From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 3
February, 1922. Price 1½d.
THE LICENSING METING
On Monday, the Dover Magistrates sit as the Licensing Authority.
There will be but little business before them, as they have already
decided to close vote, not to have any licensed houses in Dover selected
for removal by compensation. The question now seems to be decided by the
Magistrates purely on the lines of temperance v. Anti-Temperance,
although to an impartial observer it is difficult to see how the matter
effects temperance, which in these days means prohibition. Removal of
redundant public houses by compensation cannot possible mean
prohibition, and it is very doubtful if it means a glass of beer less
being drunk. But it does mean that public houses not required can be got
rid of; and in that way it helps the brewer, the licence holder, and the
public, as such houses are a nuisance to all three.
But as all the brewers and licence holders pay heavy contributions to
the compensation fund, it hardly seems right that the opportunity of
Dover getting some of this money back should be prevented because of the
difference between the Magistrates on temperance questions. If Dover
does not send any houses for removal by compensation, it simply means
that other towns are benefiting at Dover's expense. That there are no
public houses in Dover that are not useless to everyone, we do not
believe. But to refuse to take advantage of the Act, whilst still paying
its levies, goes further. It is a means of getting rid of public houses
that may, in the future, have to be purchased at great costs to the town
to carry out public improvements. There are several houses in that
position which could well be sent up to the East Kent Quarter Sessions,
and the Town would be the gainers financially if they could get rid of
them in this cheap way. It is just as much to the interests of the
brewers and licence holders as to the rest of the ratepayers, that rates
should not be made unduly heavy by having to provide money from them,
when it can be provided in other ways. the opportunity has gone this
year, but the Dover Magistrates should remember that it is a poor
policy to cut off one's nose to spite one's face.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 3
February, 1922. Price 1½d.
ANNUAL LICENSING MEETING
The monthly sitting of the Wingham Petty Sessions was held on
Thursday at the Court House, Wingham, before Messrs. H. Fitzwalter
Plymptre (Chairman), Admiral Sir H. Headerson, Messrs. W. Plumtre,
Godfrey, Baird, Chandler, Rose, May and Fagg.
THREE HOUSES REFERRED
The Police reported on the conduct of licensed houses during the
year. Supt. Barton, of the Wingham Division, in his statement said that
there were 51 ale, 28 beer, and 4 grocer's licence houses in the
district. Three houses had been closed by compensation, and 11 ale, 4
beer on, and one off had been transferred. Two licenses were proceeded
against, but otherwise the houses had all been conducted satisfactorily.
Supt. Castle, of the Elham Division, reported that there were 11 ale
and 5 been on houses, all conducted satisfactorily, with the exception
of one licence proceeded against and convicted. No persons were
convicted for drunkenness, against one last year.
Supt. Ford, of the Home Division (who was welcomed by the Bench
having succeeded Supt. Heard, retired) said that the whole of the 17
ale, 6 on beer and two off beer licensed houses had been conducted
satisfactorily. for the sixth year in succession there were no cases of
drunkenness.
The Chairman said he would like to congratulate the holders of
licences on the satisfactory report. This was not part of the country
where there were serious offences against licensees, but at the same
time it was as well to remind them of their responsibilities. The
licenses of all the houses would be renewed, except the "Endeavour,"
Shatterling, and the "Dog and Duck," Stourmouth, which were referred
last year, and the "Royal Oak," Woodnesborough, which they recommended
for closing as redundant. As regard the "Charity Inn," Woodnesborough,
although well equipped, they thought when the owners were considering
alterations they should alter the approach to the club-room and the
position of the urinal, but they did not press for the alterations at
the moment. The Clerk would serve notices of objections on the three
houses and they would be considered next month.
|
Sevenoaks Chronicle and Kentish Advertiser, Friday 3 February 1922.
HURST GREEN PETTY SESSIONS. SUPERINTENDENT’S REPORT.
This being the Annual Licensing Session the superintendent stated that
there were 22 fully licensed houses, 7 beer houses licensed to sell the
consumption on the premises, one beer house licensed to sell off the
premises, and three licenses granted to grocers and others to sell
spirits, etc. by retail. Proceedings had been taken against two persons
during the year for drunkenness. One was convicted and the case against
the other dismissed. This showed an increase of one as compared with the
previous year. No proceedings were taken against any license for breach
of the licensing laws. The licensed houses had been well conducted.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 10 February, 1922. Price 1½d.
ANNUAL LICENSING MEETING
The general annual licensing meeting of the Borough and Liberties of
Dover, was held at the Town Hall on Monday, before Sir William Crundall
(in the chair), Messrs. W. J. Barnes, H. F. Edwin, W. Bradley, W. G.
Lewis, W. B. Brett, W. Hollis, C. Wood, W. J. Palmer, T. A. Terson, A.
Clark and Edward Chitty.
The application for the transfer of the music, singing and dancing
licence of the “Queen's Hall,” Queen Street, from Mr. Temple C. Overston
to Mr. Clarence Wittell, of 62, Loughton Road, Dinnington Road,
Rotherham, Yorkshire, was adjourned to the adjourned licensing meeting,
for Police testimonials to be produced.
The Chief Constable presented the report, which was as follows:-
Gentleman, I have the honour to submit for your information my annual
report under the Intoxicating Liquor Laws. On September 1st last, the
Licensing Act, 1921, came into force, and the Orders of the Central
Board (Liquor Traffic) ceased to have effect, and the Board was
abolished. From September 1st until the transfer sessions held on
October 7th, the hours during which intoxicating liquor could be sold in
any licensed premises or clubs on weekdays were between half-past eleven
in the morning and three in the afternoon, and between half-past five in
the afternoon and ten in the evening; and on Sundays between half-past
twelve and half-past two in the afternoon, and between seven and ten in
the evening. At the transfer sessions, the hours were altered on
weekdays to between half-past ten in the morning and half-past two in
the afternoon, and between six and ten in the evenings; and on Sundays
between twelve noon and two in the afternoon, and between seven and ten
in the evening, and up to the present time I believe these hours have
proved satisfactory. Under Section 3 of the Licensing Act, 1921, seven
certificates were granted by the Licensing Justices to the following
licensed premises, viz. The “Lord Warden Hotel,” the “Hotel Burlington,”
No. 177, Snargate Street, No. 5, Bench Street, the Prince of Wales Pier,
the Admiralty Pier, and the Dovorian Restaurant. The first four have
availed themselves of the extra hour in the evening but the last three
have not done so. With regards to the Standing General Orders of
Exemption, granted under Section 66 of the Licensing (Consolidation)
Act, 1910, at the last annual licensing meeting, six were granted to the
following licensed premises to open between half-past three and six in
the morning, viz.:- The “Duchess of Kent,” the “Walmer Castle,” the
“Rose and Crown,” the “Barley Mow,” the “Harbour Station,” and the
“Marine Station,” and to nine others to open between five and six in the
morning, viz.:- The “Bull,” the “Tower,” the “Park,” the “Griffin,” the
“Prince Regent,” the “Union,” the “Shakespeare,” the “Railway Inn,” the
“Terminus,” and of these only three have availed themselves of the
exemptions, viz.:- The “Rose and Crown,” the “Duchess of Kent,” and the
“Prince Regent,” the last two only occasionally; and I respectfully
recommend that owing to the changed conditions in the Borough, with the
exception of those who have availed themselves of the General Orders,
these exemptions be not renewed. All the houses have been conducted
satisfactorily, with the exception of the following persons, who have
been proceeded against for infringement of the Licensing Acts, and the
Central Control Board (Liquor Traffic) Orders:- On June 3rd, Thomas
Henry Baldry Tiffin, licensee of the “Granville Restaurant,” Marine
Parade was summoned for permitting intoxicating liquor to be consumed on
his premises after closing time, and he was fined £5. On July 14th this
house was placed “out of bounds” to all troops in the Garrison, and on
October 10th, it was placed “in bounds.” The licence of this house had
since been transferred. On July 8th, George Wayte, proprietor of the
refreshment house, No. 75, Snargate Street, was fined 5s. for keeping
his house open for the consumption of refreshment after doing hours,
contrary to the Public-house Closing Act, 1864. On August 19th, Ernest
Grigg, Secretary of the Territory Club, Northampton Street, was summoned
for supplying intoxicating liquor during prohibited hours, contrary to
the Orders of the Board, and the case was dismissed on the payment of
the cost. Fifty special orders for exemptions, under Section 57 of the
Licensing Act, 1910, have been granted to licensed premises, (including
three clubs), during the year, and 14 occasional licenses have also been
granted by the Justices, 436 visits were made to clubs and licensed
premises by the Police during the year. Twenty-nine fully licensed
premises, two “on” beer houses, one “off” beer house, and one shop
changed hands during the year. There are in the Borough:- Fully licensed
houses, 143; “on” and “off” beer houses, 5; “off” beer houses, 10;
shops, 11; confectioners, 3; total 1172. Drunkenness:- 1919, 21 males, 7
females, total 28; 1920, 18 males, 3 females, total 21; 1921, 14 males,
6 females; total 20. of those proceeded against for drunkenness, ten
were residents, eight non-residents, and two soldiers. Population,
census,1921, 39,965; population to each licenses house, 232.47;
drunkenness by 1,000 population, 0.5. I have selected no licenses for
compensation this year, owing to the difficulty of differentiation, but
the “Endeavour Inn,” Bulwark Street, has been closed since October last,
and I have reason to believe that the renewal of the licence will not be
applied for; there are also the “Archliff Fort Inn,” Bulwark Street, and
the “Two Brewers” and the “Exeter Arms,” Limekiln Street, all of which
come under the Pier Improvement Scheme and may not be rebuilt, and I
respectfully suggest that should the Justices desire to send any for
compensation, a small committee of Magistrates be formed to assist me in
selecting the houses:-
Charles Green. Chief Constable.
The Chairman said that it was a very satisfactory report indeed.
The Magistrates' Clerk said that all the licenses would be renewed,
except that of the “Prince of Orange,” New Street, the landlord of which
had just died, and Messrs. Rigden would make the necessary steps in that
case.
Public dancing, singing and music licenses were renewed.
Mr. Fraser, for the South-Eastern and Chatham Railway Company, appeared
in support of an application for certificates for the Harbour Station
and the Marine Station refreshment rooms to be renewed, and that the
compensation should be, as before, reduced to a third.
Mr. Rutley Mowll made a similar application for the Gordon Hotels'
refreshment rooms on the Prince of Wales Pier, and the Admiralty Pier.
These applications were granted, and similar certificates were granted
to local restaurants.
In connection with the renewal of licenses for opening early in the
morning, Alderman Chitty said that the Magistrates had decided to adopt
in respect of the Chief Constable, and this contained a recommendation
that the exception should not be renewed except to those who had availed
themselves of the opportunity.
The Magistrates' Clerk said that there was no discussion on the point
when it was adopted. The real discussion was on the question of houses
for compensation.
Mr. Barnes said that they could not take it away without giving notice
to the holders.
It was decided to give notice that the matter would be considered at the
adjourned general meeting.
The following dates were fixed as dates for special sessions for
transfers:- Fridays, April 7th, June 2nd, August 11th, October 6th,
December 1st, 1922, and January 12th, 1923.
Mr. Shea, of Margate, applied on behalf of the Isle of Thanet Licensed
Victuallers' Association, to ask for a variation in the hours of opening
under the Licensing Act, 1921, which came into force on September 1st
last. The hours when fixed were 10.30 a.m. to 2.30 p.m. and from 6 p.m.
to 10 p.m., and on Sundays from 12 noon to 2 p.m. and from 7 p.m. to 10
p.m. As regards the Sunday hours, they had worked admirably and no one
wanted to make a change. The persons whom he represented were also
satisfied with the morning hours, but they were going to ask the
Magistrates to grant an extension of the evening hours. He knew he was
asking a good deal. They were called upon to administer a licensing
district of which he did not think there was the like anywhere in
England. They had jurisdiction over a large Borough, and, in addition,
even a track of country which might be known to some of them but
certainly not as intimately as Dover, which was not under the
jurisdiction of the Borough Police and which had towns over twenty miles
apart.
The Chairman: That's not our fault, (laughter).
Mr. Shea: No, it is your misfortune (laughter).
Continuing, Mr. Shea said that no one by any stretch of imagination
would call Dover a health and pleasure resort, despite what it was in
the past; in fact, he thought he could call it an industrial town, even
allowing for the bad times. Westgate, Broadstairs, and Birchington were
entirely different, and descended upon London visitors who came for
their holidays. These people came for relaxation, and they endeavoured
to supply it. During the season many of the concerts and entertainments
were carried on till ten o'clock which, bearing in mind the Daylight
Saving Bill, was really only nine o'clock. These people if they wanted
any refreshment before going home, had, therefore, to leave the concert
before it was over. Two of the licensees would tell the Bench that
shortly before ten o'clock their places were besieged with people
wanting refreshment. He applied for as extension of the hours till 10.30
p.m. or failing that being considered, that the hours should be altered
to 6.30 p.m. to 10.30 p.m. It would be an immense boon, and would make
all the difference between convenience and inconvenience. He did not
know if there was to be any opposition, but there was absolutely none
from the County Police. He referred to the excellent manner in which the
houses had been conducted in the district.
The Chairman said that was quite right; he had said so for many years
past.
Mr. Skinner, licensee of the “Tartar Frigate,” Broadstairs, said he had
three years' experience of the requirements of the locality. The present
hours were irksome to the visitor, and a penalty to the licensed
victualler every summer. Shortly before ten o'clock a queue assembled at
his house, and it was absolutely impossible to serve them all. It would
be a great advantage and an acquisition to the place if the half-hour
was granted.
The Rev. W. Holyoak said that he appeared on behalf of the Dover
Temperance Council to urge that the hours in the evening should not be
extended as desired to 10.30. Most visitors to the district were,
presumably, from London, and he could put before the Bench figures
showing that the extension beyond ten o'clock there had been attended to
by a serious increase of drunkenness. The average number of cases of
drunkenness before the extension from 10 to 11 were 432 a week in the
Metropolitan district, but after the extension the average rose to 643,
which was an increase of over 45 per cent. He submitted that it would be
a lamentable step to take, not only for the general public but for the
publicans as well.
Mr. Ovenden, Chairman of the Dover Licensed Victualler's protection
Society, made application for an extension of half an hour to be granted
to Dover. He said they had heard all kinds of promises of a similar
reason and they were looking forward to more visitors coming to Dover
next year. Attractions were being put forward, and he thought that
should be up-to-date. Mr. Shea had said that Dover was not a health
resort, but in that he (Mr. Ovenden) differed from him, for the town was
gradually coming back to its pre-war condition, and it was up to them to
meet its requirements. He contended that the licensed victuallers knew
these requirements. He pointed out that they were playing the same
license duties as they did when they were open a larger number of hours,
and more than half the licensed vistuallers in the town had a hard job
to meet these expenses; in fact, he thought he would be right in saying
that 75 per cent, were not doing so. The Police report was very
satisfactory, and he thought that the Dover public could be trusted with
the extra half an hour, even if it was only as a kind of medal for past
good behaviour. If the application was not granted, he formally asked
that the hours should be changed to 6.30 p.m. to 10.30 p.m.
After the Bench had deliberated in private, the Chairman said that the
Bench had considered Mr. Shea's application, and by a majority they
had come to the conclusion that they would grant the extra half an hour
on one condition alone – that they received themselves the right to
reconsider the matter at the meeting in October next.
Mr. Shea: It is an extra half hour as a trial?
The Chairman: Yes, to see how you behave yourselves. It will be the same
for Dover as well.
It was decided that the new hour should come into force on Friday.
An application by Russell's Gravesend brewers Co., for the approval of
plans of proposed alterations to the “Callis Court Hotel,” Broadstairs,
was granted.
The Court decided to hold the adjourned meetings (1) at the “Piermont
Hall,” Broadstairs, on Wednesday, February 22nd, at 3 p.m., for renewing
licenses; and (2) at the “Town Hall,” Dover, on Friday, March 3rd, at 11
a.m., for the purpose of hearing applications for new licenses within
the Liberties if any.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 17 February, 1922. Price 1½d.
COUNTY PETTY SESSIONS
At the monthly sitting of the Wingham Petty Sessions at Dover Town Hall
on Thursday, before Messrs. T. A. Terson (in the chair), Col. Cavenagh,
and Messrs. M. Prickett, Chandler, C. J. Burgess and Rose.
ADJOURNED LICENSING MEETING
The report of the police on the licensed houses in the district, which
was first presented at Wingham on February 2nd, and published at the
time, were again read over.
The Chairman announced that the licenses of all the houses in the
district would be renewed with the exception of the “Fox Inn,” Temple
Ewell, which was objected to on the ground of redundancy, and the matter
would be considered at the adjourned meeting on the 16th March.
Plane for the alteration to the “Chance Inn,” Guston, were submitted by
Mr. F. G. Hayward, and approved, the improvement being an alteration to
the staircase.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 10 March, 1922. Price 1½d.
STRANGE METHODS OF THE LICENSING JUSTICES
The adjourned annual licensing session was held at the Dover Police
Court o Friday last, before Sir William Crundall (in the chair), Dr. C.
Wood, and Messrs. W. Hollis, C. E. Bossfoy, Edward Chitty, W. D. Atkins,
A. Clark, W. J. Barnes, W. J. Bussey, W. B. Brett, T. A. Terson, W. G.
Lewis and W. Bromley.
The Magistrates' Clerk said that the question of the granting of early
licenses was adjourned from the general licensing meeting for
consideration that day.
Mr. G. P. Wood, on behalf of the “Walmer Castle,” the first case heard,
said that he did not propose to apply for the renewal of the privilege.
He hoped, however, that if the time should come when they desired to be
allowed to open early, the Bench would bear in mind that the early
licence had been granted previously. The same would apply in the cases
of the “Union Hotel,” the “New Commercial Quay Inn,” and the “Bull Inn,”
London Road.
The Chairman: Why do you not want the licence now?
Mr. Wood said that with people starting work later, it was not required.
The Chairman: If you have it, you are not compelled to use it.
Mr. Wood: As you wish.
Alderman Chitty: Surely, we do not wish to force it upon them, unless
they wish.
The Chairman: I quite expected that from you, Mr. Chitty. (Laughter).
Alderman Chitty: But surely it is reasonable?
The Magistrates' Clerk in reply to a question, said that it was open to
Mr. Wood to apply for the facility at any transfer session, if the
circumstances warranted it.
The Chairman: That settles it, then.
Mr. Wright, of the “Rose and Crown,” Clarence Place, was the next case.
The Magistrates' Clerk: You have opened early?
Mr. Wright: Yes, from 3.30 a.m. to 6 a.m. Facilities are needed for the
pilots and the men from the boats.
Mr. Atkins: Are there any night boats now?
Mr. Wright: No, but there are people working all night , and we have a
lot of pilots in from Gravesend. We do more before breakfast than at any
other time.
The application was granted, eight Magistrates voting in favour and
Alderman Chitty and Mr. Atkins against.
Mr. Sandifird appeared in the cases of the “Barley Mow Inn,” the
“Shakespeare Inn,” Elizabeth Street, and the “Griffin Inn,” Folkestone
Road. In reply to the Magistrates' Clerk he said that advantage had not
been taken of the licence in any way of the three houses. They had not
been able to.
The Chairman: Why?
Mr. Sandiford: Because of the restrictions under the Liquor Control Act,
which did not cease until last September. He asked for renewal of the
licenses.
Mr. Brett moved that they be granted.
Alderman Chitty: Did not the Chief Constable, in his report, suggest
they these houses which had not used the permission should not have it
renewed?
Chief Constable Green said that was so. There was hardly anyone about
early now. The conditions were altered entirely, with men not starting
work before eight o'clock. These houses were shown on his books as
early-licence houses, but they did not use the privilege. It was always
open to a licensee to apply when he wanted the permission.
The Chairman: You say they are required, Mr. Sandiford?
Mr. Sandiford: Yes.
Chief Constable Green said that the onus was on the licensee to show
that it was required.
The licensee of the “Shakespeare Inn” said that he used to do well with
the fish market, and he did not want to lose the chance of opening if
the occasion again arose.
Mr. Hollis: If permission were granted, would you not use it at once?
The licensee: No.
Mr. Hollis: You can apply for it when you want it.
The Chairman: You apply for it now?
The licensee: Yes.
Mr. Atkins: Then show cause why it should be renewed.
The licensee: Because I do not want it to be taken away. (Laughter).
Mr. Beaufoy said that anyone could go and knock up a licensee during
these hours if he was not open.
Mr. Atkins: if I come down there at five o'clock and want a cup of tea,
you will have to get it?
The licensee: Yes, I will. (Laughter).
The licenses for the three houses were granted, on being just to the
vote, by seven voted to six, Dr. Wood, Alderman Chitty, and Messrs.
Clark, Atkins, Hollis and Beaufoy voting against.
The licensee of the “Tower Inn,” Tower Street, made no application for
the renewal of the early morning licence.
Mr. Hollis: Will you not make them have it? (Laughter).
Mrs. Pennington, of the “Park Inn,” Park Street, applied for the renewal
of her licence.
Mrs. Pennington, in reply to the Chairman said that she had not used the
licence. She did not know she was entitled to, until she saw it in the
papers recently. She thought that amongst those who would use the house
were the electric light men.
Mr. Beaufoy: They are all total abstainers. (Laughter).
On being put to the vote, the licence was granted by seven votes, to
six.
The licensee of the “Prince Regent,” Market Square, and the “Railway
Inn,” Hawkesbury Street, did not apply for the renewal of the licenses
granted them.
Mr. Pritchard, of the “Terminus Hotel,” Beach Street, appeared , and
asked for a renewal of his licence. He said he thought that, as time
went on, there would be an opportunity to use it.
Alderman Chitty: You know you can apply for it at any time?
Mr. Pritchard: Yes, but I prefer not to lose it.
The licence was granted by seven votes to six.
No application was made by the licensee of the “Duchess of Kent,” market
Square.
The Queen's Hall music, singing and dancing licence was transferred from
Mr. E. Overston to Mr. Clarence Whittell.
A similar licence for Messrs. Woolworth's Stores, from Mr. William G.
Netherell to Mr. C. J. Markwick, the Manager.
Mr. Clark asked if the licence for the Queen's Hall was for seven days.
The Magistrates' Clerk said that it was.
Alderman Chitty asked if they had any power to withdrawer permission for
opening on Sundays?
The Magistrates' Clerk said that the licence had already been renewed
for the year. The Hall was licensed for pictures by the Council.
Mr. Clark said that he did not see that one picture house should be
licensed for six days and another for seven days.
The Chairman: There are three down the town who can open. Must we have a
resolution?
Mr. Atkins: I am dead against it. I do not work seven days a week, and I
would not do it for anyone.
Ten voted in favour of the transfer, on the matter being put to the
vote.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 14
April, 1922. Price 1½d.
LICENSING BUSINESS
The "Brown Jug,"
Dumpton, near Broadstairs, was transferred from the late Mr. A. J.
Sutton to Mr. G. Watts.
Mr. Shea applied for the confirmation of the medical wine licence
granted to Mr. John Walton, chemist, of Broadstairs, and this was
granted.
Mr. M. Mowll applied for the transfer of the licence of 177, Snargate
Street from Mr. Vinoli to Mr. Francesco Capelli, of London, S.E. His
difficulty was that the incoming licensee was represented by a London
firm of solicitors, who would be down that day with the references. He
asked that the Bench should grant a protection order until the Police
were satisfied with the references, and the matter could be confirmed at
the next Sessions in June. The Bench granted the application, but said
that it was not to be taken as a precedent.
The "Grand Hotel," Broadstairs, which re-opened for the summer season
on Tuesday, applied for extensions for dances during the Easter
holidays, which were granted.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 3 March, 1922. Price 1½d.
WINGHAM PETTY SESSIONS
The monthly sitting of the Wingham Petty Sessions was held at the Court
House, Wingham, on Thursday, before Mr. H. Fitzwalter Plumptre
(Chairman), Lord Northbourne, Admiral R Henderson, Messrs. C. J.
Burgess, H. M. Baker, Elmer Speed, Baird, A. H. G. Dubrey, M. Pickett,
Chandler, Rose, May, Raggete, Branson, Kennedy, Fagg, and Champion.
OBJECTED TO LICENSES RENEWED
The Magistrates set to hear objections to the renewal of licenses of
three licensed houses in the District. In the first case, “Dog and
Duck,” Stourmouth, Mr. R. Mowll appeared and formally asked for the
renewal. He said that the licensee could not attend owing to being ill
with phlebitis.
The Bench retired, and, on their return, said that the license would be
renewed.
Mr. R. Mowll appeared on behalf of the licensee and the brewers, Messrs.
Thompson and Son, Ltd., to ask for the renewal of the license of the
“Endeavour,” Shatterling, Staple.
On return, the Chairman said that the licence would be renewed.
The third house considered was the “Royal Oak,” Woodnesborough, and Mr.
R. Mowll appeared to ask for the renewal.
The Bench after a lengthy retirement renewed the licence.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 9 June, 1922. Price 1½d.
LICENSING BUSINESS
At the wine and beer licence of 177, Snargate Street was transferred
from Mr. Virgilio Vanoli to Mr. Francis Capelli, of 177 Snargate Street.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 30 June, 1922. Price 1½d.
DRUNKEN MAN'S NARROW ESCAPE
At the Dover Police Court on Friday last, before Messrs. C. E. Beaufoy
(in the chair), W. E. Palmer and A. C. Leney.
William Foster was charged with having been drunk and incapable on
Crosswall Quay.
The prisoner pleaded guilty, and said he was sorry.
P.C. Max Heller said that at 10.40 the previous night he was on duty on
the Crosswall Quay, and saw the prisoner staggering about. He went to
him and found that he was drunk. Witness questioned him and found that
he had no abode and no friends, and as he was incapable of taking care
of himself he obtained the ambulance and brought him to the Police
Station.
Chief Constable Green said that he heard that the prisoner was found on
the railway lines at the Crosswall by the gatekeeper, and he would have
been killed if a train had come along. He had no money, and, according
to his papers, he was recently paid off from a ship at Calais.
The Chairman said that the prisoner would be fined 2s. 6d., or one day's
imprisonment.
Prisoner went below.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 11 August, 1922. Price 1½d.
A CHILD WHO SANG IN PUBLIC HOUSES
At the Dover Police Court on Monday, before Messrs. W. B. Brett (in the
chair) and A. A. Ward.
Eldridge Ougham was charged with offences against Ivy Gwendoline
Laurence, aged 13 years, on June 27th and on divers previous dates.
Mr. W. Scorer appeared for the prosecution.
The evidence of Detective Sergeant Greenland, given at the previous
Saturday's hearing, was read over. It stated that he was in company with
P.C. Cadman on August 5th at the foot of Military Hill, when he saw the
prisoner. He took him into custody, and on being charged at the Police
Station he replied, “Yes.”
Mr. Scorer said that he understood that the prisoner wished to be
legally represented by Mr. Mowll, and, realising the short notice and
the need for proper instructions in the case, he would agree to an
adjournment.
The prisoner was remanded in custody until Wednesday.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 18
August, 1922. Price 1½d.
LICENSING BUSINESS
Messrs. George Beer and Co's Stores, Priory Station was transferred
from Mr. George A. Pilcher to Mr. William Harris, Secretary to Messrs.
George Beer and Rigden, Ltd.
Messrs Rigden's Stores, Peter Street, from Mr. Frank E. Halliday to
Mr. William Harris, Secretary to Messrs. George Beer and Rigden Ltd.
The "Bay Hotel," Birchington, was transferred from Mr. Albert W.
Wheeler to Mr. John Antonio Fagnoni, of Margate.
The "Captain Digby," Kingsgate was transferred from Mr. William G.
Hobby to Mr. William Lusher.
Mr. Wood of Messrs. Leney and Co., applied for an occasional licence
to sell refreshments during the Dover Cricket Week, and to sell beers,
wines and spirits from the Dover Harbour tugboat in the bay on the
occasion of the Dover Regatta. Both applications were granted.
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 13 October, 1922. Price 1½d.
PUBLIC-HOUSE HOURS ALTERED
A full bench of Magistrates attended at the Dover Police Court on Friday
last for the quarterly licensing meeting, at which was to be
re-considered the question whether public-houses should close at 10 p.m.
or 10.30 p.m. Mr. W. J. Barnes was in the chair, and the other
Magistrates present were Alderman Sir Edwin Farley, W. Bradley, Edward
Chitty, J. W. Bussey, W. G. Lewis and C.J. Sellens; Dr. C. Wood, Dr. W.
J. D. Best, and Messrs. W. B. Brett, W. D. Atkins, T. Francis, S. Lewis,
A Clark, W. Bromley, W. Hollis, C. E. Beaufoy, and J. H. Back.
The Magistrates' Clerk said at that meeting the Justices would hear any
person whom they thought was qualified to give an expression of opinion
for the purpose of ascertaining local opinion on the question of the
hours of opening. At the last Brewster Sessions, an extra half-hour
(until 10.30 p.m.) was granted, on the understanding that it would be
reconsidered at the October session.
Mr. Ovenden said that, as representing the licensed victuallers of
Dover, he thought he might say that the extra half-hour had not been
taken advantage of by anyone, and he was sure the Chief of Police would
agree that it had entailed no extra work and that the licensees had
carried out their duties in their usual circumspect manner. Many of the
houses had lodges of various kinds which met there, and the usual time
of commencing the meeting was 8.30 p.m. but in many cases it was 9.30
before a full attendance could be met, as many members were at work and
could not get there before. If the houses were to close at ten o'clock
it gave no time for the business to be conducted or the musical portion
of the programme, which was usual. Again, there were a lot of men at the
Pier district who did not leave work till ten o'clock, and they would be
debarred from any refreshment on the way home, which they had again
become accustomed to. Licensees paid the same duties for greatly
curtailed hours, and were finding it very difficult to meet expenses,
and knocking off this half-hour would be inflicting a greater hardship
on them than was necessary. He could assure the bench that if the extra
half-hour was granted again, they would continue to carry out their
duties in a proper manner.
Mr. Shea appeared for the Thanet Licensed Victuallers' Association,
which comprised, he said, the districts of Broadstairs and St. Peter's,
with a population of anything up to 15,000, and Birchington and
Westgate, about half of that. He also asked for the present hour of
closing to be continued.
The Rev. W. Holyoak said that he had come that morning as president of
the Free Church Council, which comprised Baptist, Congregational,
Friends, Primitive Methodist, Salvation Army and Wesleyan Methodist
Churches. Whilst the bulk of their members were total abstainers, there
were still not a few who were moderate drinkers, but, at the same time,
almost to a man or woman they were in favour of reducing the hours. It
would be entirely wrong to assume that the Justices had come there with
their minds already made up. They had come prepared to listen to the
pros and cons. They were not there to discuss the question of
abstinence, or they might introduce the question of personal liberty or
St. Paul's advice to Timothy (laughter), but the issue was narrowed down
to whether the public-houses should close at 10.30 or half an hour
earlier. It was not a question to be decided in accordance with the wish
of the trade of the churches, but solely in the greatest public
interest. Their contention was that if the half-hour was taken off less
drink would be sold. They regarded the half-hour as the dangerous
period, and held that less drink sold meant less disease and deaths.
This was not the opinion of faddists, but could be supported by cold
statistics, notably in connection with deaths from alcoholism, which
dropped in 1918 to 339 from something like 2,000 before the war. In
1919, when the restrictions were somewhat relaxed, the figures rose to
384, and in 1920 to 577.
Mr. Shea said that he supposed that Mr. Holyoak was prepared to quote
the number of deaths in America since they had the prohibition?
The rev. W. Holyoak said that Mr. Shea was perfectly in order in making
such a request, but he was not prepared to give the figures, as he had
not got them (laughter). Continuing, he said that restricted consumption
of drink would mean less drunkenness. There had been, he said, with the
relaxation of restrictions, after the war, a startling increase in the
convictions for drunkenness. Further, whilst the Police were eager to do
their duty, there were numbers of cases which never came to the Courts
at all. There was another point to consider. The major part of the
public consisted of women and children, and, in considering the public
interest, he submitted that they should think of the wives who waited at
home at night for their husbands and the children who were deeply
concerned whether their father came home straight or staggering. After
quoting comparative figures of the death rate among publicans and others
he thought that the knocking off of the half hour would be in the
interest of the publicans and their staffs, not for the gathering of
more money but in the increase of happiness. As regards the question of
those who attended entertainments and were unable to obtain refreshments
after ten o'clock were the interests of the wives and children to be
outweighed by this argument? If it was necessary that these people
should obtain refreshment in order to get home, it was quite possible
foe the entertainment to arrange to close a quarter of an hour earlier.
He always repudiated the suggestion that the British working man at his
best wanted longer hours. He asked that the matter should be decided not
in accordance with what the drink Trade or the Churches desired, but in
the general public interest and he asked that special attention should
be given to the welfare of the home, which was the most vital asset in
their national life.
Lieut. Greves, R.N., also addressed the bench in favour of 10 p.m.
closing.
The Bench retired, and were absent nearly a quarter of an hour.
On their return, the Chairman said that the Magistrates by a majority
had decided that the houses should close at ten o'clock.
The Magistrates' Clerk said that it would come into force on Monday,
October 16th.
Mr. W. Evans, secretary of the River and District Co-operative Society,
applied for a music, singing and dancing licence for the new premises in
Biggin Street, next to the general Post Office.
Chief Constable Green said that he had inspected the premises and there
were two large rooms upstairs practically fireproof, and there were good
exits.
The application was granted.
|
|