17 Beach Street and Seven Star Street
Dover
Above photo date unknown from the John Gilham collection, extreme
left also showing
Cadman's Shelter next to it. |
I picked up much information concerning a "Railway Tavern" in Beach
Street but the fact that we also had an "East Kent Railway Tavern", with the
name frequently abbreviated, and a "Railway Inn", meant that kid gloves were
needed. The terms tavern and inn held a significant difference in the past
but they were more loosely applied as time passed.
For photo of Beach Street click here.
From The Dover Express (Dover, England ), Saturday, August 21, 1858.
DOVER.
NOTICE of Auction Sale of Valuable Leasehold Estate (held under the
usual leases from the Warden and assistants of Dover harbour ), which on
Tuesday, August 31, 1858, will be submitted for Sale by Public Auction.
Mr. Henry Stockwell, at the "Gun Hotel," Dover, at 6 o'clock in the
evening for 7 precisely:-
A valuable Public House, called the "Railway Tavern," consisting of two
messuages or Tenements, communicating, one fronting to Beach Street, the
other to Seven Stars Street, Dover, containing very considerable
accommodation and in a most commanding situation, fronting the down
platform of the Railway Station, occupied by William Pilcher.
Held for a term of 61 years, from 6th April, 1813.
Ground rent £4. 7s. 6d.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer, 20 July, 1861.
CAUTION TO BEER HOUSE KEEPERS - DISORDERLY HOUSE
William Pilcher, landlord of the "Railway Tavern," Beach Street, was
summonsed for keeping a disorderly house. Mr. Minter appeared for the
defendant, who on the information being read to him, pleaded not guilty.
Thomas Stokes Barton, sergeant in the Dover police force, said that
on the evening of Sunday, July 7th, about half-past ten o'clock, he went
to the "Railway Tavern" beer-house, Beach Street, accompanied by two
constables. On going upstairs, he saw a soldier and a common prostitute
in one of the bed-rooms, and in another room two other girls with
soldiers. All the women, to the best of his belief, were women of the
town.
Private John Hogan, of the 1st battalion, 60th Rifles, one of the
soldiers who had been found under the circumstances described by Barton,
was called as a witness, and gave evidence which left no doubt on the
minds of the Magistrates that the information was properly sustained.
Mr. Minter contended that the police had not proved that this was a
refreshment house within the meaning of the statute; but the Magistrates
held that proof of the house being a beer-house, which was furnished my
Barton's evidence, was sufficient to bring it under the act of
parliament. Mr. Minter then submitted that the production of the license
was necessary; but the Bench did not think so, and, as the defendant's
solicitor found it impossible to struggle against the evidence, he
declined to offer any evidence.
The Magistrates then fined the defendant £2 including costs, or in
default, six weeks' imprisonment. Mr. Elsted, who occupied the chair
during the progress of this case; remarking that the evidence was so
clear as to render it a matter of surprise to him that defendant had
retained professional assistance.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer, 9
April, 1864.
PROSECUTION OF BROTHEL KEEPER
William Bryce, the landlord of the "Railway Tavern," Beach Street,
was charged with unlawfully and knowingly suffered common prostitutes to
assemble and continue upon his premises, contrary to the statute.
Mr. Minter appeared for the defendant in this case.
Police-sergeant Geddes said that on Wednesday evening last, about
twenty minutes past seven, in company with police-constable Camps, he
went to the house kept by the defendant, in Beach Street, and there
found in an upper room, which he thought was used as a tap room, two
soldiers and three prostitutes. He called the attention of the landlord
to the character of the females in the house, and the landlord said he
would get rid of them. He returned in about half an hour, and they were
still there. He knew them to be prostitutes, from having seen them about
all hours of the night, and with different men.
Mr. Minter asked the witness if he could identify either of the girls
he saw at the house.
Geddes said he could; and Mr. Minter then called into the box a girl
named Mary Ann Jarvis, and asked if she was one of the girls in
question. He replied that it was. Geddes was then very closely
questioned as to when he had seen the girl in the company which led him
to believe she was a prostitute - whether it was six months, a month, a
week, o a day before he visited the home; but he declined to commit
himself to an answer to that question, saying that although he knew he
had seen her as described, he could not fix the time.
Mr. Minter: No, you are very careful about that. Perhaps if you had
fixed a time we should have been able to fix you.
Police-constable Camps was called to give corroborative evidence. In
reply to Mr. Minter, he said he had seen the girl Jarvis about the
streets during the day, but not at night.
Mr. Minter then addressed the Court for the defence. In this case,
the bench were asked to convict upon the evidence of whom - why, upon
that of a policeman. And what was that evidence? He submitted that the
testimony was not worth their consideration. He had in his evidence told
a positive and deliberate untruth; and he seemed to think that because
he forsooth, was a policeman of the borough - because he was a
policeman Geddes - that his word was sufficient to get a conviction from
the Bench, and that they would not listen to any evidence that was
contrary to his views.
The Mayor interpolated that he though Mr. Minter was hardly justified
in imputing motives to the Bench in the administration of justice.
Mr. Minter said the Mayor had mistaken his meaning. He hoped not to
go as far forget himself as to impute to the bench unworthy motives in
the discharge of their duties; but that he intended them to understand
was, that Geddes seemed to think that because he happened to be a
policeman he had it in his breast to get a conviction, notwithstanding
what other evidence might be brought to bear against him. He asked them,
therefore, to weigh his evidence as they would that of any independent
witness. Now he would just ask them if any court of justice in the
kingdom would convict upon a statement like Gedde's, even though made on
oath? He swore that one of the girls he saw at the defendant's house was
a prostitute, and that he arrived at that conclusion from having seen
her about the streets at all hours of the night with different men; but
now cautious he was not to fix himself to a time - not even to a month
or a day previously - when he last saw her! It was, perhaps, well for
him that he had not, because it would have been rather inconvenient
if he had sworn he had seen the girl three weeks ago and it should turn
out she had been in the town only a fortnight. In the minds of any
unprejudiced men, the evidence of a person who fenced questions in the
way Geddes had done, would be considered entirely unworthy of credit.
The decision of the magistrates in the former case
(Click here) rendered
it useless for him to again raise the point that landlords were bound to
admit girls of this class for refreshment; but he should call the young
woman Jarvis to prove that she was not a prostitute but a servant to the
defendant. With regard to the other females spoken of, one was a lodger,
and the other was a casual customer, whom the defendant knew nothing
about.
Mary Ann Jarvis was accordingly sworn: She said she was engaged by
Mr. Bryce as a general servant. She was not a prostitute. She had been
in Dover only a fortnight. It was not true she had been seen running
about the streets at night with different men. One of the girls at the
house when the policemen came in had been lodging there for some days.
The other one came in a few minutes before, and called for a glass of
beer.
The Bench, after another private consultation, fined the defendant
40s. and costs of 13s.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer, 16 September, 1870. Price 1d.
THE ANNUAL LICENSING DAY
A new licence was granted to Robert Russell for a house at the Pier.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 6 September, 1874. Price 1d.
ANNUAL LICENSING MEETING
The landlord, George Baker, made application for a spirit license. His
house was of more than the necessary value.
There was no opposition, but the Bench said they had come to the
determination that, as the wants of the neighbourhood were fully met by
the existing houses, they could not extend Baker's license.
|
A serious fire occurred in the Seven Star Street section on 2 August
1882.
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer,
4 August, 1882. Price 1d.
DESTRUCTIVE FIRE AT PIER.
The Pier District was disturbed on Wednesday night by a fire, which
broke out at the "Railway Bell," Seven Star Street about half past ten
o'clock. The "Railway Bell" is in Beach Street, but it has a large clubroom
behind, which abuts on Seven Star Street. This room, at the time above named, was
seen to be burning, and a warning was given in the street, and about the
same time the next door neighbours found the party wall on fire, the
smoke coming in from the public house. They had four children in bed, and
got them out as quickly as possible. Meantime the husband, whose name is
Goodson, went into the street and knocked on the door of the public house,
which was closed. On it being opened he found only the landlord in, and he
rushed upstairs and saw fire issuing from a sort of cupboard. The
landlord of the public house at once gave the alarm in the street, and
soon the warning had reached the Fire Station in Queen Street. The fire soon got hold of the old property, and burnt
with great fury. The
fire cart and hose was brought down, but it was then found that no one
had been sent to warn the turncocks to turn on the water, or to
concentrate it on the district. The supply in fact was so week that when
the London Chatham and Dover Railway fire engine was brought up and a
bucket of water was required to prime the pump it took several minutes
to get the bucket full from the tap. During the delay the fire made no
parley. It took complete hold of the rear building of the public house,
and found its way into three adjoining houses, driving the inhabitants
into the streets. The worst of it was, one house had three families in it
and another two. Their bits of furniture, uninsured, were burnt or
destroyed, and the poor people left homeless. Soon after eleven o'clock the water was on effectively, and began to make
an impression on the fire. Presently the building where the fire started,
fell into the street, smashing the doors and shutters of the houses on
the other side of the street, and threatening to demolish that celebrated
tenement, of which so much has from time to time been said in connection
with certain not over popular Acts of Parliament.
In addition to the turncock not being warned to concentrate the water,
no message seems to have been sent from Queen Street up to the Town Hall
Police Station, and the superintendent had not heard of the fire until
full an hour after the alarm was given at the Pier.
Yesterday morning large numbers were on the spot looking at the wrecked
houses, from which the smoke was still issuing, and the water from the
mains being reported to be too weak to reach the smoking roof of the
adjoining houses, the curate of the Holy Trinity Church was doing his
best to prevent a further outbreak with a garden squirt. We suppose the houses are insured, but the poor people's furniture was
not. In the house adjoining the "Railway Bell," which is now a mere wreck,
lived three families, namely Axford, Goodson and Babage. In the next
house to that, also penetrated by the fire, were two families, named
Campbell and Hundley. The next house to that had the windows broken by people, without authority,
who tried
to remove furniture. On the upper side of the fire the house of Mr.
Taylor, engineer on the Granville, seemed to have suffered severely, and
one end of the wall is entirely gone. The houses of Mr. Uden and Mr.
Strong opposite are also much damaged.
The origin of the fire unknown.
Damage :–
No. 45, Back of Railway Bell and 44 Seven Star Street entirely
destroyed.
No. 46, Portion of wall destroyed and house damaged by fire and water.
No. 2 and 3 Seven Star Street. windows and sashes broken by falling
wall.
No. 17 Beach Street being front of the Railway Bell much damaged by
water and smoke.
No. 44, 45, 46, Seven Star Street all insured.
Contents of No. 44 not insured.
Contents of Railway Bell insured and also No. 46.
Brigade in attendance, superintendent and 14 firemen.
|
Renovation must have proved possible because Mrs. Harding
sold it for £400 in October 1890.
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 30 August, 1889. Price 1d.
DOVER BREWSTER SESSIONS
ANOTHER SUDDEN REMOVAL
It was reported that the tenant of the “Railway Bell” had left at three
o'clock one morning taking his furniture.
Mr. Harding, son of the owner, proved the facts, and a license was
granted to J. Joyce, a man put in by the agent to hold but not to sell,
until a permanent tenant came to the satisfaction of the Bench.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 28 August, 1891. Price 1d.
DOVER LICENSING SESSIONS
A new tenant, T. Allchin, having been put in this house, Mr. Mowll
applied for the license to be granted in his name, under the ruling in
the case Regina v. the Liverpool Justices, and the license was granted.
|
Dover Express 27 September 1889.
THE RAILWAY BELL INN.
Beach-street, Dover, facing the S.E. Railway Terminus, to be Let with
immediate possession.
Apply to Messrs. Terson and Son, Auctioners and Valuers, 27,
Castle-street, Dover.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 7 September, 1900. Price 1d.
A DISORDERLY VISITOR
John Minter was charged with being drunk and using obscene language in
Beach Street.
Police Constable Morris said that on the previous evening he was passing
the “Railway Bell” in Beach Street. The landlord said he had a drunken
man in the bar, and witness put him out. He refused to go away when
outside. He said he lived at Folkestone, and when witness directed him
to the Station he used obscene language. Witness took him into custody.
He gave considerable trouble, and another constable had to give
assistance.
E. Hollis, landlord of the “Railway Bell Inn,” opposite South Eastern
Station, said that defendant came into the house about 8.15, during
witness' absence. His wife refused to serve the defendant, except a
glass of ginger beer. He commenced to sing, and became disorderly, and
witness called the constable's attention to him. He was very drunk, and
refused to go away, and wanted to fight the Constable.
A fine of 5/-, or in default 7 days' hard labour was inflicted.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 3 October, 1890. Price 5d.
PROPERTY SALE
Yesterday afternoon Messrs. Terson and Son offered five public houses,
the property of Mrs. Harding, for sale by auction at the “Royal Oak
Hotel.” The result was, the “Railway Bell,”
Beach Street, was knocked down at £400.
|
An outlet of the East Kent Brewery at the time, the licence was withheld
in 1912. The rebuilding of Beach Street commenced shortly afterwards.
From the Folkestone Express, Saturday, 17 August, 1911.
EAST KENT LICENSING COMMITTEE
THE RENDEZVOUS, FOLKESTONE
A meeting of the East Kent Licensing Compensation Authority was held
at the Sessions House, Longport, Canterbury, on Wednesday, under the
chairmanship of the Right Hon, Lord Harris. No objections were raised to
the abandonment of the following licenses, the renewals of which were
accordingly refused:- “Railway Bell,” Beach
Street, Dover, (George Thomas Stone).
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 26 January, 1912.
LICENSING COMPENSATION ACT
The Magistrate are asking that the following houses shall be remitted
to the Licensing Compensation Authority, with a view to the licenses
being taken away and the owners and tenants compensated:
The “Railway Bell,” Beach Street, owned by the East Kent Brewery
Company.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 9 February , 1912.
DOVER LICENSING SESSIONS
The annual licensing sessions were held at the Town Hall on Monday at
noon, before the following Magistrates:- The Mayor (Councillor W.
Bromley), Sir William Crundall, Messrs. E. Chitty, T. A. Terson, and J.
L. Bradley.
THE RAILWAY BELL
The renewal of the licence of the “Railway Bell,” Beach Street, occupied
by Mr. G. T. Stone, was objected to.
Chief Inspector Lockwood stated that he visited the house on 20th
January at 8.25 p.m., and found five customers. At 3.05 p.m. on 26th
January there was one customer; at 2.33 p.m. on 29th January, no
customers; at 5.55 p.m. on 30th January, one customer; at 12.38 p.m. on
31st January, one customer; and at 10.05 a.m. on 1st February, one
customer.
The Chief Constable stated that the house was a beerhouse, owned by the
East Kent Brewery Company. The licence was transferred to the present
tenant on 5th July, 1901. Previous to that the house had to change hands
about once a year. The rateable value was £20 gross and £16 net. The
licensed houses in the vicinity were the “Sceptre,” 48 yards away; the
“Terminus,” 102 yards; the “Brussels,” 108 yards; the “Pier Inn,” 128
yards; and the Station buffet.
The Magistrates without retiring, intimated that the renewal of the
licenses would be withheld, and the houses sent forward to the
Compensation Authority to deal with.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, 9 February, 1912.
DOVER LICENSING SESSIONS
THE RAILWAY BELL, BEACH STREET
There was a notice of objection against the renewal of the licence of
the "Railway Bell," Beach Street, (occupied by Mr. G. T. Stone) on the
grounds of redundancy.
Chief Inspector Lockwood stated that he visited the house on 20th
January at 8.25 p.m. and found five customers. At 4.05 on 26th
January there was one customer. at 2.33 p.m. on 29th January, no
customers; at 5.55 p.m. on 30th January, one customer; at 12.38 p.m. on
31st January, one customer; and at 10.05 a.m. on 1st February, one
customer.
The Chief Constable stated that the house was a beerhouse, owned by
the East Kent Brewery Company. The house was transferred to the present
tenant on 5th July, 1901. Previous to that the house used to change
hands about once a year. The rateable value was £20 gross and £16 Nett.
The licensed houses in the vicinity were the "Sceptre," 48 yards away;
the "Terminus," 102 yards; the "Brussels," 108 yards; the "Pier Inn,"
128 yards; and the Station buffet.
The Magistrates, without retiring, intimated that the renewal of the
licenses would be withheld, and the houses sent forward to the
Compensation Authority to deal with.
|
LICENSEE LIST
SMITH James 1851+ (also miller age 45 in 1851)
BRICE William 1864+
BAKER George Aug/1874-May/1876
RALPH John May/1876+
(of
Sandwich)
DIXON Charles July/1878+
HAXTON James to Nov/1879
RELFE Henry J Nov/1879+
DOWN George 1881+ (age 54 in 1881)
DONOVAN Cornelius July/1883+
LANDALL S J to Sept/1885
COLEMAN F Sept/1885+
(Dover
pensioner)
RYDEN Jessie 1886
ROYCE J 1886 end
HARDING W 1889
JOYCE James B 1889 end
ALLCHIN T Aug/1891+
COUCHMAN Sarah 1891+ (age 43 in 1891)
EMBERSON George 1895
GATEHOUSE Charles James 1898-99
PAIN E 1899
CASHMAN/CUSHMAN Henry Feb/1901+
HOLLIS Mr E July/1901
(age 36 in 1901)
STONE Mr George Thomas July/1901-13 (age 40 in 1911)
From Bagshaw Directory 1847
From Pikes Dover Blue Book 1895
From the Kelly's Directory 1899
From the Post Office Directory 1901
From the Dover Express
Census
|