same
day, and returned on the 13th marked “No Account”.
Mr. George Collier, clerk at the Metropole Hotel, said the prisoner had
gone to the hotel on July 16th as receiving clerk, and remained in that
capacity until October 6th. On that day he said he felt ill, and wished
to take the day off instead of the following Wednesday. Witness agreed
to that, and prisoner left that day, returning the following Thursday
morning. He left again between 9 and 10 a.m. and never returned.
Mr. P. Johnson, cashier, Lloyd's Bank, Holborn Circus, examined two of
the cheques drawn on his bank, and said they had no customer of the name
of “J.B.D. Lewis”, and so far as he knew they never had had.
Mr. P. Raynor, clerk at Barclay's Bank, Victoria Street, London, said
they had no customer of the name of “J.B.D. Lewis”.
The accused was committed for trial at the Quarter Sessions.
|
Folkestone Herald 1 November 1919.
Thursday, October 24th: Before Col. G.P. Owen, Mr. J.H. Blamey, Mr.
L.G.A. Collins and Mr. E. Condy.
Robert Wilson was charged on demand with obtaining money on false
pretences from W.W. Muddle Ltd., of 26, Bouverie Road West.
The Chief Constable said that there were now two additional charges
against the defendant.
Mr. Walter William Muddle, managing director of Muddle Ltd., grocers,
stated that on October 4th defendant asked him to cash a cheque for £10,
saying that he had some money due to him from some land and the cheque
was from one of the trustees. Witness gave him £5 on account, and later
paid the cheque into his bank. The cheque was drawn on Barclays Bank,
London, and was signed “J.D. Lewis”. Later the cheque was returned to
him marked “No Account”. He saw defendant, who promised to pay him the
money, but he had never received it. On the 16th instant he took out a
warrant for the man's arrest.
Mr. Walter Herbert Barker, of the West Cliff Shades, said he had known
defendant as a customer for about 7 or 8 weeks. On the 6th instant
defendant asked him to cash a cheque for £5 5s., drawn on Lloyd's Bank,
Holborn Circus, signed “J.D. Lewis”. Witness gave him £2 on account,
and paid the cheque into his account. On the following Tuesday it was
returned marked “No Account”.
Miss Nancy Stay, fruiterer and greengrocer, of 26, Guildhall Street,
said defendant had had some business transactions with her. On the 9th
October she cashed a cheque for £5 10s. for him. It was drawn on Lloyd's
Bank, Holborn Circus, and was signed “J.D. Lewis”. She paid the cheque
into her bank, but on the following Monday it was returned to her marked
“No Account”.
Mr. George Collier, control clerk at the Hotel Metropole, said defendant
first came to them on 6th July, 1919. On the 6th instant he was away
owing to illness, but he came back on the following Wednesday and asked
for time off. He went away and never returned.
Mr. Percival Johnston, cashier at Lloyd's Bank, Holborn Circus, said
that they had no customer by the name of J.D. Lewis or any account in
that name.
Mr. Peter Rayner, clerk at Barclay's Bank, Victoria Street, London, said
that they had no customer of the name of J.D. Lewis or any account
bearing that name.
Defendant was committed for trial at the next Quarter Sessions.
|
Folkestone Express 10 January 1920.
Quarter Sessions.
Monday, January 5th: Before Sir Lewis Coward.
Robert Wilson (48), clerk, pleaded Guilty to three charges of obtaining
money by false pretences with intent to defraud as follows: £5 from Mr.
W.W. Muddle, £2 from Mr. W.H. Barker, and £5 10s. from Miss Nancy Stay.
He admitted a previous conviction at the Marlborough Police Court. Mr.
E.A. Wetton (instructed by Mr. A.F. Kidson) appeared for the Crown.
In outlining the case, he said the man was employed at the Hotel
Metropole, where, during the railway strike, he saw Mr. Muddle and
showed him a letter addressed to Mr. Lewis, of St. Margaret's Chambers,
Victoria Street, and asked him to change a cheque. Mr. Muddle did so,
and eventually Mr. Muddle sent the cheque to the bank, but it was
returned marked “No Account”. A similar procedure took place in the
other two cases. The prisoner had been employed at the Hotel Metropole
as an entry clerk for about three months.
Det. Sergt. Squire, C Division, Metrpolitan Police, stationed at Vine
Street, said he was present at Marlborough Street Police Court on August
24th, 1918, when the prisoner was sentenced to three months' and three
months' hard labour, to run consecutively, for obtaining £3 10s. by
means of a worthless cheque. The reason why he was dealt with for the
two offences was that the prisoner went on one day to the Dairy
Company's manageress and asked her to cash the cheque. She did not care
to cash the cheque without her principal's authority, but she gave him
£2, and the following morning he went and collected 30s. The Magistrate
thought there were two offences. There were five other convictions, the
first being two terms of three months at Marylebone on December 6th,
1910 for stealing money and embezzlement. He was sentenced to six
months' hard labour at Devon Assizes on October 30th, 1912, for false
pretences and stealing clothing. He was bound over in his own
recognisances at Clerkenwell on July 3rd, 1913, for fraud, and on June
9th, 1914, he was sentenced to 12 months' hard labour at the County of
London Sessions for housebreaking. He received six months' hard labour
at Clerkenwell in October, 1916, for stealing a bag containing clothes.
He believed the prisoner's people were well-to-do. He was a native of
Carshalton, in Surrey.
Mr. Collyer, Control Clerk at the Hotel Metropole, said the Manager of
the Hotel received a very good character from the Manager of the
Burlington Hotel, Dover, regarding the prisoner.
The Recorder said it was unfortunate for such a man as the prisoner to
have got into the employ of the Hotel Metropole and to have been in the
capacity he was.
Mr. Collyer, answering further questions, said the prisoner was
receiving 45s. a week and his food.
The Recorder said the prisoner had pleaded Guilty to a succession of
serious charges. It was his duty to warn the prisoner that if he came
again before another Court he would be sent away for a very long time.
Those were very clever frauds. His record would justify him (the
Recorder) in sending him to penal servitude. He would have one more
chance, and he would be imprisoned with hard labour for twelve calendar
months.
|
Folkestone Herald 10 January 1920.
Quarter Sessions.
Monday, January 5th: Before Sir Lewis Coward.
Robert Wilson, aged 48, a clerk, was indicted for obtaining £5 by false
pretences from Walter William Muddle, also £2 from William Hubert
Barker, and £5 10s. from Nancy Stay, in October. Prisoner pleaded Guilty
to all three counts.
Mr. E.A. Whetton, who appeared for the Crown, said Wilson went to Mr.
William Muddle and asked him to cash a cheque for him, which was signed
by “J.D. Lewis”. Prisoner made a statement that through the railway
strike he was unable to get some money through. He presented similarly
signed cheques to the two other prosecutors. The accused had been
employed at an hotel as an entry clerk.
Detective Sergeant Squires, C Division, Metropolitan Police, stated that
at Marlborough Street Police Court on August 24th, 1918, prisoner was
sentenced to six months for obtaining £3 10s. by a worthless cheque.
There were five other convictions against him. One was at Marlborough
Street Police Court on December 6th, 1910, when he was given three
months for stealing money. He then got six months at Devon Assizes on
30th October, 1912, for stealing and false pretences. He was before the
Magistrates at Clerkenwell in 1913 for fraud, and on 9th June, 1914, he
got 12 months at the County of London Sessions. He received six months
at Clerkenwell also for stealing. In the Devon case it was stated that
he had been employed at an hotel, and witness believed he had been going
round the country working at different hotels. His people, he
understood, were quite well-to-do.
The control clerk at an hotel said prisoner entered their employ on July
16th last. The management, he understood, had a good reference from an
hotel at Dover.
The Recorder, in passing sentence of 12 months' hard labour, warned the
accused that if he came before any court again he would be put away for
some time. They were very clever frauds. The record before him would
justify any judge in sending him to penal servitude.
|
Folkestone Express 4 August 1923.
Local News.
Tuesday, July 31st: Before Mr. G.I. Swoffer, Col. P. Broome-Giles, Mr.
A. Stace, Alderman Dunk, Miss L. Weston, Dr. Nuttall, and Mr. G. Boyd.
Mr. Barker, West Cliff Shades, applied for permission to sell
intoxicants on the Leas Sports Ground, on the occasion of the Cheerful
Sparrows' Fete, on Wednesday and Thursday next, from 2.30 to 10.30.
The Clerk pointed out that the Act of Parliament only allowed the
licence to be granted until ten o'clock.
Mr. F. Seager (Secretary of the Cheerful Sparrows) said they must be
content with ten o'clock.
The licence was granted until ten o'clock.
|
Folkestone Herald 4 August 1923.
Local News.
At the Folkestone Petty Sessions on Tuesday, Mr. W.J. Barker, of the
West Cliff Shades, applied for a licence to sell at the Cheerful
Sparrows' Fete on the Leas Sports Ground on Wednesday and Thursday, 8th
and 9th inst., from 2.30 till 10.30.
The Magistrates' Clerk (Mr. J. Andrew) stated that the Act of Parliament
provided that permission should not be granted for later than 10 p.m.,
unless for the purpose of a public dinner or ball.
Mr. F. Seager (Secretary of the Cheerful Sparrows) amended the
application for permission to sell till 10 p.m., and the Justices gave
their sanction.
|
Folkestone Herald 20 January 1934.
Obituary.
Much regret was expressed on Friday of last week when it became known
that Mr. Walter Herbert Barker had passed away at his residence in
Christ Church Road after a sudden seizure, from which he never rallied.
The late Mr. Barker, who was 58 years of age, was a son of the late Mr.
R. Barker, of Windfarthing (Norfolk), and had resided in Folkestone for
over 30 years.
He was widely known amongst a large section – visitors and residents
alike – as lessee of the West Cliff Shades. Mr. Barker's one desire was
to keep up the tone of the Shades, and this he did to a marked degree.
Mr. Barker was a much respected member of the local Licensed
Victuallers' Association, and used his quiet but nonetheless useful
influence in upholding the dignity of the trade.
The late Mr. Barker was gifted by nature with a sunny disposition. He
was courteous and affable, not only to his customers, but to all – be
they rich or poor – with whom he was brought into contact. There is a
volume contained in the words “A Perfect English Gentleman” – the late
Mr. Barker was that.
He leaves a widow and three children (two sons and one daughter), and to
them much sympathy is extended. It is of interest to note that Mr. L.
Barker, a brother, is the proprietor of the Prince Albert Hotel,
Rendezvous Street, and was for several years a member of the House of
Commons Police.
The funeral took place on Tuesday at Golder's Green Crematorium.
|
Folkestone Express 10 February 1934.
Annual Licensing Sessions.
Wednesday, February 7th: Before Alderman R.G. Wood, Dr. W.W. Nuttall,
Mr. W. Smith, Mr. J.H. Blamey, Mr. F. Seager, Councillor W. Hollands,
and Eng. Rear Admiral L.J. Stephens.
Mr. R. Dallas Brett applied on behalf of Mrs. B.A. Barker, widow of the
late licensee of the West Cliff Shades, Mr. W.H. Barker, who died on the
12th January, for the transfer of the justices' licence which he held
there. He said that she had already been accepted as tenant by the
brewers concerned.
The Chief Constable said that the late licensee had carried on the
business of the house since 1903. It was not altogether desirable that a
woman should hold a public house licence, and he had taken the trouble
to ensure that Mrs. Barker was protected by her son in that case. He
understood that he was going to devote less time to his other business,
which was close by, and more time to the licensed house.
The Chairman: I think the Justices will agree with that remark.
The transfer was granted.
|
Folkestone Herald 10 February 1934.
Annual Licensing Sessions.
Mr. Dallas Brett applied on behalf of Mrs. Barker, the widow of the late
Mr. W.H. Barker, of the West Cliff Shades, and applied for a transfer of
the licence to herself. Mrs. Barker, he said, had already been accepted
as the new tenant by the brewers, and she also had a number of
references, which were submitted.
The Chief Constable said the references were perfectly satisfactory.
Continuing, he said it was not desirable that a woman should hold a
public house licence, but he had taken the trouble to investigate the
application of Mrs. Barker, and found she was protected by her son, and
he understood that he was going to devote more time to the licensed
business, and less to his own.
The transfer was granted.
|
Folkestone Herald 5 August 1939.
Local News.
There was a sequel to police observations on the West Cliff Shades
public house, Christ Church Road, Folkestone, at Folkestone Petty
Sessions yesterday, when William Henry Wood, of 5, Ingles Mews,
Folkestone was summoned for on July 12th and certain other dates using
the premises for the purpose of betting. Walter Aubrey Edward Hill, of
51, St. Michael's Street, Folkestone, was summoned for on the same dates
aiding and abetting Wood. Mr. Lloyd Bunce appeared for Wood. Both
defendants pleaded Guilty.
Mr. B.H. Bonniface, who prosecuted, said Hill was a barman at the West
Cliff Shades. On four successive days, July 12th, 13th, 14th and 15th,
P.C. Welch kept observation in these premises in the bar itself. During
those days betting was going on openly in the bar, Hill taking bets and
putting them in a drawer. The licensee was not there, Hill being in sole
charge at the time. When the other defendant came in on each day he look
the betting slips and the money away with him.
P C. Welch said he kept observation in the public bar of the West Cliff
Shades from 12.15 p.m. to 2.15 p.m. on July 12th.
Hill was there the whole time, and there were about 15 men present. He
saw one man go up to Hill, hand him a piece of paper and money over the
counter, which Hill put in a drawer. He later saw another man write
something on a piece of paper and hand it with money to Hill. He saw
Wood visit the premises with another man. Hill handed Wood something. He
again kept observation from 11.40 a.m. to 2.10 p.m. on July 13th. He saw
various people write out slips and with money hand them to Hill. Wood
came into the premises about 1 p.m. with the same man as the day before.
Wood stood talking to Hill, who then went to a drawer, took out a small
blue paper bag and handed it to Wood, who put it in his pocket. About
1.10 p.m. a man present went to Wood and placed a small piece of paper
with a coin in his hand. Another man did the same thing shortly after.
On July 14th slips and money were again passed over to Hill. Wood later
came into the premises and stood talking to Hill. Hill went to a drawer
underneath the counter, took out another blue paper bag and handed it
over to Wood, who then put it into his pocket.
Inspector J. Rowe said about 1.25 p.m. on July 15th he entered the
premises by virtue of a warrant. Hill was behind the bar and Wood was on
the customers' side of the counter. In Wood's possession he found a blue
bag containing two betting slips on which were written the names of four
horses running that day at Sandown Park. He also had in his possession
18s. 5½d., ten other slips and a number of "Football Naps".
Mr. Lloyd Bunce said Wood was not a bookie or engaged in the betting
business; he was a chauffeur. He was asked by friends “to put something
on" for them. Having received the slips he handed them on to another
party who in turn passed them on to a bookmaker. He took these bets as a
favour for some friends, not realising that he was breaking the law in
any way.
Continuing, Mr Lloyd Bunce said Wood, who was a man of good character,
was an "Old Contemptible'.' He was in the front line trenches from
September 8th, 1914, and served until the end of the war. He was three
times mentioned in dispatches and he received the Military Medal for
bravery in the field. He also had the Meritorious Service Medal and the
Mons Star.
Hill said he was very sorry for what had happened; it would never happen
again.
The Magistrates fined each defendant £1, and ordered Wood to pay £2 4s.
9d. costs and Hill costs amounting to £2.
|
Folkestone Express 12 August 1939.
Local News.
Police observation on a Folkestone public house resulted in two men
appearing before the Folkestone Magistrates on Friday. They were William
Henry Wood, a chauffeur, of Ingles Mews, Folkestone, who was fined £1
with £2 4s. 9d. costs for using the West Cliff Shades in Christ Church
Road for the purpose of betting on horse racing, and Walter Aubrey Hill,
a barman, of St. Michael's Street, Folkestone, who was also fined £1 and
£2 costs for aiding and abetting Wood.
Mr. Lloyd Bunce appeared for Bruce and pleaded Guilty. Hill entered a
similar plea.
Mr. B.H. Bonniface, prosecuting, said Hill was barman at the West Cliff
Shades public house, On four successive days, July 12th to 15th, P.C.
Walsh kept observation in the public bar, and on the 15th Inspector Rowe
entered the premises with a warrant. P.C. Walsh would describe to them
what he saw going on openly in the bar. Hill was taking bets
systematically, and placed them in a drawer by his beer engine. The
licensee was not there, and Hill was in sole charge of the public bar.
Wood took betting slips away with him when he visited the public house
each day. When Inspector Rowe searched the defendant he had two betting
slips relating to betting that day, together with money, in his pocket.
The maximum penalty was a fine not exceeding £100.
P.C. Walsh said he kept observation in the public bar at the West Cliff
Shades public house from 12.15 p.m. until 2.15 p.m. on July 12th. Hill
was behind the bar, and there were about fifteen men present. One man
went up to Hill and handed a piece of paper over the counter to Hill,
who placed it in a drawer under the counter. Wood came to the premises
accompanied by another man. Hill handed Wood a small piece of paper,
which was given to the other man, who unfolded it and produced some
money. Witness said on July 13th he kept observation from 11.40 a.m.
until 2.10 p.m. He saw people write slips and hand the money to Hill.
Wood entered the premises about one o'clock accompanied by the same man.
Hill took a small blue paper bag from the drawer and handed it to Wood,
who placed it in his pocket. On the following day he saw a man go over
to Wood and place a small piece of paper and a coin in his hand. Ten
minutes later another man did the same thing. On the 14th pieces of
paper and money were passed over to Hill, and Wood visited the premises.
He spoke to Hill, who handed him a blue paper slip from the drawer,
which he (Wood) put into his pocket.
Inspector Rowe said at 1.25 p.m. on July 15th he entered the premises
under a warrant. Hill was behind the bar and Wood was standing on the
customers' side of the counter. He told all the people in the bar why he
was there. And searched Wood, finding a blue bag containing two betting
slips on which were written four horses running that day at Sandown
Park. He also had in his possession 18/5½, ten other slips, a number of
football naps, and an explanatory circular.
Mr. Bunce said Wood was not a bookie, and was not engaged in the betting
business. He was a chauffeur, and went to the est Cliff Shades on a
number of occasions because he was asked by friends to put “something
on” for them, and having received the slips, the contents of which he
did not know, he handed them over to another party who, in turn, passed
them on to a bookmaker. Wood took the bets as a favour to his friends,
and did not realise he was breaking the law in any way, which was quite
a reasonable surmise if it was done in clubs in certain conditions.
Apparently if it was done in a public house it was different.
The Clerk: I do not quite follow. I do not know under what enacture that
can be done in a club.
Mr. Bunce: I think it can be arranged. (Laughter)
Continuing, Mr. Bunce said Wood was a man of good character. He was an
Old Contemptible, being in the first line trenches from September 6th,
1914, to the finish. He was mentioned three times in dispatches, and was
awarded the Military Medal for gallant conduct and bravery in the field,
the meritorious service medal, and the Mons Star.
Hill told the Court that he was very sorry for what had occurred, and
said it would never happen again.
The Chairman (Dr. W.W. Nuttall) said the defendants had both pleaded
Guilty, and would each be fined £1. Wood would have to pay £2 4s. 9d.
costs, and Hill £2.
|
Folkestone Express 7 October 1939.
Lighting Regulations.
Judging by the number of cases at the Folkestone Police Court, the
residents and traders of the town are exercising considerably more care
in the obscuring of the lights from their premises. On the two days when
such cases are usually heard at the Court there have been few summonses
compared with previous weeks. Two defendants appeared before the
Folkestone magistrates on Friday summoned for breaches of the lighting
order.
Mrs. Bessie Barker, West Cliff Shades, Folkestone, was the first
defendant.
P.C. Barrett said at 11.15 p.m. on the 24th September he noticed a
bedroom window on the first floor of the West Cliff Shades was
illuminated. The covering on the window was a blue blind, which was very
thin, and he could see the lamp through the blind. The blind was too
narrow, and there was an opening in it at the top, permitting bars of
light to be shown. He interviewed defendant, and she said she had only
just gone into the room.
Defendant said she was very sorry.
The Chairman (the Mayor, Alderman G.A. Gurr) said the defendant would
have to be more careful. She would have to pay a fine of 10/-.
|
Folkestone Herald 6 July 1940.
Local News.
A considerable amount of licensing business was transacted at the
Folkestone Police Court on Wednesday.
Mr. O. Isard-Davies asked for the transfer of the licence of the West
Cliff Shades, Christ Church Road, from the executors of the late Mrs.
D.A. Barker to a son of the deceased licensee, Mr. H.W. Barker.
The Magistrates consented.
Note: Executors do not appear in More Bastions.
|
Folkestone Herald 13 February 1943.
Annual Licensing Sessions.
The conduct of licensed premises and the public using them was praised
by the Chief Constable (Mr. R.C.M. Jenkins) at Folkestone’s annual
Licensing Sessions on Wednesday.
Mr. Barker, of the West Cliff Shades, applied for a music licence in
respect of a wireless installation, which he said would be used for
relaying news broadcasts at his house.
After the licence had been granted, the Chief Constable mentioned that
the question arose as to whether a licence was required for a wireless
set which, although not on the licensed part of the premises, was in the
house and was operated loud enough for customers to hear.
Strictly speaking he thought a licence was required in such cases. He
mentioned it to give other licensees an opportunity to make a similar
application under such circumstances.
|
Folkestone Herald 6 May 1944.
Local News.
Summonses for selling 5.000 cigarettes without a licence were heard at
Folkestone Police Court on Tuesday against George Charles Clarke, of
Terminus Street, Brighton, and Edgar George Butler, of Christ Church
Road, Folkestone. Each defendant was fined £1 with a guinea costs.
Mr. G.P. Medlicott represented Clarke and Mr. B.H. Bonniface appeared
for Butler. Defendants pleaded Guilty.
Mr. Robert Stevens, prosecuting for the Customs and Excise, stated that
defendants were liable to a penalty not exceeding £100. On February
20th, continued Mr. Stevens, D. Const. Welch saw Butler, a taxi driver,
at the West Cliff Shades public house and as a result of what he said
the police officer saw Clarke, a N.A.A.F.I manager. Butler had stated
that he had obtained the cigarettes from Clarke and that they had been
sold to Mr Drury, steward of the Folkestone Club. A tobacco licence,
said Mr. Stevens, cost only 5/3, but, as the Magistrates would
appreciate in this case, it was a wholesale fraud on the troops. A man
like Clarke, in charge of a N.A.A.F.I., should be above anything of this
kind. Although the amount of the licence was not large, unless a very
firm and strong line were taken by inflicting a substantial penalty
other people would be encouraged to defraud the troops and the public in
this way.
Mr. Medlicott said he could not agree with the comments of the
prosecuting solicitor; his remarks were far more germaine to another
charge which had been disposed of, both attendants being found Not
Guilty. There were ample cigarettes at this N.A.A.F.l. for the troops,
therefore it could not be suggested that the troops had been robbed of
them. Clarke had no idea whatever that he was committing any offence
against the revenue by selling these cigarettes. He pleaded Guilty to a
technical offence. Defendant was now out of work and he asked the
Magistrates to deal as leniently as possible with him.
Mr Bonmface said it was a surprise to him to hear that it was an offence
to sell a packet of cigarettes off premises which were licensed for
their sale. Any one of them might commit a similar offence unknowingly.
One might buy a packet of cigarettes and on coming out sell them to a
friend who had not any; that would be committing an offence, apparently.
The Magistrates knew in this case the sales had been done quite openly.
He knew that they ought to know the law; they should all know the law,
but he submitted that it was one of those instances in law of which many
of them knew nothing.
The Magistrates imposed fines as stated, Clarke being allowed a month in
which to pay.
Alderman J.W. Stainer presided, with Mr. P.V. Gurr and Mr. C.A. Wilde.
|
Folkestone Herald 13 October 1945.
Local News.
The following licence was transferred at a sitting of the Folkestone
Magistrates on Wednesday last week: West Cliff Shades, from Mr. Herbert
Walter Barker to Mr. Leonard Barker.
|
Folkestone Gazette 25 January 1950.
Local News.
Leonard Barker, licensee of the West Cliff Shades Hotel, Folkestone,
pleaded Not Guilty to an offence on December 14th, 1949, when it was
alleged that he sold gin which had 14 parts of 100 of added water.
Barker applied that Arthur William Pilcher, a barman, of 2, Ingles Mews,
Folkestone, should be brought before the court because he alleged that
it was the barman who was responsible for the contravention of the Food
and Drugs Act.
Miss Dorothy Dix (instructed by Messrs. Haines and Bonniface), appearing
tor Barker, pleaded Not Guilty. Pilcher pleaded Not Guilty to knowingly
adding water.
Mr. Salt, prosecuting, said the circumstances were very similar to the
previous case. Taking the minimum statutory standard for gin there was,
in the opinion of the Public Analyst, 14 parts in 100 of added water in
the gin sampled. The same sampling officers a little later in the
morning went to the West Cliff Shades, where they ordered two double
gins. Having been served with two doubles they ordered a third. Alter
they had disclosed their identity they sampled the gin they had
purchased. The magistrates would appreciate that in a case where the
barman had been joined it was necessary for the defence to prove that
the employee exercised due vigilance.
David Prebble, Sampling Officer, said he ordered the gins from the
barman, who gave his name as T.R. Hinchcliffe, of Segrave Road,
Folkestone. The barman brought the glasses to the bar and he told
Hinchcliffe who he was. Hinchcliiffe straightaway said he must fetch Mr.
Barker. Witness said he told Barker that he had taken a sample of the
gin and asked both men whether he could see the bottle from which the
gin had been taken. They brought a bottle labelled “Gordon’s London Gin,
70 degrees proof”; it was approximately five-eighths full.
Barker, giving evidence, said he had been the licensee of the hotel for
the past four years and previously had been a licensee in Folkestone at
the Prince Albert and the Railway Bell for about 20 years in all. He had
never been convicted of any offence. Prior to becoming a licensee he was
a police officer at the Houses of Parliament. Continuing, he said on
December 8th, 1949, he received a delivery of certain spirits and other
commodities from his brewer, Messrs Style and Winch. The defendant
produced invoices and an excise certificate relating to the delivery.
The invoice included a case of 12 bottles of Gordon's gin and showed
that the gin was 30 degrees under proof. The bottles were placed in the
cellar, the key of which he held. On December 12th he had occasion to
fetch some bottles from the cellar, including one bottle of gin which he
placed in the saloon bar for sale. Normally a bottle of Gordon’s gin
would last a week or ten days at that time of the year. Pilcher was on
duty on December 12th and 13th as regular barman but Hinchcliffe was
employed as a relief barman. Pilcher had been regular barman at the
hotel for over 21 years. Barker said when he took over the hotel Pilcher
was recommended to him by the previous licensee, who was his (Barker’s)
nephew. Until the present case he had had no occasion to complain of the
way Pilcher had done his work and conducted the bar. Defendant said he
had given instructions to the relief barman on how the bar was to be
conducted and told him never to put anything back into bottles. When he
received the summons on January 6th he made enquiries amongst his
employees to find out how the gin had become diluted. On January 9th
Pilcher came to him and made a statement in which he was alleged to have
said that two men came into the bar on December 12th and 13th and had
two half pints of beer and then called for two double gins. He then left
the bar and when he returned the men said they did not like the gin he
had served and asked whether he would change it for two double Booth's.
He did so and returned what they had left to the Gordon's bottle. On
January 13th Pilcher made a similar statement in writing in which he was
alleged to have added “I can only think while I was out of the bar the
two men drank the gin and filled the two glasses with water. Gordon’s
gin looks similar to plain water when in a glass”.
Barker said before Pilcher signed the statement he was warned by a
solicitor in whose office the statement was made.
Replying to Mr. Salt, defendant said sampling officers had never before
visited the West Cliff Shades during the four years he had been there.
He did not bother to keep the bottle because he thought the gin was all
right. Pilcher was on duty when the sample was taken.
Arthur William Pilcher, giving evidence, said he had been barman at the
West Cliff Shades for the past 22 years. He was off duty on December
14th. On December 12th or 13th two men came into the bar and he gave
them two large gins from the Gordon’s bottle. Then he had occasion to go
into the yard for a few moments; there was nobody else in the bar. When
he returned one of the men asked if they could have Booth's gin as they
did not like Gordon’s. He took the two gins back and served them with
Booth’s. He put the contents of the two glasses back into the Gordon’s
bottle.
Mr. Salt: Why are you sure it was water you poured back?
Pilcher: I say that because there was water found in it. There was no
other way water could have got into the gin.
They may have put some water into their gin? - They may have done. I was
outside.
Thomas Rufus Hinchcliffe, of 22, Segrave Road, Folkestone, said he was
relief barman and was on duty on December 14th. There was only one
bottle of Gordon’s gin in the bar.
Miss Dix: Did you add any water to that gin during the morning? - No.
Miss Dix said Barker had acted with the utmost honest y towards his
suppliers. If Pilcher had not told him what he did Barker might have had
no reason to suspect that the gin had not been sold in the condition he
had received it. If he could have satisfied the court that he had sold
it in the condition received that would have been his defence. He had
thrown on one side, however, the defence he could have put forward if he
had chosen to suppress the information which Pilcher gave to him.
Barker, therefore, had to show the Magistrates that the contravention of
the Act was due to a default by Pilcher and that he (Barker) used due
diligence and complied with all the conditions. There was only one
possible explanation of the way the gin could have been watered and that
was the explanation given by Pilcher, who should have known better than
to pour it back into the bottle. Referring to the alleged action by the
two men, she said it seemed to be a clever way of getting a second gin
free. “Mr. Pilcher has taken the responsibility of having been
careless”, she continued, “and doing what no barman should do – (a)
pouring back in the bottle, and (b) leaving the bar unattended in such
circumstances. We say that is the act which caused the contravention of
the provisions of the Act”.
The Magistrates retired to consider their decision and when they
returned the Chairman (Eng. Rear Admiral L.J. Stephens) said they had
decided to dismiss the case against Barker, but they found Pilcher
guilty and he would be fined £5 with 25/- costs.
Pilcher was allowed 14 days in which to pay the fine.
|
Folkestone Herald 28 January 1950.
Local News.
A visit by Corporation Sampling Officers to a Folkestone bar, where it
was alleged they were sold spirits which had been watered, was described
at Folkestone Magistrates' Court on Tuesday.
A summons against Leonard Barker, licensee of the West Cliff Shades
Hotel, Folkestone, alleging that he sold watered gin on December 14th
was dismissed. Arthur William Pilcher, barman at the West Cliff Shades,
was brought before the Court on the application of Barker, it being
alleged that he was responsible for the offence under the Food and Drugs
Act. He was fined £5 with 25/- costs.
Barker, represented by Miss Dorothy Dix (instructed by Messrs. Haines
and Bonniface), and Pilcher pleaded Not Guilty.
It was alleged by the prosecution that the gin purchased in the saloon
bar of the West Cliff Shades had 14 parts of added water in 100. Mr. K.
Salt, prosecuting, said the Food and Drugs Act provided a standard of
the commodity which was required when the purchaser demanded it. There
was an express provision in the Act to the effect that no offence was
committed if there were at least 65 parts of Proof Spirit in 100. In
this case the analyst had come to the conclusion that there were 14
parts in 100 of added water in the gin sampled. Mr. Salt said it was not
for the prosecution to say how the added water came in; it was the
feeling of the prosecution that the whole circumstances would speak for
themselves. “It is hoped that you will bear in mind that this was
undoubtedly a genuine purchase, one might say by members of the public,
and that members of the public were undoubtedly defrauded”.
Two of the Borough Sampling Officers, who were new to the town and were
not known, said Mr. Salt, went to the West Cliff Shades, where they
ordered two double gins. Having been served with two doubles they
ordered a third. After they had disclosed their identity they sampled
the gin they had purchased. The Magistrates would appreciate that in a
case where the barman had been joined it was necessary for the defence
to prove that the employee exercised due vigilance.
David Prebble, Sampling Officer, said he ordered the gins from the
barman, who gave his name as T.K. Hinchcliffe, of Segrave Road,
Folkestone. The barman brought the glasses to the bar and he told
Hinchcliffe who he was. Hinchcliffe straightaway said he must fetch Mr.
Barker. Witness said he told Barker that he had taken a sample of the
gin and asked both men whether he could see the bottle from which the
gin had been taken. They brought a bottle labelled “Gordon's London Gin,
70 degrees proof”; it was approximately five-eighths full.
Barker, giving evidence, said he had been the licensee of the hotel for
the past four years and previously had been a licensee in Folkestone at
the Prince Albert and the Railway Bell for about 20 years in all. He had
never been convicted of any offence. Prior to becoming a licensee he was
a police officer at the Houses of Parliament. Continuing, he said on
December 8th, 1949, he received a delivery of certain spirits and other
commodities from his brewer, Messrs. Style and Winch. The defendant
produced invoices and an excise certificate relating to the delivery.
The invoice included a case of 12 bottles of Gordon's gin and showed
that the gin was 30 degrees under proof. The bottles were placed in the
cellar, the key of which he held. On December 12th he had occasion to
fetch some bottles from the cellar, including one bottle of gin which he
placed in the saloon bar for sale. Normally a bottle of Gordon's gin
would last a week or ten days at that time of the year. Pilcher was on
duty on December 12th and 13th as regular barman, but Hinchcliffe was
employed as a relief barman. Pilcher had been regular barman at the
hotel for over 21 years. Barker said when he took over the hotel Pilcher
was recommended to him by the previous licensee, who was his (Barker's)
nephew. Until the present case he had had no occasion to complain of the
way Pilcher had done his work and conducted the bar. Defendant said he
had given instructions to the relief barman on how the bar was to be
conducted and told him never to put anything back into bottles. When he
received the summons on January 6th he made enquiries among his
employees to find out how the gin had become diluted. On January 9th
Pilcher came to him and made a statement in which he was alleged to have
said that two men came into the bar on December 12th or 13th and had two
half pints of beer and then called for two double gins. He then left the
bar and when he returned the men said they did not like the gin he had
served and asked whether he could change it for two double Booth's. He
did so and returned what they had left to the Gordon's bottle. On
January 13th Pilcher made a similar statement in writing in which he was
alleged to have added “I can only think while I was out of the bar the
two men drank the gin and filled the two glasses with water. Gordon's
gin looks similar to plain water when in a glass”. Barker said before
Pilcher signed the statement he was warned by a solicitor in whose
office the statement was made.
Replying to Mr. Salt, defendant said Sampling Officers had never before
visited the West Cliff Shades during the four years he had been there.
He did not bother to keep the bottle because he thought the gin was all
right. Pilcher was off duty when the sample was taken.
Arthur William Pilcher, giving evidence, said he had been barman at the
West Cliff Shades for the past 22 years. He was off duty on December
14th. On December 12th or 13th two men came into the bar and he gave
them two large gins from the Gordon's bottle. Then he had occasion to go
into the yard for a few moments; there was nobody else in the bar. When
he returned one of the men asked if they could have Booth's gin as they
did not like Gordon's. He took the two gins back and served them with
Booth's. He put the contents of the two glasses back into the Gordon's
bottle.
Mr. Salt: Why are you so sure it was water you poured back?
Pilcher: I say that because there was water found in it. There was no
other way water could have got into the gin.
They may have put water into their gin? – They may have done. I was
outside.
Thomas Rufus Hinchcliffe, of 22, Segrave Road, Folkestone, said he was
relief barman and was on duty on December 14th. There was only one
bottle of Gordon's gin in the bar.
Miss Dix: Did you add any water to that gin during the morning? – No.
Miss Dix said Barker had acted with the utmost honesty towards his
suppliers. If Pilcher had not told him what he did Barker might have had
no reason to suspect that the gin had not been sold in the condition he
had received it. If he could have satisfied the Court that he sold it in
the condition received that would have been his defence. He had thrown
on one side, however, the defence he could have put forward if he had
chosen to suppress the information which Pilcher gave to him. There was
only one possible explanation of the way the gin could have been watered
and that was the explanation given by Pilcher, who should have known
better than to pour it back into the bottle. Referring to the alleged
action by the two men, she said it seemed to be a clever way of getting
a second gin free. “Mr. Pilcher has taken the responsibility of having
been careless”, she continued, “and doing what no barman should do – (a)
pouring back in the bottle, and (b) leaving the bar unattended in such
circumstances. We say that is the act which caused the contravention of
the Act”.
The Magistrates retired to consider their decision and when they
returned the Chairman (Eng. Rear-Admiral L.J. Stephens) said they had
decided to dismiss the case against Barker, but they found Pilcher
Guilty and he would be fined £5 with 25/- costs.
Pilcher was allowed 14 days in which to pay the fine.
|
Folkestone Herald 15 November 1952.
Local News.
Folkestone Magistrates on Wednesday approved the transfer of licence as
follows: West Cliff Shades from Mr. L. Barker to Mr. A.S.W. Chilton.
|
Folkestone Herald 13 February 1954.
Annual Licensing Sessions.
A music licence for the use of a piano was granted to the licensee of
the West Cliff Shades.
|
Folkestone Herald 16 March 1957.
Adjourned Licensing Sessions.
The licence of the West Cliff Shades, Folkestone, was transferred at the
Folkestone adjourned Annual Licensing Sessions on Wednesday, from Mrs.
Marie Elizabeth Chilton to Mr. Robert Anderson Kitson, former licensee
of the Red Lion, Appledore.
|
Folkestone Gazette 24 May 1961.
Local News.
Two more piles of pennies were knocked over at Folkestone during the
weekend. One at the London and Paris Hotel raised £11 2/-, and the
other, at the West Cliff Shades, £18 10/6. The money goes to the
Folkestone Branch of the British Empire Cancer Campaign.
|
Folkestone Gazette 17 May 1967.
Local News.
Mr. Leonard Barker, of 14, Segrave Road, Folkestone, retired licensed
victualler, who died in March, left £12,491 gross, £12,416 net. Duty
paid was £745. Probate has been granted to his niece, Miss Winifred M.
Barker, of 10 Hurst Avenue, Horsham, and nephew Walter E.J. Barker, of
148, Comptons Lane, Horsham. He left £500 and certain effects to Mrs.
Dorothy M. de Vere, if still in his employ at his death and not under
notice; £50 to Dr. Fritz Ewer, of Greenoaks, Military Road, Sandgate,
“for his kindness and attention to my late wife during her long and
painful illness”; and £25 to the Rev. Gethin-Jones, late of The
Vicarage, Sandgate.
|
Folkestone Herald 27 January 1968.
Local News.
The licensee of a Folkestone public house, making a search after a
water-filled charity collecting box had been taken from his bar,
followed a trail of water splashes along Sandgate Road, up Castle Hill
Avenue, and into the Majestic Hotel site car park.
There, Mr. Robert Kitson, licensee of West Cliff Shades public house,
told Folkestone Magistrates on Tuesday, he saw Frank Morrison squatting
by a tree with the water-filled jar in his hands. He appeared to be
about to smash it.
Morrison, a private with the 1st Parachute Regiment, stationed at
Aldershot, pleaded not guilty to stealing the jar, belonging to the
National Kidney Research Fund, and valued with contents at £1.
After hearing the evidence the magistrates dismissed the case.
Mr. Kitson said that when Morrison saw him he dropped the jar in the car
park and ran off. He was later stopped outside the Princes Hotel.
P.C. Ivor Chapman said he took Morrison to Folkestone police station,
where, after questioning, he said “Yes, I took it, but only in fun. We
played rugby with it. We only did it to see if we could get away with
it.”
In court Morrison, who said that at the time he had been attending a
course at the School of Infantry, Hythe, said he took the jar but did
not intend to steal it. “We were going to have a bit of fun with it,” he
said. “What we were trying to do was incite the people in the public
house to a bit of fun and games, a bit of tomfoolery”. His recollection
of the evening was very hazy because he had been drinking. “If I had got
away with it, which was never my intention, I would have taken it back”,
he added.
Capt. Frances Carter, of the Hythe School of Infantry, said Morrison’s
conduct sheet showed he was of exemplary character. He had been a
normal, hard-working student while on the course, and the offence with
which he was charged seemed to be out of character.
|
Folkestone Herald 13 February 1971.
Annual Licensing Sessions.
Police are keeping an extra careful eye on some pubs in Folkestone -
particularly those popular among young people. This was revealed by
Chief Superintendent W. Pullinger in his report to the annual meeting of
the town’s Licensing Justices, on Wednesday.
He said that during 1970 licensed premises had been generally
well-conducted, But he went on “As in most towns, certain premises
require additional police supervision to ensure that the liquor
licensing laws are not abused. This is sometimes due to slackness on the
part of the licensee, or to popular premises attracting large numbers of
young people”.
Mr. P.J. Baden-Fuller, the Chairman of the Justices, appreciated the
difficulties licensees faced with young people. He said the Justices
hoped that those licensees concerned would try to enforce the liquor
laws, but added “It is so difficult to tell the ages of young people
sometimes”.
Later, The Herald spoke to landlords of Folkestone pubs that are popular
with youngsters – only to find they did not think they had a problem.
Several of them agreed with Mr. Baden-Fuller that it was difficult to
tell the ages of some young customers. The answer to a difficult
situation was, they agreed, firmness and rigidly following the maxim “If
in doubt, don’t serve”.
At the Shakespeare, in Guildhall Street, Mr. Ron Balsom, the landlord,
said “I have spent many years in London as a licensee, and the young
people here are a lot different. I find them very reasonable and very
well behaved. They certainly do not cause me any headaches”.
Mr. Alan White, landlord of the Prince Albert in Rendezvous Street, said
“There is an occasional problem caused by young soldiers from
Shorncliffe wanting a drink. You know who they are and you just have to
handle the situation firmly. Trouble is caused when youngsters unused to
alcohol have a few drinks and get a bit het up. A landlord has a duty to
regular customers, and must make sure that kind of situation does not
arise”.
At the West Cliff Shades, Christ Church Road, a spokesman said there
were no problems worth mentioning, though there had been occasional
instances of vandalism.
At the British Lion, in The Bayle, Mr. Gerry Hourahane said “It is
difficult to judge ages, particularly those of foreigners. But if you
ask them what year they were born they usually answer correctly without
thinking”.
Another aspect of Chief Superintendent Pullinger's report to the
Justices was that hotels and restaurants are catering more for
Continental visitors. The number of restricted licences granted to
hotels, restaurants and other premises had increased, he reported. “This
is no doubt due to more people requiring intoxicants for consumption
with their meals, particularly in Folkestone, where the number of
Continental visitors, especially day visitors from France and Belgium,
continues to increase.
The report showed that 19 cases of drunkenness were dealt with by the
police in 1970, compared with 16 in 1969, an increase “which does not
reflect on licensed premises”. Fourteen cases of motorists unfit to
drive through drink were also dealt with by the police – two fewer than
in 1969. There are now 177 licensed premises in Folkestone. The police
had no objections to any licences being renewed.
|
Folkestone Gazette 16 February 1972.
Local News.
A man charged with murder appeared in court at Folkestone on Monday with
his right leg in plaster and a black eye.
Cyril Alfred Kent, aged 34, accused of murdering Stephen Graham Laye,
18-year-old student, of Sandgate Road, Folkestone, on Friday night was
remanded in custody until Tuesday. After a two-minute appearance before
magistrates, Kent left the court.
Graham Laye died in the Royal Victoria Hospital, Folkestone, on Friday
evening. He had been found earlier during a black-out lying at the
junction of Sandgate Road with Clifton Gardens. His parents, Mr. and
Mrs. Gordon Laye, have three other sons and a daughter, all grown up.
|
Folkestone Gazette 21 June 1972.
Local News.
A street brawl during a power blackout last February led to a murder
trial at Lewes Crown Court on Monday.
Cyril Alfred Kent, 34, of 16 Westbourne Gardens, Folkestone, has pleaded
not guilty to murdering Stephen Graham Laye, 19-year-old student, of
Sandgate Road, Folkestone.
Mr. Petre Crowder, Q.C., M.P., prosecuting, said the killing took place
on February 11, about 10 p.m., when there was a power blackout in the
Folkestone area. A group of two or three youths were walking on the
pavement in the blackout when Kent bumped into them. This led to an
altercation between Kent, Laye and another youth called David Webb. A
fight took place and Laye received a fatal stab wound from a commando
knife in the groin. Webb received a cut on the arm.
The jury heard on Monday that Kent received a fractured ankle and other
injuries.
The trial continues and is expected to last until early next week.
|
Folkestone Herald 24 June 1972.
Local News.
Questions were asked about the effects of alcohol combined with the drug
Mandrax when a Folkestone man faced a murder charge at Lewes Crown Court
this week. Cyril Alfred Kent, aged 34, of Westbourne Gardens,
Folkestone, has pleaded Not Guilty to the murder of Stephen Graham Laye,
19-year-old student, of Sandgate Road, Folkestone.
Mr. Petre Crowder, Q.C., prosecuting, said the killing took place on
February 11 this year at about 10 p.m., when there was a power blackout
in the Folkestone area. In a fight Laye received a fatal stab wound from
a Commando knife in the groin. Another youth, David Webb, received a cut
on the arm. From what Kent said afterwards he was pleading self defence.
Mr. John Marriage, for Kent, made a formal admission that David Michael
Webb and the youth, Laye, were involved in a fight with Kent, as a
result of which Laye died. It was also admitted that, at the time, Kent
had a knife with him. Kent suffered a fractured ankle and other
injuries.
Miss Lucy Helen Boucher, 15-year-old student, of Milldown Farm, Acrise,
said that after going to a party at Wilberforce Road, Sandgate, she and
a friend decided to go into Folkestone. At the Westcliff Shades they
linked up with four youths and decided to go back to the party.
They were walking in three groups of two and she was in front with David
Marsh. Webb and Laye were last. A man passed them, and then there was a
scuffle, she said. “I heard some shouting and I heard David Webb
swearing. I looked round and saw a man with his fists up. Then a bus
came up and we ran on and caught the bus". She denied that Webb and Laye
were “spoiling for a fight” that night.
Pathologist Dr. James Cameron said the fatal injury on Laye penetrated
the groin in an area where there were no bones. It would not have
required great force to inflict. He was questioned by Mr. John Marriage,
Q.C., defending, about the combined effects of Mandrax and alcohol. Dr.
Cameron said Mandrax should never be taken in conjunction with alcohol,
but he knew youngsters took it in that way for kicks. “The majority of
people do react violently under the influence of Mandrax and alcohol”,
he said. “They would become aggressive and their character somewhat
changes. When in the sobering stage many would be unable to realise the
degree of aggressiveness they had shown”.
Mr. Marriage said it was known alcohol and Mandrax were found in the
dead man’s body. body.
Andrew David Marshall, 18-year-old trainee stock clerk, was walking with
Lucy Boucher. He said he had taken two Mandrax tablets and some drink at
the Odeon Bar and the Westcliff Shades. He was “not very clear” about
the events of the night. Answering Mr. Marriage he said Laye had sold
him the Mandrax for 15p each after Laye and Webb had gone to the C.I.U.
club. He drank a pint of bitter to wash the tablets down.
Mr. Marriage said Kent claimed he was attacked by three men, but
Marshall denied he was the third person.
Stephen Delivitt, 18-year-old pleater, of Thanet Gardens, Folkestone,
said he took half a capsule of Mandrax and had some drink. He was
feeling “slightly drunk”. He had taken Mandrax once or twice before. He
was walking along with a girl called Deborah when the man passed them.
Glancing over his shoulder he saw the man hit David Webb, and Webb
started fighting. “They remained on their feet for some time, and after
that were rolling on the ground”, said Delivitt. “Later Webb said to
Laye “Come on, help me”. Laye then went back to get the man off Webb. I
think Laye kicked him two or three times. Deborah urged me to walk on
and ignore the fight. Then Webb and Laye came running up. Webb said he
had left his coat and hat on the ground, and went back with Laye”. A bus
came along shortly after and they got on it. He, too, denied he was the
third man involved with Kent. He also denied saying to someone at the
party later that night “Graham (Laye) has been stabbed”.
David Michael Webb, aged 18, of The Star Inn, Hythe, apprentice
compositor, said he had something to drink that night and went with Laye
to the C.I.U. club. He had half a pint there. He bought three Mandrax
capsules, and spent some time at the C.I.U. before going back to the
Odeon Bar. This closed at 9 p.m. because of the power cut, and they went
to the West Cliff Shades. “The drink and the Mandrax had affected me and
it has created some gaps in my memory”, said Webb. “A man came straight
through the middle of one couple in front, and made contact with me. I
remarked about it being stupid and he had plenty of room. Thereupon he
struck me with his forearm on the back”. A fight started, but Webb was
wearing a large coat and could not move well. “I was not really in a
condition for a brawl,” he went on. “I was in control of my senses, but
the Mandrax had affected me physically." Eventually because of their
condition they walked off. H then realised he had left his coat behind.
He went back and, as he stooped to pick up the coat, saw a man coming at
him. “I did not know I had been cut until a few minutes afterwards”,
said Webb. “The man came at Graham and thrust at him. He got Graham in
the stomach or low on the body. The man was stooped and struck Graham
several times”. Webb said the man then chased him across the road. He
dodged round a car and finally escaped. He denied a suggestion by Mr.
Marriage that both his and Laye’s “aggressive instincts” had been
affected by the mixture of alcohol and Mandrax and that this led to the
attack on Mr. Kent. Webb dismissed this as “ridiculous”.
On Wednesday, Kent went into the witness box to describe the events of
that night. He said he had a Commando-type knife from his service days,
and sometimes used it in connection with skin-diving. He had the habit
of carrying the knife in his boot following an incident at a local dance
in which a young man made a nuisance of himself over a girl whom Kent
had taken there. On the night of the stabbing, he had a sauna bath, went
home and then went out, visiting the East Kent Arms, the British Lion,
the Raglan, Nailbox and the Providence. He thought he had about five or
six drinks. After visiting the Providence he started to walk to the town
centre. Visibility was about 10 or 35 yards. “I was walking with my
hands in my pockets and head slightly stooped”, Kent told the court. “I
walked into some people who were strung out across the road. I was spun
round”. He apologised, but then realised the jostling had been
deliberate, as six people closed round him. One, Webb, was more
aggressive than the others. Bad language was used, and he knew he was
“definitely in trouble”. Attacked from behind, he was pulled backwards
on to the ground. He pulled one of the assailants down on top of him.
“While I was on the ground I was severely kicked on a number of
occasions”, said Kent. From the position of the kicks he knew he was
being assaulted by at least three people. He received a direct kick in
the right eye, which caused loss of vision, and a heavy blow on his
ankle. As he got up and collected his senses, he saw three people moving
towards him menacingly. "There was no doubt whatever that they were
three of the original attackers”. He said his movements were restricted
by the effects of the attack he had suffered earlier. He told them three
or four times to “S—off”. They did not do so and he pulled the knife
from his boot with his right hand and repeated his words. “I was
positive they had seen the knife”, said Kent. “The three were shoulder
to shoulder, and then one went to my left. I hit him in the solar plexus
with my elbow. “I waved the knife. I knew I had no other choice but to
cause one or more of them a slight cut. One of them called out several
times “He has a knife”. Webb became very aggressive and abusive, and he
used threats. He was the only one of the three who did not make any
movement to withdraw. I pushed Webb”. He waved the knife two or three
times, and Webb went off. He pursued Webb, who had a slanging match over
the top of a parked car. Webb called him a “cowardly b----“ who had to
resort to a knife. Eventually he told Webb he did not want to fight and
walked off along The Leas, where he buried the knife. He said he
certainly had no intention to cause any serious wound, and was not aware
he had done so until he felt the knife was sticky. On looking he saw
blood, and it was then he decided to get rid of the knife. “I did not
realise that I had done more damage than I had intended to,” said Kent.
“I thought there was bound to be some sort of outcry, and I thought it
unwise to keep the knife in my possession”.
On Thursday Kent was cross-examined for several hours by Mr. Crowder. He
agreed he might have been intoxicated to a certain extent, as it was the
first time he had been drinking since the New Year. He denied he was not
in a very good mood that night because the woman with whom he had been
associating had told him the association must cease. Of the attack he
said he used the knife with the intention of cutting, not stabbing. “I
did not stab Laye in the stomach”, Kent said. “I wanted to cut both
these boys on the hands or arms”.
The judge, Mr. Justice Chapman, was expected to commence his summing up
yesterday, and the jury should retire on Monday.
|
Folkestone Gazette 26 July 1972.
Local News.
A Folkestone man was cleared of murder at Lewes Crown Court on Monday
after a six-days second trial. An earlier jury failed to agree on a
verdict. The jury on Monday were out for nearly four hours before
finding him Guilty of manslaughter. Cyril Alfred Kent, 34, of Westbourne
Gardens, was found Not Guilty of the murder of Stephen Graham Laye,
19-year-old student, of Sandgate Road, on February 11. The jury found
him Guilty of manslaughter and he was jailed for three years.
The prosecution had alleged that the killing occurred during a power
blackout on February 11, in Sandgate Road. Kent, walking on his own,
apparently bumped into a group of people on their way to a party. The
group included Laye, and at least two of the group had taken a mixture
of Mandrax and alcohol. During a fight in the darkened street, Kent
produced a Commando knife. He claimed he acted in self-defence because
he was attacked by two, if not three, of the group. He stabbed Laye in
the groin, severing an artery and causing his death.
After the verdict, Detective Inspector Thomas Lee, who was in charge of
the case, said Kent was in breach of a three-month suspended order for
driving while banned, made at Folkestone in October, 1970. The judge
said he would order the suspended sentence to run concurrently with the
three-year term.
Mr. John Marriage, Q.C., defending, asked the judge to take the view
that the “trigger mechanism” came from the other side. One could not say
that the youth Laye was responsible for his own death, but it could be
said that his actions and those of his companions created the series of
events leading to his death. He asked the judge to accept that it was a
“terribly unlucky blow”, in that it struck an artery.
Mr. Justice Lawson: It is rather like hitting a man with a very thin
skull, who falls down and strikes his head on the pavement, This is an
unlucky event”.
Mr. Marriage hoped the judge would look upon it as a case of a man who,
upon being set upon, defended himself. He was a man of intellect and
basically good character who perhaps drank a little too much. Probably a
man who, when he became lonely and depressed and perhaps even
embittered, behaved in a rather foolish way. His wife had divorced him
many years ago and he helped maintain their two sons. He now had no
intention ever of returning to the Folkestone area. Also he had had to
stand the strain of two trials.
The judge said: I take the view that the death of which the Court has
heard was the result of your being a man with great tendencies to
depression, finding yourself in a situation of crisis in which you
over-reacted very gravely and very seriously. I also think you had had
rather more to drink than you should have done and the great mistake you
made was to decide on this particular evening, when you had domestic
reasons for being upset and depressed, to go out with this murderous
weapon.
|
Folkestone Herald 1 July 1972.
Local News.
A jury, trying a power blackout killing last February, failed to reach a
verdict after a seven-day trial at Lewes Crown Court. They retired for
over 5½ hours on Tuesday, before being discharged by Mr. Justice Chapman
from giving a verdict. The judge said he hoped the retrial could be held
at Lewes within the next three weeks and certainly before the summer
recess.
Cyril Alfred Kent, aged 34, of 16 Westbourne Gardens, Folkestone, had
pleaded not guilty to the murder of Stephen Graham Laye, 18-year-old
student, of Sandgate Road, Folkestone. Laye died late on the evening of
Februray 11, following an incident in Sandgate Road during a power
blackout. He received a fatal stab wound in the groin from a Commando
knife.
Mr. John Marriage, Q.C., for Kent, made a formal admission that Laye was
involved in a fight with Kent, as a result of which Laye died. It was
also admitted that at the time Kent had a knife with him. Kent suffered
a fractured ankle and other injuries in the incident.
Apart from Laye, a youth called David Michael Webb was also involved in
the incident. He received a cut arm.
Evidence was given that the dead youth had traces of Mandrax and alcohol
in his body, and Webb admitted that he had taken a similar mixture that
night.
Pathologist Dr. James Cameron told the jury that the majority of people
reacted violently under the influence of the mixture.
Kent admitted using the knife in the incident, but claimed he acted in
self defence. He alleged that in the initial blackout clash he was
attacked by three people, including Laye and Webb, sustaining a broken
ankle and bruises. Then, he claimed, the assailants returned and
threatened him a second time. It was then that he took out the knife to
protect himself.
He was remanded in custody pending a retrial.
|
Folkestone Gazette 28 March 1973.
Local News.
Cyril Alfred Kent, 35, was the victim of an unprovoked assault but then
he turned on one of his attackers and knifed him, an Appeal Court judge
said on Friday.
Kent, unemployed, of Westbourne Gardens, Folkestone, was convicted at
Lewes Crown Court last July 24 of manslaughter and was jailed for three
years. He applied to the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal against his
conviction and sentence but was refused.
Lord Justice James, sitting with Mr. Justice Nield, said Kent was
attacked, his ankle was fractured and his eye blackened. His attackers
left him lying on the ground and then two returned. Kent knifed Graham
Laye, who later died, said the judge. The judge said there was nothing
at all to justify the Court interfering with the conviction and
sentence.
|
Folkestone Herald 11 September 1976.
Local News.
A man claiming to suffer from fits who was found apparently fast asleep
at Ħhe entrance of a toilet, at West Cliff Shades, Christ Church Road,
Folkestone, was fined £5 by Folkestone Magistrates on Tuesday - for
being drunk.
David Norton Welling, of Castle Hill Avenue, Folkestone, who denied the
offence, was told that he had had time to bring medical evidence that he
suffered from fits and had done nothing about it.
|
Folkestone Herald 21 May 1977.
Local News.
Katey, the border collie, is 17 dog years and 119 human years old, and a
great favourite among the regulars at the West Cliff Shades pub, in
Christ Church Road, Folkestone. Despite her great age, she still manages
to run around and enjoy life. But someone, it seems, wants Katey killed.
Katey has been reported to the RSPCA a number of times for being a
traffic hazard. Then, earlier this month, a lady went into the pub at
lunchtime and accused the landlords, Mr. and Mrs. Robert Kitson, of
being cruel in allowing the dog to live, and stormed out. A week later,
the pub had a visit from an RSPCA officer, who had received another
complaint about the dog. The Kitsons have now asked for the opinions of
their customers, and have asked them to sign one or other of two
petitions; asking for Katey to be put down, or asking to allow her to
live out her remaining days. And the result has been emphatic. Nearly100
people have signed to say Katey should live, while nobody has signed to
say she should die.
“Katey is very old and she shows a lot of the signs you would expect of
a dog that age, but she is in good health”, said Mrs. Diana Kitson. “She
does sometimes tend to wander out into the road here, and we are going
to have to make sure that she does not do that in the future. We have
had her for 15 years, and we want to keep her for a few more”.
|
Folkestone Herald 21 October 1978.
Local News.
A pub landlady and her customers were celebrating this week when they
heard that the seal cull in the Orkney Islands had been called off.
Mrs. Diana Kitson, who manages the West Cliff Shades, Folkestone with
her husband Robert, had campaigned against the cull by sending a protest
letter to the Prime Minister. “I feel very strongly over this matter”,
she said. “What annoyed me most was that about 4,000 three-week-old pups
were to be slaughtered for their pelts. This would have been a terrible
waste of life and only served to line the pockets of the hunters”. Mrs.
Kitson was about to send a petition with 65 signatures to Mr. Callaghan
when the news came that the cull had been called off.
|
South Kent Gazette 2 May 1979.
Local News.
Pub landlord Keith Hill pulled his last pint for at least 10 weeks on
Saturday. The West Cliff Shades, in Christ Church Road, Folkestone, has
closed its doors for extensive alterations to be done. The three bars
will be knocked into one and inside toilets built.
Thirty-eight-year-old Keith, who runs the pub with his 30-year-old wife
Wendy, says they will re-open in 10 weeks if all goes according to plan.
|
Folkestone Herald 14 July 1979.
Local News.
Regulars are angry because of changes to their local pub. Some are so
bitter they intend to drink elsewhere because, they say, the old
atmosphere has been lost.
The new-look Happy Frenchman, formerly the West Cliff Shades, in Christ
Church Road, Folkestone, re-opened on Wednesday after alterations and
decorations work costing £48,000. Three small bars have been knocked
into one and new Victorian-style furniture has been brought in. But many
old customers are not happy with the only Courage pub in town, and they
do not like the new name. One described it as grotesque.
Between sips Thomas Walker said “They have spent a lot of money here but
have made it a sort of London pub. The old pub needed decorating but
they have gone a bit too far. Before it was more of a family place where
people met and conversed in a close atmosphere. Now this is lost because
it is more spaced out. The room is too big”.
Henry Harrold, of Burrow Road, Folkestone, doesn't like the name. “The
French have done their best to wipe out English names, so I do not see
why it had to be the Happy Frenchman, it should have been Englishman”,
he said.
Jock, Charlie, Bill and George have been drinking at the pub for many
years. Now Charlie and George are to drink elsewhere.
They complained that pool tables, which were popular with the young
people, have gone. “It is no longer an ordinary working man's drinking
pub”, Charlie said.
New landlord, Mike Burge, said on Thursday “I think most people are
happy with the pub, and surprised at the change. It is hard to tell who
are the old regulars; on the first night there were many people in the
place. Today we have had many people from surrounding offices, who were
highly delighted at the change. As to the pool table it was a company
decision not to have one. The ambiance of the house would not benefit by
having a pool table”.
Colin Bray, Courage (Eastern) Ltd's public relations manager, said the
name was changed because of Folkestone’s close links with France.
|
LICENSEE LIST
BUNN L St L 1862
POINTER
Mr ???? 1868? (West Cliff Hotel Tap.")
COBB Thomas William Aug/1864-70
WRIGHT
George 1870-75 (age 35 in 1871)
INMAN
Thomas 1875-76
WEDDERBURN Christopher William 1867-87
BERGERSON
Robert 1897
BARRATT
William Partrick 1897
LORD C Lord 1887-99
SCHUTZ Frederick 1897-1903
BARKER Walter Herbert 1903-34
BARKER Mrs Bessie 1934-40
Executors of Mrs BARKER 1940+
BARKER
Herbert 1940-45
BARKER Leonard 1945-52
CHILTON
Arthur 1952-55
WILSON
Harry 1955-56
CHILTON
Marie 1956-57
KITSON
Robert 1957-78
HILL
Keith 1978-79
Renamed "Happy Frenchman."
From the Post Office Directory 1862
From the Post Office Directory 1874
From the Post Office Directory 1882
From the Post Office Directory 1891
From the Kelly's Directory 1899
From the Post Office Directory 1913
From the Post Office Directory 1922
From the Kelly's Directory 1934
From the Post Office Directory 1938
From the Folkestone Chronicle
Census
|