From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 12 January, 1917.
TRANSFER OF MESSRS. DICKESON & CO'S PROPERTY
At the Dover Police Court this (Friday) morning.
The Solicitors to the Army Canteen Committee applied that the licenses
at Messrs. Dickeson and Co's premises at 1, Market Lane should be
transferred to Mr. Earle, the new manager of the district. The premises
were taken over on January 1st. They asked for the transfer so as to be
on the safe side.
The application was granted.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 19 January, 1917.
CLOSING OF PUBLIC HOUSES
NONE TO BE SENT UP FROM DOVER
A meeting of the Dover Magistrates was held on Wednesday, when it was
decided not to send any public-houses for compensation this year. We
understand that the County Licensing Authorities suggested that this
course, and the local Police also reported to similar effect, in view of
the fact that the houses were now so crowded during the restricted hours
of opening that it would be difficult to get evidence of redundancy. It
is, however, probable that some levy will be made, as the Compensation
Authorities have their banking account overdrawn.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 19 January, 1917.
CHARGES OF DRUNKENNESS
At the Dover Police Court on Saturday before Messrs. J. W. Bussey (in
the chair) and W. J. Palmer.
George Gentles, a seaman, was charged with having been drunk and
incapable on New Bridge.
Prisoner pleaded guilty.
Acting sergeant W. J. Popple said that he was on duty in Snargate Street
on Friday at 4.45 p.m., when his attention was called to the defendant,
who was on a tram-car, and was drunk and incapable. Witness brought him
to the Police Station.
Chief Constable Fox said that the defendant was before the Court on the
22nd November last for a similar offence, and he thought that a serious
view of it should be taken.
The defendant was fined 20s.; in default, fourteen days' imprisonment.
Mrs. Ethel Rees, of 3, Templar Street, was charged with having been
drunk and incapable in Beaconsfield Road.
Police-sergeant Petley said that at 9 p.m. on Friday he was on duty in
Beaconsfield Road, when he saw the defendant being assisted by a sailor.
She was drunk and incapable. Witness brought her to the Police Station.
Chief Constable Fox said that she was before the Court on the 27th
November last, and was fined 15s. for assault. Defendant was the wife of
a sailor, and she could have her separation allowance stopped, and if
she came before the Court again, that drastic step would be taken.
Defendant was bound over for a year in the sum of £5, and placed under
the probation of Miss Quance.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 2 February, 1917.
LICENSE TRANSFER
The license of Messrs. J. Binfield, deceased, was temporarily
transferred to Mr. I. Davis, who has purchased the property.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 2 February, 1917.
DRUNK ON A TRAM-CAR
At the Dover Police Court on Saturday before Messrs. J. H. Back (in the
chair) and W. J. Palmer.
Alec Marshall, fireman, R.N.R. was charged with having been drunk and
incapable in Northampton Street.
Defendant pleaded guilty.
Police-constable Pott said: I was on duty in Northampton Street, when my
attention was called to the defendant, who was drunk and incapable in a
tram-car. He was bleeding from the nose.
The defendant, who had a good character from his officer, was ordered to
pay the costs, 4s.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 9 February, 1917.
DOVER LICENSING MEETING
GREAT DECREASE IN DRUNKENNESS
The annual meeting of Justices for the purpose of issuing licenses for
the ensuing year was held at the Town Hall on Monday before Mr. W. J.
Barnes (in the chair), Messrs. Edward Chitty, W. J. Palmer, W. D.
Atkins, F. W. Prescott and A. Clark.
CHIEF CONSTABLES REPORT
The following report from the Chief Constable was read:- “Gentlemen,- I
have the honour to submit for your information my annual report under
the Intoxicating Liquor Laws and Orders made by the Central Control
Board (Liquor Traffic). The houses have been conducted satisfactorily
with the exception of the following persons, who have been proceeded
against for infringements of the Board's Orders. On the 28th April,
1916, Alfred W. Shingleton, licensee of the “Cinque Ports Arms,”
Clarence Place, was fined 10s. for failing to exhibit and Order of the
Board in some conspicuous place in his licensed premises. On the same
day, William J. Fagg, of the “Eagle Hotel,” London Road, was fined 20s.
for a similar offence. On the 1st May, 1916, Albert C. Lewis, licensee
of the “Park Inn,” Park Place, was fined 20s. for permitting
intoxicating liquor , to be consumed on the premises when the house
should have been closed; the house is now under new management. On the
18th August, 1916, Gilbert C. Deverson, licensee of the “Shakespeare
Inn,” Elizabeth Street, was fined 20s. for supplying intoxicating liquor
to a person when the premises should have been closed. On the 6th
October, 1916, Albert Edward Groombridge, licensee of the “New Inn,”
York Street, was fined £20 for accepting an order from a sailor for four
half-pints of whisky on a Sunday evening during the hours when the sale
of spirits was prohibited by the Orders of the Board; the house was
placed “out of bounds” to sailors and soldiers, and is still “out of
bounds”; it is under new management. On the 27th October, 1916, Alfred
William Sheridan, Secretary of the “Oddfellows Club” was fined 40s. for
consuming intoxicating liquors; and Archibald Webb, the Steward, was
fined 10s. for permitting it to be consumed contrary to the Orders of
the Board. On the 5th January, Edwin Le Gross, licensee of the “Avenue
Inn,” Snargate Street, was fined 10s. each in two cases for permitting
treating on his premises; the premises are now “out of bounds.” Also on
the 5th January, John Casselden, licensee of the “Trocadero,” Snargate
Street, was summonsed for permitting treating, and Mrs. Mabel Newing, a
barmaid, was summonsed for supplying the liquor; the case against
Casselden was dismissed, and Mrs. Mabel Newing was fined £2, being £1 on
each of two summonses; the premises are now “out of bounds.” On the 8th
January, William Walter Wall, licensee of the “New Endeavour Inn,”
Buckland, was summonsed for permitting intoxicating liquors to be
consumed after closing time, contrary to the Orders of the Board; the
case was dismissed on the payment of costs. The “Burlington Inn,” Castle
Street, mentioned in my report of last year as being “out of bounds,” is
still “out of bounds.” 2,295 visits have been made to licensed premises
this year, against 471 the previous year; the increased visits this year
having been caused by certain houses selling light beers, which have
necessitated increased vigilance by the Police. Ninety-five visits have
been made to clubs. There are in the Borough:- Fully licensed houses,
143; on and off beer-houses, 5; off beer-houses, 10; confectioners, 3;
and shops,11; total 172. Drunkenness:- 1914, males 86, females 19,
total, 105; 1915, males 108, females, 31, total 139; 1916, males 27,
females 15, total 42. The great reduction in drunkenness I attribute
principally to the Board's Orders limiting the hours for the sale of
intoxicating liquors. The population last census was 43,645; now
estimated at 57,645. Population to each licensed house on estimated
population, 335.24; population to each licensed house on estimated
population last year 329.24. Drunkenness per 1,000, 0.72; last year,
2.4. The undermentioned houses were closed on 30th December last, under
the Licensing (Consolidation) Act, 1910:- The “Crown,” beerhouse (anti
1869) London Road; the “Bell Inn,” St. James's Street; the “Royal
Hotel,” Clarence Place. This makes a total of forty houses been closed
in twelve years by the Compensation Authorities. With regard to the
selection of houses to be referred for compensation, I respectfully
submit that, in consequence of the reductions in the cases of
drunkenness and the difficulty of differentiation by the restricted
hours, that no licenses should be selected for compensation this year.-
I am, Gentleman, etc., David H. Fox, Chief Constable.”
The Chairman said that it was a very satisfactory report.
RENEWAL OF LICENSES.
In the case of the “Avenue Inn,” Snargate Street, Mr. E. le Gros having
joined up, the license was transferred to Mrs. Le Gros. It was stated
that the house had been in the family for many years. The Bench warned
Mrs. Le Gros to be very careful.
The license for singing and music granted for the St. Mary's Parish Hall
was put in the name of Mr. Matthews, the Secretary of the Parish Hall,
instead of the late Mr. Baker.
The Magistrates decided to renew the whole of the licenses, except the
following, the licensees in respect of which were called forward:- Mr. Shingleton, “Cinque Ports Arms”; Mr. A. Fagg, “Eagle Hotel”; and Mr. G. Deverson, “Shakespeare Inn.” The two former had been fined for not
exhibiting notices; and the latter for serving at a prohibited hour; and
they were cautioned by the Chairman to be very careful to carry out all
Orders, after which their licenses were renewed.
ALTERATIONS.
In the case of the “Avenue Inn,” Snargate Street, notice had been given
to present plans of alterations. Mr. Mowll appeared, and showed that the
corner of the partition where the barrel was in the recent case should
be taken off, so that there should be no corner.
In the case of the “Trocadero,” Mr. Casselden attended with a plan, and
the Magistrates examined it. The question of the sanitary accommodation
was raised by Mr. Prescott; and it was decided with regard to the
proposed alterations to the bar, which will be reduced by 8ft., that it
would not be passed until the sanitary accommodation was increased. The
renewal of the licence was adjourned till the adjourned Sessions in
March. The compensation levy of the railway buffet and the refreshment houses
was ordered to be one-third of the ordinary levy.
The permission to open several houses early was renewed, but it was
stated that they were not opened now.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 9 February, 1917.
TRANSFER SESSIONS
The special Sessions for transfers, will be held on April 13th, June
1st, August 3rd, October 5th, December 7th, 1917, and January 4th, 1918. The adjourned meeting for renewing licenses for the Liberties will be
held on Wednesday, February 21st, March 22nd, at 11 a.m., for the
purpose of hearing applications for new licenses within the Liberties
(if any). |
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 9 February, 1917.
THE LICENSING SESSIONS
The Dover Licensing meeting on Monday was notably as the first that has
been held since the Licensing Compensation Act came in force when the
Magistrates have not sent any of the houses in the Town to the
Compensation Authority at Canterbury on the grounds of redundancy. The
statistics as to drunkenness showed that there were only 42 charges last
year, against 139 the previous year – the lowest, we believe, on record.
The number of cases reported by the Chief Constable where prosecutions
have taken place against licensees shows that the Central Control
Board's Orders are being enforced in Dover. The restrictions that the
licensed houses are under in Dover are likely to increase instead of
decrease. The naval and Military Authorities are clearly determined to
strongly enforce all the Government Orders, and there is the fact that
in the near future, owing to the decrease of imports, it will be
necessary to decrease the amount of grain that is to be converted into
beer, with the result that one may expect that if the War continues
another twelve months there will, in all probability, be no grain at all
available for making beer.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 9 February, 1917.
THE EFFECT OF DINNER BEER
At the Dover Police Court on Monday before Messrs. F. W. Prescott (in
the chair) and W. D. Atkins.
William Sawyer was charged with having been drunk and incapable in
Woolcomber Street.
The defendant said that he had not had any drink for years, and the cold
got hold of him.
Police-constable Vincent said that at 4.20 p.m. on Saturday his
attention was called to the defendant in Woolcomber Street by a soldier
and a civilian. Defendant was standing with his back to the wall.
Witness got him on the path, and as he could not walk he took him into
custody.
The defendant said that what he had was in his dinner hour, he walked
towards East Cliff and it overcame him. It was due to the bitter cold
weather.
The case was dismissed with a caution.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 16 February, 1917.
A RUM CASE
At the Dover Police Court on Wednesday before Messrs. H. F. Edwin and W.
D. Atkins.
Frederick Webb, was charged with being drunk and incapable in Cannon
Street.
Acting-sergeant H. E. Roberts said at 11.20 p.m. on Tuesday night, he
saw prisoner lying on the footpath in Cannon Street, helplessly drunk.
In the road near prisoner was a bottle (produced), which he claimed as
his property. It contained about three pints of rum. He would not say
where he got it. Witness took him on an ambulance to the Police Station.
The Chief Constable said the man had got the drink from where he was
employed and it would be a matter for the Customs to say if he had paid
duty. It really belonged to the Navy, but the officer of his ship did
not want to make a charge. Prisoner was a Dover man employed as a
watchman and had not been before the Court before.
A fine of 10s. was imposed.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 16 February, 1917.
DRUNK AND INCAPABLE
At the Dover Police Court on Monday before Messrs. H. F. Edwin (in the
chair) and W. D. Atkins.
Edward Thomas Lane was charged with having been drunk and incapable in
Tower Hamlets Road.
Police-constable Roberts said that he saw the prisoner lying on the
footway in Tower Hamlets Road, helplessly drunk, at five minutes to
eight on Sunday evening. Witness removed him on the ambulance to the
Police Station with assistance.
Several previous convictions were proved against the prisoner; and the
Chief Constable said that the prisoner left his cell that morning in an
abominable state.
The Bench said that the prisoner had a very bad record, and they would
fine him all they could, but that would only be 10s. It was lucky that
he fell into the hands of the Police, as he had £3 19s. upon him.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 16 February, 1917.
DOVER COUNTY SESSIONS
The Dover County Sessions were held on Thursday at the Town Hall. Those
present on the bench were Messrs. Monings (in the chair), Edward Chitty,
Prescott, Hinds and Major Banks.
LICENSING SESSIONS
It was the annual licensing sessions, and the report of Superintendent
Stone, as read at Wingham a fortnight ago, was presented. Superintendent
Castle's report was also read.
The Chairman said that the Bench were satisfied with the reports. The
licenses had been signed and would be given to the licensees. They were
pleased to see the decrease in the convictions.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 2 March, 1917.
DRUNK IN WORTHINGTON STREET
At the Dover Police Court on Saturday morning, before Messrs. T. A.
Terson (in the chair) H. F. Edwin and W. D. Atkins.
Elizabeth Helen Pollard was charged with being drunk and incapable in
Worthington Street.
Prisoner pleaded guilty.
Sergeant Husk said he was on duty at 8.45 p.m. in Worthington Street,
and saw prisoner who was supporting herself against the railings. He
spoke to her, and finding she could not take care of herself, took her
to the Police Station.
Prisoner said that she was waiting for a tram. She had not been very
well, and took a little whisky, but not being used to drink it overcame
her.
Prisoner was discharged with caution.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 2 March, 1917.
ADJOURNED LICENSING SESSIONS
The adjourned Licensing Sessions were held at the Town Hall this
(Friday) morning, before Sir William Crundall (in the chair), Messrs. W.
J. Barnes, H. Hobday, and W. Bradley.
The license of the “Walmer Castle,” Market Square, was transferred from
Mr. J. Jolly to Mr. G. Wood (Messrs. A. Leney and Co's agent).
The license of the “Tower Inn,” Tower Street, was transferred from Mr.
W. Dobson, to his wife, Mrs. A. J. Dobson, during his illness.
The “New Mogul” was transferred from Mr. A. Booker, who had joined the
colours, to his wife, Mrs. M. F. Booker.
The billiard license at the Naval Rest and Sailors' Bethel, Northampton
Street, was transferred from Mr. A. Dowman to Mr. F. Holmes.
In regard to the “Trocadero,” it was now explained that there was
sufficient lavatory accommodation on the premises, and, with a slight
alteration, it was quite satisfactory. In regard to the alteration to
the bar, 11ft. was being cut off, so that the customers could be kept
under observation; and the licence was now ordered to be issued.
The licence of the late Mr. J. Binfield at Last Lane was transferred to
Mr. I. Davis, who had purchased the premises.
The Chairman: Are you going to run the place yourself?
Mr. Davis: If I can have a lease to live forty more years (laughter). I
shall try and get a tenant, and then open it.
The transfer was granted.
In regard to the alteration at the “Avenue,” it was stated that it had
now been carried out, and was quite satisfactory.
|
South Eastern Gazette, Tuesday 6th March, 1917.
Adjourned Licensing Sessions.
The adjourned licensing sessions for the Cranbrook Petty Sessional
Division were held on Thursday, before Mr. E. L. Tomlin (chairman),
Captain G. S. Hancock, Messrs. J. A. Drush, W. Nash, J. Hanmer, A.
Hardcastle, and E. E. Selmes. Superintendent Cheeseman opposed
renewal of the following licences on the grounds of redundancy.
"Hearts of Oak," Biddenden, owned by Messrs Smith and Co., of
Lamberhurst, and how by Richard Ottaway; "Kings Head Inn," Biddenden, owned by Isherwood and Co. Ltd., of Maidstone, and held
by Owen Hodges; the "Royal George," Biddenden owned by Style and
Winch, Maidstone, and held by William Henry Jeffreys; the "Poplar
Tree," Marden, owned by Style and Winch Ltd,. and held by Lawrence
Knight; the "Beech Inn," Marden, owned by Style and Winch, Ltd. and
held by Mrs. Foreman; the "Bridge House," Collier Street, Marden,
owned by Mrs. Reynolds, and leased to Messrs. Leney and Sons, of
Wateringbury, the licensee being J. Kember; and the "Royal Oak," Marden, owned by Messrs. Jude, Hanbury and Co. of Wateringbury, and
held by Henry Thrower.
In the case of the "Hearts of Oak," Biddenden, renewal was not
applied for. Mr. W. C. Cripps, of Tunbridge Wells, representing the
owner, landlords and tenant of the "Bridge House," and Mr. H. J.
Bracer, of Maidstone, the landlords and tenants of the remainder.
Evidence was produced as to the trade done by the houses, and it was
argue they were required for for the needs of the district. The
Bench, however, decided to refer the whole 7 houses to the
Compensation Authority.
The licence of the "Woodcock," Biddenden, was transferred to Emma
Coley, and that of the "New Inn," Frittenden, to Martha A. Ward.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 9 March, 1917.
TOO MANY HOP GARDENS IN KENT
AREA TO BE USED TO GROW FOOD
Mr. R. E. Prothero, Minister of Agriculture, has warned the Kent County
War Agricultural committee that, owing to the further restrictions on
the output of beer, the area devoted to hops in the county is too large,
and should be reduced. He adds:- “The fertility of the land thus
diverted from the growth of hops should at once be utilised to increase
the essential food supplies of the nation. Potatoes or oats, or,
possibly in certain areas, beans, are the most obvious substitutes. I
remind you that time is short, and that immediate action is necessary.”
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 9 March, 1917.
SUPPLYING DRINK TO H.M. FORCES
CHARGE AGAINST A WOMEN
At the Dover Police Court on Monday, before. J. H. Back, W. H. Palmer
and F. G. Wright.
Agnes Hathaway was charged with unlawfully supplying intoxicating liquor
to members of His Magesty's Forces, to wit, two men of the Royal navy
Air Service and a stoker of H.M.S. _______, when not on duty, with the
intent to make them drunk, or less capable of performing their duties.
Defendant, in answer to the question whether she was guilty or not,
said, “It is true, I sent for the beer.”
Police-sergeant A. H. Ovenden said: On Saturday at 3.30 p.m., from
information received, I went with Acting-sergeant Roberts and
Police-constable Beer, to 5, Thornton's Lane. In the back kitchen were
three men, two men of the Royal Naval Air Section and a stoker of H.M.S.
________, also defendant's next door neighbour. Defendant was in the act
of going up stairs with three quart bottles of beer in her apron. We
stopped her and she said, “I bought and paid for these; these are mine.”
We also found another full bottle of beer behind a door in the room and
under the table an empty bottle. On the table were two cups which had
contained malt liquor. Two of the men were decidedly the worse for
drink. The two Royal Naval Air Service men were on pass, and were
allowed to go. The stoker was an absentee and was handed over to the
Naval patrol. We brought Mrs. Hathaway and the five bottles to the
Police Station, where she was cautioned and charged. In answer to the
charge, she said the stoker gave her 7s. with which she paid for the
beer. She said that Mrs. Hughes, the neighbour, had brought them in.
They had apparently had warning of our approach from the children that
were outside.
Defendant said that one of the bottles was a paraffin bottle.
Witness said that he was a teetotaller, and perhaps he could not tell,
but smelling one bottle he said that it smelled of beer and paraffin
mixed!
Defendant: It is paraffin! You can burn it! The two men who were drunk
did not have anything in her house. She denied saying that Mrs. Hughes
brought the men.
The Chief Constable said that he wished to call attention to the fact
that a man absent without leave was found in this woman's house, the
worse for drink. This was a thing which the Naval authorities had called
special attention to, viz., men getting drunk on the sly, which affected
the welfare of the men and made them not fit for the performance of
their duty if called upon.
The Chairman said that the Bench considered this to be a very serious
offence at this time, for the men who are defending our shores to be
enticed into these places and to be given beer, which unfitted them for
the duty they might have to go off at any time to do. They could send
defendant to prison for a very considerable period, or inflict a heavy
fine, but as this was her first offence they would deal leniently with
her by fining defendant 40s., or three weeks imprisonment in default.
She would be allowed until Saturday to pay. They wanted that case to be
a warning that others would be more seriously punished.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 16 March, 1917.
LICENSES REFERRED
The Licensing Justices of the St. Augustine's Division, at their
adjourned licensing meeting at Canterbury, on Saturday, referred the
“Rose Inn,” and the “Tower Hotel,” Herne Bay, to the Compensation
Authorities.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 27 April, 1917.
DRUNKEN SEAMEN
At the Dover Police Court on Monday, before Messrs. W. J. Barnes (in the
chair) and W. D. Atkins.
Michael m. Thornton was charged with having been drunk and incapable in
the Market Square.
The defendant pleaded guilty.
Acting Police-sergeant Popple said that at 10.10 o'clock on Saturday
night he saw the defendant and another man. The defendant was obviously
drunk. He fell whilst being assisted by another man, and when they
turned him over they found his eye bleeding.
It was stated that the defendant belonged to a merchant ship; and the
captain said that the defendant was a reliable man, but, owing to a
“little bit of a scrimmage outside, he had taken too much to drink.”
The case was dismissed with a caution.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 8 June, 1917.
KENT NEW LAND TO BE PLOUGHED
The Board of Agriculture has consented to the inclusion of the acreage
of hop land that has been grubbed as a part of the County's quota of
land (95,000 acres) to be brought under the plough.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 13 July, 1917.
THEFT OF WHISKY FROM THE PRIORY GOODS STATION.
At the Dover Police Court on Saturday, before Messrs. J. W. Bussey (in
the chair) and H. Hobday.
William Mount, of 141, Clarendon Street, was charged with stealing
twelve bottles of whisky from the Priory Goods Yard, the property of the
S.E. and C.R. Company, valued at £3 18s.
Ernest Richard Wyborn, checker at the Priory Goods Yard, said that the
prisoner was a stableman in the employ of the Company. On Thursday night
the whiskies were checked, and were safe when he closed the shed in the
yard. There were three cases of the spirit there, the same as portions
of the one produced, and there were twelve bottles of Greers' whisky in
each. Witness also saw five bags of chaff in the stable for the horses.
When witness opened the doors of the shed the next morning, in clearing
the shed up, he noticed only three bags of chaff and only two of the
three cases of whisky. Witness then reported the case to Mr. Harnett,
the manager. Prisoner came round and fetched the three bags of fodder.
It would be his duty to fetch them as required. Witness came on duty at
7.30 a.m., but the prisoner was there before that hour.
James Henry Langley, goods checker, said that he commenced work at six
o'clock on Friday morning. When he returned from breakfast at about 9.30
he saw the prisoner come out with the fodder. There were two bags on the
platform. Witness saw the third in the shed, and he carried that out for
the prisoner and put it with the others.
Detective Greenland said that shortly after three o'clock on Friday he
received information as to the theft of the case of whisky from the
yard. Subsequently he went to the stables in the yard, where he saw the
prisoner Mount, whom he asked if he was in charge of the stables. And he
replied that he was. Witness told him that something was missing, and
that he (witness) was going to search the stable. In doing so witness
found an old coat hanging on the wall, and in the lining he felt a
bottle of whisky which had been tampered with. Witness then cautioned
him, and asked him how he accounted for the bottle being there. He said,
“I do not know.” He denied that the coat was his, but on turning it
round witness found a pocket book, which the prisoner admitted was his,
and one he had for putting greenstuff down in. Witness again asked him
if the coat was his, and he said, “Yes; an old one.” Witness made a
further search in the chaff-room, and found three sacks of chaff leaning
against the bin, which witness asked him to tip in the bin. The third
sack witness undid himself, and as he was doing so the prisoner said,
“There is nothing in there.” Witness put his hand into it, and pulled
out a bottle of whisky. Witness then got the prisoner to tip the rest of
the chaff out of the sack, and witness recovered seven bottles of whisky
in all. Witness asked the prisoner how he accounted for the bottles
being there, and he said, “I do not know. I brought over five sacks of
chaff between 9.30 and 10 this morning from the goods platform.” Witness
asked him how he accounted for bringing over five sacks when there were
only three there. He said, “I brought five over.” Witness asked him at
what time he was in the yard that morning. At first he said “3.45,” and
then “4.30.” Witness brought him to the Police Station, where he was
charged, and in reply he said, “It is not in my coat.” Witness's
attention was called to the broken case (produced), which was under the
wall in the yard, near the exit gate. Witness searched the prisoner at
the Station, and found a corkscrew and £30 1s. 7d. in money, mostly
notes.
George Harnett, goods agent, said that a case of whisky, consigned to
Messrs. Lukey, left in the shed the previous night with two others, was
missing. He made every possible inquiry about the case, and subsequently
it was reported that boards representing parts of the missing case had
been found in the goods yard. He reported the matter to the Police at
once. The prisoner was the only man who would have access to the fodder
and harness room, and had the key. His booked time was 5 a.m., and he
had been specially warned not to arrive earlier. A watchman was employed
at night.
Prisoner: There is a key left there in the day time.
You should not. Why do you do that?
The prisoner asked the Bench to deal with the case, and pleaded not
guilty. He said that he went home to dinner at ten minutes to 12, and
got back at 2.30. The detective felt the coat and found the bottle
partly emptied, and he told him that he knew nothing about it.
The Magistrates' Clerk: The whisky was found in the place you had
control of. Do you want to call any witnesses?
I have no witnesses, sir.
Mr. Lord said the prisoner had worked for the Company for about thirty
years. He did not know of anything previous against him. They were
losing very many things through theft as well as the interference with
articles on transit. During the great stress of the war it was very
difficult to exercise that supervision which was necessary to prevent
that kind of thing. The prisoner had been trusted as an old servant of
the Company, and they were sorry to see him in such a position, but they
felt they must press the charge.
The Magistrates' Clerk: He loses his job?
Yes.
The Chairman said that the Bench were very sorry to see the prisoner in
that position after such service with the Company. They were satisfied
that he was guilty, but were not going to send him to prison. They would
fine him £5; or, in default, a month's imprisonment.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 20 July, 1917.
SCENE AT BUCKLAND.
At the Dover Police Court on Saturday, before Messrs. Edward Chitty (in
the chair) and H. Hobday.
Lawrence Sykes was charged with having been drunk and disorderly in
Cherry Tree Avenue.
The defendant said that he was guilty of having been disorderly.
P.C. Richards said: At 9.30 p.m. I went to Cherry Tree Avenue, owing to
information I had received. I saw prisoner there drunk and stripped to
the waist, wanting to fight someone. I advised him to go away. He
refused to do so, and asked to be locked up. I took him into custody,
and brought him to the Police Station. He has lost his foot, I believe.
The defendant: I was not drunk.
Chief Inspector Green said that he was at the Police Station when the
prisoner was brought in. He had nothing on except his trousers. He was
very excited, smelt of drink, and was apparently drunk. He lives in
Herbert Street, and the Constable had to sent to him from the Police
Station.
The defendant said that he had never had any drink that day.
The Chief Constable said that the defendant called at the Police Station
previously. He was then drunk. He had a mark on his face, and wanted a
man to be taken into custody. When they refused and told him to summons
the man, he said that he would have it out with the man himself.
The defendant said that he lived in a very rough neighbourhood, and the
people knocked his house about and stole things. A man waylaid him as he
was going from work, and he heard him raving about a woman. The man
knocked him about. He came to the Police Station to get the man
arrested, but they advised him to summons the man, and he said he would
go back and fight him. He wished that he had taken the Inspector's
advice and summoned him.
The Chairman said that after the defendant had had time to think it over
he had behaved in a disgraceful manner. No one had the right to walk
about the streets with only their breeches on. He would be fined 20s.
|
|